Github user sebgoa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1815
LGTM
but really the database should be outside the mgt server container and we
should not be using supervisord.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
> On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:36 AM, Raja Pullela wrote:
>
> Just to summarize... and to close this thread for now,
>
> 1) short term - we will move the content to cloudstack.apt-get.eu
> 2) long term - can someone from PMC or Cloudstack Apache Infra help find out
> the details on how to all the c
>
> What would you be able to do if the git-dual experiment were expanded to
> CloudStack that you couldn't do with the proposal above? I suggest that you
> take full advantage of the fact that people are now listening.
>
Thanks for chiming in Sam,
Could you give us a summary of the Whimsy
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
>> As to forks being against Apache
>> policy, forks are not, however forks that use the Apache e.g.,
>> namespace, that have the Apache logo, that use the Apache name for
>> the pr
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> The initial action (creating the fork) was not clearly done by the PMC
> as a whole, that is now being rectified by a retroactive vote being
> taken. Even that I wouldn't suggest be done any differently: many
> parts of the ASF prefer a Commit
+1
Note:
———
To be honest I never contemplated this move. Somehow it never occurred to me as
a possibility.
But if the board and infra would let use move the mirror of the apache
canonical repo to apache-cloudstack/cloudstack
then I think we would be all set.
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 5:14 PM, Pat
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thank you. What you describe effectively below is going to
> implicitly switch the “canonical” repo in my opinion of the
>
> repository to cloudstack/cloudstack. Merges that happen there,
> conversation that hap
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Thanks for your reply and yes, I am a member of the ASF board.
>
> The thing is, there was already some discussion of this at the
> ASF board meeting that happened yesterday. I can tell you that
> there were more than a
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>
> I'm more concerned that the page is indistinguishable from a fork, and
> gives no indication of official status. That may be OK for a work in
> progress, but isn't ideal as a final solution. I'll share that I've
> heard (second and third ha
Bharat, that’s great, thanks for this
But…
Since this is the first results like this sent to the list, can you explain
what we are looking at.
What hardware this is running on, what configuration of cloudstack…
And I very much would like for these results to be sent as comments to the PR
discu
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;)
>
> Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the
> fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have been a bit
cipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you
> believe you have received this email in error.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Hi folks,
Shall we disable github notifications to dev@ ?
It has become quite noisy.
On the other end you see all the comments fly by...
-sebastien
On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi Sebastien
>
> On 01/11/2016 09:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> Part 3:
>>
>>
>> To me the main issue for us is that our current privileges on GitHub prevent
>> us from building more productive CI workflow and makes the life of the
On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>
> On 07/01/16 17:22, "Rene Moser" wrote:
>> No, it is not the pace. You can do as many major as often as you want
>> but if one uses this major, how long will it get minors? We have no clue.
>>
>> I understand your point completely while my ar
see inline
On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> So, yes, monthly releases can be done and the quality is better than before.
>> Actually, I think we should go much faster. Whenever a PR is merged that
>> fixes
>> your issue, it should be possible to deploy it right away. It’s a
On Jan 5, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Happy New Year to all!
>
> Please see the BVT report
> KVM Basic - 97.1%
> XS Basic - 94.0%
> KVM Adv - 85.8% - action item on me to add configurations for the new tests
> to run
> XS Adv - 79.1% - action item on me to add configurations for
There are no release notes for 4.7 …?
I merged the new docs and website, but the link for RN break.
Hi folks,
Apologies for a week end email couple days before christmas, but this needs to
get out.
Late October I started thread [1] about moving our repo to GitHub, I would like
to re-open this discussion.
Now that we have stabilized master and release 4.6.0, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7.0 we
need to
On Dec 18, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Sebastien,
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:36 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
>> Releases branches should only be written to by RMs.
>>
> Knowing how you feel about the process you mean 'master' as much as olde
Releases branches should only be written to by RMs.
On Dec 18, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Committers, please keep in mind our quality standards when executing your
> liberty to merge.
>
> --
> Daan
On Dec 10, 2015, at 12:31 AM, Igor Wiese wrote:
> Hi, Cloudstack Community.
