RE: API documentation

Hi Paul, Yes, API documentation requires a serious revisit. I had initiated a discussion months back, and invited volunteers. A wiki page is created at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Documentation+Sprint+for+Enhancing+API+Documentation , but nothing beyond that. If you

Re: cloudstack presenting wrong used memory values

I should also point out that this is on CS 4.2.0. This issue may have been fixed since then. Marty On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: > What hypervisor are you using? > > My CS System Capacity on the dashboard shows *Memory 157.05 GB / 1.37 TB > *(which > works + overprovisi

Fwd: cloudstack presenting wrong used memory values

What hypervisor are you using? My CS System Capacity on the dashboard shows *Memory 157.05 GB / 1.37 TB *(which works + overprovisioning). I think this issue is slightly different to CLOUDSTACK-3048 as it should not effect VM allocation. I have never noticed about the memory used section: Memo

RE: Xen StorageMotion Fails

Yes, I am able to migrate a VM on local storage(host) to another local storage(host). Can you paste the API call you tried? Thanks, ~Talluri -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2014 6:31 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apach

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:57 PM, chris snow wrote: > >> I have started thinking about some options: >> >> 1) use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point >> 2) create devcloud3 from scratch >> 3) start with a

API documentation

DEVs, New features are generally cool, but given that the 'engine' of CloudStack is the API it seems ridiculous that as a minimum the API documentation isn't kept up to date. The specific example that I'm thinking of is addvmwaredc Only by using the UI and following the API calls sent could I

RE: Grunt Development

Yes - in time. I was going to let it be a separate optional step initially and if there is enough support include it in the maven build process. Alex Hitchins +44 7788 423 969 -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: 30 January 2014 05:36 To: dev@cloud

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

Hi guys, We started the procedures yesterday in order to cover UI, Nicira, Firewalling + Port forwarding and Database tests. The question is: if bugs are being fixed within the 72 hours window that we have, does it mean that we are going to extend the 72 hours? My point is: we now have to star

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Switched to Java 7

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 03:03:09PM +0100, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > I have some trouble getting into the rpmbuilders, so i can?t > configure those. I need root permissions for those boxes and i don?t > have that. > Hey Hugo - just saw this. I see the build failed in the last run but can't tell if i

Re: BVT report on 4.3 branch

This basically means a +1 on 4.3? I think there were couple of issues that emerged in the RC particularly the missing response params in the list* API that Alena reported. We should probably include a test for that in the integration suite. I would've done it had I had some bandwidth, but thought

Re: Grunt Development

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:43:58PM -, Alex Hitchins wrote: > > I'm currently working on a POC implementing Grunt for the build process. If > anyone has any comments/suggestions please let me know and I'll try to work > them into the version I'm working on. Initial goals are minify the > javasc

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

I see that the commit 9776e1af1c92486f5081b1ee8fa95cf0edb86b97 is already pushed to 4.3. I don’t see any response on my concern as well. Is it just me or anyone else sees a security issue with the generate password change? Ian/Animesh/Daan, can you please respond? Thanks, ~Rajani On 29-Jan-

Re: [4.3]Please cherry-pick the fix for CLOUDSTACK-5986

Sure will do Thanks Animesh On Jan 29, 2014, at 6:02 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: > Hi Animesh, > > Seems we need another RC, so I'd like to include this fix in the new build. > It's already in 4.3-forward branch. > > Thanks! > > commit 441d02dd402e632c3eba1062a55fc0d752e76003 > Author: Sheng Yan

[4.3]Please cherry-pick the fix for CLOUDSTACK-5986

Hi Animesh, Seems we need another RC, so I'd like to include this fix in the new build. It's already in 4.3-forward branch. Thanks! commit 441d02dd402e632c3eba1062a55fc0d752e76003 Author: Sheng Yang Date: Wed Jan 29 16:15:24 2014 -0800 CLOUDSTACK-5986: Make dnsmasq handle dnsmasq.leases

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

> On Jan. 24, 2014, 6:52 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and present in the > > patch. > > Please can you update the patch with changes needed for the fix only? > > > > Following are some such files. > > api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountServic

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #458

Kishan can you check the test failure on NetworkACLServiceTest. Animesh -Original Message- From: jenk...@cloudstack.org [mailto:jenk...@cloudstack.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:49 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #458

See Changes: [animesh] CLOUDSTACK-5970: UI > network menu > guest network section > select non-VPC isolated network with SourceNAT enabled > IP Address section > select sourceNAT IP > show Configuration tab. --

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

sorry didn't finish my last email - another late night... it would be great to see devcloud support centos/ubuntu. After getting the debian 7 based devcloud working with packer and vagrant I'll take a look in more detail at your repo to see what makes sense for the next steps. Many thanks, Chr

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

Ok pulling it into 4.3 From: Jessica Wang Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:50 PM To: Geoff Higginbottom Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi; Brian Federle; Sudha Ponnaganti; Sangeetha Hariharan Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewal

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

Thanks for the info Sebastien. I have made a bit more progress with: - fixing up the existing debian 7 veewee build [1] - converting the fixed debian 7 veewee build to packer [2] I'll focus on adding proper vagrant support over the next couple of days. --- [1] https://github.com/snowch/cloudst

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

Geoff, I fixed the bug yesterday in master branch. I just merged the fix to 4.3-forward branch: Branch: refs/heads/4.3-forward Commit: 1ad7bce69b764d3d833a8682ec5016bfbeea394c Parents: d38a503 Author: Jessica Wang mailto:jessicaw...@apache.org>> Authored: Wed Jan 29 15:40:14 2014 -0800 Com

RE: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

Daan This is from the recent commit that you cherry-picked into 4.3. These unintended consequences was my reason not to change so late. Anyhow please review Animesh -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:32

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

Hi Jessica. Yes, I can get as far as the Source NAT IP Address but then all I have is the Details Tab but no Configuration Tab. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

Geoff, > I am unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via > the UI, the interfaces no longer exist. Are you referring to the Configuration tab in IP Address detail page? It's under Guest Network section or VPC section? e.g. Network > Guest Network > IP Addresses > c

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

-1 I am unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist. I did create a Port Forwarding Rule via the API successfully to prove it's just a UI issue. VMs assigned to VPC's fail to deploy and are then deleted. I was unable to complet

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:57 PM, chris snow wrote: > I have started thinking about some options: > > 1) use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point > 2) create devcloud3 from scratch > 3) start with an existing packer definition (e.g. [1]) > > Do you have a view on w

Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

dcda79e2c02fda4e0fe52f61bf61712742e1f0db On 1/29/14, 2:22 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >Alena do you know the commit ID > >-Original Message- >From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:03 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Cc: D

RE: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

Alena do you know the commit ID -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:03 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Daan Hoogland Subject: Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters So the problem exists i

Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

Yes, the bug exists in 4.3 as well. We should fix it before the release. -Alena. On 1/29/14, 2:02 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >So the problem exists in 4.3 branch as well? > >=alena. > >On 1/29/14, 1:59 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: > >>That's the reason of: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@clou

Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

So the problem exists in 4.3 branch as well? =alena. On 1/29/14, 1:59 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: >That's the reason of: >http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg21948.html > >--Sheng > > >On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: >

Re: userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

That's the reason of: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg21948.html --Sheng On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Daan, > > In the latest master build I observed that listVirtualMachines command no > longer returns p

userVmResponse no longer returns some parameters

Hi Daan, In the latest master build I observed that listVirtualMachines command no longer returns parameters like: State displayName Account Its due to the commit that you’ve cherry-picked (fae05560218ef3bcb962bd424ae5dbf5cb8ede68) Setting corresponding fields in UserVmJoinVO to become final,

bof for denver

H, I submitted a bof proposal: continuous delivery the apache way the apache release process is based on high quality and delivering good quality software. for a big project as cloudstack this means unsure delivery schedules and long release cycles. The goal of this BoF is to find ways to hasten

Re: devcloud veewee install broken?

