Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

to > > announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC. > > > > Please join me in congratulating him. > > > > On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC > -- Alena Prokharchyk https://twitter.com/Lemonjet http://www.linkedin.com/pub/alena-prokharchyk/13/282/a7b

Re: cloudstack 4.4.2 - VM network rate limit - has no effect

a custom service offering's network rate? > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > > :) its probably the most popular doc request ever. Marcus, here is the > link: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Netwo

Re: cloudstack 4.4.2 - VM network rate limit - has no effect

ringid' => > >>>> CUSTOM_COMPUTE_OFFERING, 'templateid'=>$templateId, > >>>> 'zoneid'=>ZONE_ID, // Optional but useful: > >>>> 'details[0].networkrate'=>1, // Network Throttling of 1MB/s not > >>>> working here... //'networkrate'=>1, > >>>> 'account'=>$account, 'displayname'=>$displayName, > >>>> 'displayvm'=>$displayVM, 'domainid'=>$domainid, //ROOT_DOMAIN_ID, > >>>> 'hypervisor'=>$hypervisor, 'name'=>$name, > >>>> 'networkids'=>NETWORK_ID, ); // > >>>> https://github.com/jasonhancock/cloudstack-api-extension //... > >>>> $deploy = $cloudstack->deployVirtualMachine($vars); // does curl > >>>> request... > >>>> > >>>> Note: It will create the VM and runs fine with no errors > >>>> generated... However, when I download a 10 MB test file it will get > >>>> 10MB/s download, and does not limit it to 1MB/s. Also, when I use > >>>> the cloudstack interface to look at the Instance Details, I do not > >>>> see any rate limit set. > >>> > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > >>> Version: GnuPG v1 > >>> > >>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVFG93AAoJEAGbWC3bPspCc5UP/2/JDa7PHsDoaoOCYQlOPYaT > >>> tlJBpRviHkWl/IB5Dup86nDF6GjNYrwbRA0+YKn2E8UwgJ+lAz13Vkqg3eCLH3OK > >>> Na++WFMNePlR/MOYKRic0XuW+8YflKwKfxTs2OU96y5t3DqBuZzVpBKEKvxprTqv > >>> 5uhJZLnyoA1AZotg+oMAgD07SBtnFEIqlIxiP/K7UROPMnE0D8pUOVD4Z2Tdrh5p > >>> Rc7yNHU9XbLJjxuf1fpZkTmA6Htt+Qb4r3K4aOztmt6n7I1ov91HQSUQaYH3jQnJ > >>> t06apLb8Ip4w85HpfqupfVQAVF26swawi7ghuJ/BVvG+/EaY4nyyhoUPoM6Q42fW > >>> YusLbfCWaOM8yB0Hr0TjGBPAXzuIKcI1j4KxX13WONBMTNqn34TYanxXDD2UhYZE > >>> 6W8sfB3+cF0N4HF1EBTKDAYRcVolqZWILuvYIx1VmFEuJfSljg+X47ULI/keiuWX > >>> vcdagoS2eJCsVreym5S6lbd3jFjJibpcu+MUsT0Rb9M8hvdZ3b/x3+mHaXaAhErQ > >>> 4xOoZhbD+rbeBfD+WP6HOJRLvGsdPfSMJXxxdWz+xgIn4Odbc/eoV/zuVPGuHBSE > >>> e5JqqLuXRzQPmktrP0uxMPgyqUH/hjyW+6g4F5A3/siixjziI2NfvfEzJ1qGDtFw > >>> d3H56NFlcAPmD5/+Ldew > >>> =ii1N > >>> -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >>> > >> > > > -- Alena Prokharchyk https://twitter.com/Lemonjet http://www.linkedin.com/pub/alena-prokharchyk/13/282/a7b

Re: [ACS 4.5.1 RC1] Caught SQLException on startup

f you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a > company incorporated in England & Wales

Re: [PROPOSAL] DHCP/DNS offload and config drive support for adv zone shared network

3. Add config drive support for the VMs in this network. > > > > Please provide your comments for the below FS. > > > > ACS ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8324 > > FS: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53740 > > 797 > > > > > > Thanks, > > Jayapal > -- Alena Prokharchyk https://twitter.com/Lemonjet http://www.linkedin.com/pub/alena-prokharchyk/13/282/a7b

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

e.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Friday, December 5, 2014 at 2:15 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

Rohit, please refer to the thread with "Review Request 20099” subject and concerns raised by John Burwell. -Alena. From: Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais

Re: Review Request 24152: CLOUDSTACK-7182: NPE while trying to deploy VMs in parallel in isolated network

er classes? After that, please go ahead and commit your fix. Put myself as a reviewer. - Alena Prokharchyk On Aug. 5, 2014, 5:16 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http

Re: List APIs Behavior

Gaurav, "Ideally, when we search by Id, then exception should be thrown and when We expect by passing account/domainid/projectid/networkid etc, then Noneshould be returned. Do all List APIs follow a similar guideline?² Yes, all of CS APIs follow this behavior. If non-existing Id is passed in, the

Re: What is the behaviour of VPC Reset?

g all the rules. You can find all the rules that are being re-applied, in finalizeCommandsOnStart() method of the VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl. -Alena. From: Suresh Ramamurthy mailto:suresh.ramamur...@nuagenetworks.net>> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 5:17 PM To: Alena

Re: What is the behaviour of VPC Reset?

Suresh, Yes, it does. All the rules for all the networks inside the VPC, are being reapplied on the VPC VR after its up. I don¹t see it being documented neither in the FS, nor in the API itself. Please file a CS doc bug on that. -Alena. On 8/7/14, 3:40 PM, "Suresh Ramamurthy" wrote: >Hi Alena

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

ent to run this automation (CI/BVT) before the merge is done. Otherwise you are just shifting all existing problems from master to develop. -Alena. On 8/7/14, 2:15 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

ems of git-workflow (merges vs cherry-picks, feature/hotfix branches), my main concern is about master branch maintenance. =Alena. On 8/7/14, 2:17 PM, "Erik Weber" wrote: >On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

On 8/7/14, 1:42 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >On Aug 7, 2014, at 8:33 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen >>wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 6, 2014, at 7:15 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>&g

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

Daan, thank you. Please see my comments inline. On 8/7/14, 1:19 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> Plus if you read the discussion below the article, you will see that >> people agree that this model doesn’t wor

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

master-with-mult >>i >>ple-parallel-release-branches >> >>git-flow uses support branches to support releases that are not on >>master. >> >> >> >> >> >>On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >>alena.prokharc...

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

out and see if it would resolve your concern regarding >maintaining multiple releases > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16562339/git-flow-and-master-with-multi >ple-parallel-release-branches > >git-flow uses support branches to support releases that are not on master. > &

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

ase on-time. Major release gets merged back into master. > >-Devs: folks working on features and fixes are responsible to merge into >the develop branch and call the RM for a merge into a release branch >(this may vary with gitflow, where release branch is cut from develop) > >Once

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

automation run verifying all the code merged from hotFixes/feature branches (and possibly reverting wrong checkins), we can as well merge the code directly to master. -Alena. On 8/6/14, 2:30 PM, "Edison Su" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alena Prokha

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

CS before, and we have to implement it. > >Maybe I lost view on the obstacles and objections and am being short >sighted here, please advice, >Daan > >On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> >> >> On 8/6/14, 12:52 PM, "Erik Weber

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

On 8/6/14, 12:52 PM, "Erik Weber" wrote: >On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Agree with you, Rohit. The changes to the git model we use, are needed >> indeed. But we should address only the pr

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

thor about raised issues, will keep everyone >posted. > >Cheers. > >On 06-Aug-2014, at 8:29 pm, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> >> On 8/6/14, 11:22 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rohit Yadav >>> wrote

Re: [DB-CHANGE] Infrastructure tab fails to load with db exception

the instructions on the dev list. -Alena. From: Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 11:33 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Cc: Alena Prokha

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

On 8/6/14, 11:22 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rohit Yadav >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 06-Aug-2014, at 7:30 pm, Alena Prokharchyk >> wrote: >> >>> Rohit, thank you for the explanation. So we cut the maintena

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

. Thanks, Alena. On 8/6/14, 11:06 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi, > >On 06-Aug-2014, at 7:30 pm, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > >> Rohit, thank you for the explanation. So we cut the maintenance release >> from the master branch, not *develop as opposed to the ma

Re: [DB-CHANGE] Infrastructure tab fails to load with db exception

Thank you, Nitin. I think we should add one more item to the things that the script checks: modifications to the older upgrade paths shouldn¹t be allowed. If we already released 4.4, db upgrade changes should be accepted only to 4.4-4.5 scripts. If someone makes the changes to, say 4.3-4.4, the mai

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

we were originally thinking about leaving the release branches around. Thanks, Alena. On 8/6/14, 10:16 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > >On 06-Aug-2014, at 6:58 pm, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > >> Why implement something that doesn¹t serve any practical purpose for &g

Re: implementing git workflow

age/h7nh6ozseien7ezh >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/u7k6wv5kslb4ysyn >> >> ~Rajani >> >> >> >> On 06-Aug-2014, at 12:56 am, David Nalley >>mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alena Prokharchyk >>

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

Why implement something that doesn¹t serve any practical purpose for CS?? We should adopt only things that would address current CS problems - regressions, unstable releases, etc. That would mean - running the automation (CI, BVT) on *develop branch, cut the *fix branches for hot fixes/critical/fea

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

n there is 4.4? Thanks, Alena. On 8/6/14, 6:41 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi, > >Comments in-line; > >On 05-Aug-2014, at 10:45 pm, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > >> Rayees, >> >> I think you have the same misunderstanding as a lot of other folks

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

might have the answer :) See details of implementation #1 and #2 below. Thank you, Alena. On 8/5/14, 1:45 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Rayees, > >I think you have the same misunderstanding as a lot of other folks >(including myself) had in the beginning - seeing develo

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

Rayees, I think you have the same misunderstanding as a lot of other folks (including myself) had in the beginning - seeing develop branch as a trunk branch that gets merged into master on a regular basis after the BVT/CI tests pass. So the master branch reflects the develop branch minus changes

Re: implementing git workflow

I think we should hold on with the git workflow implementation till all the decisions on the items written by Leo, are discussed and finalized. The very beginning of ³git workflow vote² shows that the vote was just to get people opinion on the proposal. Before adopting it and cutting the develop b

Secondary ip address and static nat

Hi Jayapal, I have a question to you regarding your commit aedb8c47 for secondary ip address in terms of StaticNat feature. Before this checkin, we didn’t allow Static nat to be enabled on the 1 VM and multiple public Ips. After the checkin, you can create multiple static nat rules per same vm/

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

he CI * with what frequency 2) Reverting the fixes breaking the CI - are we planning to do it? If so, would it be done automatically after CI run, or developer should do it himself? -Alena. On 7/31/14, 4:28 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Comments in-line; > >On 31-Jul-2014, at 11:

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

Sorry, ignore #2. I’ve read on the model more, and realized that master branch would reflect the branch that has been released, not the current release. So only #1 is yet to be addressed. -alena. On 7/31/14, 2:03 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Done, updated the wiki page wit

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

astien Goasguen" wrote: > >On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > >> +1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree >>on >> all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just >> blindly follow http://n

Re: [VOTE] git workflow

+1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just blindly follow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/, plus some use cases are not explained there as I¹ve pointed in one of my previous e

Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces

elease bug fixes in a separate branch instead of a Release branch}. > >Please correct me if I am wrong in understanding. > > >On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Tanner Danzey wrote: > >> Ah. I simply misunderstood. That sounds very reasonable to me. >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces

io, but is it not what the article >located at @ http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ >already describes? > > >On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> I would rather say that the bug fix branc

Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces

n what ACS currently has, >> although I'm not going to say that ACS's current structure has not been >> sufficient, just that it simply seems to be the time for change. The >> git-flow model seems to be a little easier to form a model of in one's >>

Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces

of people who work on the bug - if more than one, then we cut the new branch c) feedback/review is needed for the bug d) anything else? -Alena > >Thanks, > >-Nate > > >On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] git commit proces

I have one more question in addition to what Sheng asked. Document http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ mentions that the *hotfix branch should be created for the blocker/critical bugs in the current production release. What about bugs happenning in the *release branch (the one t

Re: [BUG] upgrade path to 4.4.1

Just one thing was missing - upgrade path from 4.4.1->4.5, I’ve added it to DataBaseUpgradeChecker: _upgradeMap.put("4.4.1", new DbUpgrade[] { new Upgrade441to450() }); -Alena. On 7/28/14, 3:26 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Will do, thank you, Rohit. > &g