>
> My name is Igor Wiese, phd Student from Brazil. In my research, I am
> investigating two important questions: What makes two files change
> together? Can we predict when they are going to co-change again?
>
> I've
his output and queries Github, we can get a
> list of the PR titles. Then we need to make sure those titles are any good ;-)
>
>
> Regards,
> Remi
>
>
>
>
> On 07/12/15 10:13, "sebgoa" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Daan H
he features added.
Check the 4.6 release notes, I am sure we did more than this, but since dev
more often than not don't care much about the RN, the features are not
publicized.
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:55 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
>> Hate to be a pain, but could yo
Hate to be a pain, but could you make sure to keep the exact list of Features
merged, so that the Release notes are accurate ?
thanks
On Dec 4, 2015, at 11:58 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Next Monday we'll feature freeze for our upcoming 4.7 release. We looked
> through all open Pul
! wrote:
>
> > +1 your categories.
> >
> > Also +1 for the unified thing under cloudstack.apache.org domain.
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Ori
On Nov 30, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Nux! wrote:
> BTW, if these bits are "no redistribute", why are we distributing them?
This is really a case of evolution and expectation.
When Wido started this, these pkgs were not sanctioned by the *project*, hence
non-official release pkgs and not voted on.
Th
On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> On 30-Nov-2015, at 3:38 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>>
>> - source
>> - community repo
>> - 3-rd party repo
>>
>> I am +1 with this, why ?
>>
>> -source is a no brainer
>> - community
Hi folks, we need to resolve this.
1-But I have to start with one comment:
Apache open office releases binaries, users don't compile from source. So it is
possible within ASF to officially release binaries.
2-We have several initiatives around repos, apt-get.eu (Wido), shapeblue repos,
Nux mirr
On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The next version of Apache CloudStack will be built on top of 4.6 and
> released from the stable master branch. In the past weeks we’ve added several
> PRs on master with new features:
>
> * Upgrade to latest AWS S3 SDK
> *
vhd.bz2";,
>>
>> "http://people.apache.org/~sanjeev/CentOS5.3-x86_64.ova";
>>
>> "
>> http://people.apache.org/~sanjeev/eec2209b-9875-3c8d-92be-c001bd8a0faf.qcow2.bz2
>> "
>>
>> "url": "http://people.apache.or
On Nov 29, 2015, at 8:19 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> Nux,
>
> The two most deployed SDN solutions are Vmware NSX-MH (Nicara) and Nuage VSP
> (Alcatel-Lucent). Neither are cheap!
> We've been evaluating whether we're going to run a POC on Nuage, as it does
> have some very cool features includi
On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:52 AM, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> A conversation emerged on a PR [1] regarding how package repositories should
> listed on the downloads page [2]. This PR was prompted by a change on the
> page which removed reference to the ShapeBlue repositories.
Let me touch bas
looking at this:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/#
it's still on 4.5
there are no changes to it for 4.6, but it's confusing because there is no 4.6
tag, …..and a 4.5 ref in the header…
On Nov 25, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> are those refs expecting particular content returned? (it will be
> redirected)
>
the way I read the email, it will be redirected but would give a 404 if you
don't move the data yourself :)
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Rajani Karuturi
On Nov 7, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> As requested by Boris, I’ll extend the vote until the end of today CET
> (instead of 4pm CET), that’s 8 extra hours.
>
> Anyone else actively testing?
I was waiting for Pierre Luc to push the RC to docker hub to at least test the
simulator.
A
I presume simulator runs are still 100% ?
On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:01 PM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following is the latest BVT report - 10/22
> Xen Basic : 94.0%
> KVM Basic: 97.1% - glad to see the reboot ssvm/cpvm are fixed
> Xen Adv: 91.9% - test_internal_lb and test_network needs code f
Hi folks (apologies for cross-posting),
I am running out of time to do it myself so I would like to issue everyone a
challenge.
Create a docker-compose file that:
* Starts the mgt server in a container
* Starts a mysql container to act as mgt server db
* Starts the usage server in a container
*
Doc folks,
I removed all docbook references in:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs
If we need we can always get back to a previous commit...
