We can match that format pretty easily. Best place to keep this is directly in the website and not in the source code, i'll work with Dave to help get it all setup
-Jake On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org> wrote: > I agree that the format will not scale. Steve pointed out to me Docker's > use cases page [1] as an example. I like their format a *lot* more, since > it gives us a place to indicate the degree to which a company uses our > software. > > [1] https://www.docker.com/resources/usecases/ > > -=Bill > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Dave Lester <d...@davelester.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Given recent growth we've seen in Aurora the numbers of contributors and > > public adopters, I think it's time for us to create a more-comprehensive > > list of adopters.. README.md (the current home of our list) will soon > > become cluttered if we continue to list companies there. :) > > > > Here's my proposal: in addition to updating our list of companies that > > are using Aurora in a separate documentation page, it'd be valuable to > > share any additional info about how it's being used + some testimonials. > > That will, I hope, make this less of a vanity list (like Mesos has) and > > more of a resource for folks that are looking at Aurora and trying to > > understand how it's useful to them. > > > > If you're currently using Aurora in production or in a significant way, > > please tell us about it! I'd love to include you in the revamped > > documentation page. > > > > Huge thanks, > > Dave > > >
