I'll defer to Edison's expertise on this

On 8/30/13 8:54 AM, "Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote:

>Xcp and devcloud are using different code, so the issue shouldn't exist
>on xcp.
>
>Sent from my Windows Phone
>________________________________
>From: Chip Childers<mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com>
>Sent: ?8/?30/?2013 6:57 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)
>
>Does this mean that the current RC doesn't work with XCP?
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:49:19PM +0000, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>> DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559
>>
>> On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems to be an issue with a
>>XCP
>> >plugin. I don't think it warrants a -1 yet, I am scrambling to find a
>> >regular XS host to test on.
>> >
>> >
>> >On 8/28/13 6:57 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
>><animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>Fixed the subject line as third round
>> >>---------------------
>> >>Hi All,
>> >>
>> >>I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>> >>vote:
>> >>
>> >>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> 
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r
>>>>ef
>> >>s
>> >>/heads/4.2
>> >>Commit: 75dff7cc78eafac9a7723f3e97b5c13502b44e23
>> >>
>> >>List of changes:
>> 
>>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f
>>>>=C
>> >>H
>> >>ANGES;hb=4.2
>> >>
>> >>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> >>location):
>> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/
>> >>
>> >>PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>> >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >>
>> >>Testing instructions are here:
>> 
>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pro
>>>>ce
>> >>d
>> >>ure
>> >>
>> >>Vote will be open for 72 hours (Friday 8/30 11:00 PM PST) .
>> >>
>> >>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> >>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >>
>> >>[ ] +1  approve
>> >>[ ] +0  no opinion
>> >>[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Thanks
>> >>Animesh
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to