Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 6:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federl

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review26343 --- Commit 175549f3ab952bbd39318c16c269c16526255475 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 6:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federl

Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Hi Abhinav, May I know if whether below steps are required for upgrade from 4.1.x to 4.2.0? Because you mention that below is only applicable on sections 3.2 and 3.3, which are the sections for the earlier version to 4.2.0? === 6. Also, in all the sections 3.2 and 3.3 , add this step for agent u

Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Hi Abhinav and all, So is it confirmed that the correct system VM template name should be below? 1) systemvm-xenserver-4.2 2) systemvm-kvm-4.2 3) systemvm-vmware-4.2 4) systemvm-hyperv-4.2 5) systemvm-lxc-4.2 Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:47 AM, A

Re: Managed storage with KVM

I've been narrowing it down by putting in a million print-to-log statements. Do you know if it is a problem that value ends up null (in a constructor for Agent)? String value = _shell.getPersistentProperty(getResourceName(), "id"); In that same constructor, this line never finishes: if (!_resou

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Artifacts staged, just waiting for the mirrors to sync. > > Download page updated and on staging now (not published): > http://cloudstack.staging.apache.org/downloads.html > > Announcement draft sent to marketing@ for comment. > > Pypi update

Review Request 14307: CLOUDSTACK-702: New test for deploying vm in new cidr

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14307/ --- Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru, SrikanteswaraRao Ta

Review Request 14305: CLOUDSTACK-4493: registerSSHKeyPair API doc contains wrong API response (private key)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4493 Reposito

[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

This vote has passed with no -1 votes. +1 votes were from (with * binding): Chiradeep*, Hugo*, Chip*, Milamber, Amogh +0: Marcus* Marcus agreed to change his VOTE to +1 with a Release Note change that he will make. Wido can you build and publish the .deb packages Thanks Anim

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

I created a branch vmwware-wsdl at https://github.com/ibuildthecloud/cloudstack.git, and yes I did spell vmware wrong in the branch name. I also created https://reviews.apache.org/r/14304/ Darren On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya, > > This biggest advantage i see in

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

This vote has passed with no -1 votes. +1 votes were from (with * binding): Chiradeep*, Hugo*, Chip*, Milamber, Amogh +0: Marcus* Marcus agreed to change his VOTE to +1 with a Release Note change that he will make. Wido can you build and publish the .deb packages Thanks Animesh > ---

Review Request 14304: Generate JAX-WS client binding for VMware wsdl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14304/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: clou

Re: Review Request 14299: fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14299/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 2:21 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Thank you all. Let me know you have further comments. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:15 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Abhinav Roy; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Volunteers to Complete t

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

Heya, This biggest advantage i see in using vijava is that a lot of the functionality that we now have in the vmware-base project is already supplied with vijava. There is a lot of code that facilitates calling tasks and other stuff in our MO classes. These classes are available in vijava and c

Review Request 14299: fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14299/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: SSHException('Error reading SSH protocol banner',) while sshing to a machine behind a load balancing rule

Thanks for the replies Santhosh and Chiradeep. To answer your questions, the test is running through the marvin unit test framework and is using paramiko for the connection to the machine. Chiradeep could you please elaborate on how I could use HTTP in the unit tests to validate the stickiness of

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #3302

Fixed (hopefully) with 87dde7024bddb6d27b5002f47b3549b097d9a14b. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:15:58PM +, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [alex.huang] Committing review 13891. > > [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-46

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > If you remove it, it will break the following APIs: Alex had suggested that it's not maintained. Anybody want to try to maintain it / update it?

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

Looks like you are out of space. rocessing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 161342671900, via: 37, Ver: v1, Flags: 110, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"com.cloud.utils.e xception.CloudRuntimeException: org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error Child process (/bin/umount /mnt/99a4fb82

Re: Managed storage with KVM

It might be a centos specific thing. These are created by the init scripts. Check your agent init script on Ubuntu and see I'd you can decipher where it sends stdout. On Sep 23, 2013 5:21 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Weird...no such file exists. > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Marcus Sore

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Weird...no such file exists. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > maybe cloudstack-agent.out > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > OK, so, nothing is screaming out in the logs. I did notice the following: > > > > From setup.log: > > > > DEBUG:root

Re: Managed storage with KVM

maybe cloudstack-agent.out On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > OK, so, nothing is screaming out in the logs. I did notice the following: > > From setup.log: > > DEBUG:root:execute:apparmor_status |grep libvirt > > DEBUG:root:Failed to execute: > > > DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /u

