RE: Apache BarCamp Today at PESIT Bangalore

CloudStack track: Rajesh is giving a session on DevCloud Sailaja is giving a demo on CloudStack Radhika is sharing her experience as a Committer Another sessions are around Hadoop on OpenStack, Cloud Computing -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Se

RE: Apache BarCamp Today at PESIT Bangalore

On Twitter with #ApacheBarCampBLR > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 9:05 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; > Subject: Apache BarCamp Today at PESIT Bangalore > > Gentle Reminder.. > -- F

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

On 30 March 2013 09:20, Justin Grudzien wrote: > > My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As > we begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was > slightly hard to read. I have begun working on some optimizations that I > think will benefit th

RE: Scalability Limitations

No limitations at the mgt server side. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Mike Tutkowski Sent: ‎3/‎29/‎2013 9:56 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Scalability Limitati

cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As we begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was slightly hard to read. I have begun working on some optimizations that I think will benefit the community and I reached out to Rohit, who recommended th

Apache BarCamp Today at PESIT Bangalore

Gentle Reminder.. -- Forwarded message -- From: Nick Burch mailto:n...@apache.org>> Date: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:21 AM Subject: Upcoming BarCamps To: committ...@apache.org Hi All Firstly, a couple of upcoming BarCamps for your diary: Saturday 30th

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

Understandable that SHA256 is good for today but SHA512 is good for tomorrow and has excellent support in all major languages, products, etc. Oracle is the only thing I can think of that doesn't support it out of the box. I agree on balance but I can certainly spare the 32 bytes of storage. :)

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

Never too late. :) Looking at [1], it'll take about 2E64 days to search the SHA256 keyspace with a brute forcer written for a GPU accelerator. Even with 10,000 of them, it'll take way, way too long. Bitcoin coin uses SHA256, so I think it's safe for a while. :) Yes, SHA512 would be "more safe,

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

I apologize for jumping into this conversation late, but I am new to the developer mailing list. Why would we choose SHA256+salt over SHA512+salt? SHA512+salt's storage is insignificant when compared to SHA256 and the chances of a birthday attack are significantly reduced. As a security professi

[DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

Hi all, I am trying to review some feature branches, when I see merge requests coming from mailing list, one thing that makes code review almost unrealistic is that, developers tend to use "git merge" to master branch whenever rebase is needed. I don't know other people really do review fea

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/#review18548 --- client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-779] Egress firewall rules for SRX

LGTM. Only thing I'd be careful of the length of the policy name. Note that the networkid is long, so you could end up with a policy name egress-trust-untrust-1234567890123. Perhaps e-t-u- On 3/28/13 8:38 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >I would like to propose the egress firewall rules featu

Re: [ACS41][PATCH request]CLOUDSTACK-1827: Fix redundant router update mechanism

Sorry for missing it. Will test and push in about an hour. On Mar 29, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Bump... > > --Sheng > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: >> commit e3f67d126d66c31e027c96b5524667884084053b >> Author: Sheng Yang >> Date: Thu Mar 28 15:02:45 2013 -0

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-1828] NAT on private gateway

Thanks for this. It seems a reasonable approach, except that it reflects a failure of previous modeling of the private gateway feature. So, today we want to provide source nat, Tomorrow perhaps static NAT? The day after PF and LB ? The difference between the public network and the private gateway

Re: [ACS41][PATCH request]CLOUDSTACK-1827: Fix redundant router update mechanism

Bump... --Sheng On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > commit e3f67d126d66c31e027c96b5524667884084053b > Author: Sheng Yang > Date: Thu Mar 28 15:02:45 2013 -0700 > > CLOUDSTACK-1827: Fix redundant router update mechanism > > There is a bug that if the smaller number ID

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

This depends on the changes proposed in the ACL deny rules feature. Can you re-word taking into account the new proposed APIs? On 3/28/13 12:46 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature. > >On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" > wrote: > >>I wou

Re: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

I would think that an ACL container is associated with a VPC and not with multiple VPCs. You could create an ACL container that makes sense for VPC #1 but not for VPC #2. If you update the container for VPC #1 you might unwittingly make a dangerous change in VPC #2. Also, isn't the term redundant

