Re: Review Request 19039: CLOUDSTACK-2266: Adding automation tests for IP reservation feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19039/#review38068 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On March 20, 2014, 5:31 p.

Review Request 19521: CLOUDSTACK-6267: Unblock SMB as Zone wide primary storage for hyperv

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19521/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Rajesh Battala, and Sateesh Chodap

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review38055 --- Looks good for the most part, however due to the major changes in L

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review38053 --- engine/orchestration/pom.xml

RE: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

HI Daan, I have tested console proxy with new changes in 4.3 and didn't noticed this below mentioned problem(tested with xenserver) Upload SSL certificate(UI/API) :Pass CPVM-Console view--> IN HTTP Mode(default) --Pass HTTPs mode(with wild card)-Pass SSVM(with new domain name): Download templ

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

url: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Feature/GZIP_Compression#Static_Content On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:19 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > Laszlo, can you reference any other open source projects that have > similar solutions to this issue? Anything I've read states dynamic > compression in tomcat/h

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

Hi John, Jetty gives this functionality by default without a filter/servlet, simply it is not available in tomcat. I used this functionality a lot in jetty and that plus the massive size of the UI gave me the idea. My approach to the problem was motivated by that I don't like to see anything waste

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

So originally 'concepts' appeared in almost every document. I didn't personally like that, so it's now in the root docs repo: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/concepts.html That may not be the right location, but duplication of content didn't seem appropriate anymore. --David On Thu,

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

I've update pretty much all internal links in the admin guide, although I haven't found following sections: - section #2 Cloud Infrastructure concept is missing ? - appendixes Should I copy the old appendix in the admin guide ? Thanks, Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Soluti

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/3 fixed internal links, tables, CLOUDSTACK-5954 Fixed internal links, forgotten tables and update-ssl.png file : CLOUDSTACK-5954 add default OS in .gitignore file. ```

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) - CLOUDSTACK-6266 Missing "Accounts" menu text as well as the entire menu itself

Tanner, I attached two screenshots to this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/CLOUDSTACK-6266 Jessica -Original Message- From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 5:04 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; arkan...@gmail

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) - CLOUDSTACK-6266 Missing "Accounts" menu text as well as the entire menu itself

Tanner, I just got latest code from 4.3 branch and do not see this issue. "Accounts" menu is not missing. Could you please clear your browser cache and try again? Jessica -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Can you clear up browser cache and try again? > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:54 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Jessica Wang > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) > > That's weird but I do not see the issue

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

That's weird but I do not see the issue in my setup. Copying jessicaW > -Original Message- > From: Tanner Danzey [mailto:arkan...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:40 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) > > -1 see http

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Thanks for reverting on master, too - I was just in the process of doing that. :) On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > OK - thanks! I'll look into those tests now. > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Min Chen wrote: > >> To revert a commit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

-1 see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6266 (If it is something easily fixed I will happily rescind my -1) On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Edison Su wrote: > +1(binding) After fixed the serious bugs in security group in the last > round. > > > -Original Message- > > Fr

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

OK - thanks! I'll look into those tests now. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Min Chen wrote: > To revert a commit, you can just do: > git revert > git commit > > Thanks > -min > > From: Mike Tutkowski > Date: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:37 PM > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" > Cc: Min

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

To revert a commit, you can just do: git revert git commit Thanks -min From: Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> Date: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:37 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Cc: Min Chen mailto:min.

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

I have reverted it on 4.4. To revert a commit, you can just do: git revert git commit Thanks -min On 3/20/14 4:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >For example, I can't seem to force the branch back to a previous commit. > > >On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski < >mike.tutkow...@soli

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

It looks like you just literally changed the code (as opposed to force removed the commit). Is that accurate? On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Min, > > Thanks a lot!!! > (The testing failure is also blocking me) > > Jessica > > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [m

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Thanks, Min! I remembered it incorrect. I was under the impression those tests were failing before my code was changed. Can you tell me how to revert on the remote repo just for future reference? On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Min Chen wrote: > I am reverting it for you now along with my an

RE: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Min, Thanks a lot!!! (The testing failure is also blocking me) Jessica -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:31 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people? I am reverting it for you

