Quick answer to your question though is no, it's been entirely adhoc. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:50 AM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would love to see an audit and rough plan on maintenance and evaluation > criteria, etc added to the wiki for discussion. We've had a couple of users > complain about library versions when including the aftifact as a dependency > (even though we don't support this, a lot of people do it). It would be > cool to have something to point to at the very least. > > Thanks for bringing this up!! > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:44 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova < > ekaterina.dimitr...@datastax.com> wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> I was looking into some library updates these dates as per user requests. >> This made me think about one thing. As we approach the new version >> release, >> were the versions of the libraries cassandra depends on sanitized in any >> way? Is there an overall view or plans for updates? Or is it done on a >> case by case basis? >> If it is not done, do you think it would be a good idea to get a certain >> view on those and see what can be easily updated? I know it is late for >> big >> rewrites but at least maybe we can update to new versions those which >> don't >> introduce big changes? >> Any thoughts? Objections? >> >> Ekaterina Dimitrova | Software Engineer >> ekaterina.dimitr...@datastax.com | datastax.com >> < >> http://datastax.com/?utm_campaign=FY20Q2_CONSTELLATION&utm_+medium=email&utm_source=signature >> > >> >
