Re: [ANNOUNCE] Switched to Java 7

2014-01-27 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, I noticed some questions regarding the switch to Java 7. If you run Ubuntu, make sure you install this package: openjdk-7-jdk Afterwards, make sure your java and javac executables point towards Java 7: $ sudo update-alternatives --config java $ sudo update-alternatives --config javac Set

Re: Exception when starting up the MS in 4.3

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
OK, this system template seems to work for me: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Same issue (this time with the 32-bit template): > > > http://jenkins

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
They're both very specific. As mentioned, ballooning only works if you're basically just making vms for yourself. And even then you have to add your own script to make it work, hence my suggestion to enable it via agent.properties. Again, my main concern is that it messes with the service offering

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
One last comment... since you mention that it doesn't actually work for KVM without an admin writing or adding a script, maybe it would make more sense for the agent.properties tunable to *enable* balloon, basically saying that they have done that scripting portion and want to enable the balloon fo

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Actually, does anyone have objections to adding an agent.properties tunable to disable balloon? That would allow anyone who wants to overcommit to do so, without messing with the existing FS, and the calculations for allocation at least are all accurate. And I won't have to maintain another local p

RE: Urgent : Network stuck in implementing state

2014-01-27 Thread Sanjeev Neelarapu
Hi Bjoern, Since the nic's instance_id is NULL you can set the removed field with some timestamp (e.g. now()). Also check the external IP address state in user_ip_address table. If this ip address state is in allocated set it to NULL and try delete network again. -Sanjeev -Original Messag

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi Marcus, KSM or memory de-duplication on KVM can only be used when the memory pages are identical. IMO this is a huge constraint which is true only for specific use cases. using KSM to implement overprovisioning will limit this feature to a specific use case and hence memory ballooning was

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yeah, I'm a little disappointed that the functional spec doesn't really address memory deduplication, which is the real version of overcommit, IMO. Since it looks like the feature is already fully implemented, I'm not sure I have much of a leg to stand on in trying to change it. I'll just patch it

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I should add that I wouldn't expect scaling to work as a combination of a cluster setting and a service offering, I'd expect it to be handled entirely by service offerings. The former just becomes confusing... I define my service offerings with a certain level of resources, and then that's divided

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi Marcus, in case of KVM the guest memory is not dynamically adjusted by hypervisor, this is a hypervisor limitation. we have documented this in the FS in prerequisites for KVM. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CPU+and+RAM+Overcommit One way to make this work automatical

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yeah, that's not overprovisioning, though. That's scaling. The way it's implemented now is just ... provisioning. It allocates exactly what's available at the host. Also, the vm in your example can't go to 4GB. There is nothing that changes it's 'currentMemory' setting. Without a scaling feature i

Re: Exception when starting up the MS in 4.3

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Same issue (this time with the 32-bit template): http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvmtemplate-2014-01-27-master-xen.vhd.bz2 On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> w

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
Hi, I think the way it was done is to guarantee minimum memory to that VM and upon demand it can get upto the memory defined in service offering. Say a vm with service offering 4Gb is deployed with overprovisioing factor 2, we guarantee that vm should get minimum of 2GB (4GB/2) and if that VM is

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2174

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [likitha.shetty] CLOUDSTACK-5796. [VMware] Size column is not getting updated in snapshot_store_ref table when a snapshot is backed up in secondary storage. -- [...trunca

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Ian Duffy
Hi Animesh, Can you cherry-pick the below commit from from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch? Fix findbug issues within LDAP authenticator commit 92b4f66d73562e4211d2d787554ff229dbeb5705 Thanks, Ian On 28 January 2014 03:48, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Hugo I was reviewing your commits to 4.3-forward

Re: Useless egress in SG zone?

2014-01-27 Thread Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Hi Nux, 1. By default we are allowing egress in SG. 2. But when you configure any rule in egress, it allows ONLY configured rule traffic and other traffic will be BLOCKED. If admin wants allow to only specific ports/addresses this can be done by configuring SG egress rules. In my firewalls, t

Re: Exception when starting up the MS in 4.3

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Interesting...with the following system template, my SSVM and CPVM will not boot up: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-2014-01-27-master-xen.vhd.bz2 This is what the error looks like: http://

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread Anshul Gangwar
There is already a Jenkins job(http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/HyperVAgent4.3/) which generates the zip containing all the required dlls. Regards, Anshul -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 7:52 PM To: dev@c

Re: Exception when starting up the MS in 4.3

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Perhaps it's an issue with the system template for XenServer. I thought I had the newest copy, but I'm downloading it again and plan to re-try this. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > This is a bit concerning to me since it is in 4.3 and we'r

