Looks like it's running, though:

mtutkowski@ubuntu:~$ ps -ef | grep jsvc
1000      7097  7013  0 14:32 pts/1    00:00:00 grep --color=auto jsvc



On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Hey Marcus,
>
> Maybe you could give me a better idea of what the "flow" is when adding a
> KVM host.
>
> It looks like we SSH into the potential KVM host and execute a startup
> script (giving it necessary info about the cloud and the management server
> it should talk to).
>
> After this, is the Java VM started?
>
> After a reboot, I assume the JVM is started automatically?
>
> How do you debug your KVM-side Java code?
>
> Been looking through the logs and nothing obvious sticks out. I will have
> another look.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Marcus,
>>
>> I've been investigating my issue with not being able to add a KVM host to
>> CS.
>>
>> For what it's worth, this comes back successful:
>>
>> SSHCmdHelper.sshExecuteCmd(sshConnection, "cloudstack-setup-agent " +
>> parameters, 3);
>>
>> This is what the command looks like:
>>
>> cloudstack-setup-agent  -m 192.168.233.1 -z 1 -p 1 -c 1 -g
>> 6b4aa1c2-2ac9-3c60-aabe-704aed40c684 -a --pubNic=cloudbr0 --prvNic=cloudbr0
>> --guestNic=cloudbr0
>>
>> The problem is this method in LibvirtServerDiscoverer never finds a
>> matching host in the DB:
>>
>> waitForHostConnect(long dcId, long podId, long clusterId, String guid)
>>
>> I assume once the KVM host is up and running that it's supposed to call
>> into the CS MS so the DB can be updated as such?
>>
>> If so, the problem must be on the KVM side.
>>
>> I did run this again (from the KVM host) to see if the connection was in
>> place:
>>
>> mtutkowski@ubuntu:~$ telnet 192.168.233.1 8250
>>
>> Trying 192.168.233.1...
>>
>> Connected to 192.168.233.1.
>>
>> Escape character is '^]'.
>> So that looks good.
>>
>> I turned on more info in the debug log, but nothing obvious jumps out as
>> of yet.
>>
>> If you have any thoughts on this, please shoot them my way. :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> First step is for me to get this working for KVM, though. :)
>>>
>>> Once I do that, I can perhaps make modifications to the storage
>>> framework and hypervisor plug-ins to refactor the logic and such.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Same would work for KVM.
>>>>
>>>> If CreateCommand and DestroyCommand were called at the appropriate
>>>> times by the storage framework, I could move my connect and disconnect
>>>> logic out of the attach/detach logic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Conversely, if the storage framework called the DestroyCommand for
>>>>> managed storage after the DetachCommand, then I could have had my remove
>>>>> SR/datastore logic placed in the DestroyCommand handling rather than in 
>>>>> the
>>>>> DetachCommand handling.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Edison's plug-in calls the CreateCommand. Mine does not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The initial approach that was discussed during 4.2 was for me to
>>>>>> modify the attach/detach logic only in the XenServer and VMware 
>>>>>> hypervisor
>>>>>> plug-ins.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that I think about it more, though, I kind of would have liked to
>>>>>> have the storage framework send a CreateCommand to the hypervisor before
>>>>>> sending the AttachCommand if the storage in question was managed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I could have created my SR/datastore in the CreateCommand and
>>>>>> the AttachCommand would have had the SR/datastore that it was always
>>>>>> expecting (and I wouldn't have had to create the SR/datastore in the
>>>>>> AttachCommand).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I think it probably is as well, but I figured you'd be in a
>>>>>>> better position to tell.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I see that copyAsync is unsupported in your current 4.2 driver, does
>>>>>>> that mean that there's no template support? Or is it some other call
>>>>>>> that does templating now? I'm still getting up to speed on all of the
>>>>>>> 4.2 changes. I was just looking at CreateCommand in
>>>>>>> LibvirtComputingResource, since that's the only place
>>>>>>> createPhysicalDisk is called, and it occurred to me that
>>>>>>> CreateCommand
>>>>>>> might be skipped altogether when utilizing storage plugins.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>> <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> > That's an interesting comment, Marcus.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > It was my intent that it should work with any CloudStack "managed"
>>>>>>> storage
>>>>>>> > that uses an iSCSI target. Even though I'm using CHAP, I wrote the
>>>>>>> code so
>>>>>>> > CHAP didn't have to be used.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > As I'm doing my testing, I can try to think about whether it is
>>>>>>> generic
>>>>>>> > enough to keep those names or not.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > My expectation is that it is generic enough.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> I added a comment to your diff. In general I think it looks good,
>>>>>>> >> though I obviously can't vouch for whether or not it will work.
