-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/#review50430
-----------------------------------------------------------



tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/#comment88210>

    Make listall as keyword argument, instead of always making it to set to 
true.


- Santhosh Edukulla


On Aug. 11, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 11, 2014, 10:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark and Santhosh Edukulla.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7294
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7294
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> According to API changes 
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/List*+API+commands+rules),
>  listall parameter is necessary when admin wants to list the resources which 
> belong to some other account.
> 
> Adding domainid and listall parameter while making listUsers api call through 
> admin.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py 1ca79ee 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Tested two failing test cases with this change.
> 
> Test Deploy VM with 4 core CPU & verify the usage ... === TestName: 
> test_01_multiple_core_vm_start_stop_instance | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 627.195s
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> @summary: Test List IP Addresses pagination ... === TestName: 
> test_01_list_ipaddresses_pagination | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 32.022s
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Reply via email to