Shared networks without IP range.

Hello, In order to create shared network StartIp/endIp/gateway/netmask are required. I am looking at an old test case which creates shared network without IP range and deploys vm in it. It of course fails as IP range is required while creating shared network. Has anything related to shared netw

Re: Query about moving vms across domains

Hello Likitha, Thanks! Some of the test cases fail as an exception is not raised while moving vms across subdomains under different domains. The problem is that test case uses api client with root admin privileges instead of domain admin. And therefore it does not raise exception. Regards, Giri

Re: Review Request 12267: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

> On July 9, 2013, 6:29 a.m., ASF Subversion and Git Services wrote: > > Commit a54d2347fe8c798f4e3f658f683c548583d44485 in branch > > refs/heads/master-6-17-stable from Rajesh Battala > > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a54d234 ] > > > > CLOUDSTACK-3089 [ZWPS] NPE

Re: Review Request 12267: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/#review22887 --- Commit a54d2347fe8c798f4e3f658f683c548583d44485 in branch refs/head

RE: Query about moving vms across domains

Hi Girish, Both your assumptions are right. And going by the first assumption the test cases that are failing need to be updated. Since the VM is being moved from a subdomain to another under the same domain, the move should be successful and not raise an exception. Thanks, Likitha From: Giris

RE: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

Thank you Marcus -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:37 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport This fixes a known bug, was never applied to 4.1. Committed. commit 4fd921269bd

Re: Review Request 12267: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/#review22886 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On July 9, 2013, 6:04 a

Re: Review Request 12267: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 6:04 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ram

Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

This fixes a known bug, was never applied to 4.1. Committed. commit 4fd921269bdce3ea55bb63ac5226ff52e6a82e9d Author: Mice Xia Date: Fri Apr 19 10:45:43 2013 +0800 CLOUDSTACK-2083 router never comes to running state when addNicToVirtualMachine api is called with network id which is only all

Re: Review Request 12323: Cloudstack-3241 Adding ip range fails if there are two IP ranges existing in two different CIDRs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12323/ --- (Updated July 9, 2013, 5:35 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

Pushed to 4.1 commit a505b5b489ab9fc449f40214d0593d10b7403822 Author: Marcus Sorensen Date: Mon Jul 8 22:48:58 2013 -0600 Summary: update user data on all networks a VM is connected to Detail: Get list of all nics and update user data on them, rather than just the default nic for

Re: Review Request 12348: Fix for NPE when listing eligible primary storage pools for volume migration across primary storages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12348/#review22883 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On July 9, 2013, 2:53 a

New Install: CS 4.1 | Cent OS 6.4 | KVM

Hello,Fresh install /setup, I am getting error: [root@cloud ~]# /etc/init.d/cloudstack-management start/etc/sysconfig/cloudstack-management: line 21: /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6.conf: No such file or directoryStarting cloudstack-management: awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `/etc/clo

Unable to start secondary storage in DevCloud

Hi, I was trying to setup DevCloud by following https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud on my ubuntu machine. I have the xenserver vm running and I see that the secondary storage is being exported as NFS and I am able to mount it on the host machine. However it is not being

Review Request 12348: Fix for NPE when listing eligible primary storage pools for volume migration across primary storages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12348/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, rajeshbabu chintagunt

[ISSUES] ArrayTypeAdatptor

When I ran a build from latest 4.1 branch, I found an issue and I'm wondering why it is not breaking 4.1.1 builds from others, here is some of details public class ArrayTypeAdaptor implements JsonDeserializer, JsonSerializer { protected Gson _gson = null; private stati

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

The simulator issue should be fixed on 4.2 branch. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some > questions. > =) >

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

And I want to point out, that, it's easy to say this feature and that feature are supported in certain release, but without fully tested for each release, only God will know the status. For example, there is a bug in 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2583, it says can't backu

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Thanks for the offer Angie. But community has been discussing on what has been supported so far and where to go from there. That discussion has to come to closure. The link you have provided is not accessible to community. If possible can you post the test plan in Test plan area [1] on cwiki.

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Animesh, Sudha: 1. For Cloudstack Acton 3.0.0 release, Swift 1.4.4 was integrated and tested . 2. Thanks to Sudha located my old documents on http://wiki-ccp.citrix.com/display/DesignDocs/Object+Storage+%28Swift%29+test+plan 3. It seems Swift 1.9.1 is one latest version that can be int

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:23 PM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > We should support what

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

We should support whatever is supported earlier at minimum. -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:20 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be suppo

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:11 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > Sudha was Sw

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Animesh, Sudha: Swift integration was done for Acton 3.0.0 release. Anthony Xu was developer & I was QA . I will be very happy to work on test plan & testing for 4.2. Thanks -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:1

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

It was tested pre-4.0 release. As mentioned earlier, there were no changes or reported issues in this area. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broke

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:42 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > All, > > I apologize for losing track of

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Sudha was Swift working for 4.0 or 4.1? Edison couldn't we use S3 API for Swift? The support is probably not comprehensive [1][2] [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison [2] http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-object-storage/admin/content/configuring-openstack-obje

[ACS 42] Closing Resolved defects

All, There are 543 defects in Resolved state and not closed. Please make sure that you validate and close the defect if you are satisfied with the fix. If there are issues with the fix, pl reopen the defect. Pl note that these need to be validated in 4.2 branch as all are fixed in 4.2 ( should

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some > questions. > =) > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:49:52PM +0530, Pras

Fwd: Starting up management server

If it helps, I am on Mac OS X 10.8.3. Thanks! On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering how I might get around the following problem: When I start > up the management server, I have to wait for a keystore timeout, then hit > like six times to get the proc

Re: Review Request 10366: Documentation changes for VMware dvSwitch and Nexus dvSwitch

> On June 17, 2013, 1:07 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > Radhika, > > > > Was this committed? If so, can you please close this review? If not, > > what's needed to help get it done? > > Radhika PC wrote: > Hi Chip, > > There are many question unanswered. You can check the commen

Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:49:52PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:08:20AM -0700, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > - At least one available simulator template (best-case would be Ubuntu > > 10.04 or 12.04) that can be "booted up" out of the box - for whatever > > reason (I hone

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:22:07AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only > > have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. > > Before adding the feature bac

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

All, I apologize for losing track of this issue. We discussed the lack of Swift support briefly in late May/early June as part of the first round review, but I completely lost track of it in the sea of items being addressed. This gap represents a feature deprecation without any community dis

Re: database connection resilience

So to the original question, is it your opinion that a single management server (non-clustered) should also fence itself, or wait for the database connection to be restored? On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > > > On 7/7/13 3:36 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > >>I think there are

Re: database connection resilience

Yes, I have a sample set up. It took some looking through the code, but for cloud db one can set up multi-database at the JDBC driver level with no modifications. For usage and awsapi databases, this isn't currently possible because there are some parameters missing for db.properties, the aforement

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:15:19PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM > > To: ; Edison Su > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in > > 4.

Re: Review Request 11479: SolidFire storage plug-in and enhancements to the storage framework and GUI

> On June 28, 2013, 3:42 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/offering/DiskOffering.java, line 60 > > > > > > When would it be valid for the value of this property to be null? > > Seems like it should be bo

Re: building deb package problem

I solved the problem with: ln -s /usr/bin/mvn3 /usr/bin/mvn and I succesfully build the following pakage is that right for cloudstack 4.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 38962010 Jul 8 22:20 cloudstack-agent_4.1.0_all.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 63339952 Jul 8 22:21 cloudstack-awsapi_4.1.0_all.deb -r

Re: building deb package problem

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:13:05PM +0200, Thomas Schneider wrote: > I removed mvn2 and I have another problem. > > 1. mvn3 -P depsOK > 2. dpkg-buildpackageFAIL > > dpkg-source -b apache-cloudstack-4.1.0-src > dpkg-source: warning: no source format specified in > debian/source/for

RE: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Min, > would you please take a look at this to see if UI can disable decoding in > displaying this download template url > returned from API? I just changed UI to not decode the URL returned in extractTemplate, extractIso API. Jessica -Original Message- From: Min Chen Sent: Wedne

