Creating new list to track JIRA updates?

HI Guys, What about creating a new list issues@aurora to track the JIRA updates? Right now I am getting lost of any new discussion in dev@ list if any with all JIRA update emails. Thoughts? - Henry

Re: Creating new list to track JIRA updates?

at 4:01 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > A good amount of discussion happens on JIRA, though the plaintext versions > of its emails are pretty difficult to read. > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> HI Guys, >> >> What about creating a new

Re: Creating new list to track JIRA updates?

know when it is available > > -Jake > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Kevin Sweeney > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Henry Saputra > >wrote: >> >> > Agree =) >> > >> > People that contrib

Re: Creating new list to track JIRA updates?

also > updated the website with the new links for this on the community page > > -Jake > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Henry Saputra > wrote: >> >> HI Jake, >> >> That's awesome but we do need to request for issues@aurora list firs

Re: Committers: Please help keep the git log clean

Dont forget to use git rebase instead of git pull =) - Henry On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > First and foremost, please don't take committing on master lightly. Every > time you commit and push to master, i encourage you to triple-check your > commit message, and run the bu

Re: Release Voting

HI Aurora Devs, Following up on Jake's email about release, is Aurora ready for hatching a release? - Henry On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > Hey Guys > This has come up on several lists and I want to make sure that everyone is > aware of the requirements for voting and a

Re: Release Voting

-147 [1] for details. > > -Jake > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-147 > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> HI Aurora Devs, >> >> Following up on Jake's email about release, is Aurora ready for >> hatc

Re: RFC: Weekly aurora IRC meeting

+1 The Apache Helix does the similar thing and seems like it helps flush clearing up out questions and validate new ideas/proposals. Just a reminder the chat transcript need to be recorded and rebroadcasted to dev@ list. Not sure how diverse Aurora dev community is but Apache Helix alternates ea

Preparing for first Apache Aurora release under ASF

Hi All, Loving all the new ideas about what is next for Aurora, but I would like to propose that we try to start focusing on preparing for first release under ASF early. First release usually takes a lot of time and effort to get it right and soliciting VOTES in incubator will take additional tim

Re: Preparing for first Apache Aurora release under ASF

apache.org%3E > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-147 > [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-78 > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Loving all the new ideas about what is next for Aurora, but I woul

Re: Preparing for first Apache Aurora release under ASF

gt; manager >> > > role for the first rc. >> > > >> > > -Jake >> > > >> > > >> > > [1]: >> > > >> > >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201404.mbox/%3C2014042118

Re: [DISCUSS] shepherding contributors

I think for small community like Aurora we do not need shepherding for contributors. We could do it via JIRA and review boards as Sebastien mentioned. If a contributor is interested in certain feature then one of the PPMCs could just engage and help driving through solution. Once contributions co

Re: [DISCUSS] shepherding contributors

pport contact is huge to help acquaint a new developer. Perhaps our > definitions of shepherd differs, i'm thinking of it amounting to "when you > have questions, [committer name] is here to help you". > > -=Bill > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Henry Sap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0

There is a jar file inside the source artifact [1]. Is this jar generated from source code or "executable" copied from external source? Thanks, Henry [1] gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > All, > I propose that we accept the following re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0

can be used *exactly* the same way as the *gradle * > command. > [1] http://www.gradle.org/docs/current/userguide/gradle_wrapper.html > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> There is a jar file inside the source artifact [1]. Is this jar >> generated

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0

e source dist, one > example is Apache Kafka. > > -Jake > > > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> Cool, thanks! >> >> - Henry >> >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: >> > It&#

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0

Thanks for the review Justin, hopefully the team could help answer your concerns about the RC - Henry On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > As an IPMC/previous shepherd thought I give my feedback. > > Signatures and hashes all good > DISCLAIMER correct > Filename contain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0

Hi Mark, Does this mean you are -1 of the release candidate? - Henry On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll wrote: > Just tried again, and get the same error. I'm attaching transcripts of the > "vagrant up", and the run of the test script. > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Mar

