Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #121

See

[DISCUSSION] Changes to server.xml to support tomcat7

Hi all, I was using tomcat7 in my dev setup and on the latest master I am not able to start the management server due to the following class(es) which we used in "server-*.xm.in" is/are removed from tomcat7 onwards. 1. 2. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html) I do not see

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

Thanks, and enjoy the vacation :-) Amogh On 8/13/14 11:17 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >I do not know, Amogh. I do urge all of you to let it be merged by someone >you don't regularly meet on the work floor or in the bar around the >corner. >You can send a mail heading [ACS44] and cc to me if you

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

I do not know, Amogh. I do urge all of you to let it be merged by someone you don't regularly meet on the work floor or in the bar around the corner. You can send a mail heading [ACS44] and cc to me if you are not in a hurry. I expect to be on line not coming but next Wednesday (+/- a day). On W

Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

As an example, I will note that the GUI submits requests to the management server that it could - in theory - validate locally. However, the GUI is (rightly) intended in CloudStack to be a thin layer on top of the API. It purposefully avoids duplicating business logic that is run on the backend (e

Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

That's an interesting question you raise about failing fast. On the one hand, it's nice from a usability standpoint. On the other, it adds in additional business logic (the API layer would then have business logic that is duplicated on the XenServer side). On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Nitin

Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

I think there are 2 bugs here Api level - If shrinking is not allowed say in XS it should fail fast and say that strinking is not allowed in XS rather than going through the resource layer and trying the operation and getting the error from XS. Test case - I would modify the test case to expect suc

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

have a good vacation Daan, Will continue on testing 4.4.1 :) *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @Clou

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #120

See

RE: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

Thanks Marcus, John & Mike for all the information, FS at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Resize+Data+Volumes claims that XenServer can shrink data volumes. Can I edit it and remove that claim from FS? Kindly let me know, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- F

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

> On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and > > design doc on the wiki. > > > > Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any > > problem with using them but a

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #119

See

Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

If you're asking what I think, it would be RAW. The pool type would be CLVM, though. This is probably a better solution, as we likely want to grow the cases that the automated tests run. If we're testing KVM at all it is trivial to set up an LVM volume group as a storage pool to test against. O

Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

Hi, I'll put a condition around the block that does the shrinking only in the case of CLVM. Would the disk image type be "CLVM" instead of "qcow2"? Thanks, John > On 13 Aug 2014, at 20:39, "Mike Tutkowski" > wrote: > > This is how Marcus responded: > > Yes, this is true. Ideally other stor

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

Hi, Wondering who do we reach out to for hotfix* branch merge, if any. Have a nice vacation! Thanks, Amogh On 8/13/14 12:47 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > >On 13-Aug-2014, at 9:15 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> H all, >> >> I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4 branch). I am leaving for a two week >>

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

On 13-Aug-2014, at 9:15 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H all, > > I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4 branch). I am leaving for a two week > holiday with low connectivity on Saturday. Therefore I do not think I will > make/bake an RC soon and given the lack of volunteers lately, I suggest we > plan f

Re: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

This is how Marcus responded: Yes, this is true. Ideally other storage maintainers/drivers would implement it as well, but we only committed a test for shrinking clvm (over a year ago now). I'd like to keep the test itself to run regression against clvm, but since this test is being used now for s

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H all, > > I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4 branch). I am leaving for a two week > holiday with low connectivity on Saturday. Therefore I do not think I will > make/bake an RC soon and given the lack of volunteers lately, I suggest we > pl

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #118

See

[ACS44] 4.4.1 test and RC

H all, I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4 branch). I am leaving for a two week holiday with low connectivity on Saturday. Therefore I do not think I will make/bake an RC soon and given the lack of volunteers lately, I suggest we plan for the first week of September. -- Daan

Re: 4.4.1 tests

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Daan , please cherry-pick the fix from master to 4.4 if needed) ​seems reasonable, done​ -- Daan

RE: Regarding Shrinking of Volume

Marcus, May I know your response, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:37 PM To: Marcus Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Regarding Shrinking of Volume Hello Marcus, I see that

