Jul 21, 2017 12:59 AM, "Enrico Olivelli"
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I have just file this issue
> > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
> > > >
> > > > After the switch to Netty
; > On Jul 21, 2017 12:59 AM, "Enrico Olivelli"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I have just file this issue
> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
> > >
> > > After the switch to Netty 4 I noticed this "API change", tha
file this issue
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
> >
> > After the switch to Netty 4 I noticed this "API change", that is very
> > important to be documented and/or to be addresses.
> >
> >
> > I think documentation is im
On Jul 21, 2017 9:25 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
Il ven 21 lug 2017, 18:19 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> On Jul 21, 2017 12:59 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have just file this issue
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
>
> After
Il ven 21 lug 2017, 18:19 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> On Jul 21, 2017 12:59 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have just file this issue
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
>
> After the switch to Netty 4 I noticed this "API change", that
t; around
>> memory release is new concept to Java world.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:59 AM Enrico Olivelli
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > I have just file this issue
>> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
>> >
On Jul 21, 2017 12:59 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote:
Hi,
I have just file this issue
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
After the switch to Netty 4 I noticed this "API change", that is very
important to be documented and/or to be addresses.
I think documenta
ept to Java world.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:59 AM Enrico Olivelli
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > I have just file this issue
>> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
>> >
>> > After the switch to Netty 4
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have just file this issue
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
> >
> > After the switch to Netty 4 I noticed this "API change", that is very
> > important to be documented and/or to be addresses.
> &g
Can we also add some stats around this to track these. ? Discipline around
memory release is new concept to Java world.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:59 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have just file this issue
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
>
> After the sw
Hi,
I have just file this issue
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/271
After the switch to Netty 4 I noticed this "API change", that is very
important to be documented and/or to be addresses.
Inside LedgerEntry object we retain a ByteBuf, which is turn is
automatically '
👍
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Here it is!
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/
> apache/bookkeeper/
> this is the pom with netty4
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/
> apache/bookkeeper/bookkeeper/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/bo
Here it is!
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/bookkeeper/
this is the pom with netty4
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookkeeper/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/bookkeeper-4.5.0-20170519.141622-6.pom
the provider for https://prometheus.io
Awesome!!
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Great!
> I will update public snapshots asap
>
> Enrico
>
> Il lun 15 mag 2017, 19:54 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
>
> > I merged BOOKKEEPER-1008. It lands on master now! It is a great milestone
> > for 4.5.0.
> >
> > Thank you every
Great!
I will update public snapshots asap
Enrico
Il lun 15 mag 2017, 19:54 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> I merged BOOKKEEPER-1008. It lands on master now! It is a great milestone
> for 4.5.0.
>
> Thank you everyone for making this happen!
>
> - Sijie
>
--
-- Enrico Olivelli
I merged BOOKKEEPER-1008. It lands on master now! It is a great milestone
for 4.5.0.
Thank you everyone for making this happen!
- Sijie
gt; Sijie,
>>> Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
>>> Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
>>> was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
>>> I think that most of the problem is that you local fork actually is
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Sijie,
> > Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
> > Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeti
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Sijie,
> Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
> Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
> was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
> I think that most of the problem is
Sijie,
Most of the upcoming patches from Yahoo will need Netty 4, and at
Salesforce are working on Netty 4 + SSL, so the idea at the last meeting
was to get Netty 4.1 in in 4.5
I think that most of the problem is that you local fork actually is based
on Netty 3, as we recently discussed about the
I need to catch up a bit about this thread.
for my understanding, the question is shall we include netty 4.x upgrade in
BK 4.5 release or shall we push to 4.6?
- Sijie
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> I have just sent an email to JV
>
> 2017-02-24 17:03
6, 2017, 9:42:14 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:Great,
> so Kishore and JV, can you take this into account on the Netty 4 patch ?
>
> or maybe we can create a first baseline fom Kishore and than add the
> "natvie EPoll" feature with a patch from Yahoo codebase.
>
&g
Sure, I am happy to add it in afterwards too.
- Bobby
On Monday, March 6, 2017, 9:42:14 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:Great,
so Kishore and JV, can you take this into account on the Netty 4 patch ?
or maybe we can create a first baseline fom Kishore and than add the
"natvie EPoll&quo
Great,
so Kishore and JV, can you take this into account on the Netty 4 patch ?
or maybe we can create a first baseline fom Kishore and than add the
"natvie EPoll" feature with a patch from Yahoo codebase.
Bobby, can you put a comment on the JIRA for Netty 4 ?
Thank you
Enrico
2017-0
rch 4, 2017, 8:29:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:Hi all,
As we are switching to netty 4.1 maybe ee can look to this too:
http://netty.io/wiki/native-transports.html
Even if I have been using netty 4 for some year I did not get this
promising feature on linux.
Did any of you ever gi
Hi all,
As we are switching to netty 4.1 maybe ee can look to this too:
http://netty.io/wiki/native-transports.html
Even if I have been using netty 4 for some year I did not get this
promising feature on linux.
Did any of you ever give it a try?
Enrico
--
-- Enrico Olivelli
ico's
>> > patch.
>> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
>> > has
>> > > >> takes
>> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
>> > > >> > >
>> >
t; Enrico
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> >> > jujj...@gmail.com
> >> > > >:
> >> > > >> >
> >> &g
t;> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's
>> > patch.
>> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore
>> > has
>> > > >> takes
>> > > >
s
> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> > >> different
> > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I
> want
> > to
> > >> > make
> > &
; > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a
&
ER-1008 for this work. If others have a
> >> different
> >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I want
> to
> >> > make
> >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >> > > >
>
I want
> to
> >> > make
> >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > - Bobby
> >> > > >
> >> >
- Bobby
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans
>> > > > wrote:I would be happy to give it a
>> try.
>> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways.
>> Our
>> >
> > > wrote:I would be happy to give it a
> try.
> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back anyways. Our
> > > code
> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see
> > what
> > > > d
> > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see
> what
> > > differences there are with the API.
> > >
> > > - Bobby
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > &g
off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what
> > differences there are with the API.
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for
to push it back anyways. Our
> code
> > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x and see what
> > differences there are with the API.
> >
> > - Bobby
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <
> > eo
wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects
> and I am very +1 on the switch
> to Netty 4
>
> @Sijie what do you think ?
> If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
> the first port ?
>
>
> Enrico
>
> 2017-02-22 16:32
using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I
am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4
@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
the first port ?
Enrico
2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans :
> I really would like to get netty4 in soone
wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I
am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4
@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
the first port ?
Enrico
2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans :
> I really would lik
I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of my projects and I am very +1 on the switch
to Netty 4
@Sijie what do you think ?
If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can take care of
the first port ?
Enrico
2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans :
> I really would like to get n
performances using native
OpenSSL + netty 4.
How the work is going ?
Open questions are:
1) status of my current patch on SSL
should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the work from it
or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ?
2) switch to Netty 4:
Initially we said that the switch
Hi all BookKeepers,
At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce there is some
work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances using native
OpenSSL + netty 4.
How the work is going ?
Open questions are:
1) status of my current patch on SSL
should I rebase, than get it
45 matches
Mail list logo
