On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 08:14:01AM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> Hello Prasanna,
>
> +1 to the new marvin architecture.
> The proposed architecture will make marvin lot more stable, remove
> defining data in code and will be easier to add testcases.
Great! thanks for reviewing.
>
> Can we h
THRILLED to see this.
--David
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:21 PM, tuna wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14628/
> ---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14628/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Repository: cloudstack-gi
This schedule looks good to me.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> looks like a plan, Animesh
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > I would like to propose the following schedule for 4.3. Please note that
> I have pushed it ou
Hi guys.
Firstly, I would like to introduce myself.
My name is Frankie Onuonga. I work at Angani Ltd. This is a company in
Kenya.
www.angani.co
Most of you probably know me through my office email fran...@angani.co
I am writing to kindly inform you I am switching from using my office email
to us
Hi,
I tested it yesterday and it looked like working correctly. My only concern
about it is that I am not sure if this is still compatible with standard
JPA, However this may not be an important point since CS does not really
build on standard JPA. I would be interested in any info in the plans fo
looks like a plan, Animesh
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> Folks
>
> I would like to propose the following schedule for 4.3. Please note that I
> have pushed it out by 1 week for multiple reasons
> 1) Until end of September our focus was on 4.2 and master needs to b
Chris,
have you been discussing this with anybody? I think you should include
those people in the reviewers list to get feedback. I would have to
find some time to play around with it, though it looks ok on first
glance.
regards,
Daan
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:33 PM, SuichII, Christopher
wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14605/#review26966
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- daan Hoogland
On Oct. 11, 2013, 7:14 p.m., L
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14604/#review26965
---
Ship it!
:)
- daan Hoogland
On Oct. 11, 2013, 6:41 p.m., Laszlo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14603/#review26964
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- daan Hoogland
On Oct. 11, 2013, 6:39 p.m., L
It should be possible to upgrade in one go. I have not tested it
though. Can you elaborate on the problems, Paul?
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:42 PM, kel...@backbonetechnology.com
wrote:
> 4.1 had some major schema modifications around networking... At least for KVM.
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> - R
4.1 had some major schema modifications around networking... At least for KVM.
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Paul Angus"
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: 4.0.x to 4.2 upgrade
Date: Sun, Oct 13, 2013 1:31 AM
Hey,
I’ve come across a few people trying to upgrade from
Hey,
I've come across a few people trying to upgrade from 4.0.x to 4.2 having
problems.
It's not an upgrade that's mentioned in the release notes and the ../setup/db
directory contains sql scripts to update the db from 4.0 to 4.1 and 4.1 to 4.2
- so I guess it has to be a two-step upgrade?
Ca
14 matches
Mail list logo