>>>>>>> One
>>>>>>> >> thing I do have reservations about is the adaptor/pool naming. If
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> >> think the code is generic enough that it will work for anyone who
>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>> >> an iscsi LUN-per-volume plugin, then it's OK, but if there's
>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> >> about it that's specific to YOUR iscsi target or how it likes to
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> >> treated then I'd say that they should be named something less
>>>>>>> generic
>>>>>>> >> than iScsiAdmStorage.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>> >> <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> > Great - thanks!
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Just to give you an overview of what my code does (for when you
>>>>>>> get a
>>>>>>> >> > chance to review it):
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > SolidFireHostListener is registered in
>>>>>>> SolidfirePrimaryDataStoreProvider.
>>>>>>> >> > Its hostConnect method is invoked when a host connects with the
>>>>>>> CS MS. If
>>>>>>> >> > the host is running KVM, the listener sends a
>>>>>>> ModifyStoragePoolCommand to
>>>>>>> >> > the host. This logic was based off of DefaultHostListener.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > The handling of ModifyStoragePoolCommand is unchanged. It
>>>>>>> invokes
>>>>>>> >> > createStoragePool on the KVMStoragePoolManager. The
>>>>>>> KVMStoragePoolManager
>>>>>>> >> > asks for an adaptor and finds my new one:
>>>>>>> iScsiAdmStorageAdaptor (which
>>>>>>> >> was
>>>>>>> >> > registered in the constructor for KVMStoragePoolManager under
>>>>>>> the key of
>>>>>>> >> > StoragePoolType.Iscsi.toString()).
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > iScsiAdmStorageAdaptor.createStoragePool just makes an instance
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> >> > iScsiAdmStoragePool, adds it to a map, and returns the pointer
>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>> >> > iScsiAdmStoragePool object. The key of the map is the UUID of
>>>>>>> the storage
>>>>>>> >> > pool.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > When a volume is attached, createPhysicalDisk is invoked for
>>>>>>> managed
>>>>>>> >> > storage rather than getPhysicalDisk. createPhysicalDisk uses
>>>>>>> iscsiadm to
>>>>>>> >> > establish the iSCSI connection to the volume on the SAN and a
>>>>>>> >> > KVMPhysicalDisk is returned to be used in the attach logic that
>>>>>>> follows.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > When a volume is detached, getPhysicalDisk is invoked with the
>>>>>>> IQN of the
>>>>>>> >> > volume if the storage pool in question is managed storage.
>>>>>>> Otherwise, the
>>>>>>> >> > normal vol.getPath() is used.
>>>>>>> iScsiAdmStorageAdaptor.getPhysicalDisk just
>>>>>>> >> > returns a new instance of KVMPhysicalDisk to be used in the
>>>>>>> detach logic.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Once the volume has been detached,
>>>>>>> iScsiAdmStoragePool.deletePhysicalDisk
>>>>>>> >> > is invoked if the storage pool is managed. deletePhysicalDisk
>>>>>>> removes the
>>>>>>> >> > iSCSI connection to the volume using iscsiadm.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> >> >wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> Its the log4j properties file in /etc/cloudstack/agent change
>>>>>>> all INFO
>>>>>>> >> to
>>>>>>> >> >> DEBUG.  I imagine the agent just isn't starting, you can tail
>>>>>>> the log
>>>>>>> >> when
>>>>>>> >> >> you try to start the service, or maybe it will spit something
>>>>>>> out into
>>>>>>> >> one
>>>>>>> >> >> of the other files in /var/log/cloudstack/agent
>>>>>>> >> >> On Sep 21, 2013 5:19 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > This is how I've been trying to query for the status of the
>>>>>>> service (I
>>>>>>> >> >> > assume it could be started this way, as well, by changing
>>>>>>> "status" to
>>>>>>> >> >> > "start" or "restart"?):
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > mtutkowski@ubuntu:/etc/cloudstack/agent$ sudo
>>>>>>> /usr/sbin/service
>>>>>>> >> >> > cloudstack-agent status
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > I get this back:
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > Failed to execute: * could not access PID file for
>>>>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > I've made a bunch of code changes recently, though, so I
>>>>>>> think I'm
>>>>>>> >> going
>>>>>>> >> >> to
>>>>>>> >> >> > rebuild and redeploy everything.
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > The debug info sounds helpful. Where can I set enable.debug?
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > Thanks, Marcus!
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>> shadow...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > >wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > OK, will check it out in the next few days. As mentioned,
>>>>>>> you can
>>>>>>> >> set
>>>>>>> >> >> up
>>>>>>> >> >> > > your Ubuntu vm as the management server as well if all
>>>>>>> else fails.
>>>>>>> >>  If
>>>>>>> >> >> > you
>>>>>>> >> >> > > can get to the mgmt server on 8250 from the KVM host, then
>>>>>>> you need
>>>>>>> >> to
>>>>>>> >> >> > > enable.debug on the agent. It won't run without
>>>>>>> complaining loudly
>>>>>>> >> if
>>>>>>> >> >> it
>>>>>>> >> >> > > can't get to the mgmt server, and I didn't see that in
>>>>>>> your agent
>>>>>>> >> log,
>>>>>>> >> >> so
>>>>>>> >> >> > > perhaps its not running. I assume you know how to
>>>>>>> stop/start the
>>>>>>> >> agent
>>>>>>> >> >> on
>>>>>>> >> >> > > KVM via 'service cloud stacks agent'.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > On Sep 21, 2013 3:02 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>> >> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > Hey Marcus,
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > I haven't yet been able to test my new code, but I
>>>>>>> thought you
>>>>>>> >> would
>>>>>>> >> >> > be a
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > good person to ask to review it:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/incubator-cloudstack/commit/ea74b312a8a36801994500407fd54f0cdda55e37
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > All it is supposed to do is attach and detach a data
>>>>>>> disk (that
>>>>>>> >> has
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > guaranteed IOPS) with KVM as the hypervisor. The data
>>>>>>> disk
>>>>>>> >> happens to
>>>>>>> >> >> > be
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > from SolidFire-backed storage - where we have a 1:1
>>>>>>> mapping
>>>>>>> >> between a
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > CloudStack volume and a data disk.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > There is no support for hypervisor snapshots or stuff
>>>>>>> like that
>>>>>>> >> >> > (likely a
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > future release)...just attaching and detaching a data
>>>>>>> disk in 4.3.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > Thanks!
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > When I re-deployed the DEBs, I didn't remove
>>>>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>>>>> >> >> first.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > Would
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > that be a problem? I just did a sudo apt-get install
>>>>>>> >> >> > cloudstack-agent.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> I get the same error running the command manually:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> mtutkowski@ubuntu:/etc/cloudstack/agent$ sudo
>>>>>>> >> /usr/sbin/service
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> cloudstack-agent status
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>  * could not access PID file for cloudstack-agent
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> agent.log looks OK to me:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,010 INFO
>>>>>>>  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > Agent
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> started
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,011 INFO
>>>>>>>  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Implementation Version is 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,015 INFO
>>>>>>>  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> agent.properties found at
>>>>>>> >> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,023 INFO
>>>>>>>  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Defaulting to using properties file for storage
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,024 INFO
>>>>>>>  [cloud.agent.AgentShell]
>>>>>>> >> >> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Defaulting to the constant time backoff algorithm
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,029 INFO  [cloud.utils.LogUtils]
>>>>>>> >> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > log4j
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> configuration found at
>>>>>>> /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,163 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent]
>>>>>>> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> id
>>>>>>> >> >> > is 3
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> 2013-09-20 19:35:39,197 INFO
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>  [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
>>>>>>> (main:null)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> VirtualRoutingResource _scriptDir to use:
>>>>>>> >> >> scripts/network/domr/kvm
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> However, I wasn't aware that setup.log was
>>>>>>> important. This
>>>>>>> >> seems
>>>>>>> >> >> to
>>>>>>> >> >> > > be
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > a
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> problem, but I'm not sure what it might indicate:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /usr/sbin/service
>>>>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>>>>> >> status
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> DEBUG:root:Failed to execute: * could not access PID
>>>>>>> file for
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> cloudstack-agent
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /usr/sbin/service
>>>>>>> cloudstack-agent
>>>>>>> >> start
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Marcus Sorensen <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > shadow...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> Sorry, I saw that in the log, I thought it was the
>>>>>>> agent log
>>>>>>> >> for
>>>>>>> >> >> > > some
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> reason. Is the agent started? That might be the
>>>>>>> place to
>>>>>>> >> look.
>>>>>>> >> >> > There
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > is
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> an
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> agent log for the agent and one for the setup when
>>>>>>> it adds
>>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>>> >> >> > host,
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> both
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> in /var/log
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> On Sep 20, 2013 10:42 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > Is it saying that the MS is at the IP address or
>>>>>>> the KVM
>>>>>>> >> host?
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > The KVM host is at 192.168.233.10.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > The MS host is at 192.168.233.1.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > I see this for my host Global Settings parameter:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > hostThe ip address of management
>>>>>>> server192.168.233.1
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties has a
>>>>>>> >> >> host=192.168.233.1
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > value.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> shadow...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > The log says your mgmt server is
>>>>>>> 192.168.233.10? But you
>>>>>>> >> >> tried
>>>>>>> >> >> > > to
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> telnet
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > to
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > 192.168.233.1? It might be enough to change
>>>>>>> that in
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties, but you
>>>>>>> may want
>>>>>>> >> to
>>>>>>> >> >> > edit
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > config
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > as well to tell it the real ms IP.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > On Sep 20, 2013 10:12 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > Here's what my /etc/network/interfaces file
>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>> >> like, if
>>>>>>> >> >> > > that
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> is of
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > interest (the 192.168.233.0 network is the
>>>>>>> NAT network
>>>>>>> >> >> > VMware
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> Fusion
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > set
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > up):
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > auto lo
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > iface lo inet loopback
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > auto eth0
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > iface eth0 inet manual
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > auto cloudbr0
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > iface cloudbr0 inet static
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     address 192.168.233.10
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     netmask 255.255.255.0
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     network 192.168.233.0
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     broadcast 192.168.233.255
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_ports eth0
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_fd 5
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_stp off
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     bridge_maxwait 1
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     post-up route add default gw
>>>>>>> 192.168.233.2 metric 1
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >     pre-down route del default gw
>>>>>>> 192.168.233.2
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Mike
>>>>>>> Tutkowski <
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > You appear to be correct. This is from the
>>>>>>> MS log
>>>>>>> >> >> (below).
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> Discovery
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > timed
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > out.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I'm not sure why this would be. My network
>>>>>>> settings
>>>>>>> >> >> > > shouldn't
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> have
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > changed
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > since the last time I tried this.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I am able to ping the KVM host from the MS
>>>>>>> host and
>>>>>>> >> vice
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > versa.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I'm even able to manually kick off a VM on
>>>>>>> the KVM
>>>>>>> >> host
>>>>>>> >> >> > and
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> ping from
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > it
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > to the MS host.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I am using NAT from my Mac OS X host (also
>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>>> >> >> CS
>>>>>>> >> >> > > MS)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> to the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > VM
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > running KVM (VMware Fusion).
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,141 DEBUG
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> [c.c.h.k.d.LibvirtServerDiscoverer]
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>>>>> Timeout,
>>>>>>> >> to
>>>>>>> >> >> > wait
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > for
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > host
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > connecting to mgt svr, assuming it is failed
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,144 WARN
>>>>>>> >> >>  [c.c.r.ResourceManagerImpl]
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>>>>> Unable to
>>>>>>> >> >> find
>>>>>>> >> >> > > the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> server
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > resources at http://192.168.233.10
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,145 INFO
>>>>>>> >> >> >  [c.c.u.e.CSExceptionErrorCode]
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>>>>> Could not
>>>>>>> >> >> find
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> exception:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > com.cloud.exception.DiscoveryException in
>>>>>>> error code
>>>>>>> >> >> list
>>>>>>> >> >> > > for
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > exceptions
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > 2013-09-20 19:40:40,147 WARN
>>>>>>> >>  [o.a.c.a.c.a.h.AddHostCmd]
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > (613487991@qtp-1659933291-3:ctx-6b28dc48)
>>>>>>> Exception:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > com.cloud.exception.DiscoveryException:
>>>>>>> Unable to add
>>>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > host
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > at
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceManagerImpl.java:778)
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > I do seem to be able to telnet in from my
>>>>>>> KVM host to
>>>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>>>> >> >> > MS
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> host's
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > 8250
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > port:
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > mtutkowski@ubuntu:~$ telnet 192.168.233.1
>>>>>>> 8250
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > Trying 192.168.233.1...
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > Connected to 192.168.233.1.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > > Escape character is '^]'.
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > --
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > cloud<
>>>>>>> >> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > > *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > --
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > cloud<
>>>>>>> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> > *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> --
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>> *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> --
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >> *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > --
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > > *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > --
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > > > *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> > > >
>>>>>>> >> >> > >
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> > --
>>>>>>> >> >> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> >> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> >> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> >> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> >> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>>>>> >> >> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> >> > *™*
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>>> >> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> >> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> >> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> >> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> >> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>>>>> >> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> >> > *™*
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>>> > o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>>> > Advancing the way the world uses the
>>>>>>> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>>> > *™*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>>> *™*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>>> *™*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>>> *™*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>>> o: 303.746.7302
>>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>>> *™*
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
>> *™*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*

Reply via email to