Re: Disks in ACS Vmware

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > Thanks for the reply Erik. > > So sd[a-z] are the disks which will be added if default Centos template is > used ? > > sd[a-z] is the standard naming convention for scsi disk in Linux as far as I know. Vmware emulates a regular scsi contr

Re: Disks in ACS Vmware

Thanks for the reply Erik. So sd[a-z] are the disks which will be added if default Centos template is used ? Regards, Girish On 31-Jan-2014, at 1:48 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In ACS KVM the volumes attached are seen as

RE: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Tejas, You have hcloud\primary, it should be hcloud/primary Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 February 2014 05:16 To: us.

AWS EC2 Compatibility Interface

Hi Guys, Question for you about the authentication of users using the EC2 REST Servlet exposed by the AWSAPI. >From what I understand, an EC2 REST client will make a request to the servlet with their Cloudstack API key, a HMAC Signature for the EC2 request and other parameters such as the action,

Re: Review Request 17533: Added changes as per CLOUDSTACK-6006

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17533/#review33567 --- Ship it! Committed to marvin branch - Girish Shilamkar On Feb. 3

Re: Review Request 17533: Added changes as per CLOUDSTACK-6006

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17533/#review33568 --- Ship it! Committed to marvin branch - Girish Shilamkar On Feb. 3

Re: Review Request 17533: Added changes as per CLOUDSTACK-6006

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17533/#review33566 --- Commit bf72441d13845a1de92c2976e3b535634bfae740 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 17535: Added few fixes for CLOUDSTACK-5973

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17535/#review33564 --- Commit a908b8d94b3af207f4556d7d1271758c38ece3f4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 17535: Added few fixes for CLOUDSTACK-5973

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17535/#review33565 --- Ship it! Pushed to marvin branch - Girish Shilamkar On Jan. 30,

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

Daan, I have been busy with few other things. Will need to get back to this and update, hopefully before EoW. Thanks, Mandar On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:03 PM, daan Hoogland wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To

Re: Cloudstack deployment

Additionally you should probably be using this system template: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Check out section 4.5.3.3: > > > https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_Clou

Re: Cloudstack deployment

Check out section 4.5.3.3: https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded a

Re: Cloudstack deployment

You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and place in /opt/cloud/bin.

Re: Cloudstack deployment

I'm using 4.3 with XenCenter I think this a better log WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-11:ctx-a36d48cf) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to there are 0 VDIs with name cloud-fc58a816-1e6c-4f6d-a594-ec86ce8814ff WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] (DirectAgent-11:ct

Re: Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM in master branch? => Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version

Ah, yes, of course - thanks, Nitin! On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > I am able to access it (try copy pasting the link rather than clicking it > since it gets wrapped). Pasting the text as well. > > ===

Re: Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM in master branch? => Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version

I am able to access it (try copy pasting the link rather than clicking it since it gets wrapped). Pasting the text as well. === === FYI, this happens when you accidentally install different vers

Re: Creating a CloudStack "SDK"

If there aren’t any -1s, I’ll look in to creating a maven profile for this later this week. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Feb 3, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > +1. I think

Re: Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM in master branch? => Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version

I can't access the link Nitin provided. :( I wonder if setting router.version.check to false would allow you to get this working, Jessica? On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Something similar was discussed before. Check the thread. > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/c

Re: Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM in master branch? => Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version

Something similar was discussed before. Check the thread. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201307.mbox/%3C9ADD e3f979256644bed8f0d244be51f004e...@lonpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E On 03/02/14 4:43 PM, "Jessica Wang" wrote: >Hi, > >Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM

Re: Contrail issues in current master

I fixed it and sent a review request. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17684/ - Suresh On 2/1/14 3:55 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey Contrail friends, > >I¹m noticing some issues with the contrail plugin in current master. > >When you startup CloudStack master with a fresh database it will die w

Review Request 17684: Do not initialize contrail plugin component functionality like db sync, network offerring creation when contrail is not installed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17684/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM in master branch? => Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/agent/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version 51.

Hi, Did anyone get this error in SecondaryStorageVM in master branch? == Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/cloud/age nt/AgentShell : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 at java.lang

Re: Cloudstack deployment

Are you working with 4.3? What hypervisor are the system VMs to be deployed on? On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote: > Hi guys, I'm trying to deploy cloudstack but it seems I have a problems > with system vm > > Could you explain me please what means this exception: > > INFO [

RE: API Documentation Job

Can you paste the errors/output you get? On 3 Feb 2014 22:13, "Alex Hitchins" wrote: > It still complains for me. I'll refresh myself tomorrow morning and see if > I get anywhere. > > One thing I haven't tried is checking out the 4.2.1 branch, I've been > doing it all on master. > > Thank you for

RE: [DISCUSS] api level access controll

Hi Anton and Dan, Yes these usecases can be satisfied with the IAM feature being developed (CLOUDSTACK-5920) Anton, For the customer care portal case - the steps will be to create a custom policy and choose the specifc APIs the accounts/group of accounts having this policy can invoke. For read

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:   Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3        Commit: 8f63c2cf9c463373d774cb563e63fc56828e1418   List of changes: New Features in 4.3: ht

RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack

I like the monkeyinside ones - very nice. Alex Hitchins T: +44 1892 523 587 M: +44 7788 423 969 From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com] Sent: 03 February 2014 22:08 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: market...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered b

Re: Review Request 17576: Detect & log unknown parameters for CS API and refactoring

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17576/ --- (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 10:48 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 16523: Unit tests for Juniper contrail VM Interface Model and Instance Ip Model class.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16523/ --- (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 10:15 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master

Sorry, I thought I had responded to you on this, but I just realized I hadn't. I tested all my functionality a couple days ago and everything is working so this issue is resolved. Thanks... On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Will > > I

RE: API Documentation Job

It still complains for me. I'll refresh myself tomorrow morning and see if I get anywhere. One thing I haven't tried is checking out the 4.2.1 branch, I've been doing it all on master. Thank you for trying Ian. I'm sure I'll get there soon. Alex Hitchins T: +44 1892 523 587 M: +44 7788 423 9

Re: API Documentation Job

Didn't come across any issues when trying to compile it. Did a usual full compile of mvn -Pdeveloper clean install Documentation was generated and placed into /tools/apidoc/target/apidoc.tar.bz2 http://people.apache.org/~duffy/apidocs/xmldoc/html/ The header reads 4.2.0 due to a hard coded value

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

On 2/3/14, 1:07 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >> After reviewing all the suggestions, we should probably do this in the >> future: >> >> 1) Introduce the call reserveCapacityForVirtualMachine. You can execute >> the call with "count" parameter to reserve the capacity for "n" vms w/o >> actually dep

Cloudstack deployment

Hi guys, I'm trying to deploy cloudstack but it seems I have a problems with system vm Could you explain me please what means this exception: INFO [c.c.s.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-c30d43c3) No running secondary storage vms found in datacenter id=1, starting one INFO

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

> After reviewing all the suggestions, we should probably do this in the > future: > > 1) Introduce the call reserveCapacityForVirtualMachine. You can execute > the call with "count" parameter to reserve the capacity for "n" vms w/o > actually deploying them on the backend(no actual volume creation

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Karl Harris wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Daan Hoogland > >wrote: >> >> > >> > On 03 Feb 2014, at 19:45, Karl Harris wrote: >> > >> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland < >> daan.hoogl

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Karl Harris wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Daan Hoogland >wrote: > > > > > On 03 Feb 2014, at 19:45, Karl Harris wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> On 03 Feb 2014,

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Karl Harris wrote: > After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial > configuration of the open network redundant routers and the > applicability of the existing bash scripts (cloud-early-config) to the > setup of VPC redundant routers have generated.

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On 03 Feb 2014, at 19:45, Karl Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland >wrote: > > > >> > >> On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris wrote: > >> > >>> After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial >

Run In memory event bus by default

I see that in memory event bus got checked in recently. I understand that its a plugin, but can we not start it by default ? It would help different components (for example - monitoring system, usage etc.) within CS to subscribe to events and take some useful action based on them if they could a

Re: cloudstack-agent on ubuntu

Hi Gaurav, Thanks for the pointer. It was indeed cloud-agent, instead of cloudstack-agent. Anirban On Feb 2, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > Hi Anirban, > > Are you sure you have used "apt-get install cloudstack-agent" and not > "apt-get install cloud-agent". I had encountered the

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On 03 Feb 2014, at 19:45, Karl Harris wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> >> On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris wrote: >> >>> After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial >>> configuration of the open network redundant routers and the >>> ap