-Sebastien
the KVM issues currently - but not able
> to root cause what the issue is?
>
> Can anyone please run these tests on a KVM setup and report if it is
> working/not working for you?
>
> Thanks,
> Raja
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:ru
Raja,
Is anyone on your side looking at those test_ssvm failures ?
On Oct 1, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Blockers - as open in ACS JIRA:
>
> - CloudStack-8927 /
>
> - CloudStack-8924 / Test case failure. Waiting for PR-900/902 to be
> merged.
>
> - Cl
I am not aware of anyone except Schuberg that uses the nicira (NSX) cloudstack
integration.
And since Miguel wrote the test, I am comfortable doing what he suggests and
not run it as part of the standard tests for a release.
-sebastien
On Oct 1, 2015, at 12:57 PM, Miguel Ferreira
wrote:
> C
Remi, thanks for the detailed post-mortem, it's a good read and great learning.
I hope everyone reads it.
The one thing to emphasize is that we now have a very visible way to get code
into master, we have folks investing time to provide review (great), we need
the submitters to make due diligenc
On Sep 24, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Are you serious? You consider to revert a PR that was merged over 6 months
> ago? And expect it to become more stable?
>
I have not followed all the latest development, but if we are talking about the
VR refactoring, indeed it happened sever
Hi all,
After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0 *passes* with
4 PMC + 1 votes
+1 (PMC / binding)
* Rajani
* Rohit
* Sebastien (implicit)
* David
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give
the mirrors time to ca
CloudStack collab Dublin Oct 8-9 is coming up fast,
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe
Register for this exciting event.
See you all there,
Cheers,
-Sebastien
On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Where did you give cloudstack apikey and secret?
> Did you give AWS keys both at AWS configure and ec2-register?
yes you need to do both…
$ aws configure ….> give your keys
$ ec2stack-register ….> give your keys
That step is a bit clumsy ri
ect.
>
> I wish we pointed to the cloudstack docker hub account rather than the
> runseb account, but don't think it's a blocker for release
>
missed that, now fixed.
> --David
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:25 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
Hi All,
I've created a 0.8.0 release of EC2stack, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-ec2stack.git
Commit: a61d7c01129dfe4c31515a48e0f6b4a53436c208
There are no code changes from the time the code was donate
On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Rafael Weingärtner
wrote:
> Hi Daan,
> I think that we should do a proper introduction.
> It might seem kind of odd to some people that a bunch of folks suddenly
> started working for free.
>
> Our first PR was done a while ago:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudst
s in the readme. I think we had coveralls at one
point and that fury thing…not sure what that is.
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, sebgoa wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 12:31 PM, sebgoa >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I am
On Aug 12, 2015, at 12:31 PM, sebgoa wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am working towards making a release of EC2stack.
> Since it was given to our project we have not made an official release.
>
> I just added a few documentation files, added license headers, notice files,
> co
On Aug 10, 2015, at 11:25 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
>
>>
>> Can you make a PR that updates the README with this config option…
>
> Done.
>
thanks merged
>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2015, at 3:07 AM, Carlos Reategui wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW I figured out how to force the cli to send v2
Finally read the thread,
It seems to me that a way forward is to have Remi and Rajani RM 4.6 (which is
currently master).
The two of them can discuss and start RMing 4.6 (PR merge etc) and then we can
iterate on the wiki release scenario.
@Remi @Rajani, would that work for you and you ready t
On Jul 13, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 13-07-15 10:11, Rene Moser wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> Since we "rebuild" our communication stack (slack, irc, ML, ...) I
>> would bring up some discussion about the "noise" in the de
On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8640
>
> I encountered this by using the AWS SDK under 4.5 (homebrew).
>
> 4.5 uses the 1.3.22 SDK, but master uses 1.9.8 and that breaks S3 uploads.
>
> AWS SDK 1.3.22 i
On Jul 8, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you might know, we at PCextreme are using CloudStack for our public
> cloud offering and have been looking for a CloudStack dev for a long time.
>
> We found one; so let me introduce Boris Schrijver.
>
> Boris will be our
On Jul 7, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I will not do it in one commit, if we insist on a PR i will do 73 commits
> in one PR.
