pache.org
> *Subject:* *Re: Libraries update*
> *Reply-To:* dev@cassandra.apache.org
>
> For specific versions of dependencies scroll down for the Compile
> Dependencies and Managed Dependencies at Maven Repository:
> org.apache.cassandra » cassandra-all » 4.0-alpha3
>
>
&g
p://datastax.com/?utm_campaign=FY20Q2_CONSTELLATION&utm_+medium=email&utm_source=signature>
>
>
>>
>> *From:* Deepak Vohra
>> *Date:* 11 February 2020, 17:14:56 GMT-5
>> *To:* dev@cassandra.apache.org
>> *Subject:* *Re: Libraries update*
>
...@datastax.com | datastax.com
<http://datastax.com/?utm_campaign=FY20Q2_CONSTELLATION&utm_+medium=email&utm_source=signature>
>
> *From:* Deepak Vohra
> *Date:* 11 February 2020, 17:14:56 GMT-5
> *To:* dev@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* *Re: Libraries update*
> *Rep
For specific versions of dependencies scroll down for the Compile Dependencies
and Managed Dependencies at Maven Repository: org.apache.cassandra »
cassandra-all » 4.0-alpha3
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Maven Repository: org.apache.cassandra » cassandra-all » 4.0-alpha3
|
|
|
O
> do you think it would be a good idea to get a certain
view on those and see what can be easily updated?
Yes!
With more up-to-date dependencies, Cassandra will work with other open
source software smoothly. Looking forward.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:44 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hello ev
Good point Deepak - we do have:
http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/development/dependencies.html
But we dont have details or process written down.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:02 AM Deepak Vohra
wrote:
>
> Dependency management is discussed at Documentation
>
> |
> |
> | |
> Documentation
>
>
Dependency management is discussed at Documentation
|
|
| |
Documentation
The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and
high availability without compro...
|
|
|
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 07:44:15 p.m. UTC, Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
Quick answer to your question though is no, it's been entirely adhoc.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:50 AM Nate McCall wrote:
> I would love to see an audit and rough plan on maintenance and evaluation
> criteria, etc added to the wiki for discussion. We've had a couple of users
> complain about libr
I would love to see an audit and rough plan on maintenance and evaluation
criteria, etc added to the wiki for discussion. We've had a couple of users
complain about library versions when including the aftifact as a dependency
(even though we don't support this, a lot of people do it). It would be
c
