Wido, sure will do! Andrei
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, 10 February, 2015 8:04:16 PM > Subject: Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > On 02/10/2015 08:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > > Hello guys, > > > > I was wondering what is the current support for implementing > > virtio-scsi support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by > > googling apart from it has been built into OpenStack already. > > > > The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be > > increasing the number of devices you can attach to a vm, but also, > > and that's what I am interested in is the ability to use discard > > and reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. > > There are also talks about having a greater performance advantage > > as well. > > > Not done yet, but something which crossed my mind. Shouldn't be a > real > problem to do however, it's just a small XML change in the Agent. > Would you mind opening a ticket in Jira? > Wido > > Thanks > > > > Andrei > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU2mQ+AAoJEAGbWC3bPspCIbAQAKmMyO5sOfMwVBvYsAZ0sBKZ > CvjLfI+D59uH28qj80QD/Ti83JBlq1qmbGbPWlVgZkjSyWQMM0NrJ20R4sP8dXGr > kbotx25VkfMI0UqwnhplIldMmnI2ELTuLcPRUG8n6zfDDXEjZt9+iyJc94loRg7U > srHoCMDEnT+In9AtzDbzWOeZwXLYFTaajzwgDAQtJUn0xNL9v73C3cE0m72DkvPe > tHmgWJJ7aWJPseQ9SjZXj5j7GAHkZMhsLaIajVnrMvg+kXUNUnqcRXqdxdxeZIiw > J0ak9ztQd3tiLHl4qd4qjRaeROUP2TWzb5rFVATv3Ofd5g3MF0hvR/0+1T7cVD03 > Mg5cA9geHBpQvbe5Wy1c67n2zePpRP6coHb4HNIIb0EhlvaM6MzrFEvXvutnK9QF > lMAZ5z6apQUnYLUio/G7vp//yd636LUlW9cIVsyqw4TQ41JfiPYwFZvghMAjt2nk > 3SNTBkqnPmbpCT+X5dpoSqLPVhtnkg1SO2rwy1+sggvO/EGapjQ2tWqWeAbVQmPd > 1n8AYijmexFkk+sQQHGiEeff+Al65/WTeh9y9vFZKtoVyIiUOuK141Jr1LeuoDtN > wXhmuyo7otWWZjt9l5+lPFqZLNoAp59stcTLzS5/DnGl+z5n6pgtp/Q6d7o4HMH0 > Aj4TGPb16qm1nql6SAsZ > =NzP6 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