Re: database connection resilience

On 7/7/13 9:08 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >Looks like there's no "db.usage.url.params", either. Is there a reason >for it, or was it just implemented quickly? > >On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Marcus Sorensen >wrote: >> I think there are two separate issues here. >> >> 1) The management ser

Re: building deb package problem

I removed mvn2 and I have another problem. 1. mvn3 -P depsOK 2. dpkg-buildpackageFAIL dpkg-source -b apache-cloudstack-4.1.0-src dpkg-source: warning: no source format specified in debian/source/format, see dpkg-source(1) dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0' dpkg-source:

Re: database connection resilience

On 7/7/13 3:36 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >I think there are two separate issues here. > >1) The management server uses the database to determine cluster >membership, and if no database connection can be made, the management >server fences itself (shuts down). This is good, but in the case wh

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE while deploying any instances in kvm/vmware using ZWPS due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22846 --- Ship it! Fix looks good. - Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati O

Re: sonar

On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > It usually runs from a CI job, but I haven't found anything like that > between the CS builds on builds.apache.org nor on jenkins.cloudstack.org. > It requires a JDBC connection to the database of the service, so it should > be on th

Re: sonar

It usually runs from a CI job, but I haven't found anything like that between the CS builds on builds.apache.org nor on jenkins.cloudstack.org. It requires a JDBC connection to the database of the service, so it should be on the apache infrastructure. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Chip Childers

CloudStack News - Moving to Wednesday

- Multi-list send since this is a community wide announcement Just a reminder, the community news blog is moving to being published on Wednesdays starting this week on July 10! This is to make it more timely with the data that we are working on throughout the week. Please make sure to have any

[DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] CCC13 Hackfest: Storage Architecture Summary

All, During the CloudStack Collab 2013 Hackfest, a group of users and developers got together to discuss the current storage architecture and ideas for future evolution. The group focused on the following topics: * Storage architecture overview and 4.2 enhancements * Storage us

Re: sonar

On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:34:34PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Hi, > > I have found CloudStack in the ASF sonar instance > https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/100206?did=1 > > But looks like it was not executed for a good while. Is it possible to > re-enable it? In general it often hel

Re: Review Request 12265: CLOUDSTACK-2571-Zone-Wide-Primary-Storage-blocker-issues-while-Enabling-in-Maintenance-State

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12265/#review22844 --- Commit 7054db44700ba813d513bf8e16b0266d308a8dc6 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 12265: CLOUDSTACK-2571-Zone-Wide-Primary-Storage-blocker-issues-while-Enabling-in-Maintenance-State

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12265/#review22843 --- Commit 7054db44700ba813d513bf8e16b0266d308a8dc6 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 12251: Incorporating the review comments given by Alena and Sheng

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/#review22839 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/IPAddressDaoImpl.java

Re: Review Request 12251: Incorporating the review comments given by Alena and Sheng

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/ --- (Updated July 8, 2013, 5:47 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharc

Re: AWS SDK version for object store

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > +1 +1 from me as well. > > IMHO, trade off is between getting fixes, especially security fixes, and > possibility that AWS introduce a tweak that breaks our use case. > > The subtlety is that you'd use the latest version before integration

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Swift was tested for older version of Citrix release. There were no code changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. Thanks /Sudha -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:15 AM To: 'Chip Childers'; Subject:

Re: AWS SDK version for object store

Edison, I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any "refinements" that Amazon introduces as part of their continuous improvement/deployment model. Thanks, -John On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:26 PM,

RE: AWS SDK version for object store

>From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to adapt >to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to upgrade >to latest SDK? > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM >

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:40 AM >> To: >> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM > To: ; Edison Su > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 3

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:40 AM > To: > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su wrot

Re: Review Request 12251: Incorporating the review comments given by Alena and Sheng

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12251/#review22836 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java

Re: Review Request 12251: Incorporating the review comments given by Alena and Sheng

> On July 3, 2013, 3:58 p.m., bharat kumar wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java, line 3054 > > > > > > removed the sql exception > > Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Bharat, I sti

Re: building deb package problem

On 07/08/2013 06:39 PM, Thomas Schneider wrote: I have the both Aha! Since debian/rules calls the "mvn" command this might break things. I'd say, go for Maven 3 only. Wido root@csm:~/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.1.0-src# mvn --version Apache Maven 2.2.1 (rdebian-8) Java version: 1.6.0_

Re: building deb package problem

I took a look in the folder .m2 an I didn't see any zip file, but the jar and pom files are prensent. root@csm:~/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.1.0-src# ls /root/.m2/repository/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.3/commons-lang-2.3. commons-lang-2.3.jar commons-lang-2.3.pom I retryed with just dpkg-buil

Re: building deb package problem

I have the both root@csm:~/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.1.0-src# mvn --version Apache Maven 2.2.1 (rdebian-8) Java version: 1.6.0_27 Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: ANSI_X3.4-1968 OS name: "linux" version: "3.5.0-23-generic" arch: "amd64

Review Request 12327: dnsmasq propagation to vpc routervm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3357 R

Re: building deb package problem

What version of maven are you using? On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Thomas Schneider wrote: > Hello, > > I try to build the deb package for cloudstack 4.1 with the following > command but I have a problem. > > #mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm > > or > > #mvn3 -P deps > > Until there no

Re: building deb package problem

Are you sure this isn't a local system error? Since all those errors in reading zipfile don't seem right. Btw, running just "dpkg-buildpackage" should be sufficient. Wido On 07/08/2013 06:24 PM, Thomas Schneider wrote: Hello, I try to build the deb package for cloudstack 4.1 with the followi

building deb package problem

Hello, I try to build the deb package for cloudstack 4.1 with the following command but I have a problem. #mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm or #mvn3 -P deps Until there no problem but when I try to make the packages. dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us [INFO] ---

Re: S3 Global Settings

Min, Why is the reduced redundancy option global and not simply a flag on the configuration of an S3 resource? Thanks, -John On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Min Chen wrote: > s3.rrs.enable is the new one I added to address > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3028. > > Thanks > -m

Re: S3 object store - extract image (template/volume/iso)

Prasanna, To take things a step further, we should be advising admins to create unprivileged S3 accounts. CloudStack does not need to be manipulating ACLs or other administrative features. Therefore, we should add documentation to advise users that to limit the impact of a credential exposure

Re: S3 Object Storage - secret key handling

Min, +1. In my opinion, masking the secret key will only make debugging and diagnostics more difficult. From a security perspective, CloudStack administrators/operators should be creating a dedicated CloudStack access key/secret key with a read/write ACL only for the bucket used by the system

How to evaluate performance of a resource allocation policy?

Hello All, As you know, evaluating performance of a resource allocation policy for a cloud environment is very important, also it is critical to be able to compare different policies' performance with each other. So, I am interested to know that do developers of CloudStack use any specific tool

Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013, at 07:33 AM, Alexandre Sousa wrote: > Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a > good reason to include support for Oracle VM 3.x on CloudStack. It doesn't really matter where a hypervisor falls in the "magic quadrant" - we'd happily take patche

Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > CS supports 2.x OVM. Is there any great/good features added to ovm 3.x? Not since 4.0.0 it doesn't. It suffered from bit-rot, and nobody stepped up to fix it. > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@wido

RE: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

CS supports 2.x OVM. Is there any great/good features added to ovm 3.x? > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2013 8:12 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant fo

Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

On 07/08/2013 03:14 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Alexandre Sousa wrote: Hi Guys, This is the last Gartner Report: http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1GJA88J&ct=130628&st=sb Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a go

Review Request 12326: CLOUDSTACK-3094: Adding a shared network to already deployed VM is failing.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12326/ --- Review request for cloudstack and mice xia. Bugs: 3094 Repository: cloudstack

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only >> have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. >> Before adding the feature back, I'd bette

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the community, do we > want to support Swift? Yes > If so, which version of Swift? At least the version that we were supporting before the OS merge. -chip

Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only > have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. > Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the community, do we > want to support Swift?

Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Alexandre Sousa wrote: > Hi Guys, > > This is the last Gartner Report: > http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1GJA88J&ct=130628&st=sb > > Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a > good reason to include support for Orac

Re: Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Alexandre Sousa wrote: > Hi Guys, > > This is the last Gartner Report: > http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1GJA88J&ct=130628&st=sb > > Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a > good reason to include support for Orac

Oracle VM is becoming one of the leaders on Magic Quadrant for x86 Virtualization

Hi Guys, This is the last Gartner Report: http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1GJA88J&ct=130628&st=sb Oracle VM is getting better year after year, so I believe that this is a good reason to include support for Oracle VM 3.x on CloudStack. Cheers, Alexandre

Query about moving vms across domains

Hello Likitha, Some of the regression tests for changing domain membership failed. http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-regression-matrix/34/suite=test_assign_vm/testReport/ Could you please confirm my following assumptions: A domain admin can move vms only amongst its subdomains or between t

Re: [GSOC] Update to document

@sebgoa Thanks for the clear spec. 1. My intro post is already done. 2. install and run post will follow. 3. stackmate blog with whirr/provisionr comparison I will check whirr driver possibility. Thanks, Dharmesh On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jul 6, 2013,

Re: new-user

On Jul 8, 2013, at 5:12 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: > >> Hi Rohit, >> >> Most of it is linked from https://cloudstack.apache.org/contribute.html >> >> Would be cool if we could get the git 101 video added to the >> Contributing to Apache Cl

Re: Review Request 12267: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12267/ --- (Updated July 8, 2013, 11:07 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ra

Re: Review Request 12265: CLOUDSTACK-2571-Zone-Wide-Primary-Storage-blocker-issues-while-Enabling-in-Maintenance-State

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12265/ --- (Updated July 8, 2013, 11:06 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ra

Re: Review Request 12278: CLOUDSTACK-3384: CloudStack allow VLAN range between 0-4096. Should be 0-'4095'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12278/#review22809 --- Ship it! Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: 814630c5428862aa247914e5

Re: Review Request 12278: CLOUDSTACK-3384: CloudStack allow VLAN range between 0-4096. Should be 0-'4095'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12278/#review22808 --- Commit a93042674134ded31d0dea2d006fac881743ab91 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12278: CLOUDSTACK-3384: CloudStack allow VLAN range between 0-4096. Should be 0-'4095'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12278/#review22807 --- Commit 814630c5428862aa247914e5bc04c3bcbc00c501 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12324: CLOUDSTACK-3358: create template from a volume/snapshot should also take input from User/Admin whether xstools / vmware tools installed in the VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12324/ --- (Updated July 8, 2013, 9:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Review Request 12324: CLOUDSTACK-3358: create template from a volume/snapshot should also take input from User/Admin whether xstools / vmware tools installed in the VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12324/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDS

RE: AWS SDK version for object store

+1 IMHO, trade off is between getting fixes, especially security fixes, and possibility that AWS introduce a tweak that breaks our use case. The subtlety is that you'd use the latest version before integration testing rather than before release. I.e. get as many fixes as possible, but also mak

RE: codestyle checker?

> > No tool I know of, just nice idea to write one. Some projects have such tools, > for example golang has gofmt to format code as per a convention, but even > then there are hacks :P [Donal Lafferty] I'll share anything that I come up with. > > Try to read and remember the convention and adap

Re: new-user

On Jul 7, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > Most of it is linked from https://cloudstack.apache.org/contribute.html > > Would be cool if we could get the git 101 video added to the > Contributing to Apache CloudStack as a Non-Committer page. > > Is there a way to supply patch

Review Request 12323: Cloudstack-4241 Adding ip range fails if there are two IP ranges existing in two different CIDRs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12323/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: Clou

Re: [GSOC] Update to document

On Jul 6, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > I will update the report. I am aware that a "Intro to Mesos" post is also > pending from my side. Want to write on my experience while doing changes on > large and active code base too, but that is gona take some time. > > I am little off in

  1   2   >