Re: [BUG] upgrade path to 4.4.1

th class changes. > >On master: d42e20429d1e238816a07edd865567c06a4914d3 > >Regards. > >Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> The upgrade path should also be merged to master branch. Where btw I >> already see an upgrade path from 4.4 to 4.5 implemented. Should we >>change >>

Re: [BUG] upgrade path to 4.4.1

The upgrade path should also be merged to master branch. Where btw I already see an upgrade path from 4.4 to 4.5 implemented. Should we change it to 4.4.1->4.5? -Alena. On 7/28/14, 2:54 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi, > >Adding upgrade paths is simple (you may add/update a wiki page on it): > >-

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

Pierre-Luc, I¹ve closed the bug as invalid. Here is the explanation why: The first attempt to upgrade failed because the new system template wasn't pre-downloaded prior to upgrade (the requirement reflected in Release notes, for the cases when template is changed between CS versions) What should

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.0

Daan, during 4.4 testing, I found the following regression bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7118 "Unable to expunge vms in error state" There is a workaround for it - I¹ve mentioned it in the bug - yet ideally I would prefer the fix to be cherry-picked from 4.4-forward: co

Re: Question about Global Settings

is is exactly what I was wondering about. > >I can put this in my code review. > > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Mike, may be you already know this info, putting it here in case someone >> is

Re: Question about Global Settings

Mike, may be you already know this info, putting it here in case someone is not aware of that. When global config variables are plugin specific, they have to inserted by the manager from your plugin; they should never be put to Config.java class. To implement it, make your manager implement Config

Re: [DB-CHANGE]

Yes! :) Thank you and Daan who added the page. -Alena. From: Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 at 9:45 AM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apac

Re: [DB-CHANGE]

ment and there is no >script that we maintain to upgrade a DB of the same [major.minor] version. > > >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Please run these mysql statements after getting commit >> 5a96d8

[DB-CHANGE]

Please run these mysql statements after getting commit 5a96d8ef5cbc88df366016ae9dd7ee46e4ca417a on master branch: ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`user` ADD COLUMN domain_id bigint(20) unsigned DEFAULT NULL; ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`user` ADD CONSTRAINT `fk_user__domain_id` FOREIGN KEY `fk_user__domain_id`(`do

Re: Failing to start Management Server due to bug CLOUDSTACK-7043 on master branch

Chandan, are you sure that this bug is the cause of the management server startup failure? I can see that even after "Error while decrypting: ZXc_-8u2x0AFV__uuk5y5g² MS continues loading classes/managers. The log file you¹ve attached to the bug, shows this in the end: 2014-07-02 10:08:30,251 DEBUG

deploydb is broken on master (4.5)

Sebastian/Tim, DeployDB is broken on master due to commit commit a8212d9ef458dd7ac64b021e6fa33fcf64b3cce0 Author: Tim Mackey Date: Thu Apr 10 15:57:24 2014 -0400 Cleanup of Xen and XenServer terms. Cloned xen plugin creating a xenserver plugin, then removed xen plugin Signed-off-by:

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6242 - the fix needs to be reverted temporarily

Sure. On 7/7/14, 2:01 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >Alena, I had no time at all to look at cloudstack today, could you >apply it please. My $dayjob duties are requiring a slightly different >focus the coming week(s) > >thanks > >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Al

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mark Hinkle

Congratulations, Mark! -alena. On 7/3/14, 10:50 AM, "John Burwell" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Mark Hinkle to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has >accepted. > >Join me in congratulating Mark! > > >-The CloudStack PMC

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6242 - the fix needs to be reverted temporarily

sername + "', RAND(), 2, >'" + firstname + "','" + lastname + "',now(), 'disabled', 1)"; > > try { > PreparedStatement stmt = >txn.prepareAutoCloseStatement(insertSql); >

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6242 - the fix needs to be reverted temporarily

, and thank you for the follow up. -alena > On Jul 2, 2014, at 11:43 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> In any case, fixes done to ConfigurationManagerImpl are not correct, and >> logging should be fixed

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6242 - the fix needs to be reverted temporarily

t; wrote: >I have no idea, the scripts in the scripts/installer dir where written >by Manuel Amador before moving to apache. > >On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> Its ok to log as long as the original problem - with the install script >>on

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6242 - the fix needs to be reverted temporarily

, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> c031eb7d38200d680da85ef57367b21df3483c41 > > >So please amend and not revert? I suppose you are talking about >@@ -508,8 +512,9 @@ public class ConfigurationServerImpl extends &g

CLOUDSTACK-6242 - the fix needs to be reverted temporarily

Daan, We have to temporarily revert the commit (looks like it exists in master branch only) commit c031eb7d38200d680da85ef57367b21df3483c41 Author: Ding Yuan 2014-04-14 14:02:03 Committer: Daan Hoogland 2014-04-14 23:07:15 CLOUDSTACK-6242: exception handling improvements Or at least reve

Doc on Network Throttling

As I remember seeing the question on how Network throttling works in CS, so I’ve created a wiki page explaining the CS implementation. Feel free to review/update/fix: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Network+throttling+in+CloudStack Anthony/Kelven/Edison/Rajesh, can you pl

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Santhosh Edukulla as a committer...

Congratulations, Santhosh! -Alena. On 6/30/14, 9:25 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >Hi All, > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Santhosh Edukulla to become a committer and we are pleased to announce >that he has accepted. > >Being a committer allows many contrib

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

une 26, 2014 at 1:53 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: Kishan Kavala mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Murali Reddy mail

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

update from Kishan. Kishan, in addition to answering Alex’s questions, please go over the plugin design once again. Thank you, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 11:32 AM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

://reviews.apache.org/r/17790 Thank you, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 9:03 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: Kishan Kavala mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstac

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

han/Murali to look at it to see if anything is missing or incorrect in the final review, not to make you override or change everything you've already put in. Thank you, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 7:12 PM

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

. Thank you, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: Kishan Kavala mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstac

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

...@sungardas.com>> Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 4:02 PM To: Kishan Kavala mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com>> Cc: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

– come up with the valid objection. Thanks, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 5:41 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apac

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

set of regions having the same ids and names cross regions. Thanks, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@c

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

. Kishan/Murali, please confirm. Thank you, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 4:22 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Cc: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

create/update/deleteAccount commands. And the question is – what type this parameter should have (see details below) Thanks, Alena. From: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM To: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

vices call. If what you need is UUID, not the actual id, to be saved in the callContext, you have to transform it explicitly. - Alena Prokharchyk On June 24, 2014, 3:54 p.m., Alex Ough wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically g

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

ample, look at any CS plugin, for example cloud-plugin-hypervisor-vmware (refer to spring-vmware-core-context.xml file to see how the managers are defined there) - Alena Prokharchyk On June 15, 2014, 9:40 p.m., Alex Ough wrote: > > ---

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

On 6/16/14, 4:13 PM, "Alex Ough" wrote: >On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> >> --- >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To re

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

from CallContext only? Without touching anything else in the CS code like account/domain/user/event objects. Please remove it from the event. Or come up with a different solution that doesn't touch the event. - Alena Prokharchyk

Re: [PROPOSAL] Brocade network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX Switches for CloudStack 4.5

t? > >Thanks & Regards, >Ritu S. > >-Original Message- >From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 3:25 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ritu Sabharwal >Cc: Prakash Kaligotla; Nagendra Jaladanki >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL

Re: NetworkOrchestrator selects 2 NetworkGurus at one time....

it >check seems fine for now until design issue is fixed. > >> >>Thanks & Regards, >>Ritu S. >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:54 PM >>To: Chiradeep Vittal; d

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.4

be able to close it as >not an issue. > >Thanks >-min > >On 6/11/14 1:37 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > >>On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Alena Prokharchyk >> wrote: >>> If we confirm that its a race condition, then the bug should be punted >>>to >>> 4.5 >> >>or solve it? >> >>-- >>Daan >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Brocade network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX Switches for CloudStack 4.5

Ritu, Answering your DB upgrade question. Schema upgrade changes should be put to 44-45 sql upgrade script, not to create-schema.sql. All previous releases get upgraded to 4.4 before being upgraded to 45. -Alena. On 6/11/14, 11:56 AM, "Ritu Sabharwal" wrote: >Thanks Chiradeep! Please see my

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.4

a >case by case basis, in my opinion. Agree, especially at this stage of the release. > >On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> I guess its time to define what qualifies to be called a blocker bug. Is >> blocker something that: >> >> 1)

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.4

I guess its time to define what qualifies to be called a blocker bug. Is blocker something that: 1) happens on all the setups? 2) blocks core features from executing Because I think that the bug happening on KVM only (lets say the vms fail to start = core feature), can be considered as a blocker

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.4

ready >deleted? > >Thanks >-min > > > >On 6/11/14 10:58 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" >wrote: > >>CLOUDSTACK-6825 happens while doing object access check in >>ParamProcessWorker. Min/Prachi, can you take a look to see if its related >>to RBAC feature? &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.4

CLOUDSTACK-6825 happens while doing object access check in ParamProcessWorker. Min/Prachi, can you take a look to see if its related to RBAC feature? -Alena. On 6/11/14, 10:45 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" wrote: >Hi, > >AFAIK a couple of Automation blockers [1] [2], which had no owner >assigned, were m

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.4

On 6/11/14, 9:36 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Yeah, I am concerned about 4.4 getting farther behind schedule, as well, >but I agree with David that we should not cancel it. > >I know it might be a pain, but I wonder if the RM would be willing to >"nag" >people every few days (just an e-mail to de

Re: [ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6585

Yes. On 6/6/14, 12:57 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >did you mean 9e2db2f2210904752eea2f3abf87b16bb3080384? > >On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Daan Hoogland >wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Alena Prokharchyk >> wrote: >>> e4fc5d88427456b9f9b8

[ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6585

Daan, Can you cherry-pick the commit below, to 4.4? Somehow missed to include it to the original commit for the CLOUDSTACK-6585 commit e4fc5d88427456b9f9b8d37b49a4406db8c886c1 Author: Alena Prokharchyk Date: Fri Jun 6 10:39:24 2014 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-6585: added missing db upgrade

Re: [ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6676 and CLOUDSTACK-6853

And one more – fixing the unit test (sorry for that) commit 96bfa8a73f0054db42beaff6a8ba3af058d3d915 Author: Alena Prokharchyk Date: Thu Jun 5 18:20:33 2014 -0700 Fixed unittest -Alena. From: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Date: Thursday, June 5, 2014 a

[ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6676 and CLOUDSTACK-6853

Daan, can you please cherry-pick the commits below to 4.4 branch? Thank you! commit 66df43572e1a12ad2bd32f8c0aa9acaeb271828e Author: Alena Prokharchyk Date: Thu Jun 5 17:26:01 2014 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-6676: cleanup ip address details on ip disassoc commit

Re: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail

te because new generic parameters are added to the code, then anybody should add these parameters. Otherwise any time someone adds a new parameter to the code, it will be considered that I need to fix the worker, which could happen plenty of times in the future :-) Please let me

Re: Control event publishing in multi region setups

local region >uuid >because all resources are sure to be created in the local region, which is >#4. > >Thanks >Alex Ough > > >On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Alex, one more bullet is need

Re: Control event publishing in multi region setups

...@sungardas.com>> Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 at 5:28 AM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: Alex Huang mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com>>, Murali Reddy mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com>>, Kishan Kavala mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com>>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer

Congratulations, Amogh! Well done. -Alena. On 6/2/14, 11:14 AM, "John Kinsella" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has >asked Amogh Vasekar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce >that he has accepted. > >Being a committer allows many contributors

Re: Control event publishing in multi region setups

Yes, I’m back. Please check with Alex Huang what time he can be on the call with you. I can join any time today/tomorrow. -Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Monday, June 2, 2014 at 9:49 AM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc

Re: stopped getting mails from apache user list and dev list

into TO list. From: David Nalley mailto:david.nal...@citrix.com>> Date: Thursday, May 8, 2014 at 9:53 AM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Subject: Re: stopped getting mails from apache user list and dev list https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/mail_outa

commit 99b4cf788eded0f6f155ff8cda51aeb2e505f764 changes old db upgrade files

Bharat/Kishan, I’ve looked at the commit 99b4cf788eded0f6f155ff8cda51aeb2e505f764, and noticed that you modify old upgrade files - 420to421 - as a part of the commit? That’s not a recom

Re: Control event publishing in multi region setups

Alex, I’m on vacation tomorrow; leaving today at 2 pm. Thanks, Alena. From: Alex Ough mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com>> Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 1:18 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Cc: Alex Huang mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com>&

[ACS44] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-6601

Daan, can you please cherry-pick the request below: commit cadefb1aeb2e1d973c9dcf38e7f793adc50599d6 Author: Alena Prokharchyk Date: Wed May 7 16:57:10 2014 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-6601: added "forDisplay" parameter to listLoadBalancerRules API Thank you! -Alena.

  1   2   3   4   5   >