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

I am reverting it for you now along with my another fix to be checked in. Thanks -min On 3/20/14 4:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >For example, I can't seem to force the branch back to a previous commit. > > >On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski < >mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

For example, I can't seem to force the branch back to a previous commit. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hey Min, > > What is our standard way of reverting a commit? > > I have ways of doing this locally, but have never done it on a remote

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Hey Min, What is our standard way of reverting a commit? I have ways of doing this locally, but have never done it on a remote repo. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Sure, I'll look into that. Thanks > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Sure, I'll look into that. Thanks On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Mike, with your latest commit 7a7d9cff0d5bb40284506faa6e34138f97a12428 on > 4.4, test failed in cloud-server: > > Tests in error: > testRestoreVMF2(com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerTest) > testRestoreVMF3(com.clou

Re: [ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Mike, with your latest commit 7a7d9cff0d5bb40284506faa6e34138f97a12428 on 4.4, test failed in cloud-server: Tests in error: testRestoreVMF2(com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerTest) testRestoreVMF3(com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerTest) testRestoreVMF4(com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerTest) testRestoreVMF5(com.c

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #27

See Changes: [mike.tutkowski] CLOUDSTACK-6170 -- [...truncated 1326 lines...] [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cl

[ACS4.4] Are tests still failing for people?

Hi, I think there was a discussion earlier about this, but I was wondering if others were seeing test failures in 4.4 when running mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install? I have to add -D skipTests=true to get the build to finish. Thanks, -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, Soli

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

I also tried on XS setup and default case seems to be as expected. the console url is :: VM-1f2d2061-07ca-4867-9f12-edc7b845247chttp://10.223.247.3/ajax?token=P3yRFP_NZaXFv0KoRrKD6U9Riz0Cp0-0mgeGCj7 hCD5BpKSBc9pKMl53c-1zjaKyk-NsJt4qh0L82PqTOmF6ahCdNE5TJytveKZPvO5Th2NI48beO9 0uIKD0y7zTwv1x4ONdCnke

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

Laszlo, can you reference any other open source projects that have similar solutions to this issue? Anything I’ve read states dynamic compression in tomcat/httpd/nginx does not add significant CPU overhead. On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Laszlo Hornyak mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

Tried with a VPC on KVM and the console access went fine. I had initially tested console access for all three different scenarios : 1. HTTP 2. HTTPS with realhostip domain 3. HTTPS with custom domain The URL you see in the browser is for the MS, the console URL can be seen in the log. I am not su

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Right...that would be great, as well. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Also: > > (3) Change Reinstall icon to use a 'recycle' symbol, to avoid confusion w/ > reboot VM > > > > > > > > *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 20

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

Also: (3) Change Reinstall icon to use a 'recycle' symbol, to avoid confusion w/ reboot VM From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:43 PM To: Jessica Wang Cc: Brian Federle; n...@li.nux.ro; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Harikrishna Patnala; Alena

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Works for me. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > So, we'll change UI to: > > (1) Label the action icon that fires recoverVirtualMachine API as > "Recover". > Label the action icon that fires restoreVirtualMachine API as > "Reinstall". > > (2) change text in confir

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

So, we'll change UI to: (1) Label the action icon that fires recoverVirtualMachine API as "Recover". Label the action icon that fires restoreVirtualMachine API as "Reinstall". (2) change text in confirmation dialog of Reinstall action as: "The VM will be reinstalled from template, all curr

[REQUEST] Using prefixes for ML discussions

Hi, We have been using release tags as prefixes i.e ACS43, ACS44 etc for mailing list discussions. These days these prefixes are missing for some of the discussions. If community can use those prefixes, it would be very helpful to follow relevant discussions. Thanks /Sudha

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

+1(binding) After fixed the serious bugs in security group in the last round. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:06 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth rou

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Yet I see https in the url after a db clean and rebuild and reinstall of a vpc with tier and guest vm. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:25 AM >>

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

On 20.03.2014 20:54, Mike Tutkowski wrote: The only technicality is that data on data disks won't be lost (just the root disk). Yes, that is true, we can add something like: "Extra data volumes, if any, will not be touched." HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux!

