Thanks for this. It seems a reasonable approach, except that it reflects a failure of previous modeling of the private gateway feature. So, today we want to provide source nat, Tomorrow perhaps static NAT? The day after PF and LB ?
The difference between the public network and the private gateway (or the network behind the private gateway) is not much (if any). On 3/27/13 10:42 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: >I would like to propose feature NAT on private gateway. >This feature is sub feature of nTier2.0 apps. > >Using this feature we can enable/disable the source NAT on the vpc >private gateway . > > >Jira ticket: > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1828 > > >FS : > >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/NAT+on+private+gate >way > > > >Please provide your comments on above FS. > > > >Thanks, > >Jayapal >
