I'll defer to Edison's expertise on this On 8/30/13 8:54 AM, "Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote:
>Xcp and devcloud are using different code, so the issue shouldn't exist >on xcp. > >Sent from my Windows Phone >________________________________ >From: Chip Childers<mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com> >Sent: ?8/?30/?2013 6:57 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > >Does this mean that the current RC doesn't work with XCP? > > >On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:49:19PM +0000, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559 >> >> On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> >> >I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems to be an issue with a >>XCP >> >plugin. I don't think it warrants a -1 yet, I am scrambling to find a >> >regular XS host to test on. >> > >> > >> >On 8/28/13 6:57 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" >><animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> >> >>Fixed the subject line as third round >> >>--------------------- >> >>Hi All, >> >> >> >>I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a >> >>vote: >> >> >> >>Git Branch and Commit SH: >> >>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r >>>>ef >> >>s >> >>/heads/4.2 >> >>Commit: 75dff7cc78eafac9a7723f3e97b5c13502b44e23 >> >> >> >>List of changes: >> >>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f >>>>=C >> >>H >> >>ANGES;hb=4.2 >> >> >> >>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> >>location): >> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ >> >> >> >>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): >> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> >> >>Testing instructions are here: >> >>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pro >>>>ce >> >>d >> >>ure >> >> >> >>Vote will be open for 72 hours (Friday 8/30 11:00 PM PST) . >> >> >> >>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> >>indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> >> >>[ ] +1 approve >> >>[ ] +0 no opinion >> >>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> >> >> >>Thanks >> >>Animesh >> > >> >>