Re: Exception when starting up the MS in 4.3

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
This is a bit concerning to me since it is in 4.3 and we're considering RC builds at the time being. Thanks! On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone know anything about this exception and why I may be encountering it? > > I am runn

Exception when starting up the MS in 4.3

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, Anyone know anything about this exception and why I may be encountering it? I am running in a basic zone with a single XenServer 6.1 host. Thanks! ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (main:null) Error while handling ItWork[6a2bef4d-dbef-40a9-a1af-69e1f2ab1f49-Starting-3-Release] java.la

RE: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Hugo I was reviewing your commits to 4.3-forward and looked at your commits https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=f18c5a1910b6370585a1d61638b8310c3ecba5ef https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=60ac12780bfa1604902a89d5dc7937a8b9334e0d I th

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2173

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [rajesh.battala] CLOUDSTACK-5561 Support of multiple public vlans on VR running in HyperV [rajesh.battala] CLOUDSTACK-5821 systemvmiso is locked by systevmvm in hyperv [rajesh.battala] CLOUDSTACK-5941 User Vm

Callback pattern

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, I've been looking at our callback pattern. Can someone explain why we always seem to do this?: caller.setCallback(caller.getTarget().createVolumeFromBaseImageCallBack(null, null)); When setCallback is implemented like this: public AsyncCallbackDispatcher setCallback(Object useless) {

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Its an easy fix on the KVM side, just waiting to hear any objections. On Jan 27, 2014 6:11 PM, "Nux!" wrote: > On 28.01.2014 00:49, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> So... I tried to use memory overcommit on KVM this week, and it blew >> up in my face. Apparently it's configured such that if I have a >

Building Master failing with license check for network-nvp

2014-01-27 Thread Rajesh Battala
Hi All, Building latest master is failing [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 7:43.999s [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jan 28 07:12:30 IST 201

[ACS43] New features and improvements

2014-01-27 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Folks We are working on the press release for 4.3.0. If you have contributed a feature or improvement for 4.3.0 and is ready please check if it is showing up in results of the filters below. New Features: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvements: https://issues.apac

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Nux!
On 28.01.2014 00:49, Marcus Sorensen wrote: So... I tried to use memory overcommit on KVM this week, and it blew up in my face. Apparently it's configured such that if I have a Service Offering of 4G, and I set memory overprovisioning to 2:1, the guest only actually gets configured with 2G. That'

Re: KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I see that the same approach has been taken for CPU overprovisioning, but it actually works there, because cpu is allocated in 'shares', which are abstract and relative to all shares allocated. With memory, we can't just divide the raw size allocated and call it good. I think this was an oversight

KVM memory overprovision breaking me

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
So... I tried to use memory overcommit on KVM this week, and it blew up in my face. Apparently it's configured such that if I have a Service Offering of 4G, and I set memory overprovisioning to 2:1, the guest only actually gets configured with 2G. That's not how overprovisioning is supposed to work

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2172

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [brian.federle] Plugin API: Support multiple JS includes per plugin [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-5960: Domain admin or user cannot register a template using [min.chen] Fix trailing whitespace from cherry-pick [brian

RE: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Prachi Damle
There is already a ticket logged for this, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4942 Fix should be introducing a new table say storage_tag and follow the design of host_tag and also upgrade steps for existing storage tags present in the details. Prachi -Original Message-

[4.3-forward] UI show blank summary of VMs, fields missing from API response

2014-01-27 Thread Sheng Yang
The reason is due to some reason, the fields seems missing from respons. It must due to some recent change. And here is an screenshot: http://imgur.com/G6P5rsS And API response to listVirtualMachines API: { "listvirtualmachinesresponse" : { "count":2 ,"virtualmachine" : [ {"id":"aaae4df6-2d01-4

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks for pointing that out, Prachi. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > There is already a ticket logged for this, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4942 > > Fix should be introducing a new table say storage_tag and follow the > design of host_tag and also u

4.3 cherry-pick request

2014-01-27 Thread Min Chen
Animesh, Can you please cherry-pick the following commit (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=6d1475 182cd9ea17010a142043dd9fe9c923cf81) from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch? Thanks. 6d1475182cd9ea17010a142043dd9fe9c923cf81 CLOUDSTACK-5960: Domain admin or user

RE: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Agreed We need to fix the most important ones for 4.3. There may be assumptions in the code which we may not know and may get broken if these issues are fixed late. I will pull in the one Hugo casted his -1 for the first vote, any others? Animesh -Original Message- From: David Nalley