Re: Scalability Limitations

Besides the items that Chiradeep mentioned, there would be limits on Management Server Scalability. This can be easily overcome by deploying multiple management servers front-ended by a LB. Since all of the management servers are stateless, this should not cause any problems. Regards, Manan Shah

Re: Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

You should roll back your devcloud VM to the original and try again. On DevCloud2, I notice that sometimes the xapi0 bridge loses its ip address and hence loses the 169.254.0.0/16 route. You can work around this by ifconfig xapi0 (check for ipv4 address) ip route show (check for 169.254 route) If

Re: Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

Xen? KVM? Generally GetDomRVersionCmd failing is only a symptom, it usually means that cloudstack was never able to communicate with the system vm. You would need to look at whether the VM actually started on the host, and some of the text around when the VM was deployed to get any meaningful erro

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/#review18531 --- I do think an explicit migration interface on NetworkElement is the r

Re: VM not obtaing DHCP address when migrating to another host.

On 3/29/13 7:04 AM, "Sean Truman" wrote: >All, > >When I use the migrate to another host option for a running VM (Basic >networking), the VM refuses to get a DHCP address? Is this a known issue? >or is something wrong with my hosts? is there something I can check? When >I >migrate it back to t

Re: Scalability Limitations

Thanks, Chiradeep Are you aware of any documentation we have with regards to scalability? A customer asked for such a doc today. I found this one: http://www.citrix.co.jp/event/pdf/5-scalability.pdf On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > No

Re: How to create a new type of SystemVM ?

On 3/29/13 6:36 AM, "Serge A. Salamanka" wrote: >On 29.03.2013 16:27, Chip Childers wrote: >> Can you explain a little more about what you are trying to accomplish? >> What do you mean by "grid-service", and why does it need to be a "system >> vm"? > >For guest VMs in a Zone I'm trying to provi

Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

Hi All, VR is not getting started failing the instance creation. Anywork around for this issue? [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-8) Unable to get the template/scripts version of router r-4-VM due to: getDomRVersionCmd failed INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachine

Re: Scalability Limitations

No hard-coded maximums. Probably limited by the performance of the database most likely. I know of deployments which have tens of thousands. On 3/29/13 9:56 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi, > >Can someone answer these questions for me? > >Is there a max number of clusters CS supports? If so, wh

RE: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

Thanks Sheng for clarification. I checked Affected version and now filtered with fix version as well and see that it is targeted to 4.2.00 -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:16 AM To: Subject: Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker a

Re: Assigned IPs

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > In the account setup in CS it states allotted IPs allowed. Is it possible to > automatically from a template made to pull two IPs from the pool. > > I would think simply make a ifcfg-eth0:1 with DHCP settings would accomplish > this. > >

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/#review18519 --- api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/CreateAccou

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

CLOUDSTACK-1827: patch is already in MASTER, patch request for 4.1 sent to mailing list. CLOUDSTACK-1755: Fix version is 4.2, we didn't plan to fix it in 4.1 and it's not a release blocker as we agreed. --Sheng On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Below are today's ( 3/29 )

Scalability Limitations

Hi, Can someone answer these questions for me? Is there a max number of clusters CS supports? If so, what is that number? Is there a max number of primary storages CS supports? If so, what is that number? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutk

RE: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

Below are today's ( 3/29 ) defects. Upgrade is in progress - ~ 60% done. Couple of defects are not picked up - sent mail separately if anyone is interested to pick them up. Rohit mentioned that he would be offline so 1839 need to be picked up as well. I will keep it in unassigned state so som

[ACS41][QA] Upgrade defects

Want to check if anyone is interested to pick these up today https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1842 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1848 thanks /sudha

RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary Storage in latest Master

I have made the UI changes to support zone wide primary storage only for KVM as the hypervisor . For all other hypervisors , we 'll have "cluster wide primary storage" as the default option . The fix has been pushed to asf/master. Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [ma

Review request for storage motion on xenserver

I have put the feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature branch [2] up for review. Code for this feature conforms to what was proposed in FS [3]. The patch available at [4]. It includes marvin tests and unit tests for verifying the functionality. Please take a look at it and let me know