4.4.1 tests

Hi, I’m tested CloudStack 4.4 branch for the upcoming 4.4.1 target release, using KVM on Ubuntu (amd64). I’m sharing my observations before creating bugs for every issue that should be fixed. Observations: # Installation - cloudstack-cli does nothing (why do we have it here or should we add a

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #117

See

Dedicating a network to an account in Adv+Security Groups

Hi guys, I notice that in Adv zone one can dedicate a network to a single account, trying the same in Adv+SG fails miserably. Is there any work around for this? We have a customer willing to move into our deployment, but want to bring his own IPs as well. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant

Re: Interested in contribution

Thanks for your interest in CloudStack! Please refer to this page, as well: http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html It should help give you an idea regarding the process of submitting code to the project. We definitely like to work on CloudStack as a team (versus being super isolated and t

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 5:08 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #116

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #115

See

Re: Zones, Domains and Templates

That sounds right. The only thing I can think of is if you mark the templates as public they will be able to be seen across multiple domains. On 8/12/14, 2:10 AM, "Giri Prasad" wrote: >Thanks for your comments. > >I have the seen the documentation, talking of adding users and project >in

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

> On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and > > design doc on the wiki. > > > > Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any > > problem with using them but a

Re: Interested in contribution

thanks for replying sir i will surely take it seriously and will get back to you after reading this :) On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > have a look at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Development+101 > (and > don't take it all for granted) > > > On

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 2:43 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit

Re: Review Request 24648: CLOUDSTACK-7310 - don't try and shink a disk in the volume resize test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24648/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 2:22 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh E

Re: Interested in contribution

have a look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Development+101 (and don't take it all for granted) On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Parag Goyal wrote: > Hello, > I have experience of development in java of about three years. I want to > contribute to your organisation can

Interested in contribution

Hello, I have experience of development in java of about three years. I want to contribute to your organisation can you help in getting started ?

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #114

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3314

See

Review Request 24648: CLOUDSTACK-7310 - don't try and shink a disk in the volume resize test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24648/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUSTACK-7310 h

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

> On Aug. 13, 2014, 9:26 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Daniel, the patch is failing on current master. Please submit a > > git-formatted patch that would apply cleanly on master. Sorry about that, we were working on an outdated fork. Will produce a new patch file that applies on current mast

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3313

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-4770: In MacAddress skip macAddress when parsed value is 0x00 [girish] CLOUDSTACK-7284: Fixed regression issue in test_escalations_instances.py ---

Re: Review Request 24599: CLOUDSTACK-7284: Fixed test script related to expunge VM in test_add_remove_network.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24599/#review50453 --- Commit 5f893daa2cab381aef6ac59eeebe923373c4ea80 in cloudstack's bran

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #113

See

Review Request 24646: CLOUDSTACK-7337: Volume state remains in allocated after volume creation faliure from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7337 https:

Re: Review Request 24599: CLOUDSTACK-7284: Fixed test script related to expunge VM in test_add_remove_network.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24599/#review50449 --- Commit f6bde7b46bb09aa13cb35049716bd7e1fc5b7774 in cloudstack's bran

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #112

See

Re: Review Request 24643: CLOUDSTACK-7330: fixed ListNetworks issue in test_portable_ip.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24643/#review50448 --- Commit b7c4259d9750cffe0cd0796b1434b39bff185b4d in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 24644: CLOUDSTACK-7329: Fixed issues in test_region_vpc.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24644/#review50446 --- Commit 525ee4a4aada2aa90bf53b301151f20111788e65 in cloudstack's bran

Review Request 24645: Disabling failed test cases.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24645/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Repository: cloudstack-git

Versions on Jira and web

Hello, I'm not sure who has the power to change this, but in the Apache Jira the versions for the CLOUDSTACK project are a bit out of sync with reality - we currently incorrectly list the following as unreleased: 4.1.1 4.2.1 4.3.0 4.4.0 Also, on the downloads page (http://cloudstack.apache.org/

Review Request 24644: CLOUDSTACK-7329: Fixed issues in test_region_vpc.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24644/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7329

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Hi Daan, On 13-Aug-2014, at 12:34 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > If this fixes the CLVM issue in KVM environments, I want it in 4.4. Not related to CLVM directly, just template/url stuff. > > Rohit, can you expand on this? Not a major bugfix, can be even viewed as a feature to support pre-signed

Review Request 24643: CLOUDSTACK-7330: fixed ListNetworks issue in test_portable_ip.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24643/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7330

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/#review50443 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On Aug. 13, 2014, 10:44 a.

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

> On Aug. 13, 2014, 10:43 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py, line 158 > > > > > > This check is not required right? As well, i just pushed a similar > > change to master

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:44 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/#review50441 --- test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #111

See

Re: Review Request 24642: List vGPU host details and add non GPU host to GPU hosts cluster

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24642/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark a

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh

Review Request 24642: List vGPU host details and add non GPU host to GPU hosts cluster

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24642/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark and Sanjay Tripathi. Repository: clou

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

If this fixes the CLVM issue in KVM environments, I want it in 4.4. Rohit, can you expand on this? On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Completely remove the checkFormat() will cause trouble for debugging > issues later if the template format is wrong. I would prefer fail fast > a

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17120/ --- (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:31 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/#review50440 --- Patch failed to apply on master. error: patch failed: test/integrati

Re: Should we remove all the -forward branches?

On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hey, > > On 13-Aug-2014, at 5:12 am, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rohit Yadav >> wrote: >>> I remember we agreed to not use the -forward branches, so can we get rid of >>> them please? >>> >>> I was reviewing s

Re: Review Request 24557: CLOUDSTACK-7308 - Adds tagging support for security group rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/#review50438 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Stephen Hoogendijk On Aug. 12, 2014, 2:39 p.

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #110

See

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/#review50437 --- Hi Daniel, the patch is failing on current master. Please submit a

Re: Should we remove all the -forward branches?

4.4-forward should be removed. I have let it be as for a cooldown period. It has conflicts with 4.4 and I want to have a branch per fix/backport to merge. Leo's advice was to merge them as --no-ff. I haven't which has resulted in no merge commits in some cases. For single commits this is allright.

Re: Review Request 24238: Fix mvn marvin.sync profile

> On Aug. 4, 2014, 4:35 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/setup.py, line 35 > > > > > > Please tying like this to as a dependency on pom.xml, may unnecessarily > > lead to tight coupling with mvn logic in

Re: Review Request 24544: CLOUDSTACK-7294: Passing listall =True for listUsers api admin call

> On Aug. 13, 2014, 8:13 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py, line 348 > > > > > > Make listall as keyword argument, instead of always making it to set to > > true. > > Gaur

Re: Review Request 24544: CLOUDSTACK-7294: Passing listall =True for listUsers api admin call

> On Aug. 13, 2014, 1:43 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py, line 348 > > > > > > Make listall as keyword argument, instead of always making it to set to > > true. Are you

Re: Should we remove all the -forward branches?

Hey, On 13-Aug-2014, at 5:12 am, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: >> I remember we agreed to not use the -forward branches, so can we get rid of >> them please? >> >> I was reviewing someone’s patch and they had targeted that for >> 4.3.0-forward, t

Re: [SHOW] Authentication refactoring

Hi David, On 13-Aug-2014, at 5:10 am, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: >> Hi Min, >> >> For for master, we don’t have any code freeze currently, I think merge >> request/reviews are not mandatory and I was confident with the changes so I >> pushed i

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #109

See

Re: Review Request 24544: CLOUDSTACK-7294: Passing listall =True for listUsers api admin call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/#review50430 --- tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py

Review Request 24637: CLOUDSTACK-7331: Fixed VPC deletion issue in test_persistent_networks.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24637/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7331

Re: Should we remove all the -forward branches?

On Aug 12, 2014, at 11:12 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: >> I remember we agreed to not use the -forward branches, so can we get rid of >> them please? >> >> I was reviewing someone’s patch and they had targeted that for >> 4.3.0-forward, tho

Re: [SHOW] Authentication refactoring

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:10 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Code freeze means that we discuss every commit, and only critical or > blocker bug fixes make it in. Which in practice means: RM reviews quickly and cherry-picks/merges it. -- Daan

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #108

See