I have seen quite a lot of confusion about the new systemvm templates on these mailing lists, would it be possible for you to file a bug and state where the new systemvms need to be downloaded from? A quick search found this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3355, which isn't exactly the issue.
Marty On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote: > I was going through the docs for the install guide and noticed we are > still pointing to the systemVMs from 4.0/4.1 past? > > Can we point to the most recent ones? If I recall correctly, one (or > more) of these don't work with 4.2? > > Section > 4.5.9 Preparing the systemVM template > > /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt > -m /mnt/ > secondary -u > http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.vhd.bz2- > h xenserver -s <optional-management-server-secret-key> -F > > /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt > -m /mnt/ > secondary -u > http://download.cloud.com/templates/burbank/burbank-systemvm-08012012.ova- > h vmware -s <optional-management-server-secret-key> -F > > /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt > -m /mnt/ > secondary -u > http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 > -h kvm -s <optional-management-server-secret-key> -F > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:43:08PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Oh, OK, sorry - I just saw two messages yesterday from people with > critical > > fixes requesting to be cherry picked to 4.2, so I assumed that would > happen. > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:40 PM > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round) > > > > > > > > Hi Animesh, > > > > > > > > It looks like we have a couple Critical bug fixes newly checked in to > > > > 4.2-forward. > > > > > > > > Sounds like we'll be spinning up a new RC then? > > > > > > > > Just to confirm, you will pick up my fix in that new RC, as well? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > [Animesh>] I have been reviewing the fixes but waiting to see more RC > > > testing feedback come in. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Marcus Sorensen > > > > <shadow...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > These are just some notes that might be useful things to point out > in > > > > > the release, as they tripped me up, and I'm sure others will be as > > > > > well: > > > > > > > > > > 1. vnc password, still looking for docs on how this works. I found > the > > > > > bug report and the patch, but I had to resort to looking at the > > > > > StartCommand log on the agent to get the password. > > > > > > > > > > 2. can't figure out how to deploy VPC. In 4.2 it tells me to jump > > > > > through a few extra hoops regarding setting up internal > loadbalancer > > > > > service first, "Provider InternalLbVm should be enabled in at least > > > > > one physical network of the zone specified", so I look at my > physical > > > > > network -> network service providers and see "Internal LB VM" is > > > > > disabled, so I try to enable it and get "Provider is not ready, > cannot > > > > > Enable the provider, please configure the provider first". I'm > stuck, > > > > > I don't see anything in the UI that would provide a configuration > > > > > dialog for the internal lb provider, nor do I see anything in the > > > > > global options. It makes me wonder how upgrades will fare if VPCs > are > > > > > being used. > > > > > > > > > > Other than these, things seem to be going smoothly so far. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Mike Tutkowski > > > > > <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks, David > > > > > > > > > > > > My storage plug-in works for XenServer in 4.2, but - without this > > > > > > little checkin to 4.2-forward - it cannot support VMware, so I > was > > > > > > interested in seeing how far out that would be if we don't > re-spin > > > > 4.2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski > > > > > >> <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > By the way, do you know of hand when 4.2.1 is scheduled for > > > > release? > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Typically it takes a couple of months after the feature release, > > > > > >> though it might be preempted by a security issue which forces a > > > > > >> faster update. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> --David > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > > > > > *(tm)* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > > > o: 303.746.7302 > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > > > *(tm)* > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > > o: 303.746.7302 > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > *?* > > -- > Prasanna., > > ------------------------ > Powered by BigRock.com > >