Adding more information to JIRA tickets and Review submissions

HI All, I would like to request for more description and steps to reproduce if possible to the JIRA and review board submissions for Apache Aurora from contributors. It would be very appreciated and useful IMHO =) To attract new contributors we need to make it more friendly and welcoming for exte

Re: Adding more information to JIRA tickets and Review submissions

Will do, thanks Bill =) - Henry On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> HI All, >> >> I would like to request for more description and steps to reproduce if >> possible to the JIRA

Re: Heads up: the gradle build now skips code quality checks by default

Thanks for the heads up Bill On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > I just committed a change [1] that will cause ./gradlew build to skip > things like checkstyle, findbugs, etc. To run the full build, you will > need to run ./gradlew -Pq build. I've added a note on this in our >

What does " Task uses invalid resources: ports(*):[]" error mean?

Hi All, I am trying to play around with the Vagrant file from master and when I schedule a job following the Tutorial I got error message tin the Completed tasks section: LOST : Task uses invalid resources: ports(*):[] 05/27 5:15:46 local - THROTTLED - Rescheduled, penalized for 6 ms for fla

Re: What does " Task uses invalid resources: ports(*):[]" error mean?

No one can help with hint? On Tuesday, May 27, 2014, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to play around with the Vagrant file from master and when > I schedule a job following the Tutorial I got error message tin the > Completed tasks section: > > LOST : Task u

Re: What does " Task uses invalid resources: ports(*):[]" error mean?

Thanks for confirming, Bill. - Henry On Wednesday, May 28, 2014, Bill Farner wrote: > I repro, also with the vanilla tutorial. Raised > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-483 > > -=Bill > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra > > >wro

Re: No longer be able to access Aurora scheduler UI in the Vargrant vanilla after pull from master =(

- Henry On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Bill Farner wrote: > I'm curious what served the 404, are you able to repro and capture the > response message? > > On Monday, June 2, 2014, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> I did git pull last week and wh

Re: No longer be able to access Aurora scheduler UI in the Vargrant vanilla after pull from master =(

est timeout for icmp_seq 4 ^C --- 192.168.33.7 ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss Somehow my local machine cannot access the provisioned IP - Henry On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Jay Buffington wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:02 AM,

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jul 2014 ([ppmc])

Any volunteer to write up report for July? - Henry On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Marvin wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator > PMC. > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly > board

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jul 2014 ([ppmc])

ase candidate, > 0.5.0-rc0, and working to fix issues found within it. 0.5.0-rc1 > being targeted within the next week > > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](aurora) Jake Farrell > [ ](aurora) Benjamin Hindman > [ ](aurora) Chris Mattmann > [ ](aurora) H

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora

Hi Guys, Any discussion about try to cut another release RC? - Henry On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:10 AM, ASF IRC Bot wrote: > Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora at Mon Jul 14 18:04:58 2014: > > Attendees: mchucarroll, wickman, jfarrell, kts > > - Preface > - -rc1 > > > IRC log follows: > > ## Pref

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC2

Notice and license looks good Hashes and signatures are good Compiled +1 On Thursday, July 24, 2014, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > All, > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official > Apache Aurora 0.5.0 release. > > > Aurora 0.5.0-rc2 includes the following: > --- > The C

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC2

: > All, > The vote to accept Apache Aurora 0.5.0 RC2 as the official Apache Aurora > 0.5.0 release has passed. > > > +1 (Binding) > ------ > Henry Saputra > Jake Farrell > Bill Farner > Mark Chu-Carroll > > +1 (Non-binding) > --

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC2

Ah cool, sorry I missed the IRC summary - Henry On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > hey Henry > This was discussed at todays meeting and Kevin is sending an email to the > IPMC later today for the 0.5.0 release > > -Jake > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating)

> --- > Benjamin Hindman > Jake Farrell > Justin Mclean > Henry Saputra > > Non-Binding > --- > Chris Aniszczyk > Kevin Sweeney > > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Kevin Sweeney wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Please vote on releasing the follo

