Re: [LTS] Extend LTS support to 24 months

**otherwise I think it may not be always possible to enforce ... Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, September 19, 2025 14:33 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [LTS] Extend LTS support to 24 months Thanks all for chiming in -- glad

Re: [LTS] Extend LTS support to 24 months

e 2 > LTS and 2 non-LTS releases. > > Now the problem is: we do not have a release schedule set; the PMC can't > (shouldn't) enforce this without a discussed and approved process for > releases. > > I don't think this discussion makes sense in a vacuum, it must incl

Re: [LTS] Extend LTS support to 24 months

nderstanding. > 2. Does it make sense to have support for Blocker defects on a branch > that has been in maintenance for 18 months already? > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 8:06 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: >> >> All, >> >> The guidelines on regular & LTS releas

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider 0.6

Thanks Kiran, LGTM. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2025 00:10 To: dev Cc: users Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider 0.6 Thanks for volunteering Kiran! On Tue, 9 Sept 2025, 20:04 Nicolas Vazquez, wro

[LTS] Extend LTS support to 24 months

ease review and share your thoughts and comments. A formal vote may not be necessary if there are no objections. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS Thanks and Regards, Rohit Yadav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.5.0 - RC1

Thanks Abhishek and everyone involved, and congratulations everyone! From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Monday, September 1, 2025 15:42 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.5.0 - RC1

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)

+ 3 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Rohit Yadav * Nicolas Vazquez * Harikrishna Patnala * Slavka Peleva * Wei Zhou +1 (non binding) * Rene Peinthor * Kiran Chavala * Abhisar Sinha 0 none -1 none Thanks everyone for your participation. I will now work on the administrative items, and

Re: 4.22.0 Release plan

Thanks for sharing the plan Hari - sounds good to me. Regards. From: Harikrishna Patnala Sent: Friday, August 22, 2025 09:14 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev Subject: 4.22.0 Release plan Hi all, As the ongoing 4.21 release is coming to an end, I wo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5)

+1 (binding) Based on RC4 environment and basic cloud resource lifecycle & actions, in an EL8 environment. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Friday, August 22, 2025 14:32 To: dev ; users Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC5) Hi All,

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4.20.2.0 release

Sounds like a good plan, thanks for stepping up Wei. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 18:15 To: dev ; users Subject: [PROPOSAL] 4.20.2.0 release Hi all, The latest LTS version Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 was released on 10th June. S

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC4)

+1 (binding) Based on basic instance, volume, image, network lifecycles on top of a EL8/4.21-RC3 environment. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 18:25 To: dev ; users Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC4) Hi All,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC3)

MMAS ? Tata Y. > On Aug 12, 2025, at 5:48 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Tested instance, volume, snapshot, template, iso, network lifecycles in an > EL8/KVM environment, along with new features and support for tpm/windows11. > > Also tested the built-in ex

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.21.0.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) Tested instance, volume, snapshot, template, iso, network lifecycles in an EL8/KVM environment, along with new features and support for tpm/windows11. Also tested the built-in extensions with Proxmox VE 9.0 and Hyper-V on Windows Server 2019 and custom actions. The setup for both H

Re: CMK 6.5.0 milestone/release

Thanks for volunteering Abhishek, a new cmk release after 4.21 would be great! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 14:29 To: dev ; users Subject: Re: CMK 6.5.0 milestone/release Sorry, I made a typo, I meant CloudStack 4.21.0 relea

Re: New committer: Jamie Pell

Congrats Jamie! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 14:22 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: New committer: Jamie Pell Congratulations Jamie! On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 at 13:58, Daan Hoogland wrote: > The Project Ma

Re: [VOTE] deprecate OVM and OVM3 plugins

+1 Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 19:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] deprecate OVM and OVM3 plugins +1 Regards, Suresh On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 6:12 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > This is

