Considering the project currently follows the trunk-based development
workflow, I am +1 for trunk
In general I am fine also with main, but trunk sounds more accurate to me
personally.

On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 4:03, Benjamin Lerer <benjamin.le...@datastax.com>
wrote:

> +1 for trunk or main (slight preference for trunk)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 8:52 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > +1 for trunk and main.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks for raising this Brandon.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 20:40, Cyril Scetbon <cyril.scet...@free.fr>
> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Scott, I don’t think it does and don’t see any offense in what I’ve
> said.
>
> > > Can you be more specific instead of sending a link with rules numbers
>
> > that
>
> > > I don’t think apply ? I can also send links to definitions of all the
>
> > words
>
> > > in the rules you sent but it could be a waste of time. We can continue
>
> > that
>
> > > discussion on the list or in private up to you.
>
> > >
>
> > > Cyril Scetbon
>
> > >
>
> > > > On Aug 25, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Scott Hirleman <
> scott.hirle...@gmail.com
>
> > >
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Cyril, your commentary violates the code of conduct of the ASF
>
> > > > <https://apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html> re rules #2
> and
>
> > > #5.
>
> > > > It could also be very hurtful to those who feel this is important, as
>
> > > many
>
> > > > in the community do. Please think before pushing further on this as
>
> > > > projects need to be welcoming and inclusive. Thank you.
>
> > > >
>
> > > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Cyril Scetbon <
> cyril.scet...@free.fr>
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> Wow, thanks for the link Almero. I suppose the dictionary comes next
>
> > > then
>
> > > >> 🤷‍♂️
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >>> On Aug 24, 2020, at 6:54 PM, Gouws, Almero
>
> > <alme...@amazon.com.INVALID
>
> > > >
>
> > > >> wrote:
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>
>
> > >
>
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.zdnet.com_article_mysql-2Ddrops-2Dmaster-2Dslave-2Dand-2Dblacklist-2Dwhitelist-2Dterminology_&d=DwIFaQ&c=adz96Xi0w1RHqtPMowiL2g&r=42Z7FyMoAS1DbvgKNjU8zxi7xTPVAGalPzk7bfmRVgw&m=_KDgXvABczXFLLkrzUHvgLTiGM6FTGPWWBXafxw3QNM&s=nV5LVK6p96fblFesy94FxPvsMgwZbtgwNyXh5wM7yXE&e=
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>> -Almero
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > > >>> From: Cyril Scetbon <cyril.scet...@free.fr>
>
> > > >>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:47 PM
>
> > > >>> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
>
> > > >>> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] naming development branches consistently
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
>
> > not
>
> > > >> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and
>
> > > know
>
> > > >> the content is safe.
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>> Seriously ? Should we change how MySQL architectures are defined ?
>
> > > >> Should we remove it from the dictionary too ? Just to see how
> radical
>
> > It
>
> > > >> could be … 🤦‍♂️
>
> > > >>>
>
> > > >>>> On Aug 24, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>
>
> > > >> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>
>
> > > >>>> With the current social climate I thought removing the master
>
> > > >>>> reference rather than proliferating it would be better.
>
> > > >>>>
>
> > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:07 AM Joshua McKenzie <
>
> > > jmcken...@apache.org>
>
> > > >> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>
>
> > > >>>>> Why not rename "trunk" to "master" in C*?   =D
>
> > > >>>>>
>
> > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Brandon Williams <
>
> > dri...@gmail.com>
>
> > > >> wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>
>
> > > >>>>>> Hello,
>
> > > >>>>>>
>
> > > >>>>>> Currently in the cassandra repo our development branch is named
>
> > > >>>>>> 'trunk', but this is not consistently used in other repos, such
> as
>
> > > >>>>>> cassandra-dtest, -builds, -website, and probably others, which
> use
>
> > > >>>>>> 'master' instead.  I propose we rename all of those to 'trunk'
> to
>
> > > >>>>>> match.
>
> > > >>>>>>
>
> > > >>>>>> Kind Regards,
>
> > > >>>>>> Brandon
>
> > > >>>>>>
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to