Re: [DISCUSS] api level access controll

Have you seen this. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ypkTAg There was a recent thread on this ML as well. On 1/31/14 8:35 AM, "Anton Opgenoort" wrote: >+1 voted. > >Example use case: Our customer portal should actually be able to do a >'listclusters showcapacities=true', to inform our custo

Re: Creating a CloudStack "SDK"

+1. I think this is a good idea. On 1/31/14 7:27 AM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: >I¹m curious if there is any interest in creating a ³SDK² for developing >plugins in CloudStack. Right now, to develop my plugin, I need a >development environment set up in order to have the maven artifacts >requ

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris wrote: > > > After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial > > configuration of the open network redundant routers and the > > applicability of the existing bash scripts (cloud-early-con

BVT report on 4.3 branch

>On KVM(CentOS 6.3)Test Run: #1183, #1184 > >4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots and scaling VM are >not supported on KVM Hypervisor. 1 more failure is an intermittent test >script/env issue. > >Link to test reports: >http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudsta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

Thank you everyone for responding with your concerns and ideas. After analyzing all the input and talking to Alex, I would like to recall the original proposal as: 1) The call doesn't actually do any resource reservation, there is no guarantee that subsequent VM call wouldn't fail if executed some

RE: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

What's really needed is a reserve API. It would be a big undertaking though as that concept is not in any of the network and storage plugins. --alex > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 6:10 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris wrote: > After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial > configuration of the open network redundant routers and the > applicability of the existing bash scripts (cloud-early-config) to the > setup of VPC redundant routers have generated. > >

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial configuration of the open network redundant routers and the applicability of the existing bash scripts (cloud-early-config) to the setup of VPC redundant routers have generated. Some setup first: In the bash script cloud-early-config th

API Documentation Job

All, Has anyone recently been able to generate the API documentation, as described here? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+To+Generate+CloudStack+API+Documentation I've been trying without success. I know Paul Angus has also been having issues with this. I just wanted

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:09:44AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > 3. Most importantly deploying a single machine isn't interesting, and > why would I bother checking. (And this also brings up one of the > things I find lacking in the deployVM API call.) What I'd be > interested in knowing is whether

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

Hi Alena: I am not sure that I see a ton of value in this - and let me explain why: 1. This could potentially be an information disclosure issue - Could I potentially see how much storage or other resources are available. Does 2. At any scale things are going to potentially change rapidly, so a

CLOUDSTACK-5974 [Please pick up]

Hi, I have logged an issue related to persistent networks. Please pick up/assign if you can. Regards, Gaurav

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5406

Sanjay, On 2/3/2014, 2:02 AM, Sanjay Tripathi wrote: Francois, First can you check if there are disks waiting to expunge. If there are, then the primary storage count will get reduced once the disks gets expunged. When I go in the database, I do have couple volumes in the "Destroy" state, 2 o

Review Request 17658: Added Few changes for CLOUDSTACK-5980

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5980 h

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

Great idea.i supposed an api could return the remained resources, and then deciding which host,both storage and compute, to deploy vm. Koushik Das 于2014年2月3日星期一写道： > As I understand this is a best-effort approach. Even if the proposed API returns YES, deployment may still fail. I personally feel t

Review Board - Item 17531

Donal, Are you able to take a look at this? https://reviews.apache.org/r/17531/ Many thanks, Alex Hitchins -- E: a...@alexhitchins.com M: 07788 423 969

Re: [PROPOSAL] Introduce API returning you an answer from CloudStack storage/host allocators whethere there is enough resources for vm deployment

As I understand this is a best-effort approach. Even if the proposed API returns YES, deployment may still fail. I personally feel that it is better to improve the deployVM API itself to return accurate error message rather than having multiple API calls. If the deployvm call call fails, it will

Re: Review Request 17576: Detect & log unknown parameters for CS API and refactoring

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17576/ --- (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 10:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > you please do it on 4.3-forward and master as well. I'll do it on 4.3-forward and I'll be on all findbugs issues on master so it'll pass by automatically

Re: Review Request 17638: Rest client moved to utils. Nvp extended.

> On Feb. 2, 2014, 11:21 a.m., David Nalley wrote: > > pom.xml, line 181 > > > > > > Hardcoded repo url?? Please no :) Thanks David. I could mode it to my local settings, but then the build will fail for anybody who