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

Yes, "Reinstall VM" sounds clearer. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:54 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resetting a VM is broken? I also like Reinstall VM for the text (even if it doesn't match t

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

+1 -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:53 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Resetting a VM is broken? That sounds great. Let's go with your text. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nux! wrote:

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

The only technicality is that data on data disks won't be lost (just the root disk). On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I also like Reinstall VM for the text (even if it doesn't match the API's > name). > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:53 PM,

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

I also like Reinstall VM for the text (even if it doesn't match the API's name). On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > That sounds great. Let's go with your text. Thanks! > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nux! wrote: > >> On 20.03.2014 19:

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

That sounds great. Let's go with your text. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 20.03.2014 19:35, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > >> This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, >> the >> current root disk will be destroyed and un-recoverable. >> >> Jus

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

On 20.03.2014 19:35, Mike Tutkowski wrote: This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, the current root disk will be destroyed and un-recoverable. Just curious, Lucian - what is your recommended text? Your text is great, but it sounds like from a dev to a dev. I'

RE: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

> -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 9:50 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9 > > meaning the console of the ssvm? or the cpvm? > > I just confirmed myself that there is indeed a diff between 4.2.1 a

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:25 AM > To: dev > Cc: Amogh Vasekar; Suresh Sadhu > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote:

Re: Errors building master

never mind, chris did it On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Alex Hitchins > wrote: >> VolumeServiceImpl.java > > > which one is that? > > > -- > Daan -- Daan

Re: Errors building master

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > VolumeServiceImpl.java which one is that? -- Daan

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

Amogh, I am running the ms on windows but I did build a 4.3 systemvm on a differnt machine and copied it to the hypervisors. port 80 can go to the hypervisor which says that it does not have the page /console On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Amogh Vasekar wrote: > Hi, > > Tried on XenServer set-u

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- (Updated March 20, 2014, 7:53 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federl

Re: Commit Revert Request

I have reverted the commits on 4.4 and master. Sorry about that, everyone. I thought I recompiled after applying the patch but I must have missed a step… -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Mar

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, the current root disk will be destroyed and un-recoverable. Just curious, Lucian - what is your recommended text? Thanks On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 20.03.2014 19:21, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > >> Pers

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

On 20.03.2014 19:21, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Personally I prefer something more along these lines: This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, the current root disk will be destroyed. I'm fine with either, I already know what it does. It depends how much you want

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Great - thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > OK, sounds good :) > On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > > Personally I prefer something more along these lines: > > > > This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, > > the

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

OK, sounds good :) On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Personally I prefer something more along these lines: > > This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, > the current root disk will be destroyed. > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Brian F

Commit Revert Request

All, Can someone with committer permission please revert this commit? 9a615ee7b26547f0c439faf04e5fbf91dc2cbeb1 It's causing the master branch to fail on build. I attempted to upload a patch to revert however the review board said the file didn't exist (which confused me). I'll go back to my o

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Personally I prefer something more along these lines: This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. After this action, the current root disk will be destroyed. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > I was just using what was suggested earlier in the thread (I'm not real

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

I was just using what was suggested earlier in the thread (I’m not really familiar with the feature); if that is incorrect then I can change it to say, “Warning: this action is irreversible. If you continue you may lose data. Please confirm that you would like to proceed.” -Brian On Mar 20, 20

RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS > > On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > > And it just went upstream! How great is t

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

On 20.03.2014 18:55, Brian Federle wrote: Those suggestions sound good. Here are the changes I will make in the UI: - Change icon to use a ‘recycle’ symbol, to avoid confusion w/ reboot VM - Rename action(s) to reflect the name of the API calls. - Update the confirm dialog to say, “This actio

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Quick question: The current root disk will be attached to the VM. I interpret that statement (along with the line before it) to mean the old root disk is replaced by a new root disk and the old root disk will be attached to the VM as a data disk, which is not the behavior. The behavior I see coul

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Perfect On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > Those suggestions sound good. Here are the changes I will make in the UI: > > - Change icon to use a 'recycle' symbol, to avoid confusion w/ reboot VM > - Rename action(s) to reflect the name of the API calls. > - Update the confir

