Re: 20200407 4.0 Status Update

2020-04-08 Thread Jordan West
I’ve added a “LHF” quick filter to the board which filters on this. You may have to click “Show More” to make it visible. Jordan On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 6:09 PM wrote: > Hi Manish, > You can check those tickets which have Complexity: Low Hanging Fruit > > Ekaterina > > Sent from my iPhone > > >

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Jordan West
+1 (nb) to the change and +1 (nb) to updating the docs to reflect this. Jordan On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:30 AM wrote: > +1 > > > El 8 abr 2020, a las 19:05, e.dimitr...@gmail.com escribió: > > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On 8 Apr 2020, at 13:50, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > >> > >

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread a . penya . garcia
+1 > El 8 abr 2020, a las 19:05, e.dimitr...@gmail.com escribió: > > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 8 Apr 2020, at 13:50, Joshua McKenzie wrote: >> >> +1 >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:26 PM Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wro

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread e . dimitrova
+1 Sent from my iPhone > On 8 Apr 2020, at 13:50, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > +1 > >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:26 PM Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: >> >> +1 >> On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wrote: >>> >>> Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? >>> >>> We

Re: Idea: Marking required scope for 4.0 GA vs. optional

2020-04-08 Thread Dinesh Joshi
On CASSANDRA-15379, I think we would’ve discovered this issue during 4.0 testing and would have needed this bug fix anyway. We just caught it early because you went ahead and tested the feature ;) Dinesh > On Mar 31, 2020, at 3:27 PM, Joseph Lynch wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:27 PM J

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Joshua McKenzie
+1 On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:26 PM Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: > +1 > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? > > > > We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change > > from any previous release.

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread David Capwell
+1 On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 10:06 AM Dinesh Joshi wrote: > Could we please update the developer docs to reflect this? > > http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/development/index.html > > Dinesh > > > On Apr 8, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > Can we agree on keeping such test chang

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Dinesh Joshi
Could we please update the developer docs to reflect this? http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/development/index.html Dinesh > On Apr 8, 2020, at 7:08 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? > > We already don't put entries into CHANGES

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Sam Tunnicliffe
+1 > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? > > We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change > from any previous release. > > There was some discussion before¹ about this, and the problem that >

[Discuss] Whether CASSANDRA-15623 should be backported

2020-04-08 Thread Jacob Becker
Dear Cassandra community, Recently I have reported [CASSANDRA-15623](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15623) and submitted a patch for it, please see the ticket for more details. The patch has been reviewed and approved for merging into trunk. However, now there is a need to de

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Yifan Cai
+1 From: Jasonstack Zhao Yang Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 9:04:51 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt +1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 00:04 Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Sem

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Jasonstack Zhao Yang
+1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 00:04 Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? > > > > We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change > > from any previous release. >

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
+1 > On 8 Apr 2020, at 15:08, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? > > We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change > from any previous release. > > There was some discussion before¹ about this, and the problem that >

Re: Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
+1 On 08/04/2020, 16:53, "Mick Semb Wever" wrote: Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change from any previous release. There was some discussion before¹ about this, and the problem

Keeping test-only changes out of CHANGES.txt

2020-04-08 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Can we agree on keeping such test changes out of CHANGES.txt ? We already don't put entries into CHANGES.txt if it is not a change from any previous release. There was some discussion before¹ about this, and the problem that being selective meant what ended up there being arbitrary. I think this