Re: Request for Recommended Issues to Contribute To

Hi Jerome and Brady, You may find this CloudStack self-learning course useful: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook along with https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx to create local CloudStack dev-testing environments on Ubuntu/Fedora/EL. You can explore issues from here https://github.com/apache

Re: [Announce] new committer Swen Brüseke

Congratulations Swen and welcome! Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 16:15 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: [Announce] new committer Swen Brüseke Congratulations Swen ! -Wei On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:58 AM Daan H

Re: New Member Introduction

Welcome Rosi! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 15:09 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New Member Introduction Welcome Rositsa! From: Rositsa Kyuchukova Sent: 17 March 2025 10:32 To: us.

Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva

Congratulations once again Pearl – I’m sure I’ve seen this announcement last week from Daan 😊 (good to remind people ;) From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Thursday, 3 April 2025 at 12:16 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org , dev Subject: Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva Congratulations Pearl! Re

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Nicolas Vazquez

Daniel - thank you for your work in the last year. Nicolas - congratulations! Regards. From: Giles Sirett Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 22:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUN

Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva

Congratulations Pearl Regards. From: Vivek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 11:21 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva Congratulations pearl..! Regards, Vivek Kumar From: K

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.2.0 release

Thanks Daan and everyone involved in the release work. Congratulations everyone! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 16:53 To: users Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.2.0 release The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to a

Re: New PMC member: João Jandre Parraquetti

Congratulations, João! Well done. Regards. From: Slavka Peleva Sent: Thursday, 27 February, 2025 8:48:42 pm To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: João Jandre Parraquetti Congratulations, Joao! Best regar

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4

s.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to orchestrate > start VM instance > {"id":15,"instanceName":"i-2-15-VM","type":"User","uuid":"c3bdd0bb-08e7-4a54-8620-222d9ae38707"} > due to [Unable to get ans > wer that

Re: Timeline for the release of 4.20.1

Thanks for sharing the timeline Pearl, LGTM. It would be great if 4.20.1 is released by late March or even early April to give us enough time/bandwidth to focus on 4.21 in late Q2/early Q3. Regards. From: Pearl Dsilva Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 18:28

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4

+1 (binding) Regards. From: Rene Peinthor Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 21:17 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4 +1 (binding) Ran Linstor integration tests and some manual clicking. On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:1

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3

shared (see below in the quoted mail): > Test packages can be found at > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2-rc3/ On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I did basic tree check and built el8 rpm packages using Daan’s RC2 git > tree/sha.

Re: Unable to add host

Have you tried adding glusterfs storage as shared mount point or something else? Regards. From: TechnologyRss Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 7:08:39 PM To: users ; dev Subject: Unable to add host Hello, I am using primary storage is gluster and secondary

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3

+1 (binding) I did basic tree check and built el8 rpm packages using Daan’s RC2 git tree/sha. Basic install and lifecycle tests went okay. As convenience packages were not shared I built my own, available from here: https://build.yadav.cloud/cloudstack/4.19.2.0-RC2/

Re: New committer: Fabricio Duarte Junior (winterhazel)

Congrats Fabricio! Well deserved! Regards. From: Manoj Kumar Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 17:40 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New committer: Fabricio Duarte Junior (winterhazel) Congratulations Fabricio!

Re: [Announce] new committer Jithin Radu

Congratulations Jithin! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 8:23:16 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev Subject: Re: [Announce] new committer Jithin Radu Congratulations Jithin! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Pearl d'

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hi Daan, Can we start a different thread cutting a new RC on 4.19.2.0, if those fixes accepted in 4.19 branch (after RC1) must make into 4.19.2.0? Please also specify the RC number on the subject to avoid confusions, thanks. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland S

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.21.0

Thanks Suresh for volunteering, let's review and discuss the timeline again in a couple of weeks time. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 19:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Suresh Anaparti Cc: users Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM f

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.20.1

Thanks for volunteering Pearl. We will also need a volunteer as RM for 4.21. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 03:19 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Pearl Dsilva Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.20.1 Thanks, Pearl! On 2025-01-27 14:14,

