Re: Hypervisor Questions

Right, Marcus, what you say makes sense. You brought up a point I was going to ask about: If you can migrate between clusters, what's the point of a cluster? That point aside, I was really more interested (for the purposes of this e-mail thread) to find out how this works for KVM today (not to re

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

Well, my first thought on this is that the storage driver should not be telling the hypervisor to do anything. It should be responsible for creating/deleting volumes, snapshots, etc. on its storage system only. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Edison Su wrote: > In 4.2, we added VM snapshot for

RE: System VM

Hi All, Before setting up the cloudstack repo, we argued that doc should be in a different repo. At that time, nobody listened to our argument of doc having a different life cycle. I am wondering why this back and forth decisions changes now for docs. -Original Message- From: Chip Chil

Re: Hypervisor Questions

>From a kvm standpoint, a cluster has admin-defined meaning. Its not always going to map to some externally defined cluster. I can make my whole data center a cluster, and not use zone-wide storage, or still use zone wide storage. If you have zone-wide storage, maybe you want to keep VMs within sm

Re: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Done ! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6840 -abhi On 04/10/13 10:37 pm, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >Abhi > >It is best to set up a shared filter. You will need to open a INFRA >ticket like this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/INFRA-6145 >to get relevant permissions for

[DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

In 4.2, we added VM snapshot for Vmware/Xenserver. The current workflow will be like the following: createVMSnapshot api -> VMSnapshotManagerImpl: creatVMSnapshot -> send CreateVMSnapshotCommand to hypervisor to create vm snapshot. If anybody wants to change the workflow, then need to either cha

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Perhaps Marcus can answer this from a KVM standpoint? On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > This implies live migration between VMware clusters is supported in > CloudStack: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4265 > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mike Tu

Re: Hypervisor Questions

This implies live migration between VMware clusters is supported in CloudStack: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4265 On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > For anyone who is interested in the outcome of this thread, this seems to > answer the XenServer part: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

I've checked the Netscaler and HAProxy docs, this appears to be artifact of the HAProxy implementation (inability to support keep-alive). For a cloud operator that chooses Netscaler or F5 for load balancing, this won't make any sense. On 10/3/13 12:55 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Thu, Oct 3, 2

Re: Hypervisor Questions

For anyone who is interested in the outcome of this thread, this seems to answer the XenServer part: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Enabling+Storage+XenMotion+for+XenServer "CloudStack currently allows live migration of a virtual machine from one host to another only withi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Well just make sure that your script is resilient to its own crashes as well. On 10/4/13 1:59 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >Hi, > >I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on >the event of failure. It will also logs the events. > >Thanks, >Jayapal > >On 02-Oct-2

[ACS4.3] Tasks in JIRA for ACS 4.3

Hi, I see the date to propose features has passed [1]. When would the tasks be created to see full scope for 4.3?? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.3+Release Thanks /sudha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Sure, I'm open to suggestions. Basically I think we've discussed 1) Global Setting 2) canHandle() returns an int 3) Strategy has an enum type assigned I'm open to all three, I don't have much vested interest in this. Darren On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Well, i

Re: Hi

Thanks! On 10/3/13 4:37 AM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: >Welcome Steve! > > >2013/10/2 Steve Wilson > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined >> Citrix as the VP of Cloud Engineering, and I'm responsible for the >>Citrix >> CloudPlatofrm (powered by A

Re: Hi

Thanks! Looking forward to working with you too! On 10/3/13 4:35 AM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: >Hi Steve, > >Welcome to CloudStack. I look forward to working with you in the >community. > > >On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > >> H Steve, >> >> I wish you luck with managing the C

Re: Hi

I'll try to live up to that! Thanks for the welcome! On 10/3/13 1:37 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Steve, > >I wish you luck with managing the Citrix - Community interaction and given >the continued huge importance of Citrix to Apache CloudStack I am taking >the liberty of calling you our frien

Re: Hi

Thanks! On 10/2/13 10:33 PM, "Koushik Das" wrote: >Hi Steve, > >Welcome to CloudStack. Looking forward to working with you. > > >On 02-Oct-2013, at 6:10 PM, Chip Childers >wrote: > >> Welcome Steve! >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson >>wrote: >> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Well, it seems OK, but I think we should keep on discussing our options. One concern I have with the global config approach is that it adds manual steps for 'installing' extensions. Each extension must have installation instructions to indicate which global configurations it must be included in

