---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11327/#review21411
---
I am still not able to reproduce this issue on master. Attached the
+0
If proposed features are completed earlier then we shouldn't wait for 4 weeks.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11620/#review21410
---
Ship it!
D'oh. was testing the same thing. You were clearly faster.
+1, but hopefully only those features already proposed are allowed.
In future lets move the code freeze date before the freeze date :), makes
life easier for folks scrambling to get their feature in.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 04/06/13 10:47 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>+0 - similar concerns as Seba
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11620/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Hugo Trippaers.
Descripti
All the public templates will be replicated to all the secondary storage
for redundancy but private templates and uploaded volumes should be kept
in one of the randomly chosen secondary storage. Snapshots will be
randomly copied to one of the secondary storage (the chain of incremental
snapshots ar
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:26:01AM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
> HI,
>
> I looked into tomcat6.spec file, the catalina.out
> stuff seems to be handled in rpm installation process.
>
> %install
> :
> /bin/touch ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{logdir}/catalina.out
> :
>
> %files
> :
> %
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11458/#review21409
---
Should set the owner to be entity owner passed as ipowner instead of
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:51:26PM -0400, Shane Witbeck wrote:
> I was troubleshooting my ssvm the other day and found '4.4.4.4'
> defined as the secondary dns server in /tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg
> and in some other scripts.
>
> Should this be '8.8.4.4' instead since '8.8.8.8' is the one of t
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:13:19PM +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache licensed netscaler jars are now hosted in maven central.
> It is possible to make the netscaler plug-in as part of the OSS.
>
> Please check the details below.
>
> Nitro jar entry
> ***
> com.citri
+0 - similar concerns as Sebastien. I hope that we also don't
introduce any new unproposed features, or architectural changes to 4.2
at the end of the cycle, which this extension still is.
Also - it's probably worth discussing a time based release with
milestones beyond which feature proposals are
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:10:20PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote:
> Thanks Mike. Ya, I also did the same change locally and then did the
> following to not track the hack in my branch.
>
> git update-index --assume-unchanged
> tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py
>
> Thanks for submitting a p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11618/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Description
---
CLOUDSTAC
+1
-Mice
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
+1 [Binding]
Regards,
Sateesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhi
+1 [Binding]
Regards,
Sateesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:cloudst...@aprateek.com]
> Sent: 04 June 2013 09:23
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> +1 [binding].
>
> -abhi
>
> On 04/06/13 6:43 AM, "Hiroaki KA
+1 [binding].
-abhi
On 04/06/13 6:43 AM, "Hiroaki KAWAI" wrote:
>+1 because "4.2 will be delayed because 4.1 have been delayed"
>makes sense to me.
>
>Basically, time based release focuses on time only, not quality or
>feature. That's the nature of time based release, IMHO.
>I'm not voting +1 f
Hi Chip,
My JIRA ID is kyrameng
Thanks for checking that for me!
Best,
Meng
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:55:27 -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Han,Meng wrote:
Hi all,
My name is Meng Han. I am a Computer Engineering student at
University of Florida. I am int
That's interesting to see some details are different
with mine. :-)
What I usually do is,
1. Static IPv4 address in OS installation
2. Base installation is "Virtual Host"
3. The patch is grabbed from 1.9 branch of ovs.
wget -O -
"http://openvswitch.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=openvswitch;a=patch;h=
HI,
I looked into tomcat6.spec file, the catalina.out
stuff seems to be handled in rpm installation process.
%install
:
/bin/touch ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{logdir}/catalina.out
:
%files
:
%attr(0644,tomcat,tomcat) %{logdir}/catalina.out
:
So I'd like
Sure, Sebgoa.
Hi all :-)
My name is Nguyen Anh Tu, a Computer Network and Telecommunication student
at Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam. My major is
computer networking, but I also have a strongly interesting in distribute
computing, storage system and virtualization technology
+1 because "4.2 will be delayed because 4.1 have been delayed"
makes sense to me.
Basically, time based release focuses on time only, not quality or
feature. That's the nature of time based release, IMHO.
I'm not voting +1 for new feature, and at the same time, I
feel unfair to vote -1 for blocki
Vijay thanks for sharing this good news
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 7:13 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: netscaler jars hosted in maven central
>
> Hi,
>
> The Apache licensed netscal
Hi All,
Following features are done by development and marked as resolved. Each of
these stories have QA/Docs/Automation sub-tasks. Calling on community to take
action on marking sub tasks as completed if done already, so these can be
closed. Also some may need coverage esp docs and automation.
http://tagolpc.com.ua/cxsu/ghymvyzpzeaw.xighaiuptq
Hi All,
The following features are done and merged in to Master but need community
contribution to pick these up for validation. There are around 46 features
completed so far and out of which the following 5 do not have QA tasks picked
up.
Calling on community to pick these up for validation
Let's start a new thread about NFS cache storage issues on object_store.
First, I'll go through how NFS storage works on master branch, then how it
works on object_store branch, then let's talk about the "issues".
0. Why we need NFS secondary storage? Nfs secondary storage is used as a
pla
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11611/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Min Chen.
Description
---
Put
-0 [binding]
I am torn between sticking to the schedule and delay to make sure we can merge
things cleanly.
Would rather not merge and release on-time, but it would be a pitty.
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> +1 [ binding ]
>
> I've been concerned that releases every four mo
Anyone?
We are also noticing that if we register a template, that template is
registered and ready, but becomes unusable if the URL for the template
stops working at any time. Seems like we attempt to red download it every
so often. So no one-time registration. Is this by design?
On May 31, 2013 2
Here is the difference between the current iSCSI type and the Dynamic type:
iSCSI type: The admin has to go in and create a Primary Storage based on
the iSCSI type. At this point in time, the iSCSI volume must exist on the
storage system (it is pre-allocated). Future CloudStack volumes are created
Wei,
I apologize for conflating usage with billing. It seems that we need to
enhance the usage information being captured to reflect that an operation was
provisioned. It would be interesting to know if/how our users would like track
usage of volumes with provisioned IOPS.
Thanks,
-John
On
These are new terms, so I should probably have defined them up front for
you. :)
Static storage: Storage that is pre-allocated (ex. an admin creates a
volume on a SAN), then a hypervisor data structure is created to consume
the storage (ex. XenServer SR), then that hypervisor data structure is
con
Nguyen,
Could you send an email with all the information like the other guys have done ?
thanks,
-Sebastien
On May 29, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
> @Sebgoa: Done! My account on every page: tuna.
>
> Looking forward :-)
>
>
> 2013/5/29 Sebastien Goasguen
> Hi Dharmesh, Meng, I
Alternatively, you can use the PreSetup type for XenServer. In this case,
you must go to XenServer and set up the storage repository (which can be
based on an iSCSI target). Then you must go into CloudStack and select the
PreSetup type for Primary Storage. This is like selecting the vmfs type for
V
Mike,
The current implementation of the Dynamic type attach behavior works in terms
of Xen ISCSI which why I ask about the difference. Another way to ask the
question -- what is the definition of a Dynamic storage pool type?
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>
As far as I know, the iSCSI type is uniquely used by XenServer when you
want to set up Primary Storage that is directly based on an iSCSI target.
This allows you to skip the step of going to the hypervisor and creating a
storage repository based on that iSCSI target as CloudStack does that part
for
+1 [ binding ]
I've been concerned that releases every four months were too aggressive for
people to absorb given the complexity of some deployments and upgrades. With
the current 4.1 delay and 4.2 plan we would expect two major releases within
two months of each other. I'd prefer a bigger da
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Han,Meng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Meng Han. I am a Computer Engineering student at
> University of Florida. I am interested in distributed computing,
> autonomic computing, Hadoop framework and virtualization
> techonologies.
>
> I will be working
Hi all,
My name is Meng Han. I am a Computer Engineering student at University
of Florida. I am interested in distributed computing, autonomic
computing, Hadoop framework and virtualization techonologies.
I will be working on the project -Improve CloudStack Support in Apache
Whirr and Incuba
I need to customize the CS to our environment needs.