Review Board needs your attention

2014-01-27 Thread Amogh Vasekar
Hi All, The following reviews have been lingering around for more than 4 months. Please take the time to close the ones not needed anymore, or finish your pending reviews. We have had some old ones closed recently, but individual follow-up is becoming difficult. Review ID

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey David, > > As always you are completely right. I plan on referring to this message alot in the future. Especially in discussions with my wife. :) > I feel a bit bad about getting the findbugs report through at the last > moment. Howe

ReviewBoard

2014-01-27 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks: ReviewBoard is pretty bloated. There are currently 93 reviews that are open. Some of those haven't been updated in 7 months old. Unless someone objects (and promptly begins reviewing and applying patches) I will close any patch that hasn't been updated in 2 months. Please take a few m

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey David, As always you are completely right. I feel a bit bad about getting the findbugs report through at the last moment. However the coverity reports (with 6000+ issues) didn't make it easy to find what really needed fixing. However the fixes we made based on findbugs are pretty nasty. Esp

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread David Nalley
So just curious if I am the only one concerned about a ton of fixes going in at the last minute. If the fixes are for serious bugs and we have consensus around their severity being high enough, indeed lets fix things. My concern is that much of the QA we do is manual; and while we are getting bette

Re: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread David Nalley
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > The supporting DLLs are downloaded at buildtime from NuGet. > > Do the RPMs redistribute supporing libs or download them on the fly? > The RPMs redistribute a ton of jars. --David

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Right, for some reason I was thinking in the moment that all details would have a value of 'true'. Since that's not the case, and this field is clearly not a boolean field, we should just change them to storage_tag for a value, as suggested. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I agree...we should fix it in 4.4. Would you write up a JIRA ticket for it, Chris? Thanks! On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:26 PM, SuichII, Christopher < chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote: > I suspect the reason you don’t have this problem is that you don’t have > any storage pool details whose value is

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread SuichII, Christopher
I suspect the reason you don’t have this problem is that you don’t have any storage pool details whose value is ‘true’. That is the only case where this problem arises. I think we do have a problem differentiating, though. If you list all of the storage tags for a storage pool, then any storage

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hey Marcus, The main problem is that if you have a storage details row that uses the value "true", but you do not intend on this row representing a storage tag, it will be interpreted as a storage tag because its value is "true". The current storage-tag logic assumes any row in the storage detail

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2170

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [marcus] CLOUDSTACK-5956 remove persist flag during live migration -- [...truncated 5502 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I'm ok with whatever. It does seem like we have the ability to differentiate real storage tags from details, since we can list/edit those storage tags (I don't see all of my details showing up in the UI when I look at the tags for my primary storage), though I'm not immediately sure why or how at t

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread Donal Lafferty
The supporting DLLs are downloaded at buildtime from NuGet. Do the RPMs redistribute supporing libs or download them on the fly? DL > -Original Message- > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: 27 January 2014 14:22 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Donal Laffert

Bay Area Meetup

2014-01-27 Thread Amogh Vasekar
Hi All, The CloudStack Bay Area Meet-up is tomm, featuring talks on CloudStack Networking, and Monitoring CloudStack. http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-SF-Bay-Area-Users-Group/events/160369322/ for more! Hope to see you there in large numbers. Amogh

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I agree...it certainly is not an ideal situation. Have you assessed the risk involved with changing storage tags from using true as a value to using something like storage_tag as a value? If so, do you feel it is an acceptable amount of risk for 4.3 now that we have already begun spinning up RC b

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2169

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [sanjay.tripathi] CLOUDSTACK-5953: In hypervisor_capabilities, max_guests_limit are -- [...truncated 5410 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:p

4.3 cherry-pick request

2014-01-27 Thread Marcus Sorensen
commit daeea46da0fb7ba49d8c18334d9427fb9b06d524 Author: Marcus Sorensen Date: Mon Jan 27 11:04:05 2014 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-5956 remove persist flag during live migration "VMs were moved to non-persistent about a year ago when there were issues with KVM hosts remembering which VMs were running

[UPDATE][DOCS][PROPOSAL] Move to .rst and new repos

2014-01-27 Thread sebgoa
Quick update on this thread. I made some initial commits to the two new docs repo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs-admin.git;a=summary https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs-install.git;a=summary These were made by: 1- using publican to build a html-si

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

2014-01-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
good reason to skip it for a next version, let's look into it anyway, as we don't want to burn any of our ships. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Karl Harris wrote: > All, > > At first redundant DHCP seemed like a good idea. I did some cursory > research and the more I read the more I'm convinced

RE: XenServer VM live scales the CPU, but not the RAM

2014-01-27 Thread Nux!
On 27.01.2014 15:21, Prashant Kumar Mishra wrote: Can you share xen server version and logs . Hi, Xenserver is 6.2, no hotfixes applied. Which log files are you interested in? (sorry, not terribly familiar with Xenserver) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux!