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

Once the Spring work gets merged to master this will change as componentContext.xml or the nonoss version is gone now. You would need to create a file like META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-eventbus-context.xml on the classpath, so if this was production, that would probably be /etc/cloudstack/manag

RE: Master doesn't build

Sorry, forget to check in some files. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Master doesn't build > > Looks like the missing files were just added. > > We sh

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 8:23 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/RevertSnapshotCmd.java, > > line 36 > > > > > > Are there any unit or integration tests for this new API ca

Re: Master doesn't build

Looks like the missing files were just added. We should be OK now. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Here is how I tried to build it: > > mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnoredist > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.c

Re: Master doesn't build

Here is how I tried to build it: mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnoredist On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > [INFO] > > [INFO] Total time: 55.164s > [INFO] Finished at

Master doesn't build

[INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 55.164s [INFO] Finished at: Fri Oct 04 15:20:55 MDT 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 40M/483M [INFO] [ERROR] Fail

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Fair warning - some of this is a straw man argument to explore the situation, and a little bit of ranting at the end. On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:57:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'll summarize and address the concerns raised so far. > > Marvin has been in this repo for a long time for

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses > > getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet > > containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat() > > calls, but tha

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses > > getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet > > containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat() > > calls, but tha

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 12:10 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > Response in line: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Santhosh Eduku

Re: [1/2] Refactor Storage Related Resource Code These changes are a joint effort between Edison and I to refactor some of the code around snapshotting VM volumes and creating templates/volumes from V

I some outstanding questions I just posted to the review. Any thoughts on those questions? https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/ On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:07 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master c9f41d404 -> 180cfa19e > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#review26694 --- Some questions and comments that probably need to be answered before

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses > > getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet > > containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat() > > calls, but tha

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > > destroy. > > > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket >

RE: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy > > > and > > destroy. > > > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA > > > ticket > > (rest call) to track the decomision proce

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- (Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 8:19 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

RE: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > destroy. > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket > (rest call) to track the decomision process. > > When VM is deplo

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#review26693 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Oct. 4, 2013, 12:57 a.m., Chris

Re: Review Request 14471: CloudStack Plugin guide for VXLAN

Hi Prasanna, Thank you for let me know. I'll resubmit the patch, but I cannot find the repository cloudstack-docs.git in the ReviewBoard. Do you know how to send the patch to the repository? Regards, Yoshikazu 2013/10/3 Prasanna Santhanam : > Hi, > > The docs were broken out into a separate repo

Re: Review Request 14289: unit test for KVMFencer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14289/#review26691 --- Ship it! master: c9f41d40465e3cc8bd775dcfdeb3fa1907fd1e7f - Darren

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > destroy. > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest > call) to track the decomision process. > When VM is deployed, we

[HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and destroy. For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest call) to track the decomision process. When VM is deployed, we may need to do something else, but also rest based? I can see 2 ways of do

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On 10/4/13 10:37 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: >> > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" >> option, and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? >> >> Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

On 10/04/2013 11:58 AM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: Darren, I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the xml is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two strategies or providers conflict, then their priorities can be changed in XML to re

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

Response in line: > -Original Message- > From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > Not Sure, if it falls under similar lines\requ

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

On 10/04/2013 10:36 AM, Edison Su wrote: How to use the way spring 4.0 did: https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-5574? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16967971/spring-ordered-list-of-beans Add order in bean. That is a spring specific API/interface. In general we should never using S

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Darren, I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the xml is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two strategies or providers conflict, then their priorities can be changed in XML to resolve the conflict. I believe the Spring @Order annota

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review26690 --- I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the cod

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Yeah, that's kind of what I was interested in learning about. Now that we have zone-wide primary storage, does that mean CS is able to issue the live migration of a VM from one cluster to another (or are we still confined to clusters)? On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Travis Graham wrote: > Wa

Re: Review Request 14405: ConstantTimeBackoff test and cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/#review26688 --- Ship it! master: 826c69fd29bb98d3f631596f72a6eb3525d83aa2 - Darren

Re: Review Request 14290: KVMFencer cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14290/#review26687 --- I'm fine with dropping the methods that are not needed, but I don't

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/#review26684 --- It seems this patch includes a lot of line length based reformatting

Re: System VM

From the perspective of a new community member being able to contribute to a separate repo that doesn't touch the app code is nice because that would open up the possibility of being a committer for the doc repo and separate that silo of work. Also less volatile in the fact that people, like me,

Re: Review Request 13939: String join simplification

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13939/#review26682 --- I believe this is being blocked by 13938, can you please update to r

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:55:58PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Chip I get the principle behind the reasoning in thread[2] which > should be maintained but at the same time not being able to assign the issues > is a big hindrance in running a release. I am not sure if you saw m

Re: Review Request 12134: removed txn attribute from DB annotation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/#review26678 --- Ship it! master: bd8536739c012e1025d35271ce82dbc9e5e66a8d - Darren

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

Not Sure, if it falls under similar lines\requires a separate thread. I am trying to see if there is a way we can add a component field, primary owner fields for component available to be assigned for a given review under Http://reviews.apache.org. This way i will select component as "Automa

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Was that a limitation caused by the primary storage only being available to a single cluster and not zone wide like 4.2.0 provides? Travis On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we > still constrained to migrat

Re: System VM

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Hi guys, > Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning > behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What > have we experienced since this time last year which has led

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:45 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >

FWD: [IP CLEARANCE] Contrail Plugin for CloudStack

FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started. I'll update this thread when we have cleared that hurdle, allowing us to accept the patch into the repo. -chip - Forwarded message from Chip Childers - Date: Fr

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we still constrained to migrating VMs from one host to another in the same cluster? Same question for HA. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Clayton Weise wrote: > AFAIK, no, but it's a great RFE that I would vote for. > > ---

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] Chip does that mean you are open to folks assigning tickets to > others? Should this be posted in the original thread > http://markmail.org/thread/btovj6t6opqxge5q. because the threads where Ilya > reopened the d

RE: System VM

Hi guys, Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What have we experienced since this time last year which has led us to reverse the original decision to keep docs in the same repo with c

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:28 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > Qu

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" > option, and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? > > Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee. > Component-based assignment is

RE: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

> -Original Message- > From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:02 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring > > Sure - I could see that working. Anyone have thoughts whether an enum > could be used instead of an integer?

[PROPOSAL] Remove Setters from *JoinVO

*JoinVOs are used to store entries from MySQL views, which are not editable. I think removing setters from the *JoinVOs may help avoid some potential confusion as setters seem to imply that the fields are editable, which they really aren't. I started looking around and it looks like most setter

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" option, > and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee. Component-based assignment is just a wa

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

Unfortunately, that is out of scope for our plans right now. If anyone knows who originally asked for this functionality or who is still using it, we would be interested in having discussions around the use cases these APIs are addressing and then looking into bringing that functionality into ou

Re: Review Request 13938: StringUtils csv methods simplified

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13938/#review26676 --- utils/src/com/cloud/utils/StringUtils.java

Re: XenServer Question

What is your storage over provisioning factor ? Even that could be the reason. Regarding allocated vs used capacity I had written a wiki[1] sometime back. Please see if it helps. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Understanding+Dashbo ard Thanks, -Nitin On 04/10/13 8:08

[SOLVED] Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

That¹s great Benoit. You could have also found this out running the ssvm health check script. Thumb rule - In case of ssvm/secondary storage related issues first troubleshooting step is to run ssvm health check script On 04/10/13 1:37 AM, "benoit lair" wrote: >Hello, > >Issue resolved for me. >

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

As per thread below with Animesh, we would like to resurrect the issue. As per my conversation with Chip, the issue for not letting component maintainers - get assignments by default - was because we wanted to maintain a balance of "getting things done" vs "letting community grow" Question to J

RE: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Abhi It is best to set up a shared filter. You will need to open a INFRA ticket like this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/INFRA-6145 to get relevant permissions for the JIRA Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.c

Re: Scaling up cpu and memory of user vm above host capacity

changeServiceForVirtualMachine API was the old API to change the service offering for a stopped vm only. I think it shouldn't have succeeded for a running vm. Please file a bug if this is the case scaleVirtualMachine is the new API introduced in 4.2 for scaling a running/stopped vm. Do read the li

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-180 for this. Darren

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I just cherry picked that commit, so it should be fixed now. Darren On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Yes unfortunately when I did the rebase and pushed the branch, master > was broken. So that failing test is not related to Spring and was > removed in commit 765f56a02ced

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Yes unfortunately when I did the rebase and pushed the branch, master was broken. So that failing test is not related to Spring and was removed in commit 765f56a02ced44b7d95574f5901e834c799a56fe on master. Is there any way you can ignore the failure. Darren On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Prasan

