Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

urav, can you mark this review submitted? > > > - Rajani > > On April 23rd, 2014, 9:20 a.m. UTC, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy, Rajani Karuturi, Rajesh > Battala, and Santhosh Edukulla. > By Saurav Lahiri. > > *Updated April 23,

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

cripts/utils.sh PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Tested the changes with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start > and stop as expected. > > > Thanks, > > Saurav Lahiri > >

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

temvm/scripts/run.sh 146d96f systemvm/scripts/utils.sh PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/diff/ Testing --- Tested the changes with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

Santosh, Can you let me know ur thoughs If the review comments have been adequately addressed and the changes looks ok? Thanks Saurav On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/#review40414 > --- > > Ship it! > > > Ship It! > > - Rajesh Battala > > >

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

one. If you think otherwise, then a little bit more details would be very helpful. - Saurav --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/#review40251 -

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

un.sh 146d96f systemvm/scripts/utils.sh PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/diff/ Testing --- Tested the changes with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/diff/ Testing --- The console proxy vm was started and console sessions tested. The secondary storage vm was succesfully started. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

20123/diff/ Testing --- Tested the changes with console proxy vm and secondary storage vm. They start and stop as expected. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

oud.out when > > $CLOUD_DEBUG is not set or $CLOUD_DEBUG is 1 ? > > > > redirect to /dev/null when $CLOUD_DEBUG is 0 > > > > this way, it wont change the default behaviour of it. whoever doesnt > > want logging can set the variable to 0 >

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

oud.out when > > $CLOUD_DEBUG is not set or $CLOUD_DEBUG is 1 ? > > > > redirect to /dev/null when $CLOUD_DEBUG is 0 > > > > this way, it wont change the default behaviour of it. whoever doesnt > > want logging can set the variable to 0 >

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

-- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/#review39517 ------- On April 3, 2014, 2:12 p.m., Saurav Lahiri wrote: > > ---

Re: Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

/cloud 83853bc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/diff/ Testing --- The console proxy vm was started and console sessions tested. The secondary storage vm was succesfully started. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

[REMINDER]Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

Hi Rajesh, Any thoughts/suggestions on the changes? Thanks Saurav On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

Raised defect : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6328 Thanks Saurav On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Hi, > > The console proxy supporting scripts run.sh restarts the java process if > it determines that > for some reason the _run.sh has

Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

Hi, The console proxy supporting scripts run.sh restarts the java process if it determines that for some reason the _run.sh has exited. If the original java process has exited then that is not an issue. If for some reason the java process is still running, then the while loop which calls _run.sh w

Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

started and console sessions tested. The secondary storage vm was succesfully started. Thanks, Saurav Lahiri

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

> > > > > On 3/19/14 8:40 AM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: > > >Great. Post your patch at reviews.apache.org > > > >Thanks > >Rajesh Battala > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com] > >S

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

iew. > > Thanks > Rajesh Battala > > -Original Message----- > From: Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:20 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3 > > The problem appears

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

log4j would respect the settings in log4j-cloud.xml Thanks Saurav On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Could it have something to do with the RollingFileAppender that is being > used. > The following > rollingfileappender<http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nab

Re: system vm disk space issue in ACS 4.3

Could it have something to do with the RollingFileAppender that is being used. The following rollingfileappender link appears to be a bit outdated but they more or less describe a similar problem th

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

Parth, Can you shed some light on how this issue can be recreated. As mentioned earlier it looks like it is going through the non shared network code path, why this has happened is not very clear. Thanks Saurav On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Thank you very much. I w

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

Thank you very much. I will follow up on this with Parth. Saurav On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Thank you, Dave. > > Saurav, I¹ve assigned the bug to you. > > -Alena. > > On 2/25/14, 10:15 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: > > >> As for th

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5663

to be added to the Jira users DB in order to > become an assignee. Whoever administers Jira, can you please do it? > > -Alena. > > > On 2/24/14, 5:01 AM, "Saurav Lahiri" wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >I started looking at > https://issues.apache.org/j

CLOUDSTACK-5663

Hi All, I started looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5663 If anybody is actively looking into this please let me know else i can continue with this. Parth It looks like it is hitting the code path for non shared networks.You have mentioned that you are using shared netw

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

give it a try and let me know if this serves the purpose and the defect can be closed. Thanks Saurav On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Hi Chiradeep, > Appreciate your feedback. Sure I am ok with creating and running a seperate > service. Just to ensure that

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

nt router pair on a vpn might give a problem (maybe there is an > implementation) but why wouldn't you want redundant dhcp or dns > services? As I understand it these are used at Schuberg Philis at the > moment. will double check when I get a chance. > > regards, > Daan >

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Daan, So looking at what is available today for guest network, the Redundant VR can be enabled only for the source nat service. I guess the mention of the source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It appears that the other services like vpn, dhcp, dns do not benefit much f

Communication between Management Server and guest vm deployed by root admin user

Hi, Would anybody know if there is a way that guest vms deployed by root admin can be included in the system management network or routing configured to allow traffic flow between the management server and this guest vm. What I am trying to achieve is push the management server logs to a guest v

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

mvm. It seems > inconvenient to me, that's all. If you have your own template you can > deploy your add-on recardless of the underlying ACS. Maybe I am being > over paranoid so don't take my reaction as -1 or such. > > happy new year, > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:48 PM

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

? > > regards, > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Saurav Lahiri > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently looking into cloudstack-3471 , wiki link beolw. > > ( > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+to+extract+the+log+statements+by+job

[DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

Hi, I am currently looking into cloudstack-3471 , wiki link beolw. ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+to+extract+the+log+statements+by+jobid ). As part of it I was was planning on deploying and using default system vms to host the logstash+elasticsearch indexing/searching

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

t;log+statements+by+jobid > > > > > >Thanks > >Saurav > > > > > >On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Daan Hoogland > >wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Saurav Lahiri > >> wrote: > >> > saurav.lahiri > >> > >> > >> is added > >> > >> > > >

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

Thanks Dan. All, I have added the first draft of Design at the below location. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+to+extract+the+log+statements+by+jobid Thanks Saurav On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Sau

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

...@sungard.com) Thanks Saurav On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > All, > This is to initiate discussion towards implementing an api to extract the > log messages > specific to a jobid. > > As has been described in the bug descrition as of cloudstack 4.3 ther

Re: [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

t to track this issue. > > > > --Sanjay > > > > *From:* Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:53 PM > *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi > *Subject:* [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047 >

[HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047

Hi Sanjay, I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 - tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that the change corresponded to setting job-=[]. Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in the ./framework/jobs/src/org/apa

[DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

All, This is to initiate discussion towards implementing an api to extract the log messages specific to a jobid. As has been described in the bug descrition as of cloudstack 4.3 there is no api that can aggregate log messages by the job id. An api to extract logs by the jobid would make it easier

Re: Need access to Jira

Looks like I really dont need any additional permission to update comments. Have been able to update Jira. Thank you. Saurav On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Hi, > Can someone please grant me permission to add comments to Jira. I would > like to share a couple

Need access to Jira

Hi, Can someone please grant me permission to add comments to Jira. I would like to share a couple of screen shots and api output for cloudstack-1889. Thanks Saurav

[DISCUSS] (CLOUDSTACK-1889)

All, I have a query with respect to this defect. With a build off the master it looks like the updateResourceCount api is returning the count of resources a user can use or create and that appears to be the documented behaviour for this api. Furthermore it appears that the UI is correctly displayi