Re: [DISCUSS] no longer ignore dependabot

Any changes to package-lock.json should ideally requires a full UI manual QA, so ideally best avoided unless the manual QA of most/all UI features can be done. QA full test plan: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/test_full_plan.md Regards. __

Re: [ANNOUNCE] CloudStack 4.19.3.0 and 4.20.1.0 Release

Great to have the new releases! Thanks Pearl, Daan and everyone who's contributed to the releases. Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 23:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] CloudStack 4.19.3.0 and 4.20.1.0 Releas

Re: CloudStack India User Group 2025 – Event Details & Call for Speakers

All, Reminder - the CloudStack India User Group 2025 Meetup CFP closes in less than a week (16th June 2025). If you're interested in speaking, please submit your talk as soon as possible. For more details, please visit: https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/csiug-2025 Regards. ___

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2

the vote: +1 (PMC / binding): 6 * Pearl Dsilva * Rohit Yadav * Nicolas Vazquez * Slavka Peleva * Wei Zhou * Suresh Anaparti +1 (non binding): 3 * Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves * Kiran Chavala * Vladimir Petrov 0 none -1 none The vote passes. I will be doing the administrative stuff asap. Thanks to

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0

, After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.20.1.0 *passes* with 6 PMC + 4 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Daan Hoogland * Rohit Yadav * Nicolas Vazquez * Slavka Peleva * Wei Zhou * Suresh Anaparti +1 (non binding) * Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves * Kiran Chavala * Vladimir Petrov * Abhisar

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.21.0

LGTM, thanks Suresh. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 6:16:10 PM To: dev ; users Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.21.0 Hi All, It's been a few months since the proposal, and we've so far closed 62 issues and PRs in the 4.21.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Did a quick mbx env lifecycle test, LGTM. Regards. From: Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2025 22:23 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2 +1, the following tests were perfor

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 RC3

+1 (binding) Tested upgrade from 4.20.0.0 to 4.20.1.0 RC3; tested both Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04 with x86 and arm64 KVM hosts with local, NFS and Ceph storage. Tested CKS, shared filesystems, systemvm, VR, instance, volume and network lifecycles; both as admin & normal users. Also tested Ceph RGW/

Re: CAN BE USE MTU MORE THEN 9000 NFS AS PRIMARY WITH KVM HOST?

Hi Sanjay, Depending on whether you're using dedicated nics for storage traffic types or using management nics to also carry storage network, you can configure the nics with specified MTU. For example, in my KVM based env I've cloudbr0 to carry Public and Guest traffic (at 1G speed) but use cl

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

RM (and sometimes a co-RM as well), which sometimes is a PMC member and sometimes a committer; the PMC could count on them to help on the task; however, it is the PMC's responsibility (not a single person, the PMC). Furthermore, this should also be more clearly documented. Best regards, Dan

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

ically working like this. > > Regarding the LTS of 4.21.x.x and 4.20.x.x, we shall keep it as it is, > and their version naming should remain as the old one until they are > out of LTS. All versions after 4.21.x.x will follow the > MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH version naming. > > I hope this clarifies wh

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Jason Hollis

several Github issues and PRs. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project and enables better productivity. Please join me in congratulating Jason! Regards, Rohit Yadav

Re: [VOTE] Versioning process

a new one with updated descriptions when it seems like we are ready to vote again. Best regards, João Jandre On 5/14/25 04:26, Rohit Yadav wrote: > -1 (binding) > > This is mainly due to the point that "Changes to the database schema should > be introduced only in major versi

Re: [VOTE] Versioning process

ng this voting thread. Best regards, João Jandre On 5/9/25 00:54, Rohit Yadav wrote: > May I propose we hold the vote, this has three different topics being > considered which looks like still need to be discussed. Also we cannot vote > on some of the things whose details are

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

nor versions inside the same major would pose no issues and could be done whenever needed. I think the cost of waiting for the next major before having a possible optimization is worth the cost of having a stable environment. Moreover, I am not proposing to stop DB data changes (e.g. inserting/removi

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

y, upgrading/downgrading from minor versions inside the same major would pose no issues to the DB. Moreover, we should not confuse DB schema changes with DB data changes (e.g. inserting/removing/altering something in the database to normalize some inconsistency) Best regards, João Jandre On 5/8/25 09:

Re: [VOTE] Versioning process

May I propose we hold the vote, this has three different topics being considered which looks like still need to be discussed. Also we cannot vote on some of the things whose details are yet to be completed defined and proposed. Regards. From: João Jandre Sent:

Re: [Discussion] Versioning

Sorry all - I'm busy at work but want to chime in after considering the thread (plus my country's at war atm). I need more time and I wouldn't be able to vote within 72 hrs. On the face value - none of the three things needs voting on, we already use the semver & have used deprecation process f

Re: Virtual Router giving packet loss

Hi Stanley, You can use "tcpdump -i icmp" from the instance, or the VR or the host where the instance is running and the host where the VR is running, or the network router/switches in your infrastructure to debug and identify the root cause. Misconfigured VLANs or bridge/network devices on t

Re: Request for Recommended Issues to Contribute To

lated issues, but we’re open to others with good learning value and some guidance. If any come to mind, we’d appreciate your suggestions! Best, Jerome & Brady On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:38 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Jerome and Brady, > > You may find this CloudStack self-learning cour

Re: Request for Recommended Issues to Contribute To

Hi Jerome and Brady, You may find this CloudStack self-learning course useful: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook along with https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx to create local CloudStack dev-testing environments on Ubuntu/Fedora/EL. You can explore issues from here https://github.com/apache

Re: [Announce] new committer Swen Brüseke

Congratulations Swen and welcome! Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 16:15 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: [Announce] new committer Swen Brüseke Congratulations Swen ! -Wei On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:58 AM Daan H

Re: New Member Introduction

Welcome Rosi! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 15:09 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New Member Introduction Welcome Rositsa! From: Rositsa Kyuchukova Sent: 17 March 2025 10:32 To: us.

Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva

Congratulations once again Pearl – I’m sure I’ve seen this announcement last week from Daan 😊 (good to remind people ;) From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Thursday, 3 April 2025 at 12:16 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org , dev Subject: Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva Congratulations Pearl! Re

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Nicolas Vazquez

Daniel - thank you for your work in the last year. Nicolas - congratulations! Regards. From: Giles Sirett Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 22:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUN

Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva

Congratulations Pearl Regards. From: Vivek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 11:21 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: New PMC member: Pearl Dsilva Congratulations pearl..! Regards, Vivek Kumar From: K

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.2.0 release

Thanks Daan and everyone involved in the release work. Congratulations everyone! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 16:53 To: users Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.2.0 release The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to a

Re: New PMC member: João Jandre Parraquetti

Congratulations, João! Well done. Regards. From: Slavka Peleva Sent: Thursday, 27 February, 2025 8:48:42 pm To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: João Jandre Parraquetti Congratulations, Joao! Best regar

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4

s.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to orchestrate > start VM instance > {"id":15,"instanceName":"i-2-15-VM","type":"User","uuid":"c3bdd0bb-08e7-4a54-8620-222d9ae38707"} > due to [Unable to get ans > wer that

Re: Timeline for the release of 4.20.1

Thanks for sharing the timeline Pearl, LGTM. It would be great if 4.20.1 is released by late March or even early April to give us enough time/bandwidth to focus on 4.21 in late Q2/early Q3. Regards. From: Pearl Dsilva Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 18:28

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4

+1 (binding) Regards. From: Rene Peinthor Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 21:17 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4 +1 (binding) Ran Linstor integration tests and some manual clicking. On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:1

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3

shared (see below in the quoted mail): > Test packages can be found at > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.2-rc3/ On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 4:22 PM Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I did basic tree check and built el8 rpm packages using Daan’s RC2 git > tree/sha.

Re: Unable to add host

Have you tried adding glusterfs storage as shared mount point or something else? Regards. From: TechnologyRss Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 7:08:39 PM To: users ; dev Subject: Unable to add host Hello, I am using primary storage is gluster and secondary

Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 RC3

+1 (binding) I did basic tree check and built el8 rpm packages using Daan’s RC2 git tree/sha. Basic install and lifecycle tests went okay. As convenience packages were not shared I built my own, available from here: https://build.yadav.cloud/cloudstack/4.19.2.0-RC2/

Re: New committer: Fabricio Duarte Junior (winterhazel)

Congrats Fabricio! Well deserved! Regards. From: Manoj Kumar Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 17:40 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New committer: Fabricio Duarte Junior (winterhazel) Congratulations Fabricio!

Re: [Announce] new committer Jithin Radu

Congratulations Jithin! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 8:23:16 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev Subject: Re: [Announce] new committer Jithin Radu Congratulations Jithin! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Pearl d'

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hi Daan, Can we start a different thread cutting a new RC on 4.19.2.0, if those fixes accepted in 4.19 branch (after RC1) must make into 4.19.2.0? Please also specify the RC number on the subject to avoid confusions, thanks. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland S

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.21.0

Thanks Suresh for volunteering, let's review and discuss the timeline again in a couple of weeks time. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 19:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Suresh Anaparti Cc: users Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM f

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.20.1

Thanks for volunteering Pearl. We will also need a volunteer as RM for 4.21. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 03:19 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Pearl Dsilva Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.20.1 Thanks, Pearl! On 2025-01-27 14:14,

Re: upcoming release 4.19.2

Hi Daan, Since we're already ready, why don't we cut RC1 sooner that way more people can test and if there any blocker/critical issues we can still cut another RC? >From what I've followed, the 4.19 branch has already 100s of issues/PRs fixed >and ready to create ship a release out of. Regard

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CloudStack Quarterly Community Meeting (Virtual)

Great initiative Ivet, it could really benefit the community and provide a forum for discussion. Like others have mentioned we used to do this in the past. Regards. From: Ivet Petrova Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 16:11 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc:

Re: Introduction

Welcome to the community Manoj. Get Outlook for iOS From: Daman Arora Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 11:31:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Introduction Welcome to the Cloudstack Community Manoj! Best, Daman Arora. On

Re: CloudStack-go - v2.17.0

Thanks Pearl, Daan and everyone involved in the (informal) release work! Regards. From: Pearl Dsilva Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 20:49 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CloudStack-go - v2.17.0 Dear CloudStack Commu

Re: [PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

All, We've the work-in-progress script-based installer here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-installer and served via https://c8k.in/stall.sh from Github repo. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 20:33 To

Re: [PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

Thanks all, as no objections were raised I’ll proceed by creating a new sub-project repository. Once the initial installation script is pushed, everyone is welcome to submit PRs and suggest changes through Github issues. As proposed in my original email, the main objectives of this initiative i

[PROPOSE][DISCUSS] CloudStack Installer

All, Following the CCC2024 hackathon idea of CloudStack script-based installer [1], I want to propose a new repository to host this as a sub-project under the ASF/CloudStack PMC. The script-based installer will make it easier for anybody to try CloudStack on one of the supported Linux distros (suc

Re: Congratulations to Alexandre Mattioli for Joining the CloudStack PMC

Congrats Alex! Regards. From: Jithin Raju Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 10:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Mike Tutkowski Subject: Re: Congratulations to Alexandre Mattioli for Joining the CloudStack PMC Congrats Alex!! -Jithin From: Kiran Ch

Re: [PROPOSAL] release 4.19.2

Thanks for volunteering Daan, you've my support! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 20:57 To: dev Subject: [PROPOSAL] release 4.19.2 LS, I want to propose to release 4.19.2 by the end of january. This is also me volunteering to d

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.20.0.0

Congratulations everyone and well done Joao, PMCs and everyone involved! Regards. From: Jo?o Jandre Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 19:02 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.20.0.0 # Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.

Re: API Docs need updating (Examples fail)

Hi Jason, Thanks for the feedback. Can you try using the cs library here - https://github.com/ngine-io/cs [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/9f3124b08bf87463c6206241c2c666bf688526b136333af5fd55476b162f9c15/ngine-io/cs] GitHub - ngine-io/cs: A simple, yet powerful

Re: cs has a new home

That's great news René, thanks for picking up maintenance and finding a new home of a widely used Python CloudStack API library. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Friday, November 29, 2024 04:19 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rene

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.0.0 RC3

issue post upgrade) Regards. ____ From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 13:20 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.0.0 RC3 +1 (binding) Tested by upgrading my local lab env from 4.19.1.3 to 4.20.0.0 RC3 (deb) packages on four hosts;

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.0.0 RC3

Thanks Joao, Same as others have shared, I'm too at CCC and wouldn't be able to test and vote in the advised voting window (next 72 hrs). Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 13:55 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudst

[ASK] Quotes on new features in CloudStack & advice upcoming features in CloudStack

All, I'm preparing for my talk on What's new in CloudStack, for CCC2024 [1] - may I request the community if they want to share any specific quotes for any upcoming feature in v4.20 they're excited about, or if they want me to include what they may be working on targeting the next release (v4.2

Re: [Proposal] Disable API (apikey/secret-key) for users, accounts and domains

Potential use-cases could be when there are organisations who want to disable API-based access using external auth integrations like LDAP, SAML or OAuth2. In such setups, sometimes when a user leaves the org - admins would block the auth from the external system (LDAP/SAML etc.) but they may con

New PMC member: Suresh Anaparti

manager for CloudStack releases 4.16.1.0 and 4.19.1.0. Please join me in congratulating Suresh Regards, Rohit Yadav

Re: Have ARM, Intel and AMD in same cluster hosts

Hi Sanjay, 1. No, each cluster should be of the same arch/distro/hypervisor. You may mix Intel & AMD, but not ARM. Though it's assumed/advisable to have hosts in a cluster homogenous & identical to avoid migration etc issues. 2. Yes, you can have Intel & ARM hosts based clusters in the same

Re: Object Storage Framework integration for Cloudian HyperStore

Hi Tom, In addition to what has been answered and what you've found, here are some useful links for reference: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/tree/main (self-learning dev material) https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#contributing-to-cloudstack https://github.com/s

Re: After restart the service of acs it's showing [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.1 Code Version = 4.18.1.0

restart the service of acs it's showing [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.1 Code Version = 4.18.1.0 Hi Jithin, Thanks for the help! I have one more question, can go with 4.18.1.1 or upgrade to 4.18.2.2? I read some blogs by Rohit Yadav and found some sec

Re: [PROPOSAL] Update the 4.20.0.0 release schedule

Thanks Joao. Your proposed schedule LGTM. I agree that we need to draw the line somewhere and call it a freeze sooner than later. That said we've been awfully busy with quite a few security issues and usually we've been trying to do two major releases a year, with first in Q1/Q2 and second one

Re: Management server cannot connect to KVM host on AlmaLinux 9

I had tested against RHEL9 in the past, my notes with x86/KVM are here, see if it helps: https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c#file-el9-or-rhel9-acs Network configuration was the tricky bit for me and I had to use nmcli to configure that. As I can see your clo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.19.1.0

Thanks Suresh for leading the release effort, and everyone involved in the release, Well done! And congratulations everyone on the much awaited maintenance release. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 16:29 To: dev Subject: [A

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CVE-2024-41107: SAML Signature Exclusion

Thanks Abhishek for leading the effort, Lucian and everyone involved in the release, well done! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 15:35 To: dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CVE-2024-41107: SAML Signature Exclusion Apache C

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Repeated all of RC1 testing, the blockers are fixed now. Upgraded my homelab from 4.19.1.1 RC1 to RC2, no issues. Tested VM, volume, systemvm, VR lifecycles. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 19:14 To: dev ; user

Re: stored procedures and versions (Was: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1))

OTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1) > > > > Rohit, > > > > That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to > > restore them. ... > > On 2024-07-11 12:52, Rohit Yadav wrote: ... > > > * > > > I hit an issue with idemp

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

___ From: Nux Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 02:44 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1) Rohit, That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to restore them. Hope your marriage is intact after this little adv

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

+0 (binding) * Tested fresh installation of EL8 packages, deployed VM from newly created template on a newly created network; tested VM, volume & network lifecycles using both mbx & health check tests passing w/Trillian/BO * Tested upgrade from 4.19.0.2 EL8 to 4.19.1.0 RC1 EL8 pkgs using mb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

Jimmy, I usually test using packages and in VMs that support nested virtualisation manually or use mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx Regards. Regards. From: Jimmy Huybrechts Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 6:39:30 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev

Re: CCC2024 Funding - Important

iculus.io> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi Ivet, all, Thanks for starting this thread. While my work organisation, ShapeBlue, has been participating and sponsoring the CCC every year, I think it's important for all organisations

Re: CCC2024 Funding - Important

Hi Ivet, all, Thanks for starting this thread. While my work organisation, ShapeBlue, has been participating and sponsoring the CCC every year, I think it's important for all organisations who use CloudStack and benefit from CloudStack to make such conferences and events sustainable and funding

Re: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a First Class Feature

Proposed design doc largely LGTM. I've some additional suggestions and feedback to make requirements & the first phase implementation more clearer and simpler: * +1 on implementing it in a hypervisor and storage agnostic manner. * Let's have the FS VMs owned by the caller (account or pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

regards, João Jandre On 6/21/24 08:49, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Related PRs, requesting for review: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8609 > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/409 > > > Regards. > > > > > _

Re: Help with spring dependency injection

HI Davide, CloudStack has its own module loader and within each component or module, classes are instantiated via spring context xml rules. You can refer to: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/hack/service.md (and other chapters) Regards. Fr

Re: Issue in Setup KVM host with agent 4.18.1

Hi Sanjay, Generally speaking, we do support ARM-based KVM hosts with CloudStack, but not platforms may work out of the box and is largely due to libvirt/kvm/qemu support on them. ARM systems aren't homogenous in the sense how libvirt/qemu manages to produce the domain XML on them and how qemu

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up and publish images on dockerhub. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 12:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Vishesh Jindal

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

r 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 > 80:31053/TCP 7m37s > > > > 5. Delete the nginx service. > Public IP is released > > Regards > Kiran > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , > us...@cloudstack.apac

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors By all means, remove CentOS7 and any EOL OS or component from the matrix and recommendations! Regards On 2024-06-20 11:45, Rohit Yadav wrote: > + Users > > Just to be clear, what this

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

it yet. > > On the rest +1 > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 11:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and > hypervisors > > All, > > Refer

[DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

All, Referencing https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.0/releasenotes/compat.html, some of the distros and hypervisors we support have reached or reaching EOL by end of this month. Please review and advise how we should deprecating/remove the following for the next 4.20 release (i.e. c

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cl

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Source code, checksum and signature OK. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 12:20 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 (bindin

Re: Api docs

Hi Ahmed, What issue have you found? You may share here or report it as an issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/issues Thanks and Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 18:00 To: ahmed.awl...@sue.nl.invalid Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0

Thanks Vishesh for volunteering and glad to see a new maintenance release for the sub-project. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 16:20 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstac

Re: Unable to download DevCloud image file

Hi Lohit, DevCloud isn't maintained or used anymore, the apache folder was removed long back. You can try mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx or Simulator based development (https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#simulator-based-development) instead. Regards. _

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >