Re: The jar package version of Cloudstack 4.0.1 src buliding

Hi Livio, You can change company.patch.version in build/cloud.properties. Wei 2013/4/23 Livio Lv > Hi All: > I have downloaded a src package from the site: > http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html,The package name > is apache-cloudstack-4.0.1-incubating-src.tar.bz2, It is obviouse

The jar package version of Cloudstack 4.0.1 src buliding

Hi All: I have downloaded a src package from the site: http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html,The package name is apache-cloudstack-4.0.1-incubating-src.tar.bz2, It is obviouse a 4.0.1 version package. after executing the "mvn -P deps" & "ant clean-all build-all" commands following the B

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Third Round)

Following the 4.0 test procedure can pass: the source package verification source content verification code's license header verification Compile For the Deploy, Start/Configure Management Server sections, I used the Devcloud2 (http://rohityadav.in/logs/devcloud/) on VirtualBox as both Management

RE: [DOCS] "Submitting Feedback and Getting Help" in Release Notes?

Looks like the branding files are not installed properly on the build server. When I checked in a dummy feedback.xml to docs\en-US\Common_Content, the build was back to normal ! -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:01 PM To: dev@cl

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratulations!! Isaac On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Congrats Prasanna, much deserved. :) > > Dave. > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Devdeep Singh >wrote: > > > Congrats Prasanna. > > > > Regards, > > Devdeep > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Chip

RE: ReviewRequest: Storage XenMotion Test Plan

See my comments inline > -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Srikanteswararao Talluri > Subject: RE: ReviewRequest: Storage XenMotion Test Plan > > Hi, > > Some review comments on the test plan. > > 1. The listH

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

David - You have some compelling logic :) Given the debate about 4 month to 6 month, lets make an educated decision First - Lets hear from the "release managers" as to what they have to say about the last 2 releases. What went well and what didn't. Chip - ? Second - If we plan to do a 6 month rele

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats Prasanna, much deserved. :) Dave. On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > Congrats Prasanna. > > Regards, > Devdeep > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:21 PM > > To: dev@cloudstac

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats Prasanna. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:21 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC)

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats Prasanna! -Sadhu > -Original Message- > From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:35 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Congrats! > > > >-Original Message- >

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratulations Prasanna! Well deserved. > -Original Message- > From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 23 April 2013 12:21 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Congratulations! > > > 2013/4/2

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

+1 for 6 months, leave buffer for testing and bug fixing -Mice -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Thanks Everyone! On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Prasanna Santhanam to become a member of the PMC and > we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. > > Please join me in c

[ACS42][QA] Weekly Automation results - 4/22

Running automation locally - results are posted here [1]. Will be updating this weekly [2] [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4-22+Automation+Run [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Weekly+Automation+Test+Results

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

+ 1 for 6 months >From documentation perspective, it gives the doc contributors ample time to >play around with the features; accommodate all the review cycles (unit tests, >technical, and editorial if that applies); fix more number of defects. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturved

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/#review19574 --- The patch doesn't apply for me: ~/workspace/cloudstack/incubator-cl

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

+1 for 6 month cycle till Automation is in place and current backlog of defects are reduced. Once we have automation we can switch to shorter cycles May be having release goals set to meet this criteria ( % of backlog to be cleared + %age of automation to be achieved) might help to reduce the cy

RE: [ACS41] Catalana.out needs log rotate

This should work, and we can make it part of RPM/DEB builds. 1. Create this file /etc/logrotate.d/tomcat 2. Copy the following contents into the above file /var/log/cloudstack/management/catalina.out { copytruncate daily rotate 7 compress missingok size 5M } -Original Message- Fr

RE: [ACS41] Catalana.out needs log rotate

In that case, we can use native system log rotate daemon. If no objections, I can take this on. -Original Message- From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:08 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Musayev, Ilya Subject: Re: [ACS41] Catalana.out needs

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

+1, on the automation test. When will we have good automation test? > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 7:52 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Folks > > We started discussing 4 month v/s 6 month release cycle in a another thread > [1]. Since the subject of that thread was different, community may not have > participated in this important discussion fully. I am are bringing t

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/ --- (Updated April 23, 2013, 1:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/#review19572 --- - Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati On April 23, 2013, 1:55 a.m.

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/ --- (Updated April 23, 2013, 1:55 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/ --- (Updated April 23, 2013, 1:52 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/ --- (Updated April 23, 2013, 1:49 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

Re: [ACS41] Catalana.out needs log rotate

For log4j log files, we are using the rotation facility offered by log4j. catalina.out may be a problem here, I think it is created in using shell redirection Kelven On 4/22/13 5:34 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >Catalana.out on a lightly used demo ACS41 is 166mb in size in less than 2 >weeks old

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

Given the remaining work to reshape CloudStack into a better architecture to response other "Stacks" (i.e., OpenStack) at architecture level in addition to feature development. I prefer a 6 month release cycle. Kelven On 4/22/13 4:47 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >Animesh > >I personally believe 4

[ACS41] Catalana.out needs log rotate

Catalana.out on a lightly used demo ACS41 is 166mb in size in less than 2 weeks old implementation running on centos6.3 How does log rotate work? Would anyone know if we are using Linux based log rotate or some other engine? Thanks Ilya

Announcing The CloudStack Collaboration Conference North America 2013

We're pleased to announce the CloudStack Collaboration Conference North America 2013! After a successful first run in Las Vegas, we're bringing back the CloudStack Collaboration Conference for 2013! This time we're gathering the community in Santa Clara, California

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (second round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Changes from the first round of voting: Marcus found an RPM build issue when -SNAPSHOT is removed from our mvn pom.xml files, and submitted a patch for it (commit-sh 73b7fa9d). Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gi

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

Animesh I personally believe 4 months cycle is too rapid and we need more time to Qa and fix all issues. I'm finding issues constantly that automated tests missed. My opinion, we should release a stable product when it's ready, hopefully following a 6 months cycle. Regards Ilya

cannot run management server with "mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run" command

now i am using cloudstack 4.0.1 and succesfully for building section. but when i started management server, the result like this : [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache CloudStack .. ... SUCCESS [2.100s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ...

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

Same feelings here. -min On 4/22/13 4:18 PM, "Frank Zhang" wrote: >Before we have most of tests automated, 4 months release cycle seems too >tight to me > >> -Original Message- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:08 PM >>

RE: [ACS41][BUG] CS does honor use of Storage IP space- Advanced Network w/vSphere 5.x

Actually storage vm picked 3 ip addresses all from Public IP range. Why would it need 3 ip addresses on public ip space? In my case I have public ip space for qa and dev networks. 1 came from qa and 2 came from dev, none from designated storage network. Original message Fro

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

Before we have most of tests automated, 4 months release cycle seems too tight to me > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:08 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject

Re: Review Request: fix RPM version on non-SNAPSHOT releases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10714/#review19563 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On April 22, 2013, 10:52 p.m.,

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.0

-1 :-) On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:37:30AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > > vote: > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/re

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.0

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:37:30AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1 > Commit: b7abc3ca1e5f64672

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:20 PM > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month > > Folks > > We started discussing 4 month v/s 6 month release cy

Re: ebtables (More Information)

<<< text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII: Unrecognized >>>

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:53:35PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10714/ > > RPMs don't build via package.sh when '-SNAPSHOT' is removed from version OK - Cancelling the vote then.

[ACS41][Patch Request]

https://reviews.apache.org/r/10714/ RPMs don't build via package.sh when '-SNAPSHOT' is removed from version

Review Request: fix RPM version on non-SNAPSHOT releases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10714/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- When tryi

Re: ebtables

<<< text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII: Unrecognized >>>

RE: [ACS41][BUG] CS does honor use of Storage IP space- Advanced Network w/vSphere 5.x

Also, I don't believe this is VMWare related, perhaps it affects KVM/XEN implementations as well. > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 6:26 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS41][BUG] CS does honor use of Sto

[ACS41][BUG] CS does honor use of Storage IP space- Advanced Network w/vSphere 5.x

Deploy ACS too many times and notice an issue, while I have allocated an IP range for Storage VMs, the IPs are still being used from Public Network, and my storage IP space is unclaimed. I'm using ACS 4.1 Advanced Network with vSphere 5.0. Would anyone else please confirm they see a similar pro

Re: PVlan branch created

Some update: I just pushed another improved version of ovs policies for pvlan. This time we won't need to tell if the VM is in the same host as dhcp server or not. Much more elegant(and less code!) than last time. --Sheng On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I've pushe

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:10:11PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > The DB version is set to 4.1.0 on my dev systems, so I think somehow the > SNAPSHOT was added to the db version only when we hit 4.1.1. > > I think it makes sense to roll back to your 4.1.0 if/when possible, that > way if we need w

Re: CS 4.0.1 | KVM | CentOS 6.3

The msid is generated from the mac address: the first mac address found while doing 'ifconfig –a'. If this listing changes on every reboot and you have 3 nics then you might end up with 3 management servers From: Ahmad Emneina mailto:aemne...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, April 18, 2013 9:40 PM To

[DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

Folks We started discussing 4 month v/s 6 month release cycle in a another thread [1]. Since the subject of that thread was different, community may not have participated in this important discussion fully. I am are bringing this discussion to its own thread. Here is the summary so far please

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

The DB version is set to 4.1.0 on my dev systems, so I think somehow the SNAPSHOT was added to the db version only when we hit 4.1.1. I think it makes sense to roll back to your 4.1.0 if/when possible, that way if we need work on the RC we can without rolling forward and back each time the vote fa

Re: Problem creating primary storage

Thanks, I was running into the same problem. Will On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi Will, > > I actually do not see that error, but I updated master most recently some > time last week, so I don't have the super latest. > > I think my pr

[MERGE] UI support for VM affinity/anti-affinity groups

Hi all, I would like to merge the UI support for VM affinity/anti-affinity groups to master. JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2074 FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups Branch: ui-vm-affinity Unit tests:

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:01:30PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > So if I understand correctly, when the vote fails it will auto revert so we > can work on the 4.1 branch again? For the moment it's kind of stuck in > limbo, but maybe that's how it's meant to be. I suppose we work on the > branch f

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

So if I understand correctly, when the vote fails it will auto revert so we can work on the 4.1 branch again? For the moment it's kind of stuck in limbo, but maybe that's how it's meant to be. I suppose we work on the branch from the commit where the RC was cut, and then apply any patches after the

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:55:11PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0 > > completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with > > this, and then fi

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:50:52PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0 > completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with > this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to > 4.1.1

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0 > completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with > this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to > 4.1.1-SNAPSHO

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

I second that ! we could leave it in master then . -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:10 AM To: Chip Childers Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account On

Re: [ACS41] RC Blocker issue. Help Needed!

Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0 completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Yup

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On 4/22/13 1:36 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:33:32PM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> On 4/22/13 12:29 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >> >> >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:25:53PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: >> >> If we don't , then the only trade-off is the deletion of the

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:33:32PM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > On 4/22/13 12:29 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:25:53PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > >> If we don't , then the only trade-off is the deletion of the users > >>accounts won't be possible :) . IMHO , w

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On 4/22/13 12:29 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:25:53PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: >> If we don't , then the only trade-off is the deletion of the users >>accounts won't be possible :) . IMHO , we should be allowing that . >> >> I'll leave it upto you to take a final go

Converting Devcloud KVM Image to raw image format

Hi, We are trying to deploy the KVM image for devcloud on one of our cloud systems. It does not accept qcow2 disk formats. Hence, I tried converting to a raw image format using "qemu-img convert -O raw devcloud.qcow2 devcloud.raw". However, the raw image does not boot and fails at finding the d

RE: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

Joe thanks for bringing this up and noting that the subject may not have got everyone's attention. I will start a separate thread on 4 month v/s 6 month Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:49 PM > To: dev@cloudsta

Re: Problem creating primary storage

Hi Will, I actually do not see that error, but I updated master most recently some time last week, so I don't have the super latest. I think my problem at the time was that I was looking at the wrong CS repo. I was looking at the one on GitHub instead of this one: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/

Re: Problem creating primary storage

This may be related to the other problem we are seeing. Mike, can you verify if you get this same error on server startup as well? On server startup, I get this error. INFO [utils.db.GenericDaoBase] (Timer-2:) Register dao interface in GenericDaoBase entity-DAO map. com.cloud.user.dao.UserDao E

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013, at 04:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Based on the community discussions of having 4 month cadence I am > proposing the following schedule: We seem to have gone off the rails into a 4-month vs. 6-month discussion. It's been a week since the original schedule discussion sta

Re: Problem creating primary storage

I just ran into this after pulling master. I have everything compiling and I can deploy the db and then startup CS using jetty. I reverted my Xen server host back to my 'clean' snapshot and try to do deploy server (using devcloud) and I get this... Will --- WARN [cloud.storage.StorageManagerI

logstash

Is anyone using log stash to look at CloudStack logs ? I am looking for CS specific filters. -sebastien

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:25:53PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > If we don't , then the only trade-off is the deletion of the users accounts > won't be possible :) . IMHO , we should be allowing that . > > I'll leave it upto you to take a final go at it . Tell you what... why don't you go ahe

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

If we don't , then the only trade-off is the deletion of the users accounts won't be possible :) . IMHO , we should be allowing that . I'll leave it upto you to take a final go at it . -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:02:41PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Hi Chip , > > This issue has been fixed in asf/master at both the UI and API layers > (CLOUDSTACK-1941) . Now , if you think that we should support the same > functionality in 4.1 as well , then myself and Alena can back-port our f

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

Hi Chip , This issue has been fixed in asf/master at both the UI and API layers (CLOUDSTACK-1941) . Now , if you think that we should support the same functionality in 4.1 as well , then myself and Alena can back-port our fixes to 4.1 from master. Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- Fr

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratulations! 2013/4/22 Ahmad Emneina > Excellent news. Congrats Mr. Santhanam. > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < > alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > Prasanna, well deserved! Congratulations! > > > > On 4/22/13 8:51 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > > > >Hi f

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratulations Prasanna > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache C

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Excellent news. Congrats Mr. Santhanam. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Prasanna, well deserved! Congratulations! > > On 4/22/13 8:51 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >Hi folks > > > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Cl

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Prasanna, well deserved! Congratulations! On 4/22/13 8:51 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi folks > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >has asked Prasanna Santhanam to become a member of the PMC and >we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. > >Please join me in co

Re: [Discuss] - Domain admin not having the flexibility to create sub-domains/sub-child domains/accounts

On 4/22/13 10:47 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:22:16AM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Currently only the ROOT-admin has the power to create any >>domains/sub-domains/sub-child domains for himself or the domain-admin . >>But there are certain situations ( like u

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats! > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has >

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratulations Prasanna! -Original Message- From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam Congrats Prasanna! ~Talluri > -Original Messa

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

> -Original Message- > From: Min Chen > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:15 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su > Subject: Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring > > See my comments inline. > > -min > > On 4/16/13 11:41 PM, "Sanjeev Neelarapu" > wr

Re: [Discuss] - Domain admin not having the flexibility to create sub-domains/sub-child domains/accounts

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:22:16AM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Hi, > > Currently only the ROOT-admin has the power to create any > domains/sub-domains/sub-child domains for himself or the domain-admin . But > there are certain situations ( like updating resource limit for a sub-child > domain

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

No worries. I have closed the defect and one of the stories (725) as well. But waiting for doc to be completed to lose this [1] story [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-726 -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Monday, Apri

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats Prasanna! ~Talluri > -Original Message- > From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:35 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Congrats! > > > >-Original Message- >

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

See my comments inline. -min On 4/16/13 11:41 PM, "Sanjeev Neelarapu" wrote: >Hi, > >Few more review comments: >1.In a fresh installed environment will SSVM continue to be there? If yes >will it be auto launched or admin should launch it? [Min] ssvm will still be there and auto-launched as befo

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

Yes. You should be able to use it to test S3 object store. THanks -min On 4/22/13 4:53 AM, "Sanjeev Neelarapu" wrote: >Hi, > >I have prepared RIAK CS object store in our lab environment and planning >to use it for object store feature testing . >As per my understanding RIAK CS supports S3 APIs.

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats! >-Original Message- >From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:51 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > >Well done Prasanna, > >On Apr 22, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" >wrote: > >> Con

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Well done Prasanna, On Apr 22, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > Congrats Prasanna! > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:51 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna

Re: [DOCS] "Submitting Feedback and Getting Help" in Release Notes?

The branding files are in git /docs/publican-cloudstack On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Looks like I have to reinstall the branding files. I simply followed the > steps in the Publican User Guide...the branding files are grabbed from > Jessica. > > -Original M

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.0

+ 1 (binding) > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.0 > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats Prasanna! > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudS

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratulations, Prasanna. -min On 4/22/13 8:51 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi folks > >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >has asked Prasanna Santhanam to become a member of the PMC and >we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. > >Please join me in congratulat

RE: [DOCS] "Submitting Feedback and Getting Help" in Release Notes?

Looks like I have to reinstall the branding files. I simply followed the steps in the Publican User Guide...the branding files are grabbed from Jessica. -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sub

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congratz Prasanna... -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:21 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam Hi folks The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked P

Re: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Please join me in congratulating Prasanna! Congratulations, Prasanna! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 22 April 2013 21:21 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Prasanna Santha

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

Milamber, I made you a manager of the transifex project so you can help fixing those issues. -sebastien On Apr 22, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Milamber wrote: > > > Le 17/04/2013 07:26, Sebastien Goasguen a ecrit : >> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Milamber wrote: >> >>> >>> Le 16/04/2013 13:41, Ga

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats Prasanna! > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:21 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudSt

  1   2   >