+1 [binding]. -abhi
On 04/06/13 6:43 AM, "Hiroaki KAWAI" <ka...@stratosphere.co.jp> wrote: >+1 because "4.2 will be delayed because 4.1 have been delayed" >makes sense to me. > >Basically, time based release focuses on time only, not quality or >feature. That's the nature of time based release, IMHO. >I'm not voting +1 for new feature, and at the same time, I >feel unfair to vote -1 for blocking new feature. >I'd like to vote for reasonable time based release. > ># I think the version numbering scheme is somewhat problematic. ># Why not "Cloudstack version 2013Q1" if our release is based on time. > >## By the way, I'm -0 about time based release. > > >(2013/06/03 22:46), Chip Childers wrote: >> Reminder to please VOTE here. This vote will close tomorrow, and your >> opinion counts. >> >> -chip >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >>> Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature >>>freeze >>> date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus. >>>Well... >>> we have already defined the "project rules" for figuring out what to >>>do. >>> In out project by-laws [2], we have defined a "release plan" decision >>>as >>> follows: >>> >>>> 3.4.2. Release Plan >>>> >>>> Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also >>>> nominates a Release Manager. >>>> >>>> A lazy majority of active committers is required for approval. >>>> >>>> Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must >>>>occur >>>> on a project development mailing list. >>> >>> And our lazy majority is defined as: >>> >>>> 3.2.2. Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 >>>> votes and more binding +1 votes than binding -1 votes. >>> >>> Our current plan is the starting point, so this VOTE is a vote to >>>change >>> the current plan. We require a 72 hour window for this vote, so IMO >>>we are >>> in an odd position where the feature freeze date is at least extended >>>until >>> Tuesday of next week. >>> >>> Our current plan of record for 4.2.0 is at [3]. >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/vi3nsd2yo763kzua >>> [2] http://s.apache.org/csbylaws >>> [3] >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2+Re >>>lease >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I'd like to call a VOTE on the following: >>> >>> Proposal: Extend the feature freeze date for our 4.2.0 feature release >>> from today (2013-05-31) to 2013-06-28. All other dates following the >>> feature freeze date in the plan would be pushed out 4 weeks as well. >>> >>> Please respond with one of the following: >>> >>> +1 : change the plan as listed above >>> +/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or - >>> -1 : do not change the plan >>> >>> This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time. >>> >>> -chip >
