Hi everyone,
Please join me in congratulating Alexandre Mattioli for becoming a member
of the CloudStack PMC.
Congratulations, Alex! :)
Thanks,
Mike
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mike-tutkowski-5880286/
Congratulations, Gabriel!
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:12 PM Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi All CloudStack enthusiasts!
>
>
>
> Please join me in congratulating Gabriel for becoming the next CloudStack
> PMC Chair.
>
> Congratulations Gabriel, very well deserved!
>
>
>
> I would also like to thank Sven for
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
OK, this LGTM (as long as Travis shows green before we merge). Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
I should have a chance to look through this later tonight. In the
meanwhile, perhaps we can re-push the code to kick off Travis again (since its
most recent run has a failure). Thanks
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
I have run the following use cases successfully:
PS = Primary Storage
ST = Storage Tag
CO = Compute Offering
DO = Disk Offering
V = Volume
Create PS_1
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
I should be able to do so over the weekend.
On Mar 10, 2017, at 11:26 AM, serg38
mailto:notificati...@github.com>> wrote:
@mike-tutkowski<https://github
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
This code LGTM. I reviewed the code, but don't have the ability to run
tests at the moment as I'm in the process of testing RC1 for 4.10. We have
updates to two unit tes
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1962
@syed Yes, I can include you as a reviewer for the relevant PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1962
@syed Hey - I was also working on a feature like this, but related to both
XenServer and VMware (adding in VMware-specific code on the resource side). Do
you need these changes for 4.10
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1963#discussion_r102793622
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -711,6 +711,7
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1963
Yes, but the PR is scheduled for 4.11.
On Feb 23, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Syed Mushtaq Ahmed
mailto:notificati...@github.com>> wrote:
@mike-tutkowski<https://g
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1963
@syed Are you looking to get this into 4.10? If you are not, I have this
corrected in a PR scheduled for 4.11. If you are, then I think you're missing a
file (SolidFireUtil).
-
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1962
@syed This LGTM. I wonder, though, if we can only check in the necessary
parts (i.e. not the massive rearrangements to the imports)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1952
LGTM
I have also incorporated this code and created a Basic Zone with it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579#discussion_r101596817
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -2909,51 +2911,21 @@ public Vlan doInTransaction(final
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94659104
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java ---
@@ -526,16 +529,18 @@ public static DataStoreRole getDataStoreRole(Snapshot
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94661240
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/ListSnapshotsCmd.java
---
@@ -115,8 +115,10 @@ public void execute
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94660627
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java ---
@@ -493,7 +494,9 @@ public SnapshotResponse createSnapshotResponse(Snapshot
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94660806
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/manager/PrimaryDataStoreProviderManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -56,7 +55,7
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
I don't have the resources in my lab available to perform tests on this at
this time, but the code itself LGTM.
Thanks for working on this JIRA ticket!
---
If your proje
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735
@serg38 @anshul1886 @rhtyd Maybe someone could take a look at my comments
before we check this in and see if they think any of those should be
implemented here. Thanks
---
If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
I walked through the diffs and they LGTM. I did not actually run the code,
however, because I'm in the middle of another CloudStack project and I don't
have the resources av
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94657561
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java ---
@@ -526,16 +529,18 @@ public static DataStoreRole getDataStoreRole(Snapshot
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
Code = LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
To clarify this line:
"If that comes back null, then we apparently have removed primary storage,
which can only be done if your snapshots don't reside on it. If
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
Let me provide a bit of background on this and then we can decide which way
we want to correct this side effect.
Here is the PR that went in a while ago that enabled CloudStack
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
Can you tell me which line was throwing a NullPointerException in the code
that you fixed? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
@rhtyd I think we can deal with this in another PR, as you suggest.
@syed Does any of that code look like something that might have been
changed for archiving managed snapshots
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
The semi-unusual part about this PR, @rhtyd, is that is contains code
jointly developed by me and @syed.
He has reviewed my contributions and I have reviewed his.
We
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Hi @rhtyd We have one LTGM (from @syed) and I have run and posted all
regression tests for managed storage. If we could have one more person take a
look, that would be great. I don&#
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@syed Would you be able to review this code when you have a little time?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd It took a few force pushes, but it worked. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd Are we having trouble with Travis? I've amended my SHA a few times
and get different Travis failures. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
I've updated the commit summary, @rhtyd.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
I've updated the commit summary, @rhtyd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1800
Thanks, @rhtyd I've been trying to get test_snapshots.py to fail in my
environment, but haven't been able to.
I'll let @syed answer your question, Rohit, since t
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd @jburwell I recently ran all of the managed-storage-related
integration tests successfully (referenced above).
I think we're in a good position to get this into 4.1
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@rhtyd I added that JIRA ticket and referenced it in the PR description.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd I added that JIRA ticket and referenced it in the PR description.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
TestAddRemoveHosts (1, 2, and 4 were successful and 3 failed for an
environmental reason):
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/613869/results.txt
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
TestVolumes (resign = true):
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/613863/results.txt)
TestVolumes (resign = false):
[results.txt](https://github.com
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Hi Rohit,
Today is a holiday in the US and many people are also off work tomorrow.
I have a bunch of holiday-related activities going on today and tomorrow,
but should
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
This code LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@syed I think any failures/errors listed for those regression tests might
be erroneous.
I double checked the canHandle method of StorageSystemSnapshotStrategy and
our snapshot
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@jburwell @karuturi Although I won't be able to run regression tests on
#1749 anytime soon (due to being out of the country for a while), @syed has
volunteered to do so.
---
If
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@jburwell @karuturi I went ahead and opened #1749. That one just has the
fixes for #1600. That should go into 4.10 because it fixes pretty important
issues and is low risk.
---
If your
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots
This PR is to address a few issues in #1600 (which was recently merged to
master for 4.10).
In
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@karuturi @jburwell Oh, and just to point out, the reason I embedded those
changes in this PR at the time was because I couldn't finish running my
regression tests on this PR until
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@karuturi @jburwell Hi
I was recently working on some enhancements to 4.5 for a prospect.
Once I completed that work in their custom branch, I wanted to forward port
the
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
All tests for managed storage have been run and passed:
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/576566/results.txt)
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
KVM enhancements for managed storage
This PR contains changes mainly related to enhancing managed storage on
KVM. I recently added these features to a custom build of 4.5 for a prospect
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@rhtyd I don't think either of those two errors are related to this PR
(probably environment issues). I think we are good to go here. What do you
think?
---
If your project is s
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
Thanks, @rhtyd!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
@rhtyd Do you know what the results were of those regression tests you
kicked off for this PR a few days ago? Just checking in to see if we are able
to merge this. Thanks!
---
If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed Just an FYI that this branch had two conflicts with master (after
recent changes to master). I went ahead and fixed the conflicts and re-pushed
the commit.
---
If your project is
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
@rhtyd Do you know what the results were of those regression tests you
kicked off for this PR a few days ago? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@karuturi Anything else @syed needs to do for this one? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVolumes.py (no resigning)
test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName:
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVolumes (resigning)
test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName:
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVMSnapshots.py
test_01_take_VM_snapshot (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... ===
TestName: test_01_take_VM_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestVMMigrationWithStorage
test_01_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestSnapshots.py: The failure in test 04 makes sense as that test case is
actually dependent upon #1600, which has not yet been merged in
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
TestAddRemoveHosts.py
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName:
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java
SolidFire has recently released an official SDK for Java.
I have converted the SolidFire storage plug-ins to make use of this new
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd @karuturi I think we are good to go on this PR now. Do you agree?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Any way to easily just re-run test_05_stop_ssvm and test_07_reboot_ssvm?
I'm not sure how this PR would cause such failures. The only changed Java
code does the foll
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
2016-10-23 19:32:49,315 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: test_05_stop_ssvm:
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py&
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
==
FAIL: Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Tests out-of-band management change password feature ... === TestName:
test_oobm_zchange_password | Status : FAILED ===
FAIL
That might be a problem with the test.
---
If
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Looks like re-pushing the commit did the trick, @rhtyd. I think we are good
to go here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@rhtyd I changed the SHA and re-pushed the commit. Hopefully that will
clear up Travis.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Thanks for the clarification, @jburwell. I had the same question for #1642,
but your answer here works for both PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Just following up on this one. Is there any pending work item that remains
or are we able to merge? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Just following up on this one. Is there any pending work item that remains
or are we able to merge? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed Thanks! I had a similar issue with #1642 and fixed it the same way.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell Excellent...closing and re-opening the ticket fixed the CI issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Closing and re-opening the PR fixed the Travis issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
I still got a weird Travis failure, so I decided to close and re-open this
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mike-tutkowski closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user mike-tutkowski reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage
This PR makes it easier to spin up system VMs on managed storage.
Managed storage is when you have a dedicated volume on a SAN
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Travis, which was failing for a similar reason for #1600, passed, so I will
(once again) change the commit SHA and re-push. In fact, while I'm at it, I'll
rebase it against
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell I think it's Travis. I've changed the commit SHA twice now and it
failed both times plus it fails with #1600, as well (even though I pushed that
one multiple times,
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Travis issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
It looks like we're having an issue with Travis?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
I have run all of the relevant managed-storage tests and all passed
(details below).
I did encounter one issue:
When the fourth test of TestSnapshots ran, it failed
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@jburwell Yes, the managed-storage tests should be re-executed. I can do
this over the weekend as my CloudStack systems in the lab here are being fully
utilized for the time being with
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
Sounds good, @syed Since what you added is the same as what's currently in
master, it looks like your list of changed files for this PR is down to 35
(only one of which is a Python
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed It actually looks like the rebase lead to the integration tests being
put back in their pre-official SolidFire SDK for Python state.
I recommend you just remove all
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed You can actually just remove the integration tests from this PR as
they were added (along with updates to use the new SolidFire SDK for Python) in
#1689.
---
If your project is
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed @jburwell I should be able to run the tests toward the end of the
week or during the weekend. At the moment, my resources in the lab are devoted
to other CloudStack dev activities
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
@jburwell I just added that to requirements.txt. I also put a link to
solidfire-sdk-python 1.1.0.92 in the description of this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
TestAddRemoveHosts.py:
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName:
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
@syed @karuturi @jburwell Just wondering how we're doing on this one. Is
there anything else that Syed needs to do here? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1689
Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Python
SolidFire has recently released an official SDK for Python.
I have converted all of the SolidFire integration tests over to
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thanks for running that, @serg38!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@jburwell Let me run those tests next week (probably Monday) as I'm just
about ready to head out on a flight to a customer site for an upcoming meeting
and won't be back
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
Thank you, @karuturi!
Does anyone know who can run the VMware test that @jburwell asked for? I
can't due to this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi That config is actually one of the ones John is asking for. :)
Smoke test suite + system VM integration test suites (SSVM, CPVM, and VR)
against XenServer using
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
@karuturi Do you happen to have any resources we can use to fulfill John's
test requests? Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
How are we doing on this one? Do my comments above make sense to everyone?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
1 - 100 of 2809 matches
Mail list logo