Re: upcoming release 4.19.2

Hi Daan, Since we're already ready, why don't we cut RC1 sooner that way more people can test and if there any blocker/critical issues we can still cut another RC? >From what I've followed, the 4.19 branch has already 100s of issues/PRs fixed >and ready to create ship a release out of. Regard

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CloudStack Quarterly Community Meeting (Virtual)

Great initiative Ivet, it could really benefit the community and provide a forum for discussion. Like others have mentioned we used to do this in the past. Regards. From: Ivet Petrova Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 16:11 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc:

Re: Introduction

Welcome to the community Manoj. Get Outlook for iOS From: Daman Arora Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 11:31:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Introduction Welcome to the Cloudstack Community Manoj! Best, Daman Arora. On

Re: CloudStack-go - v2.17.0

Thanks Pearl, Daan and everyone involved in the (informal) release work! Regards. From: Pearl Dsilva Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 20:49 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack-go - v2.17.0 Dear CloudStack Commu

Re: [PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

All, We've the work-in-progress script-based installer here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-installer and served via https://c8k.in/stall.sh from Github repo. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 20:33 To

Re: [PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

Thanks all, as no objections were raised I’ll proceed by creating a new sub-project repository. Once the initial installation script is pushed, everyone is welcome to submit PRs and suggest changes through Github issues. As proposed in my original email, the main objectives of this initiative i

[PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

All, Following the CCC2024 hackathon idea of CloudStack script-based installer [1], I want to propose a new repository to host this as a sub-project under the ASF/CloudStack PMC. The script-based installer will make it easier for anybody to try CloudStack on one of the supported Linux distros (suc

Re: Congratulations to Alexandre Mattioli for Joining the CloudStack PMC

Congrats Alex! Regards. From: Jithin Raju Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 10:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Mike Tutkowski Subject: Re: Congratulations to Alexandre Mattioli for Joining the CloudStack PMC Congrats Alex!! -Jithin From: Kiran Ch

Re: [PROPOSAL] release 4.19.2

Thanks for volunteering Daan, you've my support! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 20:57 To: dev Subject: [PROPOSAL] release 4.19.2 LS, I want to propose to release 4.19.2 by the end of january. This is also me volunteering to d

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.20.0.0

Congratulations everyone and well done Joao, PMCs and everyone involved! Regards. From: Jo?o Jandre Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 19:02 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.20.0.0 # Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.

Re: API Docs need updating (Examples fail)

Hi Jason, Thanks for the feedback. Can you try using the cs library here - https://github.com/ngine-io/cs [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/9f3124b08bf87463c6206241c2c666bf688526b136333af5fd55476b162f9c15/ngine-io/cs] GitHub - ngine-io/cs: A simple, yet powerful

Re: cs has a new home

That's great news René, thanks for picking up maintenance and finding a new home of a widely used Python CloudStack API library. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Friday, November 29, 2024 04:19 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rene

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.0.0 RC3

issue post upgrade) Regards. ____ From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 13:20 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.0.0 RC3 +1 (binding) Tested by upgrading my local lab env from 4.19.1.3 to 4.20.0.0 RC3 (deb) packages on four hosts;

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.0.0 RC3

Thanks Joao, Same as others have shared, I'm too at CCC and wouldn't be able to test and vote in the advised voting window (next 72 hrs). Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 13:55 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudst

[ASK] Quotes on new features in CloudStack & advice upcoming features in CloudStack

All, I'm preparing for my talk on What's new in CloudStack, for CCC2024 [1] - may I request the community if they want to share any specific quotes for any upcoming feature in v4.20 they're excited about, or if they want me to include what they may be working on targeting the next release (v4.2

Re: [Proposal] Disable API (apikey/secret-key) for users, accounts and domains

Potential use-cases could be when there are organisations who want to disable API-based access using external auth integrations like LDAP, SAML or OAuth2. In such setups, sometimes when a user leaves the org - admins would block the auth from the external system (LDAP/SAML etc.) but they may con

New PMC member: Suresh Anaparti

manager for CloudStack releases 4.16.1.0 and 4.19.1.0. Please join me in congratulating Suresh Regards, Rohit Yadav

Re: Have ARM, Intel and AMD in same cluster hosts

Hi Sanjay, 1. No, each cluster should be of the same arch/distro/hypervisor. You may mix Intel & AMD, but not ARM. Though it's assumed/advisable to have hosts in a cluster homogenous & identical to avoid migration etc issues. 2. Yes, you can have Intel & ARM hosts based clusters in the same

Re: Object Storage Framework integration for Cloudian HyperStore

Hi Tom, In addition to what has been answered and what you've found, here are some useful links for reference: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/tree/main (self-learning dev material) https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#contributing-to-cloudstack https://github.com/s

Re: After restart the service of acs it's showing [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.1 Code Version = 4.18.1.0

restart the service of acs it's showing [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.1 Code Version = 4.18.1.0 Hi Jithin, Thanks for the help! I have one more question, can go with 4.18.1.1 or upgrade to 4.18.2.2? I read some blogs by Rohit Yadav and found some sec

Re: [PROPOSAL] Update the 4.20.0.0 release schedule

Thanks Joao. Your proposed schedule LGTM. I agree that we need to draw the line somewhere and call it a freeze sooner than later. That said we've been awfully busy with quite a few security issues and usually we've been trying to do two major releases a year, with first in Q1/Q2 and second one

Re: Management server cannot connect to KVM host on AlmaLinux 9

I had tested against RHEL9 in the past, my notes with x86/KVM are here, see if it helps: https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c#file-el9-or-rhel9-acs Network configuration was the tricky bit for me and I had to use nmcli to configure that. As I can see your clo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.19.1.0

Thanks Suresh for leading the release effort, and everyone involved in the release, Well done! And congratulations everyone on the much awaited maintenance release. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 16:29 To: dev Subject: [A

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CVE-2024-41107: SAML Signature Exclusion

Thanks Abhishek for leading the effort, Lucian and everyone involved in the release, well done! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 15:35 To: dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CVE-2024-41107: SAML Signature Exclusion Apache C

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Repeated all of RC1 testing, the blockers are fixed now. Upgraded my homelab from 4.19.1.1 RC1 to RC2, no issues. Tested VM, volume, systemvm, VR lifecycles. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 19:14 To: dev ; user

Re: stored procedures and versions (Was: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1))

OTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1) > > > > Rohit, > > > > That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to > > restore them. ... > > On 2024-07-11 12:52, Rohit Yadav wrote: ... > > > * > > > I hit an issue with idemp

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

___ From: Nux Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 02:44 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1) Rohit, That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to restore them. Hope your marriage is intact after this little adv

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

+0 (binding) * Tested fresh installation of EL8 packages, deployed VM from newly created template on a newly created network; tested VM, volume & network lifecycles using both mbx & health check tests passing w/Trillian/BO * Tested upgrade from 4.19.0.2 EL8 to 4.19.1.0 RC1 EL8 pkgs using mb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

Jimmy, I usually test using packages and in VMs that support nested virtualisation manually or use mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx Regards. Regards. From: Jimmy Huybrechts Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 6:39:30 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev

Re: CCC2024 Funding - Important

iculus.io> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi Ivet, all, Thanks for starting this thread. While my work organisation, ShapeBlue, has been participating and sponsoring the CCC every year, I think it's important for all organisations

Re: CCC2024 Funding - Important

Hi Ivet, all, Thanks for starting this thread. While my work organisation, ShapeBlue, has been participating and sponsoring the CCC every year, I think it's important for all organisations who use CloudStack and benefit from CloudStack to make such conferences and events sustainable and funding

Re: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a First Class Feature

Proposed design doc largely LGTM. I've some additional suggestions and feedback to make requirements & the first phase implementation more clearer and simpler: * +1 on implementing it in a hypervisor and storage agnostic manner. * Let's have the FS VMs owned by the caller (account or pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

regards, João Jandre On 6/21/24 08:49, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Related PRs, requesting for review: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8609 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/409 > > > Regards. > > > > > _

Re: Help with spring dependency injection

HI Davide, CloudStack has its own module loader and within each component or module, classes are instantiated via spring context xml rules. You can refer to: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/hack/service.md (and other chapters) Regards. Fr

Re: Issue in Setup KVM host with agent 4.18.1

Hi Sanjay, Generally speaking, we do support ARM-based KVM hosts with CloudStack, but not platforms may work out of the box and is largely due to libvirt/kvm/qemu support on them. ARM systems aren't homogenous in the sense how libvirt/qemu manages to produce the domain XML on them and how qemu

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up and publish images on dockerhub. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 12:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Vishesh Jindal

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

r 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 > 80:31053/TCP 7m37s > > > > 5. Delete the nginx service. > Public IP is released > > Regards > Kiran > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , > us...@cloudstack.apac

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors By all means, remove CentOS7 and any EOL OS or component from the matrix and recommendations! Regards On 2024-06-20 11:45, Rohit Yadav wrote: > + Users > > Just to be clear, what this

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

it yet. > > On the rest +1 > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 11:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and > hypervisors > > All, > > Refer

[DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

All, Referencing https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.0/releasenotes/compat.html, some of the distros and hypervisors we support have reached or reaching EOL by end of this month. Please review and advise how we should deprecating/remove the following for the next 4.20 release (i.e. c

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cl

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Source code, checksum and signature OK. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 12:20 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 (bindin

Re: Api docs

Hi Ahmed, What issue have you found? You may share here or report it as an issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/issues Thanks and Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 18:00 To: ahmed.awl...@sue.nl.invalid Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0

Thanks Vishesh for volunteering and glad to see a new maintenance release for the sub-project. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 16:20 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstac

Re: Unable to download DevCloud image file

Hi Lohit, DevCloud isn't maintained or used anymore, the apache folder was removed long back. You can try mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx or Simulator based development (https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#simulator-based-development) instead. Regards. _

Re: [REVIVE][DISCUSS] Closing issues & PR after a certain time

I like the general idea but at the same time want to weight in that we also do the right thing in handle issues and PRs. Sometimes there are genuine issues and PRs, however, we make no progress on them for one reason or another. As of last week, I've triaged all the outstanding Github issues tha

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0

hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.18.2.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Daan Hoogland Nux (Lucian) Rohit Yadav +1 (non binding) Bryan Lima Jithin Raju 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC2

+1 (binding) I've built and uploaded the 4.18.2.0 RC2 packages here for people's convenience - http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.18.2.0-rc2/ * Tested upgrade from 4.18.1.1 to 4.18.2.0 RC packages -ok * Rebuilt systemvms (ssvm and cpvm) - ok * Restart network - ok * New VM deployment

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

/109#issuecomment-2058519817 The only note for future release manager is to avoid publishing the artifacts before voting is closed, or to delete an already published release. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 13:15 To: dev Subject: Re

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the future though. 1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue in the

[DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

All, The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform registry website. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109 The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual resync button on the provider isn't fixing the issue

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

r CKS Rohit, It is possible to install CAPC on a CS 4.16 ? Le jeu. 11 avr. 2024 à 12:03, Rohit Yadav a écrit : > Hi Benoit, > > The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what > you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a differen

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

Thanks Kiran and all for the excellent release work. There has been some issue with publishing the v0.5.0 on the Terraform registry, for this I've logged a support ticket with the TF Registry. In the meanwhile, users can use the following to install the provider locally using artifacts from the

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

Hi Benoit, The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a different version of the data iso: http://download.cloudstack.org/cks/ Alternatively, you can also have a look at the CAPC project: https://cluster-api-cl

Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva

Welcome aboard Slavka! Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 6:16:00 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva Congratulations Slavka! R

New Committer: Kiran Chavala

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Kiran Chavala (kiranchavala) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Kiran has been a long time CloudStack contributor and has created over a hundred issues on Github. Being a committer e

[ADVISORY] Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1

Apache CloudStack security releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1 address the CVEs listed below. Affected users are recommended to upgrade their CloudStack installations. 1. CVE-2024-29006: x-forwarded-for HTTP header parsed by default Severity: moderate Description: By default the CloudStack managemen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

+1 (binding) Tested vm deployment using 0.5.0-pre. Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2:55:40 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0 Hi ALL

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer

Congratulations Rene! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 2:30:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer Congratulations Rene! On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 9:12 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > devs and

