+1 for trunk or main (slight preference for trunk)


On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 8:52 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for trunk and main.
>
> Thanks for raising this Brandon.
>
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 20:40, Cyril Scetbon <cyril.scet...@free.fr> wrote:
>
> > Scott, I don’t think it does and don’t see any offense in what I’ve said.
> > Can you be more specific instead of sending a link with rules numbers
> that
> > I don’t think apply ? I can also send links to definitions of all the
> words
> > in the rules you sent but it could be a waste of time. We can continue
> that
> > discussion on the list or in private up to you.
> >
> > Cyril Scetbon
> >
> > > On Aug 25, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Scott Hirleman <scott.hirle...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Cyril, your commentary violates the code of conduct of the ASF
> > > <https://apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html> re rules #2 and
> > #5.
> > > It could also be very hurtful to those who feel this is important, as
> > many
> > > in the community do. Please think before pushing further on this as
> > > projects need to be welcoming and inclusive. Thank you.
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Cyril Scetbon <cyril.scet...@free.fr>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Wow, thanks for the link Almero. I suppose the dictionary comes next
> > then
> > >> 🤷‍♂️
> > >>
> > >>> On Aug 24, 2020, at 6:54 PM, Gouws, Almero
> <alme...@amazon.com.INVALID
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.zdnet.com_article_mysql-2Ddrops-2Dmaster-2Dslave-2Dand-2Dblacklist-2Dwhitelist-2Dterminology_&d=DwIFaQ&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=42Z7FyMoAS1DbvgKNjU8zxi7xTPVAGalPzk7bfmRVgw&m=_KDgXvABczXFLLkrzUHvgLTiGM6FTGPWWBXafxw3QNM&s=nV5LVK6p96fblFesy94FxPvsMgwZbtgwNyXh5wM7yXE&e=
> > >>>
> > >>> -Almero
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Cyril Scetbon <cyril.scet...@free.fr>
> > >>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:47 PM
> > >>> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] naming development branches consistently
> > >>>
> > >>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not
> > >> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know
> > >> the content is safe.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Seriously ? Should we change how MySQL architectures are defined ?
> > >> Should we remove it from the dictionary too ? Just to see how radical
> It
> > >> could be … 🤦‍♂️
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Aug 24, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> With the current social climate I thought removing the master
> > >>>> reference rather than proliferating it would be better.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:07 AM Joshua McKenzie <
> > jmcken...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Why not rename "trunk" to "master" in C*?   =D
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Brandon Williams <
> dri...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Currently in the cassandra repo our development branch is named
> > >>>>>> 'trunk', but this is not consistently used in other repos, such as
> > >>>>>> cassandra-dtest, -builds, -website, and probably others, which use
> > >>>>>> 'master' instead.  I propose we rename all of those to 'trunk' to
> > >>>>>> match.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Kind Regards,
> > >>>>>> Brandon
> > >>>>>>
> >
>

Reply via email to