Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

I Agree. > I propose to declare end-of-life on all the release lines prior to 4.14. I think we should have a clear end-of-life policy for BookKeeper. > For me having two release lines is acceptable. We'd better not define the end-of-life policy based on the release lines number. Thanks, Hang

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

Agree. >In my opinion we should formalize this process in order to have a clear vision when 4.16.0 will be out. This will also help users to understand the entire lifecycle of the project. For me having two release lines is acceptable. I think that depends on how long we will stay on a major vers

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

Makes sense to me. Is the upgrade path straightforward? For example, Apache Pulsar 2.7.5 currently uses release line 4.12, so it would need to be upgraded to at least 4.14 if we wanted to stay on a supported version. Thanks, Michael On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:08 AM steven lu wrote: > > +1 I agre

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.2, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified checksums and signatures - built from sources on Mac, JDK8, tests are passing (a few flakes) - tested local bookie Thank you! Enrico Il giorno ven 23 set 2022 alle ore 09:32 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for

Re: [VOTE] BP-58 Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter

The PR has been merged without running a formal VOTE. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3501 cancel this VOTE, the next time we will follow the community process. say sorry for Bookkeeper Community Enrico Olivelli 于2022年9月27日周二 17:25写道： > +1 (binding) > > But I don't think we need this V

Re: [VOTE] BP-57 Add a public API for creating embeddable servers

+1 (non binding) Nicolò Boschi Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 11:25 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I think that we need some more binding VOTEs please > > Enrico > > Il giorno dom 25 set 2022 alle ore 16:15 ZhangJian He > ha scritto: > > > > +1 , non binding > > > > Th

Re: [VOTE] BP-57 Add a public API for creating embeddable servers

I think that we need some more binding VOTEs please Enrico Il giorno dom 25 set 2022 alle ore 16:15 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > > +1 , non binding > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 21:56, Lan Liang wrote: > > > +1 , non binding. > > > > This is a useful feature! > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] BP-58 Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter

+1 (binding) But I don't think we need this VOTE as the patch has already been merged Steven, it's up to you Enrico Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 09:10 steven lu ha scritto: > > Hi Bookkeeper Community, > I would like to start a VOTE on " Change the API for > org.apache.bookkeeper.stats

Pulsar Summit Asia 2022 CFP is Open Now!

Hi Apache BookKeeper community members, Pulsar Summit Asia 2022 will be hosted virtually on November 19th and 20th, 2022. It is expected to cover the pivotal topics and technologies at the core of Apache Pulsar and Apache BookKeeper. The CFP is open n

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-58 Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter

Got it thanks Nicolò Boschi Nicolò Boschi 于2022年9月27日周二 16:10写道： > +1 for the BP, thanks Steven > > Usually is a good practice to put the pull request in the "Draft" status to > ensure nobody is able to merge it > > Nicolò Boschi > > > Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 08:59 Enrico Olivelli < >

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-58 Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter

+1 for the BP, thanks Steven Usually is a good practice to put the pull request in the "Draft" status to ensure nobody is able to merge it Nicolò Boschi Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 08:59 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello, > The PR has been merged without running

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

+1 I agree. Nicolò Boschi 于2022年9月27日周二 16:00写道： > I agree. And it actually reflects what we're doing in the community (only > cherry-pick to branches 4.14 and 4.15). > > In my opinion we should formalize this process in order to have a clear > vision when 4.16.0 will be out. > This will also he

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

I agree. And it actually reflects what we're doing in the community (only cherry-pick to branches 4.14 and 4.15). In my opinion we should formalize this process in order to have a clear vision when 4.16.0 will be out. This will also help users to understand the entire lifecycle of the project. Fo

[VOTE] BP-58 Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter

Hi Bookkeeper Community, I would like to start a VOTE on " Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter."(BP-58) It changes the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter. we have updated its implementation in bookkeeper projects, when bookkeeper-4.16.0 is released, we can update its im

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-58 Change the API for org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter

Hello, The PR has been merged without running a formal VOTE. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3501 I think that given the impact of this change for this time we can move forward and consider the BP "accepted" A few people already commented by "supporting" the BP Thoughts ? Enrico Il