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0

# Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0 Release Apache CloudStack, proven as one of the most scalable, free and open source cloud computing operating system for large scale private, public, and hybrid clouds, today announced the availability of the latest release of Apache CloudMonkey v6.4.0, the l

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. And I'll publish the Github release as latest. Regards, Rohit Yadav On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

All, Reminder - cmk 6.4.0 RC1 is up for testing and voting. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 4:08:29 PM To: dev ; users Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1 Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 relea

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador

in me in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / VP. Best Regards, Rohit Yadav

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 Commit: df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 GitHub pre-release (cont

Re: [DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Since we haven't heard of any issue/feature requests and the ones in the current milestone are all done. I'll start a vote on this today. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/milestone/5 Thanks and regards. ____ From: Rohit Yadav Sen

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

ssues/regressions at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 18:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Pro

Re: Re-Introduction

Welcome back Sina! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Re-Introduction Welcome back Sina! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Sina Kashipazha Date: Sunday, 17 March 2024 at 18:10 To:

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

All, Kiran is release manager for the next Terraform provider release (v0.5.0) but isn't a committer to have commit privileges to the upstream repo (something PMC can help into?). To assist him, I've created a pre-RC (alpha) build for testing purposes and we encourage users to test and report

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

simple way to warn of > API disruptive changes - but that warning can be given in other ways (in > documentation , a compatibility matrix, etc) *If* it ever happened, we would > be using the first number for bothand > > > > Kind Regards > Giles > > > &

Re: [PROPOSE] upgrade paths for 4.19 and 20

I think it would be most likely that we work towards releasing 4.19.1 before 4.20.0. Then, it would be sensible to have 4.19.0 -> 4.19.1 -> 4.20.0 upgrade path. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 14:50 To: dev Subject: [PROPOSE] upgr

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

g. > > So, to be pedantic, and have a clearly defined vote, I'd change the vote to > something like "Drop semantic versioning and continue from 20". And include > your explanation about moving to > . . > > I would be ok to +1 that ^^^ > > -paul > >

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

As I understand Daan's vote proposal and from the previous discussion thread, the current scheme that results in a release like 4.20.x.y would simply become 20.a.b, wherein "a" is for maintenance release (counter, starting with 0) and "b" is only used for security releases (counter, starting wit

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

Thanks for stepping up and sharing your plan. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 5:36:55 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider +1, on the ti

Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh)

Congratulations Vishesh! Regards. From: Daman Arora Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 8:59:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh) Congrats Vishesh! On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 10:29 a.m. Ruben Bosch wrote: > Congr

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

+1 Regards. From: m...@swen.io Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 18:29 To: 'dev' Subject: AW: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 +1 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daan Hoogland Gesendet: Montag, 19. Februar 2024 13:50 An: dev Cc: users Betre

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

(+ users) All, Generally speaking, any versioning/styling change can be perceived as a big or concerning change by users (those existing or new ones trying/adopting). So, we must get our message across properly and correctly. I'm not for or against cosmetics change in versioning, but I'm reall

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.19.1.0

Thanks for volunteering Suresh. Agree as Daan has mentioned, community would benefit to have the 4.18.2.0 first with some gap to then have 4.19.1.0. The 4.19.1 RC by May end or early June LGTM. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 5:2

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] web site publishing procedure

Thanks Daan, LGTM - though, if website isn't going to get too many activity and updates (except for couple of blogs a month), we may simplify publishing from main in future. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 17:39 To: dev Cc:

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

384 may be good enough. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 13:00 To: Rohit Yadav Cc: dev Subject: Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3 Hi Rohit, Thanks. I will revert the changes then. If the users think 512MB will lead to large memory cons

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

I would advise we should move to 512 MiB. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 4:14:06 PM To: Rohit Yadav ; dev Subject: Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3 Hi Rohit, I tested the VRs of a VPC (with 2 tiers

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

seem good. For > stability, I have updated the PR to change the memory size of the > default > offering of virtual routers from 256 MiB to 384 MiB. > > The current default memory size of system vms (CPVM, SSVM) is 512 MiB, > so > they will not be impacted. > Hope it has les

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >