---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11649/#review23000
---
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/resource/ArchiveAle
That's correct. Currently all messages are hard-coded in the Java code. First
all these strings needs to be moved out to something like a 'resource file' and
only then they can be localized.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursda
Hi,
4.2 Management server startup failure is fixed with latest commit from Edison
:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=ecd2a273cbf21ec7388afdc1cbeda35aa421bd1a
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@c
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> 3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release?
> Such as adding it into automate test? Right now, I break this
> feature, I am pretty sure, it will be broken by other developers, if
> we continue adding feature without
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:46:50PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm concerned that object store implementations that's going into
> 4.2 will repeat this fate if we don't add them into the automated
> test environment. Perhaps, you, me, Edison, Prassana, and perhaps
> Thomas can work toget
This is sort of related to this topic.
It sounds like CS relies on vCenter for HA.
How about for XenServer and KVM?
I don't think KVM has any notion of HA, so I assume CS handles it for KVM.
Is that true?
With XenServer, is CS the only entity that handles HA or can that be
enabled within XenSer
Hi,
I was wondering if the GUI is the only component of CloudStack that is
localized?
It looks like we never localize anything in the Java codebase. That being
the case, error messages returned from the Java side to the client appear
in English only.
Does that sound correct?
Thanks!
--
*Mike
Association of DC to a Zone was introduced as part of [1]. With this change
VCenter details at the "Add Cluster" page should be optional to take care of
legacy zones(zones created prior to [1] support). This could be a bug in UI
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Mapping
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22999
---
Review request already got a ship it. Committed the changes to maste
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#review22998
---
Ship it!
Committed the changes to master and 4.2. Kindly close the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22996
---
Commit b5cf3510eb01b8b81f3437eaebbb4a6ede0f55bc in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#review22997
---
Commit 2ac8f2b4525d664c9e44a9846cd688020df5cc72 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12245/#review22994
---
Commit 8bd1d27315cf1dbac29e2328bbf50c4aff784555 in branch refs/heads
That's right. Cloudstack relies on native HA capabilities provided by vSphere.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirkkosin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:30 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/#review22995
---
Commit 2e8d16b36549d6364ed0b4e54b095c7101d64e7c in branch refs/heads
Failed to start management server in 4.2 build, created blocker defect
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3459;
Observed below error in MS log
2013-07-11 00:28:50,831 ERROR [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Duplica
Vijay,
I did clean build. Not seeing error.
Is ListVmwareDcsCmd.class in one of the jars? Probably you might want to do a
grep in target directory.
- Sateesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelven Yang
> Sent: 11 July 2013 06:59
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> Su
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12278/#review22993
---
Commit 4d4bd8a263b974daf53a60a1590f22c96bdd5e48 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12278/#review22991
---
Commit b4cd6f097fcac7033ca8a07143e9e2592369945b in branch
refs/head
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12278/#review22992
---
Commit 3f5c1c6da3d2152fdc966603f929c3ea880d8b60 in branch refs/heads
Greetings,I've been trying to get this advanced networking going on my server. However, it's just not working; I am utilizing 1 server for everything. KVM |CentOS 6.4| CS 4.1, is there a trick to this that I am JUST not getting. Along with that, it works without issues in basic mode.I just wanted t
You're doing great, Edison. :) Keep up all the awesome work!!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> I spent two days to install Basio, about one week to get Cloudian work,
> don't know how many days I need to get swift work.
> Guys, don't blame me not support this feature and that
OK - thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> short answer... dont think so. having said that, I believe we used DSL
> which can be downloaded from:
> http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
>
> its around 50 megs :)
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.t
Thanks, everyone!
I was mainly curious about the "traditional" model (as opposed to the
SolidFire plug-in) where multiple VMs and data disks share an iSCSI LUN (a
customer asked about how LUN extension works).
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> But, if the iscsi LUN is managed
The website comes back online now. Just in time for the newsletter this
week. XD
---
Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher
Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory
ryan...@cht.com.tw
Is ListVmwareDcsCmd.class in one of the jars?
Kelven
On 7/10/13 5:55 PM, "Vijayendra Bhamidipati"
wrote:
>I'm running into the following spring exception when starting up the
>mgmt. server on latest master:
>
>org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
>bean with na
Hi, unless something changed (I checked 4.0/4.1 release notes and found
nothing), CloudStack uses the native vSphere HA (unlike XenServer and
KVM), so HA must be enabled in a CloudStack-managed vSphere for HA to
work. Shutting down a VM through vCenter is probably seen as a valid
shutdown (same as
I'm running into the following spring exception when starting up the mgmt.
server on latest master:
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean
with name 'apiDiscoveryServiceImpl': Injection of autowired dependencies
failed; nested exception is
org.springframew
On 7/8/13 1:40 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
>So to the original question, is it your opinion that a single
>management server (non-clustered) should also fence itself, or wait
>for the database connection to be restored?
Yes, my opinion is that a single management server should also fence
itse
But, if the iscsi LUN is managed by solidfire's cloudstack plugin, then the
size of change need to be handled by solidfire:
1. resize the LUN on solidfire's storage though the plugin.
2. need to talk to xenserver hypervisor in your plugin, that the size of LUN is
changed. Make sure, the volume is
Note that cloudstack RPMs don't ship with a tomcat6.conf, only:
/etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-nonssl.conf
/etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-ssl.conf
I believe it's the cloudstack-setup-management that creates a symlink
to the correct one of the two.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Marcus
The user, on installation of the cloudstack-management RPM, should have seen:
"Unable to determine ssl settings for tomcat.conf, please run
cloudstack-setup-management manually"
If there was a previous install, the existing tomcat6.conf would have
been used. Since there is none, the user needs to
Cooli like that even better. :)
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Expanding a volume on a SAN
>
> If you put the primary storage in maintenance mode to
If you put the primary storage in maintenance mode to evacuate the VM, when you
cancel maintenance mode for the primary storage, CS will get the new size of
the primary storage.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4
Geoff, can you answer Keerthi ?
thanks
On Jun 29, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Is there any patch file for cloudstack-4.1 to added xenserver-6.2.0 .
>
>
>
> I knew that
> plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/discoverer/XcpServerDiscoverer.java
On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:58 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Fresh install /setup, I am getting error:
>
> [root@cloud ~]# /etc/init.d/cloudstack-management start
> /etc/sysconfig/cloudstack-management: line 21:
> /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6.conf: No such file or directory
> Starti
>
> I agree with your points above, but think that we need to take this step by
> step. Let's figure out what code isn't actually in shape, based on historical
> understanding first. We then at least have a target to ask the next question:
> what's covered by testing (automated or manual) for ea
ah sorry. Yes. From the CloudStack management UI, you can force cloudstack to
reconnect to the host. This forces cloudstack to flush it's connection and
restablish the connection. On restablishing the connection, there's a series
of checks and information gathered. Size of the storage pool
I spent two days to install Basio, about one week to get Cloudian work, don't
know how many days I need to get swift work.
Guys, don't blame me not support this feature and that feature, please just
take a look at how many work/hours I need, to a simple thing work.
> -Original Message-
>
short answer... dont think so. having said that, I believe we used DSL
which can be downloaded from:
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
its around 50 megs :)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudSt
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:15 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: 'Caleb Call'
> Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
>
> All,
>
> For me, there are significant is
Code for S3 API is lying under awsapi project. Only EC2 API under awsapi is
functionally tested.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Prachi Damle
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What other "features" or code is sitting aroun
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11910/#review22982
---
Commit 79bec35476508b23077311888a00189573c5c9d9 in branch refs/heads
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What other "features" or code is sitting around that
> might be suffering from bit rot?
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 5
On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
>>
>> I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
>> tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
>>
>
>
Hi,
I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudStack on a host in an ESX cluster.
Do we have a tiny template similar to the one we use for XenServer that I
might be able to leverage?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303
@Abhi - Just to keep you updated code will be pushed here frequently
to show progress. I will let you know when it is in a good enough
state to be reviewed/merged.
On 10 July 2013 16:54, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI: I created a ldapplugin feature branch for Ian to commit his patches i
Hey Alex,
When you say, "force a reconnection," I'm not sure to what part of the
system you're referring. Is this an action performed on the CloudStack side?
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver in order for CS to
I'm working on setting up a CS installation with a single XenServer host.
However, once I add the primary and secondary storage, the system vms fail to
start up.
For readability, I've put several logs and traces here:
http://pastebin.com/eb51JDHF <--- CS Mgmt Log 1
http://pastebin.com/mbfRCei3
You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver in order for CS to see
it. On every connection, CS checks these items and updates its database.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:14 PM
> To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11984/#review22980
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 2, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Venka
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22981
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 4, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Rajes
John,
I'm concerned that object store implementations that's going into 4.2 will
repeat this fate if we don't add them into the automated test environment.
Perhaps, you, me, Edison, Prassana, and perhaps Thomas can work together about
how to add the current implementations into the regression
All,
For me, there are significant issues with the object_store patch. First, it
was merged to master with a unresolved -1 against it. Second, it merged a
feature depreciation without community consensus. On their own, each of these
actions violate core community values. Cumulatively, I am
OK, great - thanks!
So, it sounds like on XenServer, you have to perform some manual activity
for it to see the new size of the iSCSI target (and there is probably a
similar requirement with ESX), but CloudStack will notice the size
difference automatically (once the storage repository or datastor
Very good, thanks you!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> 'random among the storage pools that have, say, the necessary storage tag'
>
> Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:44 PM
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
> Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
>
> I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
> tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
>
Awesome, that's one. Any others?
> I'm all for coming up with
OK, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or
> user-dispersing strategies are present. This is governed by the
> 'vm.allocation.algorithm' global config.
> So for you case with storage tags, if you choose random,
'random among the storage pools that have, say, the necessary storage tag'
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Storage Allocator Question
Oh, when you say "
CS will see the new size,
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Expanding a volume on a SAN
Hey Anthony,
I assume this would be a candidate situation where
Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
I'm all for coming up with this list but I don't see how this list can be
conclusive. The problem that Edison dealt with in swift su
Oh, when you say "random," does that mean random among the storage pools
that have, say, the necessary storage tag or does random ignore storage
tags?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> OK, thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:40 P
Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or user-dispersing
strategies are present. This is governed by the 'vm.allocation.algorithm'
global config.
So for you case with storage tags, if you choose random, either of the pools
can get chosen. For firstfit, you will mostly see one
Hi,
I have a question about how current storage allocators work.
Let's say I have two primary storages with the same storage tag.
If I execute compute and disk offerings that reference that storage tag
only, will one primary storage be (essentially) filled up before the other
is utilized or do w
Hi Ahmad,
Yeah, it seems to ask for vCenter credentials both when adding the VMware
Datacenter to the Zone and when creating a CS Cluster based on a VMware
Cluster.
Interesting
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> one typically adds a cluster during zone creation or adds th
It "should" work for CS to do the HA (typically with the VMware
cluster *not* having HA enabled).
Nicolas, perhaps open a bug?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jörgen Maas wrote:
> This should be done by ESX instead of CS, to CS ESX hypervisor is
> externally managed (vCenter)
> I guess you need
one typically adds a cluster during zone creation or adds the cluster as a
unit (which maps to the vmware dc/cluster). I believe at the cluster
addition phase, is where you should be prompted for credentials. Give that
a try, see if you get any miles out of that.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:35 PM,
This should be done by ESX instead of CS, to CS ESX hypervisor is
externally managed (vCenter)
I guess you need to enable HA in your vmware configuration
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:11 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
> We are testing CS 4.1.0 with VMWare vSphere 5.0.
> If we stop a VM using vCenter, CS doesn't
Hi,
I've been primarily working on the 4.2 branch as of late and was setting up
a VMware cluster for the first time in a while.
I noticed from an error message that before I can set up a cluster based on
VMware that I must add the VMware Datacenter to the Zone. I went ahead and
did this.
I then
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> 1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two days,
> to setup a swift environment.
Great!
> 3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release? Such as
> adding it into automate test? Right now,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> 2. There is no single user from the "group of swift users" jumping into the
> thread. Do they really care about this feature?
This is a developer list. Even our users don't have to be on the users
list. We have at least one known user
I wonder if this Swift-support question has gone out to the CloudStack
users e-mail list for opinions?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> 1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two
> days, to setup a swift environment.
> 2. There is no single user fr
1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two days, to
setup a swift environment.
2. There is no single user from the "group of swift users" jumping into the
thread. Do they really care about this feature?
3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release? S
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11910/#review22962
---
Commit f7f826d4f516144069e26b3bb112e8c22414123e in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11649/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 5:50 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Si
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 08:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on CLOUDSTACK-3350, we have a known user. IMO, this should be a
> blocker. We should either fix Swift to support users or revert the
> object store branch merge changes.
+1
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @j
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Caleb Call wrote:
> Although my voice doesn't mean a lot, I too would vote this as
> a blocker. If it's going to be dropped, users need to be notified well
> in advanced so they can be make plans moving forward instead of suddenly
> being stranded on an out-dated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 5:43 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan
Hi,
FYI: I created a ldapplugin feature branch for Ian to commit his patches in.
Cheers,
-Sebastien
No meeting today, as we had only four people show up.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
(Note: Sending this to the mailing lists as blogs.apache.org is down for
the moment.)
The community is busy working on 4.2.0, and there's much to be done
before the release is ready. This week, we're taking a look at some of
the interesting discussions going on in the the community about the
next
I understand, so either change the checker (as i sugested) or change the
expected result in the testcase.
Op 10 jul. 2013 15:37 schreef "Dharmesh Kakadia" het
volgende:
> @chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
>
> I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written by me.
> It is
I like,
thanks for starting this discussion.
Please ignore the rest of this mail as it is not of any consequence.
As a folowup, I would like ti propose to move any peace of code to branches
if it meets the qualifications you mention; not (full) functional, not
production ready. And i would like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/#review22959
---
plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/Citri
On 10 Jul 2013, at 17:08, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
>
> I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our
> social media for promotion ahead of time if folks send a note
Maurice,
You should check the logs before this exception trace is logged, just follow
the consoleproxy-1 thread to see what went wrong in the deployment process.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:59 AM
To: dev
It's decisions like this (dropping a previously advertised supported feature
simply because it wasn't tested) are part of the reasons that have changed our
plan to use Cloudstack in our corporate environment. I'm glad to see Chip,
David, and others pushing back on the decision to just drop it a
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +, Mathias Mullins wrote:
>
> On 7/10/13 8:59 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > -Original Message-
>
On 7/10/13 8:59 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
>>> > Sent: Tuesday,
That seems to be the latest stable release for the KVM template (according
to the 4.1 install docs). You can also get bleeding edge templates from:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master, say if youre
interested in ipv6 support and other features that didnt make it into
'-stable'.
Ignore that….I was running mvn with sudo, so of course it couldn't find the
artifact…
On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:36 AM, "SuichII, Christopher"
wrote:
> Now I'm seeing this issue after pulling the latest and rebuilding.
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-client-ui: Could not resol
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 3:31 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien Goa
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our
social media for promotion ahead of time if folks send a note to
marketing@ with the full info...
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Br
Seb,
Please circulate a picture of yourself in the branded clothing distributed
during the event.
;)
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 July 2013 12:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Dublin meetup tonight
>
> To all d
Could I get some comments on the following proposal?
Background:
System VMs are passed their configuration details in the 'bootArgs' field of
the StartCommand used to create and start them. For instance, with XenServer,
the vm.set_PV_args command is used.
When the SystemVM is launched, the clo
I created that document, as a suggestion. I never got feedback. The
way it worked previously was sort of a happy accident, which was
'fixed' when the code changed to accept overlapping vlan numbers on
multiple physical devices (hence the bridge name change).
However... I believe there is still a
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.
You can use NFS with a single server, but if you choose local storage
instead, you need to go into the global options and tell system vms to
use local storage. Parameter "system.vm.use.local.storage". I'm not
sure that's the problem, but somewhere in the log it may lead you to
why there is no serve
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a patch request for both 4.1.1 and 4.2 for issue
> CS-3904.
>
> Commit 8e4e56f73175363038a5361fe99e882562c2913a resolves this issue,
> but it should imho be fixed in 4.1.1 since this is hurting KVM
>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su
> > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybo
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo