As a relative outsider; any branch that is not released yet is a beta release. Why make it more explicit. Wouldn't this add support burdon? Make a branch 'in beta' and appoint a guard to make sure no new feartures but only fixes go in (kind of how you are working right now)
Daan On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 09:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what > > does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each > > major feature release? > > Yes to beta releases. I know that users could test at any time, but we > need explicit targets for users that say "now is a good time to test > this and give feedback." > > +1 > > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
