+1 (binding)

Re-confirmig my vote - previously I didn't do instance deployment. With RC4 
updated pkgs I built an EL8 env [1] using mbx. Deployed adv zone KVM with NFS 
and local storage. Tested by deploying instance in isolated network, checked 
systemvms and VR instances, console of instances. Basic vm and volume 
lifecycles tested.

[1] > mbx list
MonkeyBox 🐵 v0.4

Name: qa1-4192-rc4-9dbcf037-kvm
qa1-4192-rc4-9dbcf037-kvm-mgmt1 172.20.0.142    http://172.20.0.142:8080/client
qa1-4192-rc4-9dbcf037-kvm-host1 172.20.0.57
qa1-4192-rc4-9dbcf037-kvm-host2 172.20.0.246

Regards.


 


________________________________
From: Kiran Chavala <kiran.chav...@shapeblue.com>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 14:07
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4

Thanks Daan for the updated packages

+1 ,

- tested vm deployement and life cycle operations
-  Template/iso registration
- vmware to kvm import


Regards
Kiran

From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, 22 February 2025 at 1:10 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4
Kiran, I had mistakenly uploaded a set of packages with simulator enabled,
therefore registration was successful without even trying to download any
iso or template. Forgive me please. I have updated the packages now and
this version should work.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 12:51 PM Kiran Chavala <kiran.chav...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> -1 , vm deployement with new registered  template is failing,
>
> It was working on rc 3 release
>
>
> 2025-02-21 11:33:27,220 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
> (API-Job-Executor-16:ctx-12a2368d job-97) (logid:e31678b7) Unexpected
> exception while executing
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdB
> yAdmin
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to orchestrate
> start VM instance
> {"id":15,"instanceName":"i-2-15-VM","type":"User","uuid":"c3bdd0bb-08e7-4a54-8620-222d9ae38707"}
> due to [Unable to get ans
> wer that is of class com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer].
>
>
> Regards
> Kiran
>
>
>
> From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> Date: Friday, 21 February 2025 at 9:31 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rene Peinthor <rene.peint...@linbit.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 21:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 4.19.2.0 rc4
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran Linstor integration tests and some manual clicking.
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:15 AM Daan Hoogland <d...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > packages are ready now
> > at http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.19.2.0-RC4/
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 9:38 AM Daan Hoogland <d...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've created a 4.19.2.0 release candidate, with the following
> > > artifacts up for a vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.2.0-RC20250220T0932
> > > Commit: 4e321d43565951a3856923d680976b8cd4eb1b46
> > >
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.2.0/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using
> 256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> > > I am in the process of creating convenience packages and will update on
> > > those in this mail-thread.
> > >
> > >
> >
>


--
Daan



Reply via email to