Re: conflicting dependencies between CloudStack and Whirr

Okay, I officially throw in the towel on this one. I made really good progress on getting jackson into place, but after I was about 75% done I just felt it was WAY too big of a change to do at once. If we want to move to jackson, I would say the best approach would be more incremental and not big

Re: Managed storage with KVM

OK, so, nothing is screaming out in the logs. I did notice the following: >From setup.log: DEBUG:root:execute:apparmor_status |grep libvirt DEBUG:root:Failed to execute: DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /usr/sbin/service cloudstack-agent status DEBUG:root:Failed to execute: * could not access PID file

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Ah right, okay. So your talking about the order of the adapters. Currently that is maintained as the order in the AdapterList in the componentContext.xml. So what I've done is that extensions get added to "Registries." Registries that need to be ordered can specify an ordering configuration vari

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

I think I'll wait until the vote passes, just to be sure that it won't need to be backed out. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 2:44 PM >> To: dev@c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

I understand that loading order can be completely solved by Spring with dependency injection, either within flat context or hierarchy context structure. But some sibling plugins in CloudStack do require a flexible way to declare ordering for runtime. For example, allocator plugins or authenticator

Re: Review Request 13891: replaced volatile int values with AtomicInteger

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13891/#review26324 --- Ship it! Master: 3e813ce61d308c09ce23f54bd67adc980478640c - Alex H

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 2:44 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round) > > I can change my vote to +1 if we include instructions similar to th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

I can change my vote to +1 if we include instructions similar to the following in the upgrade notes: If using local storage on KVM, the local storage path needs to be changed in order to pass new validation. Remove any trailing slashes in the path column of the storage_pool table before starting a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

+1 Two tests (same env: CentOS 6.4 + KVM + NFS primary storage): * Fresh install test * Upgrade from 4.1.1 (fresh install with simple VMs/VirtualRouter) to 4.2.0 with success (after some fails because the Release Notes were incomplete) Tests of all languages UI with success (login + each mai

Re: Review Request 13891: replaced volatile int values with AtomicInteger

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13891/#review26322 --- ping? - Laszlo Hornyak On Aug. 28, 2013, 7:40 p.m., Laszlo Hornya

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Thanks, Marcus I've been developing on Windows for most of my time, so a bunch of these Linux-type commands are new to me and I don't always interpret the output correctly. Getting there. :) On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Nope, not running. That's just your grep proce

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

> -Original Message- > From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:55 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Radhika > Puthiyetath; Harikrishna Patnala > Subject: RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes > > Hi

Re: community testing

On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:58 PM >> To: Prasanna Santhanam >> Cc: Mike Tutkowski; Marcus Sorensen; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ahmad >> Emneina >> S

Re: conflicting dependencies between CloudStack and Whirr

On Sep 23, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I still think this is the wrong way to implement the Whirr integration. Probably, but it's too late now. We can just get it in a branch and look at it > > On 9/23/13 6:45 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: > >> >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Darre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding) On 9/20/13 8:36 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > > > > >I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > >Git Branch and Commit SH: >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs >/heads/4.2 >Commit: 69c459342c568e2400d57ee885

Review Request 14290: KVMFencer cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14290/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Review Request 14289: unit test for KVMFencer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14289/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: whoa! our official upgrade procedures require 8096?

Or make it a cloudmonkey script. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I don't think one example of abuse means we shouldn't have it > altogether. I do agree that we can't have any customer procedures > requiring it. I'm not really sure why this script even exists, it > looks

Re: conflicting dependencies between CloudStack and Whirr

I think I agree, but I hate to shoot down a GSoC project. Where is the code for this currently? I don't really know much about this enhancement. Regardless, I still want jackson. Darren On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I still think this is the wrong way to implemen

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Yes , that’s true Milamber. It's my fault, Somehow I overlooked it. But, the check for 8096 API port is already there for 4.1.x to 4.2 upgrades. Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:53 PM To: us...@

RE: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 12:55 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers! > > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > > > > > >> -Original Messag

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Siblings have no relationship to each other really. The load order doesn't matter as one sibling has no visibility to another. Child contexts are pretty much for plug-ins. Core components of ACS will live in the core context as they are all interdependent. I will explain the whole Spring lifecy