Re: XenServer Question

Effectively, it's very surprising. I checked my differents storage (local as iscsi sr) on xcp 1.0, xcp 1.1, xcp 1.4.90, xcp 1.6, xenserver 6.0 and xenserver 6.2, i observe that i can have a 'used' storage more important that the 'allocated' one I verified connected to my hypervisors shells and ve

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

4.2 in the new repo, yes. It doesn't fail. I happend to notice the severe message as it ran by mobile biligual spell checker used Op 4 okt. 2013 16:22 schreef "David Nalley" : > Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question. > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote:

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

And i will hold my peace thee rest of the week. mobile biligual spell checker used Op 4 okt. 2013 16:28 schreef "David Nalley" : > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > H, > > > > Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master > > but only in 4.2?

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4799) Update Deployment Architecture Overview section

Travis: Why are we using linkend on some, and urls on others? I am reticent to put version specific urls in documents as that becomes a maintenance nightmare. --David On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Travis Graham (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-479

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master > but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait > with that for some reason? > There are two reasons that it's that way. First, some

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg > I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the > docs? > > > Pro

Re: XenServer Question

Doh! I guess that would have been helpful info. :) It is in XenCenter. If you click on an SR and look at the General tab. http://i.imgur.com/z5F1Ct0.png On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:34 AM, benoit lair wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Where do you see this information ? On the CS dashboard ? Or with > xencen

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg > I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the > docs? > I personally don't like the -all target. I generally consider the minimum

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225 > > > > > > What I am suggesting is that add a method something like > > boolean isEqual(var1,

Re: Review Request 14467: fix for Invalid SMTP breaks HA

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > On Thursday 03 October 2013 08:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > >> Description > >> --- > >> > >> added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and sending > m

2 questions regarding building docs

H, I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the docs? Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/zone-add.xml -> tmp/en-US/xml/zone-add.xml Beginning work on en-US Validation failed: hypervisor

Re: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Yes, specially the one in CC. On 04/10/13 6:16 pm, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: >Do you mean UI guys?? > >-Original Message- >From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:54 AM >To: CloudStack Dev >Cc: Brian Federle; Jessica Wang; Sonny C

Re: [DOCS] CS-docs patch

Hello Prasanna, After sending this out yesterday I realized it would probably get stripped so Chip recommended opening issues in Jira and attaching the patches there. I've created two issues and attached patches as well as attaching a patch to another issue that came in about the docs: * CLOUD

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Prasanna, I share Chips concern. But let me start by saying that given the effort Citrix puts in the integration testing, making it easy for your guys should be somewhat a priority. However, can we do the separation is such a way that integration tests as part of plugin and other enhancements is s

RE: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Do you mean UI guys?? -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:54 AM To: CloudStack Dev Cc: Brian Federle; Jessica Wang; Sonny Chhen Subject: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets There are around ~72 UI tickets open. Most of th

Re: unable to get tiny linux template in ready state, DOWNLOAD ERROR

hi guys , finally i was able to add the instance, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting the above like helped to find the problem. i ssh'd into SSVM using sh -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 root@LinkLocaip ran the script t

docs split of only to 4.2

H, Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait with that for some reason? Daan

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

I'll summarize and address the concerns raised so far. Marvin has been in this repo for a long time for us to start writing tests. The only tests I've seen coming are from a specific set of people focussed on QA efforts. I want to reduce the impediment for people who are writing tests *today*. Tho

[ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

There are around ~72 UI tickets open. Most of them are major, can documentation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them. Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open. project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in ("4.2.0", "4.2.1") AND text ~ “UI" -abh

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225 > > > > > > What I am suggesting is that add a method something like > > boolean isEqual(var1,

[ACS4.2.1] Doc tickets

There are around ~47 Documentation tickets open. Most of them are major, can documentation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them. Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open. project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in ("4.2.0", "4.2.1") AND text ~

Re: docs build with publican

works slow but like a charme. no tinkering needed for creating the devguide in pdf format. I am about to try the rest in pdf+html thanks Sebastien On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:58 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > Does anybody have a link to a howto t

[ACS4.2.1] Automation tickets

There are around ~110 Automation tickets open. Most of them are major, can automation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them. Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open. project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in ("4.2.0", "4.2.1") AND text ~ “Aut

  1   2   >