>
are you automating those commits ?
I would not mind scanning through them and giving green light. and in that case
squash might be good :)
> On Tue, J
On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> If you look at the discrete operations wearing a hat of a Project Manager,
> you won’t care… neither would I. However, from a Software Engineer
> perspective, as much as the other people contributing with the Java code, I
>
On Jul 7, 2015, at 8:17 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I haven't heard of this in a few days. Does anyone keep track of 4.5
> releasebility at the moment? I would like to move on to 4.6:) So can
> we make a release candidate for 4.5.2 yet?
if you think it needs to be done, just do it
>
> --
> D
>>> mostly dev from this list.
>>>
>>> Anyone with an @apache.org account can sign-up and anyone else could ask
>>> me, Daan, Rohit, Wilder or Funs for an invite (for now). I can imagine we
>>> setup some other structure for this later on. If you
On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Sebastien,
>
> So wouldn't it be nice to make clear which release is still supported
> and which release is not?
>
> On 03.07.2015 09:20, sebgoa wrote:
>
>> I think we got in a situation with 4.4 that called fo
;> On 3 jul. 2015, at 10:10, Erik Weber wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:27 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>>
>>> Some great ideas in there.
>>>
>>> I am +1 for:
>>>
>>> -consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack
>>> -move bot
On Jul 2, 2015, at 8:43 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:
> Sateesh and Rajesh,
>
> It seems you were the only guys who +1 the squash idea. Could you please
> share with us what benefits you think squashing commits will bring?
>
> I wil give you the simplest example that could come to my mind to
Some great ideas in there.
I am +1 for:
-consolidate #cloudstack-dev and #cloudstack
-move bots to #cloudstack-announce
-Remi's idea to publish slack message to #cloudstack (and vice versa).
-the idea to use something like discourse or stack overflow etc…
Somebody wants to take this on :)
On
On Jul 3, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Remi,
>
> couple of questions on the branching part - when we take the Feature PR and
> Feature is back in Master, feel like we are potentially destabilizing Master
> ? I know, currently we push changes to master even before anything is
>
On Jul 2, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Bug fixing in older releases is actually a lot of work. For security related
> issues we could maybe do it.
>
> Personally, I prefer to have a fast release cycle and smooth (tested) upgrade
> paths over 2-year LTS release cycle. It's more agi
On Jun 26, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Team,
>
> Would like to enhance usage server to provide quota management service to
> cloudstack.
> This will provide better control on resource usage; and a common denomination
> to measure resource usage.
> This will be an optional
on holidays?
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
>> On 29 Jun 2015, at 11:27, sebgoa wrote:
>>
>> Ok we are on,
>>
>> Starting today, commit to master through PR only.
>> 2 LGTM needed for merge.
>> If Travis fails, we can still merge given a good exp
Ok we are on,
Starting today, commit to master through PR only.
2 LGTM needed for merge.
If Travis fails, we can still merge given a good explanation of why (since
travis has issues once in a while).
I will keep an eye on commit, at least once a day, and ping the list if I see a
commit that wen
Hi,
A note to everyone about the roadmap.
We need to get going on this, add description to items already there, link to
JIRA and offer to contribute:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap
Please chime in,
thanks,
-sebastien
ready with a 4.6
release and if we already have 4.6 blockers.
> Looking forward for Pyr's input on this :)
>
Since he is the one who mentioned this feature, I am hoping he can comment soon
on it.
-sebastien
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:28 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
>>
t;>
>>>
>>>> For committers, it is not a big deal since they can manage their
>> branches in the cloudstack repo. However, for non-committers, this freeze
>> could cause unnecessary frustration and discourage further contributions.
>>>
>>> A
On Jun 17, 2015, at 10:18 PM, Milamber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Great idea. I can help.
>
> I already created a playbook for CS+Ubuntu+KVM
> https://github.com/milamberspace/ansible-cloudstack-ubuntu-aio
>
> Some parts can be got from this playbook.
>
> Milamber
>
You (rene) Milamber and Paul,
I am coming over.
On Jun 17, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H,
>
> Who are going, next week?
