I would love to see an audit and rough plan on maintenance and evaluation criteria, etc added to the wiki for discussion. We've had a couple of users complain about library versions when including the aftifact as a dependency (even though we don't support this, a lot of people do it). It would be cool to have something to point to at the very least.
Thanks for bringing this up!! On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:44 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova < ekaterina.dimitr...@datastax.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > I was looking into some library updates these dates as per user requests. > This made me think about one thing. As we approach the new version release, > were the versions of the libraries cassandra depends on sanitized in any > way? Is there an overall view or plans for updates? Or is it done on a > case by case basis? > If it is not done, do you think it would be a good idea to get a certain > view on those and see what can be easily updated? I know it is late for big > rewrites but at least maybe we can update to new versions those which don't > introduce big changes? > Any thoughts? Objections? > > Ekaterina Dimitrova | Software Engineer > ekaterina.dimitr...@datastax.com | datastax.com > < > http://datastax.com/?utm_campaign=FY20Q2_CONSTELLATION&utm_+medium=email&utm_source=signature > > >