Re: Aurora Tech Talk in Sunnyvale, CA on August 14th

yes to south bay location =) On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Joe Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > In case you're in Northern California on August 14th at 6:30pm, Twitter > will be hosting a tech talk at their office in Sunnyvale > . I'll

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for October 2014

Fixing issues brought up in our first release > > Date of last release: > > - Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) - 2014-08-01 > > > Signed-off-by: > > [ ](aurora) Jake Farrell > [ ](aurora) Benjamin Hindman > [ ](aurora) Chris Mattmann > [ ](aurora) Henry Saputra

Question about sprint in Aurora development

HI Guys, I start noticing that Aurora jira has sprint tagged to the issue. Kevin also has sent email about documentation sprint happening. However I dont think I ever recall explicit discussion about having sprint-like mode to drive development for Aurora. Seemed like internal Twitter sprint is

Re: Question about sprint in Aurora development

Re-ping, just in case the email did not get send - Henry On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > HI Guys, > > I start noticing that Aurora jira has sprint tagged to the issue. > > Kevin also has sent email about documentation sprint happening. > > Howeve

Re: Question about sprint in Aurora development

n on development process? (I'm sure I could find some, but as > I've learned from various folks at Apache over the last couple of years, > some are better examples than others.) > > Thanks, > Chris > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Henry Saputra > wrot

Re: Question about sprint in Aurora development

14 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I have no problem about using sprint to help manage JIRA issues for > Twitter development on Aurora. > However, the Aurora PPMCs should not use Twitter specific sprints into > development discussio

Re: Question about sprint in Aurora development

nry, > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> I have no problem about using sprint to help manage JIRA issues for >> Twitter development on Aurora. >> However, the Aurora PPMCs sh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.6.0 (incubating) RC2

Hash and signatures are good. DISCLAIMER is correct LICENSE and NOTICE files look good No 3rd party executables +1 (binding) Thanks guys! On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > All, > > I propose that we accept the following release candidate as the official > Apache Aurora 0.6.0

Do we have JIRA ticket for legal for approving the name?

Hi All, Do we have a JIRA ticket to ask ASF legal to approve the name? - Henry

Re: Next Apache Aurora IRC meeting, rescheduled for Tuesday 1/20?

No recording for today meeting? On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Aurora community regularly holds IRC meeting on Mondays at 11am PST, > however this upcoming Monday (1/19) is Martin Luther King day in the United > States. > > Since this American federal ho

Re: Graduation and TLP Resolution

Aurora. - Henry Saputra On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > +1 this is looking good to me (strike the last part about approved > by unanimous approval of the board ;) cut/paste bug) > > My suggestion would be to call a VOTE in the next 48-72 hours > if

Re: Graduation and TLP Resolution

il: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++ >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> +

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora

As for announcement, I remember usually ASF would prefer to add blogs for top level projects =( I remember try to add blog for Apache MetaModel incubating at that time and was recommended that they prefer TLP for doing official blog post. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:23 AM, ASF IRC Bot wrote: > Su

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora

to TLP's on http://www.apache.org/press/ > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: >> Thats correct, blog posts on blogs.a.o are reserved for TLP's >> >> -Jake >> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.7.0 (incubating) RC2

Hash file looks good. Signature is good. Tests pass. DISCLAIMER and LICENSE files look good. No 3rd party executables. Small detail -1 because NOTICE file need to be updated to Copyright 2014-2015. I would think some IPMC members will cry foul. If JIRA is file against NOTICE file then +1 from me.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.7.0 (incubating) RC2

Thanks Maxim, Change to +1 (binding) - Henry On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > Thanks for catching this Henry! Created AURORA-1072 and added it as a > 0.8.0 release blocker. > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: >>

Re: [Announcement] New Committer: Joshua Cohen

Congrats Joshua and welcome On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Aurora PPMC, I would like to welcome our newest > committer to the project: > > Joshua Cohen > > He has been extremely active contributing quality patches as well as > helping > the com

Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.7.0 (incubating) RC3

Hash file looks good Signature file look good DISCLAIMER file exists NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good No 3rd party executables in source artifact Source artifact build and passed tests +1 (binding) - Henry On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > All, > > I pro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.7.0 (incubating) RC3

Forward my binding vote from dev@ list +1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > Hi All, > > The Apache Aurora project has voted to release 0.7.0-incubating, our > third release. The team voted in favor of this release with 7 binding > +1s, 1 non-binding +1. 3 of t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.7.0 (incubating) RC3

Thanks Justin, we will check it out for the additional LICENSE issue. - Henry On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > - signatures and hashes correct > - LICENSE and NOTICE correct but may have minor issue (see below) > - DISCLAIMER exits > - incubating i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.7.0 (incubating) RC3

Good catch, we should have put git commit id to be more precise. Thanks for the review, John. - Henry On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 binding. Contents look good. > > Ideally you should point to a git commit id for the release though. Not a > big deal, more procedura

Re: Seeking volunteers to create scheduler REST API RFC

BIll, I helped built Telemetry RESTful APIs before so I could help. Count me in please. - Henry On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > Reviving this thread. I would love to see a non-Twitter employee > collaborate on this for a more diverse panel. > > -=Bill > > On Tue, Feb 10,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora as a TLP

isted immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Aurora Project: > >* Mark Chu-Carroll > >* William Farner > >* Jake Farrell > >* Benjamin Hindman > >* Suman Karumuri > >* Maxim Khutornenk

Re: Shepherding new contributions

Ok, we need to be careful about this maintainers/owners or shepherds business. Apache Spark got into some trouble from board when introducing this concept. First of all, in the eyes of ASF, all (P)PMCs have equal rights and responsibilities. Meaning, no concept of owners or maintainers for partic

Re: Shepherding new contributions

e, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Bill Farner wrote: >> >> > Thanks for that background, Henry! That is actually useful for other >> > unrelated thoughts I have had. We will make sure to keep this in mind. >> > >> > On Monday, February 23, 2015, Henr

Re: Shepherding new contributions

hu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Zameer Manji wrote: > >> I have set Joshua and Bill to be the defaults for now: >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31496/ >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Henry Saputra >> wrote: >> >> > This would work. >> >

Re: Shepherding new contributions

g/mod_mbox/mesos-dev/201502.mbox/%3CCA%2B8RcoReugMVqoOpsnB8WGYBELa5fHwPA%3DJ%3DYHJE22iwZvsbeQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > (note the last message in the thread asking how it interacts with the > Apache by-laws ;)). > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >

Re: PODLINGNAMESEARCH for Aurora?

Thanks for the reminder, Ted. I created podling name search for Aurora: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-72 - Henry On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > Thanks Ted > I replied to Shane on the trademarks@ list and will bring this up during > our community meeting on irc later today > > -Jake >

Re: Draft blog post: "Upcoming Apache Aurora Meetups in NYC and the Bay Area"

Looks awesome. +1 Thanks Dave =) On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > Hi all, > > Since there are a few upcoming Aurora meetups and the videos from the > recent Bay Area meetup are online, I thought it'd be a good opportunity > to write up a short blog post about it. Here's a dr

Re: Apache Aurora Graduation

Congratulations! On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > Today the Apache board approved the resolution to adopt Aurora as a top > level project, we have graduated! > > Next steps will be to perform the outlined items within the graduation > guide [1], I will create a ticket for t

Re: Upcoming Meetups in NYC and Bay Area + new Bay Area Aurora Users Group

Thanks for keeping us updated, Dave =) - Henry On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Dave Lester wrote: > This went out on the Apache Aurora blog[1] last week. In the next 6 > weeks there are two upcoming Apache Aurora meetups on our radar, and a > talk at the Austin Mesos Users Group: > > * New Yo