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 06:12:14PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:29:33PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > commit d13c18516a30d035e2251d187979e805670aab81 > > Author: Prasanna Santhanam > > Date: Fri Mar 29 13:25:20 2013 +0530 > > > > CLOUDSTACK-1841: Miss

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:25:23AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > commit 48311363d600264cb3542992a615706cb92f90ad > Author: Murali Reddy > Date: Fri Mar 29 15:53:21 2013 +0530 > > CLOUDSTACK-1834: Events are not generated for registerUserKeys(), > Enabling account and Editing account. Pu

Review Request: Storage motion changes for xenserver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10196/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, edison su, Alex Huang, and an

Re: Review Request: MidoNet Networking Plugin [2/2]

Sounds great, thanks Hugo! On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Hugo Trippaers < htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Hey Dave, > > My "ship it" is waiting for a last compile and test run on my dev > platform. I'll try to do that over the weekend. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > Sent from my iPhone

Re: [CI] Upgrading Jenkins

The repo was pointed wrong. Fixed now. On 29 March 2013 19:52, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Shouldn't be. But not sure, will take a look shortly. > > > -- > Prasanna., > > - Original Message - > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 09:24 PM

Re: [CI] Upgrading Jenkins

Shouldn't be. But not sure, will take a look shortly. -- Prasanna., - Original Message - From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 09:24 PM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: [CI] Upgrading Jenkins On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 05:07:23PM +0530, Prasann

VM not obtaing DHCP address when migrating to another host.

All, When I use the migrate to another host option for a running VM (Basic networking), the VM refuses to get a DHCP address? Is this a known issue? or is something wrong with my hosts? is there something I can check? When I migrate it back to the original host it obtains an IP address. v/r Sean

Re: Review Request: Fix log4j configuration for KVM agent

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 05:40:31AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > On March 15, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > > also, what's the bug ID? > > I updated the BUG ID. Chip looking at JIRA you have already committed it. > Kelven can you mark the patch as submitted? > > > - Ani

Re: How to create a new type of SystemVM ?

On 29.03.2013 16:27, Chip Childers wrote: > Can you explain a little more about what you are trying to accomplish? > What do you mean by "grid-service", and why does it need to be a "system > vm"? For guest VMs in a Zone I'm trying to provide a specific service (that doesn't have to be a Grid serv

Re: How to create a new type of SystemVM ?

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:05:02PM +0300, Serge A. Salamanka wrote: > Dear all, > > There is a need to create a new type of system VM that will provide a > grid-service for a Zone. Can you explain a little more about what you are trying to accomplish? What do you mean by "grid-service", and why d

Re: Review Request: BigSwitch networking plugin update

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9789/#review18512 --- Ship it! Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: ee3fd1843533528eb38729517

Re: [CI] Upgrading Jenkins

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 05:07:23PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:54:02PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm hitting couple of jenkins bugs [1][2] on my build jobs. > > Jenkins.cs.o will be upgraded. > > > > [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse

How to create a new type of SystemVM ?

Dear all, There is a need to create a new type of system VM that will provide a grid-service for a Zone. Could anyone give me some tips, please, where to start from? I have already all the information on how to create new system VM but there is no information on the list and in the docs on how t

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/#review18508 --- Commit 5a66ec35ad08ff3313e72b54eba7e1754868eee4 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/#review18509 --- Commit 95fce112157526b0727821e145ec53d0e8f3e824 in branch refs/heads/

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 01:29:33PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > commit d13c18516a30d035e2251d187979e805670aab81 > Author: Prasanna Santhanam > Date: Fri Mar 29 13:25:20 2013 +0530 > > CLOUDSTACK-1841: Missing `cloud`.`configuration` stmts in upgrade > > Following global confi

Review Request: Cloudstack-1739

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10189/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Description --- VMs

Re: Maven POM file question (related to Eclipse)

I'm just ignoring those. I haven't seen any trouble during development. I do use a separate linux host to build packages to avoid problems. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 29 mrt. 2013, at 03:21, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Hi, > > I've been building and running outside of Eclipse for th

Re: Review Request: MidoNet Networking Plugin [2/2]

Hey Dave, My "ship it" is waiting for a last compile and test run on my dev platform. I'll try to do that over the weekend. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 29 mrt. 2013, at 02:17, "Dave Cahill" mailto:dcah...@midokura.com>> wrote: Hi all, I think all review comments have been addresse

Re: [CI] Upgrading Jenkins

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:54:02PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hitting couple of jenkins bugs [1][2] on my build jobs. > Jenkins.cs.o will be upgraded. > > [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13972 > [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-17337 > This is

RE: 4.1 Patches on review board

Sure, thanks Prasanna. -Original Message- From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Prasanna Santhanam Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.1 Patches on review board On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:43:12AM +, Pradeep So

[CI] Upgrading Jenkins

Hi, I'm hitting couple of jenkins bugs [1][2] on my build jobs. Jenkins.cs.o will be upgraded. [1] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13972 [2] https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-17337 Thanks, -- Prasanna.,

Re: 4.1 Patches on review board

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:43:12AM +, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > 9946 Referenced bug is fixed Pradeep > Update the > patch with commit details and mark the patch as submitted > > This patch has not been applied. I have sent the request once again >

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/#review18507 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On March 29, 2013, 10:41 a.m.,

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/#review18506 --- Commit 5a66ec35ad08ff3313e72b54eba7e1754868eee4 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/#review18505 --- Commit fa47d30866f17201a74ec145c96c9bd79b022887 in branch refs/heads/

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Mar 29, 2013, at 6:57 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 06:30:50AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Mar 29, 2013, at 5:55 AM, prasanna wrote: >> >>> On 29 March 2013 15:16, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/#review18504 --- Commit 95fce112157526b0727821e145ec53d0e8f3e824 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: Mulitiple ip address per nic support for advacned shared networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10040/#review18503 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 06:30:50AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 5:55 AM, prasanna wrote: > > > On 29 March 2013 15:16, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> > >> On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> > >>> Here's the latest Blockers and criticals (U

RE: 4.1 Patches on review board

9946Referenced bug is fixed Pradeep Update the patch with commit details and mark the patch as submitted This patch has not been applied. I have sent the request once again with the latest diff to apply it. Thanks, Pradeep S -Original Message

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 10:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 29/03/13 12:45 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >For optional dependencies, JSR330 injection requires using setter >injection. >You should write > >@Inject void setGslbProvider(GslbProvider provider) { > this._gslbProvider = provider; >} Thanks Chiradeep for suggestion. But due to Spring defaul

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Mar 29, 2013, at 5:55 AM, prasanna wrote: > On 29 March 2013 15:16, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> >>> Here's the latest Blockers and criticals (UTC +0530, Mar 29) >>> >>> Blocker: >>> CLOUDSTACK-1746 >>> Cloudstack Usage Server

Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

On Mar 29, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: > > (2013/03/28 20:38), Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>> I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still >>> have trouble in building ja-JP docs. :-) >> >> thanks, I pulled all new translations. I am not sure what you did in

[ACS41][Patch Request]

commit 48311363d600264cb3542992a615706cb92f90ad Author: Murali Reddy Date: Fri Mar 29 15:53:21 2013 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-1834: Events are not generated for registerUserKeys(), Enabling account and Editing account.

Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

(2013/03/28 20:38), Sebastien Goasguen wrote: I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still have trouble in building ja-JP docs. :-) thanks, I pulled all new translations. I am not sure what you did in transifex but it did not fix the issue :) -snip- There was an inva

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:57:17AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Here's the latest Blockers and criticals (UTC +0530, Mar 29) > > CLOUDSTACK-1841 > ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Few Global Configuration parameters on the > Upgraded Setup > Unassigned Chandan Purushothama Sent a patch r

Re: Review Request: Feature Syslog Enhancements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9870/#review18502 --- Ship it! Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: 6a7156ad9af6ca173c0b685d6

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

> On March 29, 2013, 5:52 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > setup/db/create-schema.sql, line 2370 > > > > > > Kawai-san, If this is applied to master, I think this section should go > > in the schema-40to410.sql, in

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On 29 March 2013 15:16, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> Here's the latest Blockers and criticals (UTC +0530, Mar 29) >> >> Blocker: >> CLOUDSTACK-1746 >> Cloudstack Usage Server won't start >> Kishan KavalaFrancois Gaudreault >> >> CLO

Re: Review Request: Feature Syslog Enhancements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9870/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 9:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Rajesh Battal

Re: [ACS41] Today's 4.1 blocker and crit list! Go get 'em!

On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Here's the latest Blockers and criticals (UTC +0530, Mar 29) > > Blocker: > CLOUDSTACK-1746 > Cloudstack Usage Server won't start > Kishan KavalaFrancois Gaudreault > > CLOUDSTACK-1836 > License header failures for ja-JP .po trans

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

> On March 29, 2013, 5:52 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > setup/db/create-schema.sql, line 2370 > > > > > > Kawai-san, If this is applied to master, I think this section should go > > in the schema-40to410.sql, in

RE: MASTER NONOSS BUILD FAILURE

Please find the surefire report https://www.dropbox.com/s/vyq610sdqzs7pt9/surefire-reports.zip As discussed, I will create a new node for master-nonoss build in Jenkins.cs.o once I am free. Thanks, Pradeep S -Original Message- From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On B

[OFFLINE] 30March-30April

Taking time off, will check ML if possible and work on few blockers. From now onwards, I would only be able to work on ACS in my free time. Pl. email me on bhais...@baagi.org for something urgent. I'll be only following dev ML from now. Cheers.

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1592: [UI] Add support to limit newly added resourcetypes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9816/#review18499 --- Commit 2c176ab9ea6216b7c9da25ce0b0d2b34cbc2a776 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1592: [UI] Add support to limit newly added resourcetypes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9816/ --- (Updated March 29, 2013, 8:35 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Pranav Saxena

Re: Feature Request: Password Reset / Change UI

On 29 March 2013 13:39, prasanna wrote: > On 29 March 2013 12:49, Maurice Lawler wrote: >> Hello Gang, >> >> I was wondering short of rendering this with the API. Is there plans to >> allow end users on the CS UI to be permitted to easily change their login >> password ? >> >> I noticed at this

Re: Feature Request: Password Reset / Change UI

On 29 March 2013 12:49, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Hello Gang, > > I was wondering short of rendering this with the API. Is there plans to allow > end users on the CS UI to be permitted to easily change their login password ? > > I noticed at this time I (being the admin) can change them, but someon

[ACS41][Patch Request]

commit d13c18516a30d035e2251d187979e805670aab81 Author: Prasanna Santhanam Date: Fri Mar 29 13:25:20 2013 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-1841: Missing `cloud`.`configuration` stmts in upgrade Following global configurations introduced b/w 3.0.2 and 4.1 were missed. concurrent.snapsh

Assigned IPs

In the account setup in CS it states allotted IPs allowed. Is it possible to automatically from a template made to pull two IPs from the pool. I would think simply make a ifcfg-eth0:1 with DHCP settings would accomplish this. Am I wrong in my thinking?

[ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Multiple IP Ranges support"

Hi, I have identified test cases for "Multiple IP Ranges support" in cloudstack and the test plan is @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+IP+Ranges+support Please review and let me know your feedback. Reference FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDS

[ACS41][QA] Issues with upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 (Ubuntu 12.04)

Hi, I tried upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 with Management server installed on Ubuntu 12.04 . Instructions are : 1) http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.1-incubating/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-builddebs.html 2) http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudSt

Feature Request: Password Reset / Change UI

Hello Gang, I was wondering short of rendering this with the API. Is there plans to allow end users on the CS UI to be permitted to easily change their login password ? I noticed at this time I (being the admin) can change them, but someone was asking me; if this would be implemented in future

Re: MASTER NONOSS BUILD FAILURE

This will need the stacktrace from the maven-surefire report in server. Can you post those? Also - there should've been a job on jenkins.cs.o looking at the nonoss build. Can you refresh that with your latest nonoss jars? I've given you access on jenkins. If the job's running it'll be easier to tr