Wido,
I suppose it's a nice solution as shorthand workaround. But in the
long-term perspective, I believe all stuff related to (SO, network) must be
reimplemented.
Cases
- A SO may have different bandwidth limitation for different networks;
- Your case with SGs: for certain networks, SGs may be e
Hi,
I'm looking into this setup:
Advanced zone with VXLAN
- Guest Network 1: Network Offering with SG
- Guest Network 2: Network Offering WITHOUT SG
This doesn't work as the zone has SG enabled and thus all guest networks
require SG.
I wonder why each Guest Networks needs to have SG enabled. F
dav
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
Hi Wido & Rohit;
I tested the patch and its ok, parsing works as expected, thanks for all help.
Özhan
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@sha
;
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Wido den Hollander
> *Sent:* Monday, January 22, 2018 8:08:33 AM
> *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Cc:* Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
>
> *Subject:* Re: [4.11] KV
Thanks Wido, I'll review your patch.
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 8:08:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Network
>> Wido
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Rohit
>>>
>>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Wido den Hollander
>>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:12:4
it
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:12:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
On 01/19/2018 02:03 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman wrote:
Hi Daan;
Wid
Wido
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:12:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
On 01/19/2018 02:03 PM, Özhan Rüzgar Karaman wrote:
Hi
Wido - Were you able to reproduce and fix the issue? Thanks.
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:12:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking w
ng old
4.9
VRs
help fix the issue? /cc Wido
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:38:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
Hi;
We solved the bug there
gt; > Thanks for sharing.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I traced the change to the following PR that changes the delimiter
> > > > > character to ';' than ":" to support ipv6 addresses:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloud
; > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2028/files
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can you share with the workaround, if applicable send a pull request?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Were you still using old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, do
ll using old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, does killing old 4.9
> VRs
> > > help fix the issue? /cc Wido
> > >
> > >
> > > - Rohit
> > >
> > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __
plicable send a pull request?
> >
> >
> > Were you still using old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, does killing old 4.9 VRs
> > help fix the issue? /cc Wido
> >
> >
> > - Rohit
> >
> > <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, does killing old 4.9 VRs
> help fix the issue? /cc Wido
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:38:19 PM
> To: dev@clou
st?
Were you still using old 4.9.3 VRs post upgrade, does killing old 4.9 VRs help
fix the issue? /cc Wido
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.org>
From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:38:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subjec
gt; Any takers - Wido, Wei, Mike and others who may be using KVM+SG?
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> From: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:53:59 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apach
16, 2018 9:53:59 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [4.11] KVM Advanced Networking with SG Problem
Hi;
We made a test with 4.11 rc over Ubuntu16.04 KVM hosts and we noticed that
there is a problem on setting & applying security group changes on KVM
host.
All instances could ping vr
Hi;
We made a test with 4.11 rc over Ubuntu16.04 KVM hosts and we noticed that
there is a problem on setting & applying security group changes on KVM
host.
All instances could ping vr and they could access internet but no one could
access to the instances.
I checked iptables rules and i noticed t
Hello Everyone,
We at Schuberg Philis, had couple of discussions regarding the support for
IPv6 in CloudStack for VPC and we have come up with first version of its
design document.
Please find the design document at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+in+VPC+Router
Design
> I have started to work on this, have you started to work on this as well
> [~frank.zhang] ?
>
>> Baremetal Advanced Networking support
>> -
>>
>> Key: CLOUDSTACK-6278
>> URL: https://i
on Weller"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 9 May, 2014 5:00:53 PM
Subject: Nasty regression bug in 4.3 on KVM with advanced networking
All,
If any of you plan to upgrade to 4.3 and use advanced networking with traffic
labels on KVM, you may want to reconsider. JIRA is track
All,
If any of you plan to upgrade to 4.3 and use advanced networking with traffic
labels on KVM, you may want to reconsider. JIRA is tracking a regression bug
that will break VR routing.
The issues details are here:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6464>
Thanks Yoshikaza, Marcus and Yitao. I agree with Yoshikazu, that "Guest
Network"
under Admin is a "Shared Networks". It will be good to change UI to avoid
confusion.
Can someone pls. clarify my second question.
> I created and Enabled a new "Network Offering". But when I
> create an Isolated Ne
In my understanding, "Guest Network" Sachin said is called "Shared
Network" in the document. [1]
The word "Guest Network" refers "Shared Network" and "Isolated
Network" in some cases.
Why don't we avoid using "Guest Network" to point "Shared Network" in GUI?
[1]
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/
I can see how that is confusing, because 'guest' traffic type is where
isolated networks are created. They are largely synonymous in many
areas of cloudstack.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Yitao Jiang wrote:
> Guest network is same as public ip, which vm's traffic go through switch
> directly.
Guest network is same as public ip, which vm's traffic go through switch
directly.
Isolated Network is a virtual network, all traffic go through VRouter.
And if you assigned tag on Physical Network, if so you should set same tag
on n/w offering.
The
effective way is compare your new n/w offerin
Hi,
Under "Networks" Tab in UI for Admin user, Cloudstack provides 2 options to
create networks
1) Add guest network 2) Add Isolated Network.
- What is the difference between these 2 networks.
Also, I created and Enabled a new "Network Offering". But when I create an
Isolated Ne
Oh great! Yes, 4.4 is the current master.
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Hair [mailto:j...@greenqloud.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 3:16 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: EC2 Rest Servlet "domain cannot be null!!" Error In Advanced
>N
8 .
>
> BTW you mentioned that you trying EC2 Query API against a setup with
> Advanced networking? I just want to point out that AFAIK, we have never
> tested EC2 REST/SOAP API compatibility in a setup with Advanced networking.
>
> Thanks,
> Likitha
>
> >-Original
Jeff, what you have reported is a bug. Created an issue to track it in in JIRA
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5998 .
BTW you mentioned that you trying EC2 Query API against a setup with Advanced
networking? I just want to point out that AFAIK, we have never tested EC2
REST
rns a
>> >>fault
>> >> with "domain cannot be null!!" as the error text. I've traced this
>>down
>> >>to
>> >> CloudStack not setting the EC2 domain (standard or vpc) in the
>> >> EC2SoapServiceImpl#toDescribeAddressesRes
perty is not being set, and then it explodes on serialization with
> >>the
> >> above error.
> >>
> >> So, my questions are these:
> >>
> >> 1. Is this a bug in CloudStack with the EC2 API and Advanced Networking?
> >> Or are we missing some configuration/setting?
> >> 2. If this is actually a bug, what is the best way to work around it
> >> temporarily, and also where to start fixing it for real in the CS
> >>codebase?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
>
>
ization with
>>the
>> above error.
>>
>> So, my questions are these:
>>
>> 1. Is this a bug in CloudStack with the EC2 API and Advanced Networking?
>> Or are we missing some configuration/setting?
>> 2. If this is actually a bug, what is the best way to work around it
>> temporarily, and also where to start fixing it for real in the CS
>>codebase?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jeff
>>
serialization with the
> above error.
>
> So, my questions are these:
>
> 1. Is this a bug in CloudStack with the EC2 API and Advanced Networking?
> Or are we missing some configuration/setting?
> 2. If this is actually a bug, what is the best way to work around it
> t
(standard or vpc) in the
EC2SoapServiceImpl#toDescribeAddressesResponse static method. The domain
property is not being set, and then it explodes on serialization with the
above error.
So, my questions are these:
1. Is this a bug in CloudStack with the EC2 API and Advanced Networking? Or
are we missing some
(moving to the users list as it’s more appropriate for user support queries)
On 09-Nov-2013, at 3:40 pm, Joshua wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have a special client request that I'm not quite certain the most secure
> way to fulfil.
>
> Client wants to host a virtual office environment of Windows VM
Hello guys,
I have a special client request that I'm not quite certain the most secure
way to fulfil.
Client wants to host a virtual office environment of Windows VMs on the
cloud but needs the VMs to be connected to an onsite print/scan/fax. Access
to all VMs must be available at this same onsit
Here is problem I just encoutered on 4.3 Master:
1. Created a Shared Advanced network
2. Created an instance
3. Removed the instance
4. After the GUI showed the Instance was removed I tried to delete the network
The network deletion fails, due to VRouter Instance being present:
>> WARN [c.c.n.Net
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Advanced Networking Public Network Service Providers
What services would you provide on the public network?
I see a similar discussion here:
http://goo.gl/eESveL
On 9/13/13 11:35 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote:
>In the Advanced Networking use cases you have two phys
What services would you provide on the public network?
I see a similar discussion here:
http://goo.gl/eESveL
On 9/13/13 11:35 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote:
>In the Advanced Networking use cases you have two physical networks
>(Public and Guest Networks). What is the reason
In the Advanced Networking use cases you have two physical networks (Public and
Guest Networks). What is the reason for the GUI not providing Network Service
Provider configuration for the Public Network?
Thanks,
-Soheil
Aug 1, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I'm short on time, but here's the KVM advanced networking config we
> use for testing. If someone wants to write a doc based around it that
> would be nice.
>
> Start out KVM host with two networks, eth0, eth1. eth0 is inten
I'm short on time, but here's the KVM advanced networking config we
use for testing. If someone wants to write a doc based around it that
would be nice.
Start out KVM host with two networks, eth0, eth1. eth0 is intended for
public traffic, eth0 will be guest vlans and management vlan. t
om]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with
> Advanced Networking
>
> The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading.
> The documentatio
dkend...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:49 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with
Advanced Networking
The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading.
The documentation reads as though one can s
I've been trying to get this advanced networking going on my server. However,
> it's just not working; I am utilizing 1 server for everything. KVM |CentOS
> 6.4| CS 4.1, is there a trick to this that I am JUST not getting. Along with
> that, it works without issues in basic
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:10:00AM +, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been trying to get this advanced networking going on my server. However,
> it's just not working; I am utilizing 1 server for everything. KVM |CentOS
> 6.4| CS 4.1, is there a trick t
Greetings,I've been trying to get this advanced networking going on my server. However, it's just not working; I am utilizing 1 server for everything. KVM |CentOS 6.4| CS 4.1, is there a trick to this that I am JUST not getting. Along with that, it works without issues in basic mode.I j
49 matches
Mail list logo
