+1 for the BP, thanks Steven

Usually is a good practice to put the pull request in the "Draft" status to
ensure nobody is able to merge it

Nicolò Boschi


Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 08:59 Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Hello,
> The PR has been merged without running a formal VOTE.
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3501
>
> I think that given the impact of this change for this time we can move
> forward and consider the BP "accepted"
>
> A few people already commented by "supporting" the BP
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 03:13 Yong Zhang
> <zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > LGTM.
> >
> > Best,
> > Yong
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 15:56, wenbing shen <oliver.shen...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Wenbing Shen
> > >
> > > ZhangJian He <shoot...@gmail.com> 于2022年9月26日周一 11:15写道:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > ZhangJian He
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 20:45, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I agree
> > > > >
> > > > > Enrico
> > > > >
> > > > > Il Dom 25 Set 2022, 03:09 steven lu <lushiji2...@gmail.com> ha
> > > scritto:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi BookKeepers, I've changed the API for
> > > > > > org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter:
> > > > > > BP-58 <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3502>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Motivation"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The latency of the OpStatsLogger.registerSuccessfulEvent
> calculation
> > > is
> > > > > to
> > > > > > convert the time to milliseconds
> > > > > > but Counter.add nothing to do
> > > > > > so when using Counter for latency statistics, the time unit and
> > > > > > OpStatsLogger are not unified, which is easy to be misleading.
> > > > > > then we unified latency metric unit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Proposal"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We already have the Counter metric for counting , we just need to
> > > > > refactor
> > > > > > it and expose it as a public method.
> > > > > > My idea is to change the API of
> org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter
> > > > > >
> > > > > > when using Counter for count metric, use Counter.addCount,intead
> of
> > > old
> > > > > > API(Counter.add)
> > > > > > when using Counter for latency metric, use Counter.addLatency
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Release"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > because it change the API,so we don't cherry pick this into
> released
> > > > > > branches
> > > > > > so it should go into a major release, like Release-4.16, then we
> can
> > > > > update
> > > > > > its implementation in other projects, like pulsar
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think about it?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to