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

2014-01-27 Thread Karl Harris
All, At first redundant DHCP seemed like a good idea. I did some cursory research and the more I read the more I'm convinced it may be more trouble than its worth for the first implementation. I'll talk with some of our Systems Engineer's here and get a broader perspective. There seems to be only

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread SuichII, Christopher
I think my only real concern with working around it in this manner is that once a fix is applied, we now have a bunch of settings that do not conform to the true/false pattern. In order to migrate them from using t/f, yes/no or enabled/disabled back to using true/false, we would have to write so

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread Mike Tutkowski
It is a problem, but I think - at the moment - only NetApp, SolidFire, and Marcus have storage plug-ins. We could document this issue and the easy workaround of not using true and false as a value and try to address it in 4.4. On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:53 AM, SuichII, Christopher < chris.su...@n

RE: XenServer VM live scales the CPU, but not the RAM

2014-01-27 Thread Prashant Kumar Mishra
Can you share xen server version and logs . -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 8:16 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Dev Subject: Re: XenServer VM live scales the CPU, but not the RAM Hi, Copying dev@, maybe someone has an idea fo

Re: Tags on storagePool

2014-01-27 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Any final thoughts on this? Letting this go into 4.3 could potentially cause issues with anyone using the configuration system for plugins in 4.3. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Jan 24, 201

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2168

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [wido] Switch to Java 7 [sanjay.tripathi] CS-5950: Wrong storage tags are used for ISO deployed VMs. -- [...truncated 19169 lines...] 1016/1332 KB 1020/1332 KB 1024

Re: XenServer VM live scales the CPU, but not the RAM

2014-01-27 Thread Nux!
Hi, Copying dev@, maybe someone has an idea for the below? On 27.01.2014 10:28, Nux! wrote: Hi, I'm testing Xenserver live scale-up feature, and it almost works. I'm using a Centos 6 64bit PV guest and trying to upgrade from an offering of 2 CPU and 512MB RAM to 3 CPU and 1024MB RAM. The CPU

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #131

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See

RE: starting instance with simulator on 4.3-forward fails

2014-01-27 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
Sebastian, 1. We need to set router.version.check to false under global properties of CS and restart CS. 2. Check the below mail: http://markmail.org/search/?q=router.version.check#query:router.version.check+page:1+mid:dlf6nzyfv5gmhru6+state:results Santhosh ___

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #130

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See -- Started by user Hugo [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder in workspace Fetching changes from the

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread Paul Angus
The files in the directory are: AgentShell.exe Newtonsoft.Json.dll AgentShell.exe.config NSubstitute.dll AgentShell.exe.mdb System.Net.Http.Formatting.dll AWSSDK.dll System.Web.Http.dll HypervResource.dll System.Web.Http.SelfHost.dll HypervResource.dll.mdb WmiWrappers.dll Ionic.Zip.dll WmiWrappers

Re: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread sebgoa
On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Guys, > > Don't forget that Hyper-V server is 'server core' so has no GUI. Therefore a > 'clickable' installer is not a lot of use. I've been simply copying over my > agentshell directory and running 'AgentShell.exe --install' so I haven't >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Switched to Java 7

2014-01-27 Thread Hugo Trippaers
I have some trouble getting into the rpmbuilders, so i can’t configure those. I need root permissions for those boxes and i don’t have that. The cloudstack-slaves will be fixed to support jdk 7. Cheers, Hugo On 27 jan. 2014, at 14:18, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Working on it :-) > > Sent fro

starting instance with simulator on 4.3-forward fails

2014-01-27 Thread sebgoa
Hi, while testing 4.3-forward with the simulator I can see that the template shows up now, but when trying to start an instance it fails with the following message: 2014-01-27 14:53:41.028:INFO::Started SelectChannelConnector@0.0.0.0:8080 [INFO] Started Jetty Server INFO [c.c.c.ClusterManagerIm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Switched to Java 7

2014-01-27 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Working on it :-) Sent from my iPhone > On 27 jan. 2014, at 13:57, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > >> On 01/27/2014 12:04 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As promised [0], I switched the master [1] branch to Java 7 this morning. >> >> The builds all work on my Ubuntu 12.04 system,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Switched to Java 7

