---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11026/#review20563
---
Ship it!
commit 7d380423b59fc45b588260baa50653bc8bff9e6b
Author: sa
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:43:44AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
> Prasanna,
>
> Interesting point. On one hand there is consistency and on the other
> hand flexibility. Not sure if the framework should be restrictive or
> as flexible as possible but I personally like the latter option.
Sorry, don't
On 05/14/2013 05:34 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey all,
We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older releases
to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things I value
CloudStack for.
However as a developers there are some drawbacks to this. It means eve
Prasanna,
Interesting point. On one hand there is consistency and on the other hand
flexibility. Not sure if the framework should be restrictive or as flexible as
possible but I personally like the latter option.
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
I guess i'll answer my own question...
On May 14, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Chiradeep (others),
>
> Pedro Marques is working on a POC for an integration of Juniper's Contrail
> technology. He's Cc'ed on this thread.
>
> There are a number of questions related to system VM's below
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:54:36AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> > Behalf Of Will Stevens
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:19 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
> > S
Congrats Devdeep :)
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to co
Congrats Devdeep!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> a
Congrats Devdeep.
On 14-May-2013, at 8:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribu
> -Original Message-
> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Will Stevens
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:19 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
>
> Ya, I am not sure. I am working off
Congratulations Devdeep!
> -Original Message-
> From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2013 9:59 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
>
> Hearty Congratulations Dev!
>
> > On 14/05
> -Original Message-
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:29 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: Firewall rule question
>
> For the createFirewallRule and createEgressFirewallRule APIs the p
understood. I assume this is the documented (in a FS or some such design
doc) behavior, correct? Thanks for the prompt reply Jaypal!
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> For the createFirewallRule and createEgressFirewallRule APIs the por
For the createFirewallRule and createEgressFirewallRule APIs the port
parameters are optional.
If you don't specify the port range for the prototocol (TCP) it allows all the
tcp traffic.
Ingress:
1. First firewall rules filters traffic then PF/Static NAT will NAT to the
specific VM.
If you sp
Regarding upgrade path I had updated in the FS.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sowmya Krishnan
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:38 PM
> To: Rajesh Battala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Test Plan for Support of Netscaler as external LB in
> VPC
>
>
>
> > -Origin
Hearty Congratulations Dev!
> On 14/05/13 8:48 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> >Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
> >they have accepted.
> >
> >Being a committer allows many contributor
Well deservedŠcongrats :)
On 14/05/13 8:48 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
>announce that they have accepted.
>
>Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
Hi everyone,
Is anyone planning on attending Build a Cloud Day tomorrow in San Francisco?
I'll be there. I'd love to say 'hi' if you're there, as well. I think
it's really good to get a little face time in with the people you work
with. :)
Talk to you later!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior Clou
for KVM, we could potentially force the kvmclock clocksource on system vms
via the libvirt XML. It requires that all system vms be linux though, and
I'd have to look into whether the old system vm supports it. If so, should
be an easy fix.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, John Burwell (JIRA) wrot
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, John Burwell wrote:
> Chip,
>
> After some further discussion about this issue on IRC, Alex and I
> determined that system VM clock drift issue not only breaks S3, but has
> other significant impacts that merit it being a blocker for 4.1 (e.g.
> timestamps of files writte
Chiradeep (others),
Pedro Marques is working on a POC for an integration of Juniper's Contrail
technology. He's Cc'ed on this thread.
There are a number of questions related to system VM's below. Can someone
please help answer them for him?
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013, Pedro Marques wrote:
> Chip,
Chip,
After some further discussion about this issue on IRC, Alex and I determined
that system VM clock drift issue not only breaks S3, but has other significant
impacts that merit it being a blocker for 4.1 (e.g. timestamps of files written
by the SSVM being incorrect, log file correlation dif
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/
---
(Updated May 14, 2013, 10:35 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers
Chip,
The source of the problem appears to be clock drift between the SSVM and S3 per
following stack trace:
2013-05-14 06:51:55,400 DEBUG [cloud.utils.S3Utils] (agentRequest-Handler-3:)
Putting directory
/mnt/SecStorage/93fd0cb0-033b-3248-bcd0-ef6d460635ef/template/tmpl/1/5 in S3
bucket jsb-
Chip,
I am looking into the issue now. There is a failure when the S3 upload
template command is issued. I working to determine whether or not the cause is
environmental or code.
Thanks,
-John
On May 14, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a clear bug list (blocke
Hi all,
We have a clear bug list (blockers and critical) for 4.1.0. I'm going
to cut a new release candidate tonight.
If there are *any* outstanding issues known, now's the time to raise
them.
(I'm specifically looking for an ACK from jburwell here, since he
mentioned a possible S3 feature issu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11164/#review20543
---
Ship it!
Applied, Thanks!
commit 39491fe754d594302bb99d84f2e09fbf1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11164/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Disables 'security group' o
Congratulations Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:17 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack h
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:05:21PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:16:28PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > > FS at:
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/pvlan-for-isolation-within-a-vlan.html
> > >
> > > PVLAN
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:16:28PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > FS at:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/pvlan-for-isolation-within-a-vlan.html
> >
> > PVLAN branch has been under development for some time, and now the
> > functionali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11163/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
Add
Ya, I am not sure. I am working off a master branch from about 2-3 weeks
ago. I was kind of expecting it to error and it didn't, so it was not
clear how that case would behave. I am currently developing an integration
with the Palo Alto firewall and they don't support specifying a protocol
like
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:39:11AM -0700, Jessica Wang wrote:
> Chip,
>
> Brian will provide the UI patch (to hide Advanced zone with Security Groups
> option from UI).
Fantastic! Thanks folks.
-chip
>
> Jessica
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sung
+1 to what Ahmad says here . Perfect reasoning .
There have been many users on the list asking for some capability /feature
present in CloudStack when it's actually under development in the current
release. Beta release would allow them to get a feel of it . Definitely , it
would help to furth
I'm hoping thats not the default behavior, and nothing happens on the
firewall. I guess the fact that empty values entered returns success is a
bug?
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> This applies to both Egress firewall rules as well as IP specific firewall
> rules.
>
> If
Chip,
Brian will provide the UI patch (to hide Advanced zone with Security Groups
option from UI).
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:09 AM
To: ; Jessica Wang
Subject: [ACS41] CLOUDSTACK-2463 Patch?
Jessica,
+1
I feel this allows for users who are chomping at the bit to get a hold of
feature X. Tinker with feature X, expose bugs or use case issues well
before an official release. Saves on the disappointment as well. ;)
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1
Awesome! Congrats Devdeep.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Congrats Devdeep!
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Chip Childers >wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> > has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased
Jessica,
How's the UI patch you mentioned coming along?
Any ETA?
-chip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11157/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Description
---
This is t
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 14 mei 2013, at 18:28, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Hugo Trippaers
>> wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older
>>> rel
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 mei 2013, at 18:28, "David Nalley" wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Hugo Trippaers
> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older
>> releases to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:00 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Sanjeev Neelarapu
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-702 Multiple Ip ranges in different
> subnets
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1
Hey Justin,
Just checking in on this... if you give us your pypi username I'd be
happy to give you the rights to push SNAPs to pypi for cloudmonkey.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Justin Grudzien wrote:
>
>> When I become reliable I am cert
Congrats Devdeep!
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contri
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:52:08AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Kelven:
>
> Any chance you can help with this? If not, anyone you'd recommend to
> pick this up?
>
> --David
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Chip Childers w
Congrats Devdeep !!!
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
Sent: 14 May 2013 21:08
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
Congratulations Devdeep !:)
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isa
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:03:25AM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> I have encountered an issue with SSVM connectivity which is outlined in
> ticket CLOUDSTACK-2479. Essentially, the SSVM is being created, but the
> management server is unable to connect to it. Additionally, I am unable t
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:59:14AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Are you going to support upgrades from your Betas to release (and
> betaN to betaN+1)?
> If the answer is no, then there is no interest on my part. It's not
> better than us producing nightly builds, or highlighting jenkins
> builds.
Are you going to support upgrades from your Betas to release (and
betaN to betaN+1)?
If the answer is no, then there is no interest on my part. It's not
better than us producing nightly builds, or highlighting jenkins
builds.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Tue, May 14
Congrats Devdeep :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:47 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older
> releases to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things I
> value CloudStack for.
>
> However as a developers there are some drawbacks to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11151/#review20537
---
LGTM. Fairly straightforward to strip the word endings. Any concerns
+1
Wei
2013/5/14 Hugo Trippaers
> Hey all,
>
> We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older
> releases to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things I
> value CloudStack for.
>
> However as a developers there are some drawbacks to this. It means every
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:39:15PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> There's proven methods of doing database change managment [1] and we've
> taken a good first step in establishing a base schema [2] at 4.0. It's
> probably the right time to think about these things now that 4.1 has
> been stalli
Congrats Devdeep
Party time :-) :-) :-)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:34:00PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from
> older releases to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of
> the things I value CloudStack for.
>
> However as a developers there are some draw
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:34:00PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older
> releases to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things I
> value CloudStack for.
>
> However as a developers there are some dr
+1
Hugo - I think that's a very pragmatic approach. Whilst it would be great to
upgrade any version to any other version, I think most people are used to
sequential paths for upgrade of server platforms.
Kind Regards
Giles
D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
Kelven:
Any chance you can help with this? If not, anyone you'd recommend to
pick this up?
--David
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> CLOUDSTACK-2064 - "The Vmware template dosent have permissions to be
>> c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11156/
---
Review request for cloudstack and mice xia.
Description
---
When we call U
+1
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: 14 May 2013 16:34
To: 'dev@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: [DISCUSS] Backward
Congratulations Devdeep !:)
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:59 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
Congrats! :)
Regards
Isaac
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Prasann
Hey all,
We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older releases
to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things I value
CloudStack for.
However as a developers there are some drawbacks to this. It means every time
we release a new version we need to QA t
Congratulations!
2013/5/14 Chip Childers
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> autonomously. For
Congrats! :)
Regards
Isaac
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:16:59AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> > has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> > a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11151/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Jayapal Reddy, Alex Huang,
an
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:16:59AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
Congrats Devdeep.
- Reply message -
From: "Chip Childers"
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 8:47 pm
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we
Congratulations Devdeep.
Regards,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Clo
Congratulations Devdeep :)
-Original Message-
From: Abhinav Roy [mailto:abhinav@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Devdeep Singh
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
Congratulations Devdeep :)
-Original Message-
Congratulations Devdeep
On May 14, 2013 8:47 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contri
Congratulations Devdeep :)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked D
Congrats Devdeep :D
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 5:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
>
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Devdeep Singh to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
e
upgrades are a valid point. No one tests those as a user does.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > As a relative outsider;
> >
> > any branch that is not released yet is a beta release. Why make it more
> > ex
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:03:25AM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> I have encountered an issue with SSVM connectivity which is outlined in
> ticket CLOUDSTACK-2479. Essentially, the SSVM is being created, but the
> management server is unable to connect to it. Additionally, I am unable t
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:50 PM
> To: Devdeep Singh
> Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Invitation to become a CloudStack Committer: DevDeep
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:24:08AM +, Devd
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 03:56:36PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> As a relative outsider;
>
> any branch that is not released yet is a beta release. Why make it more
> explicit. Wouldn't this add support burdon? Make a branch 'in beta' and
> appoint a guard to make sure no new feartures but only fi
All,I have encountered an issue with SSVM connectivity which is outlined in ticket CLOUDSTACK-2479. Essentially, the SSVM is being created, but the management server is unable to connect to it. Additionally, I am unable to SSH to it on the link-local interface. I have outlined the environment an
+1
It would be much easier for planning purposes if we had target dates for betas.
That would allow us to say to our user community "hey, we've got something new
for you to test, come and get it" - instead of people having to stay up to date
with the development and then choose when to start to
This applies to both Egress firewall rules as well as IP specific firewall
rules.
If you specify TCP but do not specify any port details, it saves fine. I
am wondering what this config implies. Does this mean that all TCP traffic
is allowed?
Thanks,
Will
+1
We could do an RC type thing. I wouldn't feel bad if we ship every release we
vote for as a RC release. The last RC release that wins the vote will turn into
the regular release.
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May
As a relative outsider;
any branch that is not released yet is a beta release. Why make it more
explicit. Wouldn't this add support burdon? Make a branch 'in beta' and
appoint a guard to make sure no new feartures but only fixes go in (kind of
how you are working right now)
Daan
On Tue, May 14,
On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 09:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what
> does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each
> major feature release?
Yes to beta releases. I know that users could test at any time, but we
Jessica,
How is this patch coming along?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Jessica Wang wrote:
> I'll remove this option (Advance zone with SG) from UI in 4.1 branch.
> Will submit a patch soon.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, May
As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what
does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each
major feature release?
This might fall in line with some of the stated concerns about our
release schedule (see [1]). I've stated a desire to be quicker ab
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11153/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
Fix
Hi,
System vm template creation build failed in Jenkins.cloudstack.org, not sure
who is responsible for this to fix ?
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
Regards,
Rayees
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> CLOUDSTACK-2064 - "The Vmware template dosent have permissions to be
> copied from secondary storage."
>
> I need someone to grab this one and work on resolving it please!
>
> -chip
Help is still needed on this bug. Anyone care to
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 6:39 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Regrading support for intel txt
>>
>> Heya,
>>
>> >
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:02:36AM +, Sowmya Krishnan wrote:
> I am planning to execute performance test runs for 4.2 and I've posted an
> initial draft here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Performance+Test+Plan+for+4.2
> Please take a look and let me know your feedb
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:49:57PM +, Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:58 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Regrading support for intel txt
> >
> > On Tue, May 14
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:42:48AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Good initiative Sanjeev.
> It would be really cool if we can follow this model as much as possible
> going fwd for feature development. Not to say that the feature dev
> shouldn't submit the integration tests :).
Working together with
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:32:32PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Murali,
>
> I've updated the document to give more background details on the thought
> process. I'm sorry that I'm having hard time to describe it like other
> normal high-level FS, since the change is at architecture level, and to
> u
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:58 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Regrading support for intel txt
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:33:21PM +, Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > The API library and the
Nice! Thanks for writing this!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 11:59 PM
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: [WIKI] Marvin Test wiki
>
> I've rewritten most sections of the marvin wiki and organized it better now.
>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:33:21PM +, Devdeep Singh wrote:
> The API library and the API documentation are behind an account which Intel
> provides. So should we get in touch with legal for this? If yes, who can help
> here?
>
> Given this, is it still possible to keep it as a separate profi
Hi David,
I got the library directly from intel ftp site with the username and
credentials they had shared. Not sure if I can share these details publicly :(.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 8:23 PM
> To: dev
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