I managed to fix the prompting, but ran into some other issues. Will report back here when I have something a bit more concrete. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Oh this looks like something new, using debconf you can set one of the > two network drivers and fix in vagrant

RE: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

-Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 1:06 PM To: dev; Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward H Animesh, I am done cherry-picking, compiling and pushing. [Animesh] Cool, I will also need to pull

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

H Animesh, I am done cherry-picking, compiling and pushing. I wonder if now is opportune to build a new rc. shouldn't we wait till more people have tested? I for instance (doing a quarter of the test plans that we have at Schuberg Philis) ran into some issues and am not sure yet if they are in th

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > and will the push and will then push

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh] I know but at this time we need closer scrutiny and just the > specific change helps in that. There was a similar comment in private when > some of us were reviewing security patches. point taken I am not cherry picking the

RE: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

-Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 12:14 PM To: dev Subject: Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Instant gratification on fixing something is trumping man

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

sure, not sure if I'll be done today however. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Daan > > Please commit your + Ian's patches that you see fit directly into 4.3 > branch. But next time around I would like to see the patches that do not have > lots of unnecessary format

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Instant gratification on fixing something is trumping managing risk. I don't think I like the implication of that remark. I am sure you mean well and are tired. > The patches are littered with formatting changes that make review > time

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

good point Mike, I would like to add that in our case 'quality' means 'usability'. We are not writing military or madical grade code. However I don't want to tell a big far eastern telco that their it is out because i left an == in the code that was meant to be an equals() call, or a leak because

RE: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

Daan Please commit your + Ian's patches that you see fit directly into 4.3 branch. But next time around I would like to see the patches that do not have lots of unnecessary formatting changes that mask the real fix at this time of the release. Let me know when you are done so I can rebuild an

RE: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

-Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:15 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward I agree that quality should be our primary focus. [Animesh] No one would disagree that qual

Re: Callback pattern

Glad you already figured it out. Removing generic is for purpose, since AsyncCallbackDispatcher sits at the bottom of the chain that needs to deal with different kinds of callback completion routines. Type-safe check for callback completion routine is done through AsyncCompletionCall itself publi

Re: Review Request 17504: Fix the response names in assign and remove cert from LB

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17504/#review33142 --- The patch is created incorrectly; when try to submit, getting error

cloudstack-agent on ubuntu

Hi All, I am trying to install cloudstack-agent on ubuntu 12.04 and it is failing with openjdk-6-jre dependency. Following is the error message: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cloudstack-agent : Depends: openjdk-6-jre but it is not installable or

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

I agree that quality should be our primary focus. My one point of caution here would be, "How risky are these fixes?" Just because we believe we have fixes for issues does not necessarily mean they should be put in a release late in the game. We have to weigh the benefits of having the fixes versu

RE: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Yes that's fine -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Murali Reddy; Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands Animesh, should it go directly to 4.3 branch? Thanks, Alena. On 1

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Animesh, should it go directly to 4.3 branch? Thanks, Alena. On 1/29/14, 9:58 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: >Thanks Alena, > >I have the review request at https://reviews.apache.org/r/17504/ > >-Syed > > >On Wed 29 Jan 2014 12:47:54 PM EST, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> The commands that should be fixe

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:36:52PM +0100, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey Animesh, > > Not in agreement here. These are squashed bugs and we want as less bugs in > the release as possible. > > This is why we test any RC before we release it. I say include all the big > fixes we have in the release.

RE: Release Managers for 4.3.1 and 4.4.0

Hugo, Daan Thanks for stepping up. I will also do a write up on my experiences as soon as I am done wrapping up 4.3 Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc:

Review Request 17506: mvn clean - test logs- contrail -cleanps up only target, dist directories; testclient.log file should be generated inside target directory

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17506/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: [ACS 43] juniper-contrail RAT failure in logs

Hi Animesh, I fixed this issue. This is the review request url: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17506/ Regards, Suresh From: Animesh Chaturvedi mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>> Subject: [ACS 43] juniper-contrail RAT failure in logs Date: January 28, 2014 at 4:40:43 PM PST To: "dev@cloudsta

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

I have started thinking about some options: 1) use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point 2) create devcloud3 from scratch 3) start with an existing packer definition (e.g. [1]) Do you have a view on which option may be most suitable? If we go with option 2 or 3,