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Nope, not running. That's just your grep process. It would look like: root 24429 24428 1 14:25 ?00:00:08 jsvc.exec -cp /usr/share/java/commons-daemon.jar:/usr/share/java/jna.jar:/usr/share/cloudstack-agent/lib/activation-1.1.jar:/usr/share/cloudstack-agent/lib/antisamy-1.4.3.jar:/usr/

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Looks like it's running, though: mtutkowski@ubuntu:~$ ps -ef | grep jsvc 1000 7097 7013 0 14:32 pts/100:00:00 grep --color=auto jsvc On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hey Marcus, > > Maybe you could give me a better idea of what

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Hey Marcus, Maybe you could give me a better idea of what the "flow" is when adding a KVM host. It looks like we SSH into the potential KVM host and execute a startup script (giving it necessary info about the cloud and the management server it should talk to). After this, is the Java VM started

Re: [PROPOSAL] adding [SOLVED] tag in mailing list subject

I noticed you wrote, "using suggestions/solutions as replies send by community members." I would recommend replying with [SOLVED] even if you ended up solving the issue yourself. Just to pass the info around. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Well, if you've swapped out all of the INFO to DEBUG in /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml and restarted the agent, the agent will either spew messages about being unable to connect to the mgmt server, or crash, or run just fine (in which case you have no problem). The logs in debug should tell

RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Sep 23, 2013 1:03 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:38 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp

Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Le 23/09/2013 18:47, Abhinav Roy a ecrit : Yes , that’s true Milamber. It's my fault, Somehow I overlooked it. But, the check for 8096 API port is already there for 4.1.x to 4.2 upgrades. Sure? I've just found this in 4.1.x to 4.2 section: 10. Once you've upgraded the packages on your managem

RE: community testing

> -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:58 PM > To: Prasanna Santhanam > Cc: Mike Tutkowski; Marcus Sorensen; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ahmad > Emneina > Subject: Re: community testing > > > While everything happens on the

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:44:51PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > I'd like to get a final word on this - is it OK to be removed? Is there > someone who is knowledgable with what it will take to remove it and/or is > comfortable removing it? I don't know how tied into the rest of the codebas

Re: Managed storage with KVM

Hey Marcus, I've been investigating my issue with not being able to add a KVM host to CS. For what it's worth, this comes back successful: SSHCmdHelper.sshExecuteCmd(sshConnection, "cloudstack-setup-agent " + parameters, 3); This is what the command looks like: cloudstack-setup-agent -m 192.1

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

This is the code snippet from the build.sh bundled with Vmware SDK: if [ "x${1}" != "x-w" ] then echo Generating vim25 stubs from wsdl if [ -d "com/vmware/vim25" ] then rm -rf com/vmware/vim25 fi mkdir -p com/vmware/vim25 cp -f ../../../wsdl/vim25/*.* com/vmware/vim25/

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

Artifacts staged, just waiting for the mirrors to sync. Download page updated and on staging now (not published): http://cloudstack.staging.apache.org/downloads.html Announcement draft sent to marketing@ for comment. Pypi updated: I've actually had to replace the previously uploaded 5.0.0 versi

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

Dear all, The script failed to restart the system VMs. See below. All my system VMs (except one virtual router) are in "Starting" state but it never got started. Any idea how to resolve this issue? === nohup: ignoring input /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No su

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

Dear all, The script failed to restart the system VMs. See below. All my system VMs (except one virtual router) are in "Starting" state but it never got started. Any idea how to resolve this issue? === nohup: ignoring input /usr/bin/cloudstack-sysvmadm: line 21: /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: No su

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

Hi Chiradeep, I have uploaded the logs in pastebin here: http://pastebin.com/jy49jF4A Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Logs? > > On 9/23/13 12:46 PM, "Indra Pramana" wrote: > > >Dear

Re: Upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 failed: Error creating bean with name 'apiDBUtils'

Darren, You are my life saver! Managed to get the componentContext.xml file which comes with the 4.2 dist and it works! Checking further now if everything is OK... Many thanks!!! On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Hi Darren, > > Good day to you, and thank you for your e-

RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp > release process > > Guys, I think we are not currently in a stat

Re: cloudstack-sysvmadm takes very long to run?

Logs? On 9/23/13 12:46 PM, "Indra Pramana" wrote: >Dear all, > >The script failed to restart the system VMs. See below. > >All my system VMs (except one virtual router) are in "Starting" state but >it never got started. Any idea how to resolve this issue? > >=== >nohup: ignoring input >/usr/bin/

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

How'd you know about the post processing? I generated the stubs and it compile perfectly and ACS compile against the stubs too. I have no clue if it work as I never ran it though. One thing I ran into was that you had to generate for jaxws 2.1. Darren > On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Min C

CloudSatck SF BayArea Meetup on October 15th @ SAP Labs : Spread the word

Folks I am happy to announce the CloudStack Bay area meetup is on October 15th. Here is the link for meetup details http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-SF-Bay-Area-Users-Group/events/141814852/ If you wish to be the speaker for this meetup please reach out to Karen Vuong, John Kinsella or Animes

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Hi Milamber, Created a defect for both the issues you pointed out at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4728 Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4725) KVM agent fails to join if local pool is already registered

I'm wondering if the upgraded agent is treated as a new host. This was literally built fresh, new zone, added one host, upgraded to 4.2, break... Is storage plugin's initialize called every time a host connects, or should it only be called for new agents/hosts? On Sep 23, 2013 12:43 PM, "edison su

Re: whoa! our official upgrade procedures require 8096?

The script was created back when 8096 was opened by default. We should def. come up with more secure way for calling the Apis for system vms restart. We already have APIs for restarting the vms, they just have to be called against all system vms in cloudstack - therefore the script. My suggest

RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp > release process > > On Sep 23, 2013 1:03 PM, "Animesh Chaturv

Re: conflicting dependencies between CloudStack and Whirr

I still think this is the wrong way to implement the Whirr integration. On 9/23/13 6:45 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Darren Shepherd > wrote: > >> The only way this will get committed is if we either move to latest >>gson or >> jackson. Regardless, the outcome will be tha

Review Request 14285: Add multi-row action support to UI list views (CLOUDSTACK-1579)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14285/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

[PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

Guys, I think we are not currently in a state to handle time-based releases. Until we can cut master at any time and have it releasable, or at least at a reasonable RC-level matching minimum tested requirements, it's just going to continue to be an exercise in frustration to cut RCs simply becaus

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

I merged changes from Radhika as per updates from Abhinav into 4.2 branch and kicked off a new doc build for release notes on Jenkins > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 4:07 AM > To: Abhinav Roy; dev@

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Darren, Due to internal release work, I haven't got a chance to review it but I'm planning to do so later today and tomorrow. Before that, I have one question about hierarchy-orginzated context structure, could you elaborate an example to the ML on how two sibling plugins to declare their runtime

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

I'd like to get a final word on this - is it OK to be removed? Is there someone who is knowledgable with what it will take to remove it and/or is comfortable removing it? I don't know how tied into the rest of the codebase it is. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Da

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

When I upgraded vmware sdk from 4.x to 5.1 before, I looked into the build script used by Vmware published SDK. It seems that besides normal jawxs generated client stubs from wsdl, Vmware sdk published build script has another post processing done on VimService.java class generated. The post proces

Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Hi Abhinav, >But, the check for 8096 API port is already there for 4.1.x to 4.2 upgrades. I don't think it's there. Can you check again? Thank you. On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Abhinav Roy wrote: > Yes , that’s true Milamber. It's my fault, Somehow I overlooked it. > But, the check for

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

All, After a little more investigation, I found that the 'MigrateCommand' defined its 'executeInSequence' method to return 'FALSE', which seems to make the vm migrations as serial even if the migration requests are dispatched to ha_worker in parallel. You can confirm this in line 56 of '/cloudstac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

+1 Based on testing described in release procedure. Thanks, Amogh On 9/22/13 11:24 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >+0 (binding), created 4.1.1 zone with vms and a vpc, upgraded to 4.2 >via RPMs. Restarted vpc. Then wiped database and redeployed zone, vms >to test 4.2 basic functionality. All on C

Re: Upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 failed: Error creating bean with name 'apiDBUtils'

Hi Darren, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. I chose to keep the existing componentContext.xml because of this instruction on the documentation: After upgrading to 4.2, API clients are expected to send plain text passwords for login and user creation, instead of MD5 hash. If A

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

Prior to 5.1, VMware provides java binding in its SDK and this is where CloudStack VMware integration began with. Starting from 5.1, VMware no longer provides the java binding in binary form and recommends its customers to generate directly from its WS WSDL. Since we are not sure if we can distrib

Re: whoa! our official upgrade procedures require 8096?

I don't think one example of abuse means we shouldn't have it altogether. I do agree that we can't have any customer procedures requiring it. I'm not really sure why this script even exists, it looks up the system vms in the database, then fires off calls to cloudstack to restart them, am I missing

Re: Upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 failed: Error creating bean with name 'apiDBUtils'

>From the spring log it seems it can't find GlobalLoadBalancingRulesService. That is defined in componentContext.xml. Is it possible you have a customized version of componentContext.xml? If you did you need to merge your customizations into the new componentContext.xml shipped with 4.2. Darren

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

If you remove it, it will break the following APIs: createPool createVolumeOnFiler createLunOnFiler AssociateLun Here's how it is used: The steps are 1. create a volume pool using the createPool API (algorithm can be "leas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:36:11AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 69c459342c568e2400d57ee8

Re: [PROPOSAL] adding [SOLVED] tag in mailing list subject

Excellent suggestion On 9/23/13 6:50 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >Hi, > >When the issues raised in dev/users mailing lists are solved by using >suggestions/solutions as replies >send by community members then the one who raised the issue please reply >to the thread by adding [SOLVED] tag. >

Re: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Le 23/09/2013 10:48, Abhinav Roy a ecrit : Hi, Here are some of the steps which are missing from the release notes, 1. Before upgrading from any version to 4.2 we need to register the new 4.2 systemvm templates . This step is there in section 3.3 i.e for upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2, but

RE: Upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 failed: Error creating bean with name 'apiDBUtils'

Can you post the log, mailing list will not take an attachment, so you can create a JIRA ticket and put in the log as attachment. Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:10 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: Moved the systemvm to its own maven project

Hugo, I emailed it to you directly, I'll put it below in this email, but I'm using gmail and it might screw up the patch >From b7e4e9c3770e44fb055007dcbdfb4ac9e426b787 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Darren Shepherd Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:59:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Update paths to reflect

whoa! our official upgrade procedures require 8096?

I complained once before that I didn't like the existence of 8096 but then plenty responded that its an optional thing. I just noticed in another thread that cloud-sysvmadm requires 8096. This is exactly why 8096 should not exist. If we create an unauthenticated backdoor, its just too tempting t

Upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0 failed: Error creating bean with name 'apiDBUtils'

Dear all, Apologise, reposting this issue since the subject on the earlier thread might not be clearly depicting the problem. I tried to perform upgrade of CloudStack version 4.1.1 to 4.2.0, and I am not able to access the CloudStack GUI after the upgrade. I am able to start the cloudstack-manag

Re: Upgrading from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0, cloudstack-sysvmadm fails to execute

Dear Simon and all, Managed to use "--force-reinstall true" option to force reinstall the cloudstack-management. However, same issue persists after reinstallation. Error message on management-server.log file: 2013-09-23 23:06:17,884 ERROR [web.context.ContextLoader] (main:null) Context init

Re: Upgrading from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0, cloudstack-sysvmadm fails to execute

Hi Simon and all, I tried to rebuild/recompile from the beginning. How to force my Cloudstack management server to perform the update? It says it's already the newest version: root@cs-mgmt-01:/var/log/cloudstack/management# apt-get install cloudstack-management Reading package lists... Done Buil

[RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

This vote has passed with no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes were from (with * binding): Marcus*, Rohit, Sebastien*, Ian, David*, Sateesh I'll start the process of staging the artifacts and edit the website to support the new distribution! -chip On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Chip Childer

Re: Upgrading from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0, cloudstack-sysvmadm fails to execute

Hi Simon, Yes, I downloaded the source from the URL given by Animesh when he started the last vote. [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round) which is this file: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2 I then compiled it as follows

Re: Upgrading from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0, cloudstack-sysvmadm fails to execute

Indra, Can you supply some more information about your installation? Is this built from source and installed, or packaged? What distro are you running? Any other errors during installation or build? - Original Message - From: "Indra Pramana" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us..

Using Vlan id in the physical network

Hello, I am working on test cases of "adding non contiguous vlan ranges" in the physical network. (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701) One of the test case requires to make use of the vlan id from the extended range. Can you guide me in how I can use this vlan id? *Issue:* If I

[PROPOSAL] adding [SOLVED] tag in mailing list subject

Hi, When the issues raised in dev/users mailing lists are solved by using suggestions/solutions as replies send by community members then the one who raised the issue please reply to the thread by adding [SOLVED] tag. Also please add the accumulated steps performed to solve it, this will help

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

> Do you know if legally we can add the vmware wsdl to git? If I recall correctly when we discussed it before it seems we were instructed to ask legal@ for blessing. That said - shipping or not shipping in a binary isn't really an issue as a project our official releases are always source. --Davi

  1   2   >