2014-01-27 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 01/27/2014 12:04 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Hi, As promised [0], I switched the master [1] branch to Java 7 this morning. The builds all work on my Ubuntu 12.04 system, but if anything is broken on your system, keep this switch in mind. Right, I see that it broke Jenkins, since that

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #128

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [sanjay.tripathi] CS-5950: Wrong storage tags are used for ISO deployed VMs. -- [...truncated 51 lines...] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor [INFO] Apa

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #127

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [wido] Switch to Java 7 -- [...truncated 51 lines...] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Concentrated Pod Deploym

Re: DB timeouts on failover

2014-01-27 Thread Shanker Balan
On 27-Jan-2014, at 11:57 am, Damoder Reddy wrote: > Hi Francois, > > In current Cloud Stack versions there is no way to tell management servers > that wait/reconnect for some time without fencing the management server if it > sees a Db Connection failure. > > Also the default connection-timeout

Re: Review Request 17391: Fix base.py for Dynamic compute offerings

2014-01-27 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17391/#review32828 --- tools/marvin/test_deploy_vms_with_dynamic_compute_offesrings.py

Re: Review Request 17391: Fix base.py for Dynamic compute offerings

2014-01-27 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17391/#review32827 --- tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #20

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See

Review Request 17391: Fix base.py for Dynamic compute offerings

2014-01-27 Thread prashant mishra
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17391/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: https://issue

[ANNOUNCE] Switched to Java 7

2014-01-27 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, As promised [0], I switched the master [1] branch to Java 7 this morning. The builds all work on my Ubuntu 12.04 system, but if anything is broken on your system, keep this switch in mind. Wido [0]: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201401.mbox/%3C52E0F3B1.1000100%

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2166

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See

4.3 cherry-pick request

2014-01-27 Thread Koushik Das
Animesh, Please cherry-pick the following commit to 4.3 Commit 3fae917ebefb56ba280c2e6c5b6ff0f1720d46ed in branch refs/heads/4.3-forward from Koushik Das [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3fae917 ]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #19

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 578 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (373075/467422), 210.15 MiB | 614 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (373075/467422), 210.94 MiB | 675 KiB/s Receiving obj

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #18

2014-01-27 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 545 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (356724/467422), 151.36 MiB | 460 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (356724/467422), 151.44 MiB | 428 KiB/s Receiving obj

Review Request 17389: Fix base.py for Dynamic compute offerings

2014-01-27 Thread prashant mishra
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17389/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: https://issue

Re: VM instance view UI is broken in 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Koushik Das
The only UI related commit I see is 81a83b5b31f0a237ae56449c60350160915f28f8. List VM API is working fine. On 27-Jan-2014, at 2:26 PM, Koushik Das wrote: > I noticed that VM instance view is broken in UI. It works fine in 4.3 branch. > It worked till commit d31fa09c7e5bb04fcc4594c0352d9b91171e9

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread Paul Angus
Guys, Don't forget that Hyper-V server is 'server core' so has no GUI. Therefore a 'clickable' installer is not a lot of use. I've been simply copying over my agentshell directory and running 'AgentShell.exe --install' so I haven't bothered building the installer. The command line options for

RE: [ACS 4.3] Release Notes

2014-01-27 Thread Shweta Agarwal
I can see there are some issues with 4.3 release notes available at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-docs-release-notes-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/Apache_CloudStack-4.3.0-Release_Notes-en-US.pdf Upgrade instruction says For registering template Name and description has sys

Persistent Networks - Assign VM operation

2014-01-27 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
Hello all, According to the Persistent Networks test plan at [1], if we assign a virtual machine deployed in a persistent network (in account-1) to a different account (say account-2), then a persistent network should get created in account-2 with the same network offering which was used for the p

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread Anshul Gangwar
I can generate msi. Where can I share it? Regards, Anshul -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 2:38 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Anshul Gangwar; Rajesh Battala; Paul Angus; Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi C

Re: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

2014-01-27 Thread sebgoa
Could one of you prepare an .msi that we can host like the linux packages ? On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > The ACS build avoids proprietary tools by building with Mono. > > One option is to generate an MSI using WiX + Wine, see > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/W

VM instance view UI is broken in 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Koushik Das
I noticed that VM instance view is broken in UI. It works fine in 4.3 branch. It worked till commit d31fa09c7e5bb04fcc4594c0352d9b91171e9d1a. -Koushik

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-27 Thread Daan Hoogland
Animesh, I commented the once i made yesterday with findbugs: I allready send a few and will get you a list of the rest later today. regards, On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Good job fellas. I see a number of commits 20+ into 4.3-forward branch. Are > their specifi