---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30866/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30865/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82
My finding thus far - not a blocker, could be classified as known
issues, but should consider fixing:
My environment:
OEL 6.3
CloudStack 4.3.2
vSphere 5.5 and ESXi5.5
Issues noticed:
-
CloudStack MS complains:
2015-02-11 00:55:58,545 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.Script] (main:null) Executing:
s
Hi,
Are there any one meet this issue? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Star Guo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Star Guo (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
发送时间: 2015年2月10日 20:45
收件人: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org
主题: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-8237) add nic with instance throw
java.lang.NullPointerExcept
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/74#issuecomment-73816188
Yes, this is good idea.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
CLOUDSTACK-8239 Has been created
Thanks
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Wido den Hollander"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 February, 2015 8:04:16 PM
> Subject: Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
Wido, sure will do!
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Wido den Hollander"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 February, 2015 8:04:16 PM
> Subject: Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> On 02/10/2015 08:15
I cant positively vote on this just yet, I've noticed that I have issues
with encryption/decryption of passwords..
-0, until i make further progress...
On 2/7/15 11:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi All,
I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote
Ok. I don't know what the expected behavior for XCP is (though I believe shared
storage for system VMs should work on XCP as well).
If you were using XenServer then the way it works is that depending on the
value (true/false) set for global config system.vm.use.local.storage, CS will
set the st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2015 08:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I was wondering what is the current support for implementing
> virtio-scsi support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by
> googling apart from it has been built into OpenSta
Hello guys,
I was wondering what is the current support for implementing virtio-scsi
support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by googling apart from it has
been built into OpenStack already.
The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing the
number of dev
Somesh Naidu,
I am using the 4.3.0 version.
I am using Xen hypervisor with XAPI (old XCP) packages over Debian 7.4
I did not understand what you mean with “in the system offerings” . The
primary storage of the clusters are NFS servers.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Somesh Naidu
wrote:
> R
GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/75
Feature/systemvm persistent config 4
Fixed:
ACL between tiers in the same VPC
VRRP router password generated by the management server
DHCP fixes
Fix state of isolated
Seem to be hitting CLOUDSTACK-7671 despite it previously being marked as
fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7671
Using the ShapeBlue centos7 testing RPMs with Xenserver 6.5. By the looks of
the jira issue, I'm not the only one. This is a bit of a blocker for me at
least as you
Rafael,
What version of CS are you using? I have a 4.3 and a 4.5 environment with
XS/VMware/KVM hypervisors and on all of them, the system VMs are being created
on shared primary storage.
Can you check what storage type is set in the system offerings?
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message---
Marcus, the parameter “system.vm.use.local.storage” was already set to
false. That parameter does not make any sense to me; it seems that it is
not used, at least for Xen.
Abhinandan Prateek, I did not configure it erroneously. I configured NFS
storage to store users VMs (primary storage), I am no
16 matches
Mail list logo