Is the meetup happening? I have the last three hangout URLs up and just waiting for someone to join/let me into the hangout.
- Bobby On Friday, February 24, 2017, 6:01:10 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Thank you @Kishore for review the initial SSL patch. I have addressed most of the issues and rebased the patch to current master. See you at the meeting -- Enrico 2017-02-23 17:05 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > Ok see you tomorrow > > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 17:03 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > >> Hmm. I am not sure if we have decided. Ok lets move it to Friday. tomorrow >> 8 AM PST. >> Lets discuss and get agreement on the slot tomorrow. >> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid >> > >> wrote: >> >> > I was assuming Friday, because that is what it was last week. >> > >> > >> > - Bobby >> > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 9:59:00 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Ss we are going to meet today, Thursday or >> on >> > Friday? >> > >> > Il gio 23 feb 2017, 16:13 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com> >> ha >> > scritto: >> > >> > > Sijie is still in China. Use the link I provided for today's meeting. >> > > >> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < >> > > jujj...@gmail.com >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > If @sjije is not there I can host it. @sjijie can you respond? >> > > > >> > > > https://hangouts.google.com/call/delo7ot7ajdidcakwvrklcnpkme >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Enrico Olivelli < >> eolive...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> It depends on the "host". >> > > >> Last time Sijie was away and JV hosted the meeting. Usually we use >> the >> > > >> room >> > > >> linked at >> > > >> >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ >> > Community+Meetings >> > > >> (hosted by Siji @Twitter) >> > > >> >> > > >> I don't know whether Sijie will attend. >> > > >> >> > > >> If Sijie is not available does anyone volunteer to drive/host the >> > > meeting >> > > >> ? >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> 2017-02-23 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid >> >: >> > > >> >> > > >> > What is the hangout URL we are going to use? Last time there was >> > > >> > confusion so I was not able to join, and I want to be sure I join >> > the >> > > >> right >> > > >> > one this time. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > - Bobby >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Thursday, February 23, 2017, 2:06:08 AM CST, Enrico Olivelli < >> > > >> > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Great! >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I have drafted the agenda of the next meeting >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ >> > > >> > 2017-2-24+Meeting+notes >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Enrico >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > 2017-02-23 0:26 GMT+01:00 Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < >> > jujj...@gmail.com >> > > >: >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Kishore has done bunch of work, and he is reviewing Enrico's >> > patch. >> > > >> > > I will request Kishore to be in next meeting. The patch kishore >> > has >> > > >> takes >> > > >> > > to Netty 4.1.7. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bobby Evans >> > > >> <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > I just filed BOOKKEEPER-1008 for this work. If others have a >> > > >> different >> > > >> > > > opinion on this feel free to comment here or on the JIRA. I >> > want >> > > to >> > > >> > make >> > > >> > > > sure we have the backing of the community on this. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 10:35:29 AM CST, Bobby Evans >> > > >> > > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote:I would be happy to give >> > it a >> > > >> try. >> > > >> > > > Like I said we are coming up on needing to push it back >> anyways. >> > > >> Our >> > > >> > > code >> > > >> > > > is based off of 4.0.36.Final, but I can take a look at 4.1.x >> and >> > > see >> > > >> > what >> > > >> > > > differences there are with the API. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > - Bobby >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:57:52 AM CST, Enrico >> > Olivelli < >> > > >> > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:I'm using Netty 4.1.x for all of >> my >> > > >> > projects >> > > >> > > > and I am very +1 on the switch >> > > >> > > > to Netty 4 >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > @Sijie what do you think ? >> > > >> > > > If we all agree to switch to Netty 4 (I hope 4.1.x) who can >> > take >> > > >> care >> > > >> > of >> > > >> > > > the first port ? >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Enrico >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > 2017-02-22 16:32 GMT+01:00 Bobby Evans >> > > <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid >> > > >> >: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > I really would like to get netty4 in sooner rather then >> later. >> > > >> > Simply >> > > >> > > > > because we have been running with it for quite a while in >> > > >> production >> > > >> > so >> > > >> > > > we >> > > >> > > > > know it is relatively stable, and it is the basis of a lot >> of >> > > >> other >> > > >> > > > patches >> > > >> > > > > we want to push back. Meaning we only have a handful of >> > patches >> > > >> to >> > > >> > > push >> > > >> > > > > back before netty4 starts to make things much more >> difficult >> > if >> > > >> not >> > > >> > > > > impossible for other patches. If we do want to wait until >> > 4.6.x >> > > >> for >> > > >> > > > netty4 >> > > >> > > > > then I would propose that we create a 4.5.x branch simply >> so >> > we >> > > >> can >> > > >> > > start >> > > >> > > > > to move forward with netty4 on master. I realize that a >> > change >> > > >> this >> > > >> > > big >> > > >> > > > is >> > > >> > > > > going to add more work to others too so I am open to other >> > > >> opinions. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > - Bobby >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 9:22:39 AM CST, Enrico >> > > Olivelli < >> > > >> > > > > eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi all BookKeepers, >> > > >> > > > > At the last community meeting JV reported that a Salesforce >> > > there >> > > >> is >> > > >> > > some >> > > >> > > > > work on SSL/TLS, in particular due to better performances >> > using >> > > >> > native >> > > >> > > > > OpenSSL + netty 4. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > How the work is going ? >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Open questions are: >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > 1) status of my current patch on SSL >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > should I rebase, than get it merged and then continue the >> work >> > > >> from >> > > >> > it >> > > >> > > > > or JV and SF guys will pick up the work entirely ? >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > 2) switch to Netty 4: >> > > >> > > > > Initially we said that the switch to Netty 4 (from Yahoo >> and >> > now >> > > >> from >> > > >> > > > > Salesforce) could be skipped and done maybe for 4.6.x. >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > What are your current thoughts ? >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > -- Enrico >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > Jvrao >> > > >> > > --- >> > > >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight >> > you, >> > > >> then >> > > >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Jvrao >> > > > --- >> > > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, >> > then >> > > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jvrao >> > > --- >> > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, >> then >> > > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi >> > > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jvrao >> --- >> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then >> you win. - Mahatma Gandhi >> > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
