On Nov 30, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > BTW, if these bits are "no redistribute", why are we distributing them?
This is really a case of evolution and expectation. When Wido started this, these pkgs were not sanctioned by the *project*, hence non-official release pkgs and not voted on. This is still the case. We called this pkg repo the "community" repo because they are maintained by community members but not sanctioned by a vote by the project and hence to this point, not official ASF releases. These are convenience pkgs. It seems that it might be the time to work on figuring out how to offer official pkg, meaning sanctioned by a vote on dev@. Until we establish this process and actually do a release, this repo remains a community repo (which does not imply that they are official pkg). The only difference I make between apt-get.eu and shapeblue repo is that the apt-get has folks from different affiliation with access to the machine. Even though the shapeblue repo is also maintained by committers. This discussion is all good for the project, so let's not try to create any type of conflict here. Now that we have a second pkg repo to list on the download page this is forcing us to (re) think what deem a "community" repo and most possibly work towards official pkgs. To re-iterate my take on this, we are going to have a period of time where we still have the community repo (called like this historically) + shapeblue repo until we potentially unify them of list them with a proper term. This is why I proposed: 1-source release (official) 2-community repo (non-official) 3-third party (non-official, with single affiliation of people who have access). ** We just need a simple, acceptable naming for the download page for a transitory period ** Ps: certainly things could get a bit more complicated if people outside shapeblue had access to this repo. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Sent: Monday, 30 November, 2015 15:28:24 >> Subject: Re: Package Repositories > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: >> >>>> Paul, as far as releases I know, package on cloudstack.apt-get.eu >>> include >>>> noredis libraries. >>>> >>> >>> The debs don't I think. I never checked the RPMs. >> >> >> Any RPMs I uploaded do. Those are mostly the 4.4 ones (not sure but I >> think the 4.3 ones as well). >> >> >> >> -- >> Daan