Re: cloudstack presenting wrong used memory values

Doesn't anyone think that those memory values presented on infrastructure>hosts are a little odd? On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Rafael Weingartner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am mailing this to the dev and users list, since I am not sure which one > would be the best

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Thanks Alena, I have the review request at https://reviews.apache.org/r/17504/ -Syed On Wed 29 Jan 2014 12:47:54 PM EST, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: The commands that should be fixed are: assignCertToLoadBalancer removeCertFromLoadBalancer Thanks, Alena. On 1/29/14, 8:33 AM, "Syed Ahmed"

Review Request 17504: Fix the response names in assign and remove cert from LB

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17504/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk, Animesh Chaturvedi, and Murali

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

The commands that should be fixed are: assignCertToLoadBalancer removeCertFromLoadBalancer Thanks, Alena. On 1/29/14, 8:33 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: >Hi Alena, > >I was checking the code and I see that the response for uploadSslCert >is uploadsslcertresponse and deleteSslCert is deletesslcert

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

please pull d38a50343130f6f147e2c9c7b2e32a43f31c7e6b to 4.3 this one came out of our regression testing, I hope other people are keeping up the testing as well in spite of all the discussion on the RC!!! thanks for your patience Animesh, Daan On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #33

See

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > and > > caf17c2f46bf317ec8966b08aaff728a73fda14a never mind that last one, i was in a hury and screwed up. will revert

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #32

See Changes: [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-5979 vlan parsing fixed -- [...truncated 3436 lines...] [INFO] -

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

The first five I allready posted. The ones between brackets seem minor to me. Then again they also pose the least risk so in my opinion you should pull them all. The last one is a bug we found during testing (which was already fixed in master a while back). these three in combination: 43ba36f97950

Grunt Development

All, I'm currently working on a POC implementing Grunt for the build process. If anyone has any comments/suggestions please let me know and I'll try to work them into the version I'm working on. Initial goals are minify the javascript files and get better sprite generation. Alex Hitchins

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Hi Alena, I was checking the code and I see that the response for uploadSslCert is uploadsslcertresponse and deleteSslCert is deletesslcertresponse are you expecting something different? Thanks, -Syed On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:06:23 AM EST, Syed Ahmed wrote: Yes Animesh. -Syed On Wed 29 Jan

RSA Key Issue

All, I've rebuilt my development environment from the 4.3 branch. In rebuilding, I hit upon a number of errors namely around ssh keys (id_rsa.cloud & id_rsa.cloud.pub). When running the Jetty command there were errors due to the file not existing. It then later looks for the file it's tried to

RSA Keys & Deployment on Windows

All, I've rebuilt my development environment from the 4.3 branch. In rebuilding, I hit upon a number of errors namely around ssh keys (id_rsa.cloud & id_rsa.cloud.pub). When running the Jetty command there were errors due to the file not existing. It then later looks for the file it's tried to

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Yes Animesh. -Syed On Wed 29 Jan 2014 10:54:02 AM EST, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Can you provide the fix today? Thanks Animesh On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:36 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: Hi, I'll check this and fix it. This was in the 4.3 release. Thanks, -Syed On Tue 28 Jan 2014 07:31:51 PM EST,

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Can you provide the fix today? Thanks Animesh On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:36 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: > Hi, > > I'll check this and fix it. This was in the 4.3 release. > > Thanks, > -Syed > > On Tue 28 Jan 2014 07:31:51 PM EST, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> Hi Murali, >> >> Doing some integration w

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

I have asked for specific commits already a few times. Can you provide list today? Thanks Animesh On Jan 29, 2014, at 4:03 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > come to think of it, I probably shouldn't burden you with the decision > on each of those commits. So if you don't want to go through all of >

Re: assignCertToLB/removeCertToLb commands

Hi, I'll check this and fix it. This was in the 4.3 release. Thanks, -Syed On Tue 28 Jan 2014 07:31:51 PM EST, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: Hi Murali, Doing some integration work with ssl cert stuff, and found that Apis you’ve submitted on behalf of Syed, have incorrect response name format (sho

RE: Release Managers for 4.3.1 and 4.4.0

Hey guys, We've discussed this internally in our company and we want to put in the effort to drive the 4.4 release. Daan and me are not quite sure yet who will be picking this up when the time comes, but one of us will step up to be the release manager. That said, I fully agree with Edison th

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Thanks for stepping in. That is much needed, in fact I think we should > use something like packer alongwith vagrant/veewee for both devcloud > and systemvmtemplate. Veewee can build vms, packer can export them to > various platforms/formats and

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

Thanks for stepping in. That is much needed, in fact I think we should use something like packer alongwith vagrant/veewee for both devcloud and systemvmtemplate. Veewee can build vms, packer can export them to various platforms/formats and a developer could use vagrant for local devcloud/host autom

Unable to add host with latest build on RHEL6 master

Hi All, I am unable to add a host. i am getting this issue. i freshly compiled the source and started the serverusing jetty on rhel server 6 as master and xenserver6.2 as host. mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run do i need to perform any special settings for Rhel? i did not get these issues when

Re: devcloud veewee install broken?

Oh this looks like something new, using debconf you can set one of the two network drivers and fix in vagrant scripts. Patch welcome. Regards. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:15 AM, chris snow wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I've managed to figure out how to perform the veewee build for devcloud at [1] > > Howe

Re: [Question] Refactoring ApiDispatcher and processing parameters

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Antonio Fornié Casarrubios wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm working on cloud-server#com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher and related classes > and trying to do some refactoring here. But I just had a couple of > questions to make sure I'm not missing anything important. > > > 2* Abou

Xen StorageMotion Fails

Hi, I posted this on the users@ mailing-list yesterday, but giving it more thoughts I think this should have been posted here. We are running 4.2.1 with XenServer 6.2SP1. I tried to run a storage motion from a local storage to another, and I am getting this error. Xen returns a VM_REQUIRES_NE

Review Request 17497: CLOUDSTACK-5977 - Incorrect String Quotations

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17497/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

BVT report on 4.3 branch

>Here is the report of automated smoke tests results on Xen and KVM. > >On Xenserver 6.2/Test Run: #1174 and 1175 > >This report is consolidation of runs #1174 and #1175 >3 failures are not product failures but ssh time outs in the scripts. > >Link to reports: >http://jenkins.bu

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

come to think of it, I probably shouldn't burden you with the decision on each of those commits. So if you don't want to go through all of them I will review them and compile a list. If you don't want to wait my call would be include all. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > A

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

Animesh, As for my fixes, I agree with you that not all of them are vital. You pulled only one and this seems too few. There where more null pointers and uses off == and more scary things. I have rerouted my efforts to master now. Again (Hugo end I don't always agree on practical matters, on prin

Re: master not building

H Marcus, sorry, I will off course better my ways even more. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Girish, > > Did you build cloudstack entirely before compiling just the marvin project? > > Try running this before you build marvin: mvn -pl :checkstyle install > > Cheers, > >

Review Request 17495: CLOUDSTACK-5976: Typo in "ssh_keypairs" table's foreign key constraints on the Upgraded Setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17495/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5976 http

Re: master not building

Girish, Did you build cloudstack entirely before compiling just the marvin project? Try running this before you build marvin: mvn -pl :checkstyle install Cheers, Hugo On 29 jan. 2014, at 10:13, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > I still see problems with latest master while building marvin. Not sure

Re: master not building

I still see problems with latest master while building marvin. Not sure if this is also related checkstyle [root@pun-lsfs21-node02 cloudstack]# /usr/local/apache-maven-3.1.1/bin/mvn -P developer -e -pl :cloud-marvin [INFO] Error stacktraces are turned on. [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO]

[Question] Refactoring ApiDispatcher and processing parameters

Hi, I'm working on cloud-server#com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher and related classes and trying to do some refactoring here. But I just had a couple of questions to make sure I'm not missing anything important. 1* There are several instance methods, but then there is this #processParameters that is

[JENKINS] Jenkins the spammer

Hey guys, Ofter the last few weeks we had a lot of problems with Jenkins actually reporting build problems that were actually infrastructure related. I try and explain the issues and how we try to prevent them from happening in the future. The GIT plugin used by jenkins has a build in timeout o