Re: Cloudstack on VMs

Thanks Shankar, Dan and Mike for your help. Regards, Jitendra On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > For 4.3 development purposes, I have been running the CloudStack Management > Server in Ubuntu 12.04 in a VM on ESX. I've also got a XenServer h

Re: Create VM - find out the NIC on KVM host connected to a Network switch

Hi Chiradeep, the LLDP output on the switch looks something like * Local Interface    Parent Interface    Chassis Id  Port info  System Name ge-0/0/21.0    -   00:30:48:c9:54:26   eth1   bng-p3-vmm-cloudstack.eng

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

In 4.2.1 , I have tested the feature where user has the option to choose single part or multi part upload with S3 store. It worked fine in my environment. The feature works as below: If you have a snapshot or template or anything that needs to be uploaded to S3 based secondary storage, it can b

Re: Cloudstack on VMs

For 4.3 development purposes, I have been running the CloudStack Management Server in Ubuntu 12.04 in a VM on ESX. I've also got a XenServer host running in another VM on this same ESX host. When I want to run CloudStack with ESX, I run another VM with ESX on top of the same ESX host. ESX (running

Re: Cloudstack on VMs

[Moving dev@ to BCC] Comments inline. On 20-Dec-2013, at 9:27 am, jitendra shelar wrote: > Hi All, > > In the last month I had successfully deployed cloudstack 4.0.2 on 2 > physical machines (one was VT enabled ubuntu host and other was ubuntu > management server ). Hi Jitendra, 4.2.0 is a mo

Re: Question about XenServer Snapshots

It looks like I found the issue: Insufficient space in the storage repository. >From the XenServer vmopsSnapshot plug-in's revert_memory_snapshot method (which is invoked by the XenServer server resource): [root@XenServer-6 ~]# xe snapshot-revert snapshot-uuid=82e33f6d-59f3-a26d-4171-d51cd58716d8

NFS secondary storage in multi zone config

Today I set up a second zone in one of our 4.2.1 CS environments. To my surprise, it loaded the SSVM and consoleproxy for the zone from the NFS secondary storage of the first zone. This is great for us, since we have 30Gbit of transport between sites, but I'm guessing its not supposed to work that

Cloudstack on VMs

Hi All, In the last month I had successfully deployed cloudstack 4.0.2 on 2 physical machines (one was VT enabled ubuntu host and other was ubuntu management server ). Can anyone please tell me, whether it possible to deploy cloudstack on 2 virtual machines? Thanks, Jitendra

Re: XenServer snapshots taken by CS don't show up in XenCenter?

Ah, it seems when we take a snapshot of a VM on XenServer, the snapshot is not "linked" to the VM it is a snapshot of. That would make sense because the VM it is a snapshot of might not exist from XenServer's point of view (say, if the VM is in the Stopped state from CloudStack's point of view, th

XenServer snapshots taken by CS don't show up in XenCenter?

Hi, I notice if I take a snapshot of a VM running on XenServer from CloudStack, then go over to XenCenter and view the snapshots of the VM that the snapshot is not displayed. I do see the snapshot if I do a xe snapshot-list, though. Does anyone know why this is? Thanks -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Se

RE: [ACS43] Schedule Reminder : 4 weeks to RC

-Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:03 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS43] Schedule Reminder : 4 weeks to RC Animesh, One week before the RC, can we stop commit and have you as the only committer to that bran

Re: Loading order of Adapter components

I think it's documented on the wiki but the name comes from the getName() of the class. If getName isn't available the it's getClass().getSimpleName(). The default behavior of getName is to grab the class name, so for most practical cases it's the class name. Darren > On Dec 19, 2013, at 3

Re: why we delete prmary storage pool every time when stopping vm?

I updated the CRs and assigned them to Marcus. Since the issues are not related to the new iSCSI code specifically, I think Marcus will have a good idea what's going on there. In any event, if I can be of assistance, please let me know. Thanks On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski <

Re: Create VM - find out the NIC on KVM host connected to a Network switch

What does the LLDP output look like? On 12/18/13 11:03 PM, "Pradeep Cloudstack" wrote: >Hi , >on a KVM host, I have a bridge interface - cloudbr1 to which eth1 has >been added. >This is for guest Network. > > >When we create a VM on the KVM host, the NetworkGuru plugin gets to know >about cloudb

Re: [PROPOSAL] region level VPC and guest network spanning multiple zones

Is there any reason to restrict a subnet to a single zone? AFAIK, AWS VPC lets you stretch a subnet across AZ. This way you can replicate *within* the DB tier to another zone. Also, once you introduce distributed routing, access to other datacenter services (S3 for instance) from within the VM wil

Re: Question about XenServer Snapshots

I went ahead and forwarded the message to the XenServer group, as well. If anyone here does have knowledge about XenServer snapshots, it is also of interest to note that deleting a VM snapshot (as long as I didn't do a revert) works fine. So, that means taking and deleting the VM snapshot is fine

Re: Issue with CloudStack-Usage 4.2.1 - Possible broken mirrors

Matt: Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 hasn't been released; and thus it should be on any mirrors just yet. Also - that looks very strange (cloud-temp, using s to install usage) and not any form of CloudStack installation I am aware of. --David On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Mathias Mullins wrote: >

Re: Resource capacity was not updated

Hi Nitin , Thanks for heads-up. Will be waiting for official release. > That¹s a bug in 4.2 and is fixed in 4.2.1 - Refer to > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4755 > > On 19/12/13 1:13 PM, "d...@soleks.com" wrote: > >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> I have cloudstack 4.2 environemt - 1

Issue with CloudStack-Usage 4.2.1 - Possible broken mirrors

Folks, I’m in Mexico installing CloudStack-Usage package and I believe we may have some broken mirrors. I have also heard about this as well in Germany too. I would need some help with more confirmation. Right now using the RHEL repository, I’m getting back that Cloud-Temp cannot install. Clou

Re: Resource capacity was not updated

That¹s a bug in 4.2 and is fixed in 4.2.1 - Refer to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4755 On 19/12/13 1:13 PM, "d...@soleks.com" wrote: > > >Hi All, > >I have cloudstack 4.2 environemt - 1 advanced zone, 1 pod, 1 cluster, 2 >hosts running xenserver 6.2. Initially hosts had 40G

RE: Loading order of Adapter components

That worked. But initially I had tried with the small case bean id ‘roleBasedEntityAccessChecker’ that matched the DB entry and that did not load the order correctly. So should it be the class name and not the ‘id’ in the bean definition in the order config? Thanks, Prachi From: Darren Sheph

Re: Question about XenServer Snapshots

Good idea, Tim. Thanks On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Tim Mackey wrote: > Mike, you might want to post this to xs-devel on XenServer.org. Some of > the storage engineers there would be in s better position to diagnose. > On Dec 19, 2013 5:10 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I

Re: Loading order of Adapter components

The names are cases sensitive. Is there a reason you put the name as lowercase in the global configuration? Darren > On Dec 19, 2013, at 3:12 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: > > Hi Darren, > > I am trying to add a new implementation of SecurityChecker interface which is > an Adapter. I am addin

Re: Question about XenServer Snapshots

Mike, you might want to post this to xs-devel on XenServer.org. Some of the storage engineers there would be in s better position to diagnose. On Dec 19, 2013 5:10 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Hi, > > I have been experimenting with VM snapshots on XenServer and have noticed a > problem that I h

Loading order of Adapter components

Hi Darren, I am trying to add a new implementation of SecurityChecker interface which is an Adapter. I am adding a plugin - RoleBasedChecker, and I want to add it to the list of SecurityCheckers at first position. However the new checker gets added to the list at the last position. The order

Question about XenServer Snapshots

Hi, I have been experimenting with VM snapshots on XenServer and have noticed a problem that I hope someone might be able to shed some light on. In a normal flow of taking a VM snapshot, reverting to it, then deleting the VM snapshot, I have observed the following (which looks just fine): *SR:*

RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs

-Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski Subject: RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedoc

Resource capacity was not updated

Hi All, I have cloudstack 4.2 environemt - 1 advanced zone, 1 pod, 1 cluster, 2 hosts running xenserver 6.2. Initially hosts had 40Gb of RAM on board, CS was reporting that i had 74Gb available, that's true because 3Gb on each server reserved for hypervizor. Yesterday i added 8G to each hos

Re: why we delete prmary storage pool every time when stopping vm?

Interesting...that commit was a combination of Marcus' and my code. We might want to bring him in on this conversation. I believe the idea is when a VM is stopped that we want to remove, for example, its iSCSI connections to its data disks (just using iSCSI as an example here). This is similar (bu

why we delete prmary storage pool every time when stopping vm?

Hi Mike, I looked at your commit: 858ce766659101eb731c83c806892dd5d9baa976, seems it will try to delete primary storage every time when stopping a VM ,which maybe the root cause a kvm blocker bug: CLOUDSTACK-5432, KVM guest vms are crashed during the automation test. From the agent log, I fi

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #297

See Changes: [kishan] CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value -- [...truncated 3542 lines...] [INFO] Copying

Re: Questions about XenServer Delta Snapshots

I've done more research into this and figured I'd send out my findings to the group: 1) Yes 2) It seems you never write to state E. If you revert to state E, what happens is you get a new state that is the same as state E (in the diagram, envision state D being gone after reverting to state E and

Re: Review Request 16362: CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16362/#review30701 --- Commit 227567cf6ca79c7bc398b55f2eee4d8fb93c0de4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16362: CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16362/#review30700 --- Commit c39431ff6a1d10a5d4c278418ff7198edd8903f5 in branch refs/heads

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Daan, Not sure if this is relevant to this release, but the feature list of 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 shows that S3 is supported for secondary storage. If this feature is broken and can't be used in production does it not mean that it has to be fixed in the next release? I am not a developer, so I do

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/#review30699 --- api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/BaseCmd.java

Review Request 16386: CLOUDSTACK-5518: Fixing non contiguous vlan test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16386/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5518 h

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Andrei, This sounds like a serious issue but not like an issue related to the release. Unless off course you have been able to get it working in 4.2.0 and it is now broken. If not it will have to move to a future release. I do not use s3 based secondary storage so I can't verify. regards, Daan

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 19/12/13 8:10 pm, "Tomasz Zięba" wrote: >+/- 0 because of simple bugs: >CLOUDSTACK-5422 >CLOUDSTACK-5332 >CLOUDSTACK-3806 The tickets should addressed in upcoming release, have updated the fix version. -abhi

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

Not that I want to delay the release even more, but has anyone tested the S3 Secondary Storage functionality of the 4.2.1? I can't be the only one with issues. I've tried installing ACS three times and the issue is reproducable. Things like migration of vms installed from templates or isos store

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+/- 0 because of simple bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5422 CLOUDSTACK-5332 CLOUDSTACK-3806 -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/

Re: Review Request 16384: Adding the OpenDayLight Neutron REST API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16384/#review30697 --- Ship it! Committed to branch open daylight commit b7d7342cd787af27

Re: Review Request 16384: Adding the OpenDayLight Neutron REST API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16384/#review30696 --- Ship it! Committed to branch open daylight commit b7d7342cd787af27

Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/ --- Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4406 http

Review Request 16384: Adding the OpenDayLight Neutron REST API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16384/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cloudstack-git

[PROPOSAL] region level VPC and guest network spanning multiple zones

I would like to propose two networking models enhancements for ACS 4.4 release that will enable building highly available applications. Currently VPC in CloudStack is a zone level entity. So tiers with in the VPC are confined to the zone to which VPC belongs. For an application deployed in current

Review Request 16381: CLOUDSTACK-4402: [deleteStoragePool] There is no way to delete Primary storage if the last host with which it was associated is already removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16381/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Re: Review Request 16350: Fixed it in ClusterManagerImpl while resetting the heart beat connection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16350/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2013, 11:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 16350: Fixed it in ClusterManagerImpl while resetting the heart beat connection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16350/#review30691 --- Patch doesn't apply on master. Please upload a new one. - Koushik D

Re: Review Request 16350: Fixed it in ClusterManagerImpl while resetting the heart beat connection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16350/#review30690 --- Ship it! 4.3 -> 8c29760db7275d31d720aa88e8d8a89494d31323 - Koushik

Re: Review Request 16282: CLOUDSTACK-5208: upgrade from 3.0.6 to 4.3 is not throwing any exception if new System VM template is not registered with proper name

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16282/#review30689 --- Commit 29b90e7a5c226f110a1f48de09a9b9c967c34f96 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16362: CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16362/#review30688 --- Commit 707da55fe3f94e95ee0186fd119f78d1d3def5c7 in branch refs/heads

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

H, We've started running our custom 4.2.1 build 24 hours ago on our internal projects/employees system. The build is based on the last fix by Kishan's fix for CLOUDSTACK-5145. The environment is a hybrid xen/vmware environment with nicira networking and nexenta storage. No issues have come up

Re: Review Request 16350: Fixed it in ClusterManagerImpl while resetting the heart beat connection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16350/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2013, 10:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 16128: CLOUDSTACK-4973: Specified locale keyboard language is not showing as default in consoleView passed during deployVM.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16128/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2013, 10:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sing

Re: Review Request 16350: Fixed it in ClusterManagerImpl while resetting the heart beat connection

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16350/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2013, 10:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 16362: CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16362/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2013, 10:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Ka

Re: Review Request 16362: CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16362/#review30687 --- Ship it! 1c6b146d0421ef66be1015d9f422274cea741ce3 - Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 16362: CLOUDSTACK-5554: Custom disk offering allows to create a datadisk with size greater than custom.diskoffering.size.max value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16362/#review30684 --- Commit 1c6b146d0421ef66be1015d9f422274cea741ce3 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16282: CLOUDSTACK-5208: upgrade from 3.0.6 to 4.3 is not throwing any exception if new System VM template is not registered with proper name

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16282/#review30686 --- Ship it! 4034aad250106eaaa85c7f57df12965c878fb2c1 - Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 16282: CLOUDSTACK-5208: upgrade from 3.0.6 to 4.3 is not throwing any exception if new System VM template is not registered with proper name

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16282/#review30685 --- Commit 4034aad250106eaaa85c7f57df12965c878fb2c1 in branch refs/heads

Re: [ACS43] Schedule Reminder : 4 weeks to RC

Animesh, One week before the RC, can we stop commit and have you as the only committer to that branch. I think it would help reduce the number of RC respins/vote if we have a stable branch ahead of the RC for testing. -sebastien On Dec 13, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Fixe