Sanjay, Thank you for the clarfication. I have created a ticket CLOUDSTACK-5410 to track this one.
Saurav On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Sanjay Tripathi <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com>wrote: > Hi Saurav, > > > > After the CS got switched to use new jobs framework, the > AsyncJobManagerImpl.java file got moved under framework package; but the > changes which I committed are not there in the file, somebody must have > missed it during the transition. > > > > I’ll port the same changes in the new jobs framework, so that we can have > UUIDs in our logs. Can you please open a ticket to track this issue. > > > > --Sanjay > > > > *From:* Saurav Lahiri [mailto:saurav.lah...@sungard.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2013 3:53 PM > *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi > *Subject:* [HELP] query w.r.t to cloudstack-1047 > > > > Hi Sanjay, > > I was looking at the changes that were done as part of [cloudstack-1047 - > tracking in logs using job id ]. From the defect history it appears that > the change corresponded to > > setting job-<id>=[<uuid>]. > > > > Currently the changes dont appear to be there in the master in > the > ./framework/jobs/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/jobs/impl/AsyncJobManagerImpl.java > file. Could you please let me know what I am missing here. This is to help > me in identifying the best approach to fix cloudstack-3471. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Saurav >