>
> --
> Daan
On Jun 12, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Christian wrote:
> Thank you all for your views and comments. I agree with everything said
> when it is positioned under today’s business-as-usual cloud compute.
> Perhaps I should put some context around my thoughts.
>
> NFV is coming and the world is looking to d
On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:45 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can jump in and work with Rohit and Daan to make 4.6 happen.
>
> +1 for the QA on master. It would be best if we could then all focus on
> stabilizing 4.6 aka master and wait with refactor stuff and new features
> until 4.6 is out,
Hi folks,
Couple months ago I shared a few thoughts for 2015 [1], things that we could do
to make our project even greater.
There has been good progress, so I would like to share a few updates.
1- Review board.
We are no longer using review board, all code contributions should now come as
githu
On May 13, 2015, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I hope that’s not too late to react on this one.
>>
>> Having 6 RMs seems a bit too much for me. For PRs containing a few lines of
>> code, just bug fixes or changi
Folks,
The exoscale driver was recently merged in Docker machine.
There is an oustdanding pull request for a more generic cloudstack driver:
https://github.com/docker/machine/pull/425#issuecomment-101440493
Sander who originally made the PR has no cycles right now to finish it.
So that's an op
On May 13, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Jan-Arve Nygård wrote:
> I created a PR to add committers that fell out of the list during the move.
> I'm not sure if you want non committers to build with middleman and then do
> a PR so i just created a PR against the source for the next build until
> instructions
Hi folks,
Our website is now managed via Git.
The build is now using Middleman [1] instead of the Apache CMS.
The source of truth for the site is at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-www.git;a=summary
It is mirrored on GitHub like all our other repos and we can accept pull
same issue that Abhi reported,
fixed
On May 12, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Not found" error is seen for the link -
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/
> I do know that the documentation has moved to
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/index.html
> but th
On May 11, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>> On May 11, 2015, at 4:59 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> So - you can now have git based websites [1]
>>
>> Those websites will publish as soon as something hits the git repo in
>> the proper branch. Note, that it won't build for you,
It seems we forgot to announce that Marco was made a committer, my sincere
apologies
-
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Marco Sinhoreli to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted.
Marco has done
Rohit, looks good to me
On May 11, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If the following announcement (draft) is alright, I would like to send it out
> later today or tomorrow. Please review, thanks.
>
> Sally - can you too please have a look. Thanks.
>
>> On 08-May-2015, at 4:
r me- all
other direct commits to master will be reverted
-sebastien
> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 09:47 schreef sebgoa :
>
>> So no -1 on this.
>>
>> Do we have volunteers to RM 4.6 on the master branch ?
>>
>> I propose to set a date asap, tag master and tel
Folks,
Git repos have been created and the github mirrors are in place.
ec2stack and gcestack are now official CloudStack subproject
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-ec2stack
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-gcestack
We just need to create two releases for these.
Note that while ec2stack
On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test
This is very important .
> can refine at any time.
>
> Op vr 1 mei 2015 om 09:55 schreef sebgoa :
>
>>
>> On May 1, 2015, at 12:52 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In my mind it was kind of making more sense to start by keeping 4.6 into
>> a
>&
Add support for cloud profiles in config, closes #7
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/d0cb4ffa
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/d0cb4ffa
Diff: htt
Imporve base controller code
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/fbe09a54
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/fbe09a54
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.o
Add *ini files in migrations to package data
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/8f696555
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/8f696555
Diff: http://git
Begin support for updated gcloud
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/34c685db
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/34c685db
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apac
Fix any issues tests didn't pick up on
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/1fc107a5
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/1fc107a5
Diff: http://git-wip-u
Restructure controller functions, private -> public -> routed
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/40616111
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/40616111
Code cutdown in controllers
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/d705e338
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/d705e338
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.or
Continue refactor
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/0f104a2e
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/0f104a2e
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/as
Refactor aggregated / normal description functions
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/fbb27197
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/fbb27197
Diff: http
Remove unnecessary individual description functions
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/repo
Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/commit/787b7208
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-gcestack/tree/787b7208
Diff: htt
1 - 100 of 516 matches
Mail list logo
