Re: Aurora adopters list

2015-02-06 Thread Dobromir Montauk
We'd love to get TellApart on this list now :) On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > We can match that format pretty easily. Best place to keep this is directly > in the website and not in the source code, i'll work with Dave to help get > it all setup > > -Jake > > On Thu, Feb 5

Re: Aurora adopters list

2015-02-05 Thread Jake Farrell
We can match that format pretty easily. Best place to keep this is directly in the website and not in the source code, i'll work with Dave to help get it all setup -Jake On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > I agree that the format will not scale. Steve pointed out to me Docker'

Re: Aurora adopters list

2015-02-05 Thread Bill Farner
I agree that the format will not scale. Steve pointed out to me Docker's use cases page [1] as an example. I like their format a *lot* more, since it gives us a place to indicate the degree to which a company uses our software. [1] https://www.docker.com/resources/usecases/ -=Bill On Thu, Feb

Aurora adopters list

2015-02-05 Thread Dave Lester
Hi All, Given recent growth we've seen in Aurora the numbers of contributors and public adopters, I think it's time for us to create a more-comprehensive list of adopters.. README.md (the current home of our list) will soon become cluttered if we continue to list companies there. :) Here's my pro