Edison, I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any "refinements" that Amazon introduces as part of their continuous improvement/deployment model.
Thanks, -John On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to > adapt to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to > upgrade to latest SDK? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: AWS SDK version for object store >> >> There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears I >> can't >> use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception when this is done >> [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also couple of other issues >> fixed >> related to s3 on the latest version of the SDK. Is there any reason not to >> use >> the latest stable SDK version in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the >> v1.3.21? >> >> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374 >> >> -- >> Prasanna., >> >> ------------------------ >> Powered by BigRock.com >
