Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))

2013-10-17 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
UI doesn't do it, its a bug. If you use some API client, you have to make the calls explicitly. -alena. From: Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org&g

Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))

2013-10-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > updateNetworkServiceProvider ah, so this works even if the uuid is not returned in listNetworkServiceProvidersCmd?

Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))

2013-10-17 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
r 17, 2013 10:17 AM To: dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)) Thanks Marcus, this helps, I can now enable it in the interface after configuring it as enabled. Somehow I still have to enable the Interna

Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))

2013-10-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
Thanks Marcus, this helps, I can now enable it in the interface after configuring it as enabled. Somehow I still have to enable the InternalLbVm provider in the physical network after configuring it as enabled and can't find a api call to do this. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen

Re: internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))

2013-10-17 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yes, it should supposedly never happen under normal circumstances. The issue I had was because I was using a Marvin zone config that needed to be updated for the new feature. Added: { "broadcastdomainrange": "ZONE",

internal LB provider (from the thread: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round))

2013-10-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
Marcus. I ran into this on today's master. Did you follow up on this in 4.2? Or do you have a ticket or wiki page for it? tahnks Daan On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > 2. can't figure out how to deploy VPC. In 4.2 it tells me to jump > through a few extra hoops regarding

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Mike Tutkowski
; > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > > Hi Animesh, > > > > Sorry to keep bothering you about this. :) But people have been asking > > me to confirm. > > > > Will this commit

RE: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 3:35 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > Hi Animesh, > > Sorry to ke

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Mike Tutkowski
ginal Message- > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 6:58 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > > > > Fixed the subject l

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > Fixed the subject line as third round > - > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:29 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > > > -Original Message

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Edison Su
g> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) Does this mean that the current RC doesn't work with XCP? On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:49:19PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559 > > On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chirade

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Verified third round RC with XS 6.0.2, basic zone (raised a couple of minor UI defects) On 8/29/13 11:49 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559 > >On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" >wrote: > >>I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems t

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
ailto:chip.child...@sungard.com> >Sent: ?8/?30/?2013 6:57 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > >Does this mean that the current RC doesn't work with XCP? > > >On Thu, A

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Chip Childers
Does this mean that the current RC doesn't work with XCP? On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:49:19PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559 > > On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" > wrote: > > >I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems to be a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
two messages yesterday from people with > > critical > > > fixes requesting to be cherry picked to 4.2, so I assumed that would > > happen. > > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi &l

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Marty Sweet
gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:40 PM > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-30 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
t; animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:40 PM > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-29 Thread Mike Tutkowski
> -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:40 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > > Hi Animesh, > >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-29 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:40 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > Hi Animesh, > > It looks like we

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-29 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559 On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems to be an issue with a XCP >plugin. I don't think it warrants a -1 yet, I am scrambling to find a >regular XS host to test on. > > >On 8/28/13 6:5

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-29 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems to be an issue with a XCP plugin. I don't think it warrants a -1 yet, I am scrambling to find a regular XS host to test on. On 8/28/13 6:57 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > >Fixed the subject line as third round >- >Hi All, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi Animesh, It looks like we have a couple Critical bug fixes newly checked in to 4.2-forward. Sounds like we'll be spinning up a new RC then? Just to confirm, you will pick up my fix in that new RC, as well? Thanks! On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > These are just so

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Marcus Sorensen
These are just some notes that might be useful things to point out in the release, as they tripped me up, and I'm sure others will be as well: 1. vnc password, still looking for docs on how this works. I found the bug report and the patch, but I had to resort to looking at the StartCommand log on

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks, David My storage plug-in works for XenServer in 4.2, but - without this little checkin to 4.2-forward - it cannot support VMware, so I was interested in seeing how far out that would be if we don't re-spin 4.2. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Thanks > > By the way, do you know of hand when 4.2.1 is scheduled for release? > Typically it takes a couple of months after the feature release, though it might be preempted by a security issue which forces a faster update. --David

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Mike Tutkowski
subsequent maintenance release. > > Thanks > Animesh > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:12 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Clou

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
k.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > I hate to do this, but I just found a critical, but simple-to-fix issue. > > It is low risk and only impacts the SolidFire plug-in. > > Sorry for the late notice here, but I just finished all of my regres

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Mike Tutkowski
al Message- > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:21 PM > > To: dev > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > > I don't want to judge on this, as I know you have been askin

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
een requesting for Release Notes volunteersNobody've responded so > far... > > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:21 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
I have been requesting for Release Notes volunteersNobody've responded so far... -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:21 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) I don'

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
I don't want to judge on this, as I know you have been asking for community support but how do we go about creating release notes as no one seems to have time for those? Would a list of child pages to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Design+Documents do? This is rhetorica

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Chip Childers
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:57:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 75dff7cc78eafac9a7723f3e9

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

2013-08-28 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Fixed the subject line as third round - Hi All, I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: 75dff7cc78eafac9a7723f3e97b5c13502b