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Those suggestions sound good. Here are the changes I will make in the UI: - Change icon to use a ‘recycle’ symbol, to avoid confusion w/ reboot VM - Rename action(s) to reflect the name of the API calls. - Update the confirm dialog to say, “This action will restore the VM to a fresh root disk. Af

Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS

On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote: And it just went upstream! How great is that? Pretty great. That's how open source works. :) Quick question: there is no problem if instead of using NFS directly we use the "shared mount point" option, is it? Probably not, since we would t

Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS

On 03/20/2014 05:38 PM, Nux! wrote: On 19.03.2014 22:48, Edison Su wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:34 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su wr

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

I think with the addition of detailed confirmation info that that is a good solution. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > And also provide detailed info in confirmation dialog when clicking the > icon that fires restoreVirtualMachine API. > > e.g. "This action will r

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

Hi, Tried on XenServer set-up, and the defaults work fine for me. The console URL for me : 2014-03-20 18:43:08,558 DEBUG [c.c.s.ConsoleProxyServlet] (24565443@qtp-27436568-8:null) Compose console url: http://192.168.56.139/ajax?token=tVsokSDt2PUASaa77NN_qBAZFJsma76qRT5Y1OLQFW 1zl82-vizkq36Fii1yLNv

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

And also provide detailed info in confirmation dialog when clicking the icon that fires restoreVirtualMachine API. e.g. "This action will restore the VM to a fresh new root disk. After this action, the current root disk wll be destroyed and a new root disk will be attached to the VM." Harikri

Re: cloudstack talent

Normally I'm looking to hire, but its also nice to survey the opportunities out there. On Mar 20, 2014 9:06 AM, "ilya musayev" wrote: > Marcus, > > Not the best place, but CloudStack LinkedIn group has job posting section. > > btw, are you looking for a change or need to hire? > > Thanks > ilya

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Sorry i missed this email, will update later tonight. Actually doing more work with ACS 4.3 - so test cases are growing. On 3/20/14, 12:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: again I am seriously considering -1 (binding) and (sigh) and. Is there any doc I missed on getting the console proxy working in 4.3

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

How about we just match text with API name? i. Label the icon that fires recoverVirtualMachine API as "Recover". ii. Label the icon that fires restoreVirtualMachine API as "Restore". From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:29 AM To: Jessica Wa

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

OK, thanks for the history there. What about the text we're using? Are we OK with Reset VM, for example? Thanks! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Mike, > > > > Right. > > > > The history is recoverVirtualMachine API was created several years ago, > restoreVirtualMachine

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

Mike, Right. The history is recoverVirtualMachine API was created several years ago, restoreVirtualMachine didn't exist yet at that time. So, the icon that fires recoverVirtualMachine API was labeled as "Restore" at that time. restoreVirtualMachine API came along several years later. Then, sin

RE: Errors building master

Hugo/Daan, Could you roll back the commit related to the 'VolumeServiceImpl.java' file commit. I'm working on a fix however the build is now no longer working so I need to resolve that issue first. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hit

RE: Errors building master

Ah, yes - that's related to my last patch. I'll log it and raise a new request. Sorry everyone. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #25

See Changes: [chris.suich] Issue CS-5825 Part Resolution -- [...truncated 1589 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloudstack-service

Re: Review Request 19463: UI: Applied localization function to labels on Zone Chart page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19463/#review37920 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On March 20, 2014, 2:11 p.m.,

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

> [Mike Tutkowski] Unless I'm reading this incorrectly, it looks like > label.action.restore.instance (Restore Instance) maps to > recoverVirtualMachine > and > label.resetVM (Reset VM) maps to restoreVirtualMachine Yes, this is confusing. I'll file an UI bug to match icon label with API

Re: Errors building master

Hi Alex, It should be OK if you recompile, the required module is in the module tree. Btw I am getting a compile error: engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeServiceImpl.java:[1502,12] error: unreported exception ResourceAllocationException; must be caught or declare

RE: Resetting a VM is broken?

