I have just sent an email to JV 2017-02-24 17:03 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>:
> Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and just > waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout. > > > - Bobby > > On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial SSL > patch. > > I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current > master. > > See you at the meeting > > -- Enrico > > 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > > > Ok see you tomorrow > > > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com> > ha > > scritto: > > > >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. > tomorrow > >> 8 AM PST. > >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week. > >> > > >> > > >> > - Bobby > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < > >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or > >> on > >> > Friday? > >> > > >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com > > > >> ha > >> > scritto: > >> > > >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's > meeting. > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > >> > > jujj...@gmail.com > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond? > >> > > > > >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli < > >> eolive...@gmail.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> It depends on the "host". > >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we > use > >> the > >> > > >> room > >> > > >> linked at > >> > > >> > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > >> > Community+Meetings > >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter) > >> > > >> > >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the > >> > > meeting > >> > > >> ? > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > >> >: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there > was > >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I > join > >> > the > >> > > >> right > >> > > >> > one this time. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > - Bobby > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico > Olivelli < > >> > > >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Great! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Enrico > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > >> > jujj...@gmail.com > >> > > >: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's > >> > patch. > >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch > kishore > >> > has > >> > > >> takes > >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans > >> > > >> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others > have a > >> > > >> different > >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. > I > >> > want > >> > > to > >> > > >> > make > >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby > Evans > >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to > give > >> > it a > >> > > >> try. > >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back > >> anyways. > >> > > >> Our > >> > > >> > > code > >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at > 4.1.x > >> and > >> > > see > >> > > >> > what > >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico > >> > Olivelli < > >> > > >> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all > of > >> my > >> > > >> > projects > >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch > >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4 > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ? > >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who > can > >> > take > >> > > >> care > >> > > >> > of > >> > > >> > > > the first port ? > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Enrico > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans > >> > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid > >> > > >> >: > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then > >> later. > >> > > >> > Simply > >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in > >> > > >> production > >> > > >> > so > >> > > >> > > > we > >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a > lot > >> of > >> > > >> other > >> > > >> > > > patches > >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of > >> > patches > >> > > >> to > >> > > >> > > push > >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more > >> difficult > >> > if > >> > > >> not > >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait > until > >> > 4.6.x > >> > > >> for > >> > > >> > > > netty4 > >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply > >> so > >> > we > >> > > >> can > >> > > >> > > start > >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a > >> > change > >> > > >> this > >> > > >> > > big > >> > > >> > > > is > >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to > other > >> > > >> opinions. > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico > >> > > Olivelli < > >> > > >> > > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers, > >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a > Salesforce > >> > > there > >> > > >> is > >> > > >> > > some > >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances > >> > using > >> > > >> > native > >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4. > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ? > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are: > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the > >> work > >> > > >> from > >> > > >> > it > >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ? > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4: > >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo > >> and > >> > now > >> > > >> from > >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x. > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ? > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > -- > >> > > >> > > Jvrao > >> > > >> > > --- > >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they > fight > >> > you, > >> > > >> then > >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Jvrao > >> > > > --- > >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight > you, > >> > then > >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Jvrao > >> > > --- > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, > >> then > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > >> > > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jvrao > >> --- > >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > >> > > -- > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > >
