Re: naming development branches consistently

; > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.zdnet.com_article_mysql-2Ddrops-2Dmaster-2Dslave-2Dand-2Dblacklist-2Dwhitelist-2D

Re: naming development branches consistently

2Ddrops-2Dmaster-2Dslave-2Dand-2Dblacklist-2Dwhitelist-2Dterminology_&d=DwIFaQ&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=42Z7FyMoAS1DbvgKNjU8zxi7xTPVAGalPzk7bfmRVgw&m=_KDgXvABczXFLLkrzUHvgLTiGM6FTGPWWBXafxw3QNM&s=nV5LVK6p96fblFesy94FxPvsMgwZbtgwNyXh5wM7yXE&e= > > >>> > > >>

Re: naming development branches consistently

whitelist-2Dterminology_&d=DwIFaQ&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=42Z7FyMoAS1DbvgKNjU8zxi7xTPVAGalPzk7bfmRVgw&m=_KDgXvABczXFLLkrzUHvgLTiGM6FTGPWWBXafxw3QNM&s=nV5LVK6p96fblFesy94FxPvsMgwZbtgwNyXh5wM7yXE&e= > >>> > >>> -Almero > >>> > >>&

Re: naming development branches consistently

t;> >>> -Almero >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Cyril Scetbon >>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:47 PM >>> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] naming development branches consistently >>&g

Re: naming development branches consistently

ww.zdnet.com/article/mysql-drops-master-slave-and-blacklist-whitelist-terminology/ > > > > -Almero > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cyril Scetbon > > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:47 PM > > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [EX

Re: naming development branches consistently

> From: Cyril Scetbon > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:47 PM > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] naming development branches consistently > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unle

Re: naming development branches consistently

Just saw it’s actually a thing https://github.com/github/renaming … > On Aug 24, 2020, at 6:47 PM, Cyril Scetbon wrote: > > Seriously ? Should we change how MySQL architectures are defined ? Should we > remove it from the dictionary too ? Just to see how ra

RE: naming development branches consistently

https://www.zdnet.com/article/mysql-drops-master-slave-and-blacklist-whitelist-terminology/ -Almero -Original Message- From: Cyril Scetbon Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:47 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] naming development branches consistently CAUTION: This

Re: naming development branches consistently

Seriously ? Should we change how MySQL architectures are defined ? Should we remove it from the dictionary too ? Just to see how radical It could be … 🤦‍♂️ > On Aug 24, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > With the current social climate I thought removing the master > reference rath

Re: naming development branches consistently

+1 to trunk and main > On Aug 24, 2020, at 9:59 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > I'm fine with that, though it's probably a tab bit more involved than > the rest due to website/doc changes. > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:29 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko > wrote: >> >> Last thing I want is to bikeshed,

Re: naming development branches consistently

I'm fine with that, though it's probably a tab bit more involved than the rest due to website/doc changes. On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:29 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > > Last thing I want is to bikeshed, but seems like ‘main’ is what’s being > adopted by GitHub, so we might as well rename all ‘m

Re: naming development branches consistently

Last thing I want is to bikeshed, but seems like ‘main’ is what’s being adopted by GitHub, so we might as well rename all ‘master’ and ’trunk’ branches to that. > On 24 Aug 2020, at 17:22, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > Ah! Totally didn't even think of that. Good point. > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at

Re: naming development branches consistently

Ah! Totally didn't even think of that. Good point. On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:12 PM Brandon Williams wrote: > With the current social climate I thought removing the master > reference rather than proliferating it would be better. > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:07 AM Joshua McKenzie > wrote: > >

Re: naming development branches consistently

With the current social climate I thought removing the master reference rather than proliferating it would be better. On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:07 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > Why not rename "trunk" to "master" in C*? =D > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Brandon Williams wrote: > > > Hell

Re: naming development branches consistently

Why not rename "trunk" to "master" in C*? =D On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Brandon Williams wrote: > Hello, > > Currently in the cassandra repo our development branch is named > 'trunk', but this is not consistently used in other repos, such as > cassandra-dtest, -builds, -website, and prob

naming development branches consistently

Hello, Currently in the cassandra repo our development branch is named 'trunk', but this is not consistently used in other repos, such as cassandra-dtest, -builds, -website, and probably others, which use 'master' instead. I propose we rename all of those to 'trunk' to match. Kind Regards, Brand