Perhaps a recycle icon would be better? To me it makes more sense. I do like the idea of making sure via dialogs that the user knows what they are doing. Perhaps configurable so for private clouds where sysadmins know their stuff they don't get prompted. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Thanks, Jessica The even weirder part, though, is that the text Restore maps to the recoverVirtualMachine API and the text Reset VM maps to the restoreVirtualMachine. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Jessica Wang wrote: > > [Mike Tutkowski] Unless I'm reading this incorrectly, it looks like >

Re: Review Request 18964: Windowsfication of CloudStack Management Server - Changes to support windows OS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/ --- (Updated March 20, 2014, 5:47 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

I don't really have an opinion regarding icons, but maybe another idea here would be to provide a detailed explanation in the confirmation dialog of what's about to happen since it could lead to data loss (unless you follow John's solution of the management server having to be stopped, which seems

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

+1 Marco Sinhoreli Consultant Manager Phone: +55 21 2586 6390 | Fax: +55 21 2586 6002 | Mobile: +55 21 98276 3636 Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil - CEP 22250-040 marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com| www.shapeblue.com

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

please note that 10.200.23.42 is a xenhost hosting the consoleproxy and 195.66.90.213 is the cpvm the ms is localhost with ui on port 8080 On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > btw > > the last lines: > > 2014-03-20 13:57:09,858 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] > (1372260265@qtp-16769214

Re: 4.4 and master failing due to missing license header

as long as nothing in git is in it, no On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:17 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Maybe I should add **/target-eclipse/** to the list of excludes for the > license checking? Anyone have an objection? > > -Chris > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.com > NetApp Software Eng

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

please see the thread 'concole proxy in 4.3RC9' about this On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> should work > > > You mean 'should work" after default installation, Animesh? > consoleproxy.url.domain is empty. > >

Re: Review Request 19039: CLOUDSTACK-2266: Adding automation tests for IP reservation feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19039/ --- (Updated March 20, 2014, 5:31 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edu

Re: Review Request 19039: CLOUDSTACK-2266: Adding automation tests for IP reservation feature

> On March 18, 2014, 6:57 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_ip_reservation.py, line 258 > > > > > > Move this to a utility function i believe. Also, do we have a class in > > base.py f

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

>> the Reset Vm option is presented as a button unlike the icons I think this was because all the other icons we tried to represent this with were too confusing to users — they were clicking on 'reset VM' thinking it was ‘reboot VM’ — then as a last minute fix the decision was to just to show a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > should work You mean 'should work" after default installation, Animesh? consoleproxy.url.domain is empty. thanks, -- Daan

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

It should work and has been tested, adding Amogh and Sadhu > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 10:19 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) > > Thanks Ove, > > It looks like the inf

Re: Resetting a VM is broken?

Thanks, John I am mainly curious about this use case because of work I did on 4.4 to support root disks for managed storage (just on XenServer for 4.4.). It appears I need to make a small tweak to 4.4 code in the managed-storage area for this cleanup to completely work (the SR that was auto creat

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Thanks Ove, It looks like the info I want. I will give it a try. (almost hitting myself) On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > On 03/20/2014 05:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> again I am seriously considering -1 (binding) and (sigh) and. Is there >> any doc I missed on getting

Re: 4.4 and master failing due to missing license header

Maybe I should add **/target-eclipse/** to the list of excludes for the license checking? Anyone have an objection? -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Mar 20, 2014, at 1:08 PM, SuichII, Christo

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

btw the last lines: 2014-03-20 13:57:09,858 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (1372260265@qtp-1676921458-10:null) Seq 1-762183775: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 24062491136, via: 1(mccdxen2), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.GetVncPortCommand":{"id":5,"name":"i-2-5-VM","wait":0}}] } 2014-03-20 13:

Re: 4.4 and master failing due to missing license header

I tried running the command with -X. There is quite a bit of output, but this is what I was able to find: ... [WARNING] Missing header in: /Users/csuich/CloudStack/cloudstack/utils/target-eclipse/test-classes/com/cloud/utils/db/transactionContextBuilderTest.xml ... [WARNING] Missing header in:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

On 03/20/2014 05:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: again I am seriously considering -1 (binding) and (sigh) and. Is there any doc I missed on getting the console proxy working in 4.3, that will make me hit me on the head and retract this thread? A pointer to this will fit nicely in the 4.3 release no

  1   2   >