Since ACS at present moment does not support management network with VLAN
tagging, I need to use another unused network as management vlan.
We are enterprise customer and at the moment have no need for "public" network.
All the natting is han
Hey Rohit,
Do you think that we should remove the 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT artifacts from
PyPi? It's actually a higher version than 4.1.0-0 I think.
-chip
Thanks for the answers Wei.
Is the public traffic broken down by public IP then? Lets say we have 3
public IPs setup on a network; the source nat ip, a port forwarding ip and
a static nat ip. Would each of these ips track its own traffic and only
the traffic which goes through that IP? If so, w
Hi Will,
Commencts inline:
> Is this only for traffic between the public and the private network?
yes.
> Does private traffic affect these numbers if the traffic does not go
through the public?
No.
> So if two VMs on the same network send traffic between them selves on
their vlan without it bei
Mike,
Reading through the code, what is the difference between the ISCSI and Dynamic
types? Why isn't RBD considered Dynamic?
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> This new type of storage is defined in the Storage.StoragePoolType class
> (called Dynamic):
>
> pu
I have spent some time looking at the usage data in the database and
looking over the code.
When 'bytes_in' and 'bytes_out' are reported, they are reported for a
specific network. Is this only for traffic between the public and the
private network? Does private traffic affect these numbers if th
This new type of storage is defined in the Storage.StoragePoolType class
(called Dynamic):
public static enum StoragePoolType {
Filesystem(false), // local directory
NetworkFilesystem(true), // NFS or CIFS
IscsiLUN(true), // shared LUN, with a clusterfs overlay
For example, let's say another storage company wants to implement a plug-in
to leverage its Quality of Service feature. It would be dynamic, zone-wide
storage, as well. They would need only implement a storage plug-in as I've
made the necessary changes to the hypervisor-attach logic to support thei
Oh, sorry to imply the XenServer code is SolidFire specific. It is not.
The XenServer attach logic is now aware of dynamic, zone-wide storage (and
SolidFire is an implementation of this kind of storage). This kind of
storage is new to 4.2 with Edison's storage framework changes.
Edison created a
Mike,
It is generally odd to me that any operation in the Storage layer would
understand or care about details. I expect to see the Storage services
expose a set of operations that can be composed/driven by the Hypervisor
implementations to allocate space/create structures per their needs. If we
To delve into this in a bit more detail:
Prior to 4.2 and aside from one setup method for XenServer, the admin had
to first create a volume on the storage system, then go into the hypervisor
to set up a data structure to make use of the volume (ex. a storage
repository on XenServer or a datastore
Hi John,
The storage plug-in - by itself - is hypervisor agnostic.
The issue is with the volume-attach logic (in the agent code). The storage
framework calls into the plug-in to have it create a volume as needed, but
when the time comes to attach the volume to a hypervisor, the attach logic
has t
Mike,
Can you explain why the the storage driver is hypervisor specific?
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 3, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Yes, ultimately I would like to support all hypervisors that CloudStack
> supports. I think I'm just out of time for 4.2 to get KVM in.
>
> Right now this
Hi there,
This thread is to address John's review comments on S3TemplateDownloader
implementation. From previous thread, there are two major concerns for this
class implementation.
1. We have used HttpClient library in this class. For this comment, I can
explain why I need that HttpClient dur
+1.
4.2 carries some important changes for the long run, giving it more time
would help a smooth release in the final
Kelven
On 6/3/13 10:55 AM, "Edison Su" wrote:
>+1[binding] on pushing back feature freeze date.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sun
+1 [binding]
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 11:08 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> +1 [Binding]
>
> It looks like there are a couple of last minute feature
+1 [binding]
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10:32 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
>
> +1 to move feature freeze date to 6/28 to get in the featur
+1 [Binding]
It looks like there are a couple of last minute features that would make 4.1 a
superb release. I would say that we should not allow any new features that
haven't already been proposed and that the extension does not go beyond 4
weeks. If beyond that, I'm a -1.
Will
> -Ori
Hi there,
This thread is to address John's comments about missing error handling in S3 as
secondary storage in object_store branch implementation. From previous merge
email thread, I realize that we may not explain clearly in FS how S3 should
work in new object_store branch, so causing several c
Sure. Edison will start one soon with this context information.
Thanks
-min
On 6/3/13 10:33 AM, "John Burwell" wrote:
>Chip/Min,
>
>For thread 1, I would like to see an expanded discussion regarding the
>need for the staging area. In particular, what features on which
>hypervisors created the
I just built the latest source code, and deployed on devcloud , everything
is ok.
-Wei
2013/6/3 Will Stevens
> Has anyone else experience this? I just pulled in the master code into my
> branch and now I am getting this in my dev environment.
>
> [DEBUG] Executing command line: python ../marv
+1[binding] on pushing back feature freeze date.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:00 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> Following our discussion on the proposal
+1
We have spent the past one and half month working on object_store feature,
it is very close to merge, just need some time to address review feedback
and resolve any technical concerns.
Thanks
-min
On 6/3/13 10:35 AM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote:
>+1 [binding]
>
>Given that there are around 47
I was troubleshooting my ssvm the other day and found '4.4.4.4' defined as the
secondary dns server in /tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg and in some other
scripts.
Should this be '8.8.4.4' instead since '8.8.8.8' is the one of the google dns
[1]?
Thanks,
Shane
[1] https://developers.google.co
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> Yes, looks like a doc bug to me. Have to replace systemvm-vmware-3.0.5
> with systemvm-vmware-4.0
I can update this in the docs if it's not correct before I upload them
tonight.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @j
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Please respond with one of the following:
>
> +1 : change the plan as listed above
> +/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or -
> -1 : do not change the plan
>
> This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time.
-1 do no
On 6/3/13 10:30 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:21:40PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
>> Nicolas, in order to upgrade to 4.0, you need to have
>>systemvm-vmware-4.0
>> template pre-installed. Apache CS release notes mention it (section
>>3.2):
>>
>>
>>http://cloudstack.
+1 [binding]
Given that there are around 47 features that are still in Open state,
community can focus on cleaning up that part before feature freeze date. As
indicated in Chip's original mail and indicated in Animesh' s mail below, I
assume that no new proposals will be accepted in to 4.2. S
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:24 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> -1
>
> Extending the release will mean even more features will be packed into
Chip/Min,
For thread 1, I would like to see an expanded discussion regarding the need for
the staging area. In particular, what features on which hypervisors created
the need for it. With the wider expertise of the list, we may be able to find
solutions to these issues that either reduce or e
+1 to move feature freeze date to 6/28 to get in the features proposed earlier
for 4.2 and have a longer bug fix cycle.
After moving 103 open 4.1 targeted defects to 4.2 we will have total of 367
open defects for 4.2. I hope with this change we are able to resolve lot more
defects before RC an
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:21:40PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> Nicolas, in order to upgrade to 4.0, you need to have systemvm-vmware-4.0
> template pre-installed. Apache CS release notes mention it (section 3.2):
>
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Releas
+1 (not sure if my vote counts for anything since I'm not a committer)
To me it seems that many people spent a lot more time on 4.1 than expected,
so I think an extra 2 - 4 weeks for 4.2 would make sense.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00 AM,
Ah, OK. I tend to re-deploy daily. :)
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I think a lot of people use DevCloud but they don't redeploy very often so
> bugs like this don't get noticed. I use DevCloud all the time.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike
Wido,
I have the access, and I have the results of building from the release
source, but I don't have the knowledge to specifically know what to put
where and what to run to get the non-OSS DEB's I just built into the
repo.
Can you share some instructions please?
-chip
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze
> date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus. Well...
> we have already defined the "project rules" for figuring out what to do.
> In out project b
Nicolas, in order to upgrade to 4.0, you need to have systemvm-vmware-4.0
template pre-installed. Apache CS release notes mention it (section 3.2):
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Releas
e_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-2.2.x-to-4.0
What pdf you
Yes, ultimately I would like to support all hypervisors that CloudStack
supports. I think I'm just out of time for 4.2 to get KVM in.
Right now this plug-in supports XenServer. Depending on what we do with
regards to 4.2 feature freeze, I have it working for VMware in my sandbox,
as well.
Also, j
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> How would this vote work? Is it consensus that wins?
Consensus would win if we had it. However, we don't, thus we have a vote.
I think a lot of people use DevCloud but they don't redeploy very often so
bugs like this don't get noticed. I use DevCloud all the time.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Surprisingly this has been like this for a long time.
>
> It kind of makes me wonder if anyone uses
+1 to extend the feature freeze date.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:00 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature
Is there any plan on supporting KVM in the patch cycle post 4.2?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tutkowski"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 10:12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER
I agree on merging Wei's feature first, then mine.
If his f
I agree on merging Wei's feature first, then mine.
If his feature is for KVM only, then it is a non issue as I don't support
KVM in 4.2.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> John,
>
> For the billing, as no one works on billing now, users need to calculate
> the billing by themsel
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:09:24PM +, Min Chen wrote:
> Chip/John,
>
> This thread has become very hard to follow due to several technical
> debates mixed together. Chip earlier made a good suggestion that we should
> start separate threads for several important architectural issues rais
Thanks Mike. Ya, I also did the same change locally and then did the
following to not track the hack in my branch.
git update-index --assume-unchanged
tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py
Thanks for submitting a patch for that.
Cheers,
Will
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Mike Tutko
I will look into it.
On 6/3/13 6:47 AM, "nicolas.lamira...@orange.com"
wrote:
>I create an issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2822
>
>--
>Nicolas Lamirault
>
>__
>__
Chip/John,
This thread has become very hard to follow due to several technical
debates mixed together. Chip earlier made a good suggestion that we should
start separate threads for several important architectural issues raised
by John so that community can get clear grasp on the debating i
On 6/3/13 8:33 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote:
>What is the difference between these interfaces? I see that StaticNat is
>used in network elements.
StaticNat maps user VM to the Public IP address.
>And StaticNatRule used elsewhere including APIs.
Legacy code. In 2.1.x version of the CS there were no
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:04:54PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> How would this vote work? Is it consensus that wins?
As stated below:
> > > > 3.4.2. Release Plan
> > > >
> > > > Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also
> > > > nominates a Release Manager.
> > > >
> > > >
Surprisingly this has been like this for a long time.
It kind of makes me wonder if anyone uses DevCloud. I use it all the time.
If others were using it, I would have expected this to be corrected like a
month or two ago.
I am "alone" in using DevCloud?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Mike Tut
In cloudstackConnection.py, I made the following change:
-def marvin_request(self, cmd, response_type=None, method='GET'):
+def marvin_request(self, cmd, response_type=None, method='GET',
data=''):
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
How would this vote work? Is it consensus that wins?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 9:47 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> Reminder to please VOTE here. T
I have fixed this in a patch I submitted last week.
I'm not sure when it began, but I noticed it a long time ago and had just
sent out an e-mail then and corrected it in my sandbox.
Let me see if I can find what I did to fix it.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Has anyon
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be
> building the DEB's and RPM's today.
>
> We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM
> build. I think we have a decision to make... announce 4.1 relea
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be
> building the DEB's and RPM's today.
>
> We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM
> build. I think we have a decision to make... announce 4.
Hi,
I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be
building the DEB's and RPM's today.
We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM
build. I think we have a decision to make... announce 4.1 release with
the permission defect or wait for a 4.1.1 to officia
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:35:43PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since I'm going to be on vacation until next Monday (starting Tuesday
> > evening), I'd like to ask for help in creating the board report for
> > this month.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since I'm going to be on vacation until next Monday (starting Tuesday
> evening), I'd like to ask for help in creating the board report for
> this month.
>
> I've created the template here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/di
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:58:45AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> >> Hi folks:
>> >>
>> >> I came across an
Has anyone else experience this? I just pulled in the master code into my
branch and now I am getting this in my dev environment.
[DEBUG] Executing command line: python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py
-i devcloud.cfg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "../marvin/marvin/deployDataCente
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:58:45AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> >> Hi folks:
> >>
> >> I came across an interesting problem today, and think it's one that
> >> deserves fi
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
